Ruh roh! Rorama's roosing roo Romney!

[Old Rocks]

New poll shows Obama making big gains with female voters in battleground states | The Ticket - Yahoo! News

The biggest change came among women under 50. In mid-February, just under half of those voters supported Obama. Now more than six in 10 do while Romney's support among them has dropped by 14 points, to 30%. The president leads him 2-1 in this group."

 

[mudwhistle]

Simple demographics.

the GOP is alienating working folks (about 70% of the electorate) Women (about 50% of the electorate) and Hispanics (about 15% of the electorate).

To get which votes, exactly? The angry white male vote.

The GOP has lost four of the last five popular votes for president. The only won 2004 because there were judicial shennanigans in 2000, and even with a good economy, a war, incumbancy AND a truly awful Democratic candidate, the only barely won, 51-49. A change of 118,000 votes in Ohio would have given the election to Kerry.

Actually Obama is alienating working folks by lying about the GOP.

He actually said that Ronald Reagan was a wild-assed Socialist.

Good luck selling that Bull Shit. Might as well try to sell everyone on the premise that Abraham Lincoln was a racist.

Ronald Reagan would be called a RINO today.

He raised taxes after cutting them, appointed moderates to SCOTUS, granted amnesty to 3 million illegal aliens, cut arms control deals with the Soviets.

And sorry, most working folks are getting upset about the legacy of Ronald Reagan, part of which was destroying the unions that got them good wages.

Revisionist history.

He lowered taxes overall, yet you Dems claim he raised taxes.

Unions were part of the problem back then and they still are. Reagan handled them the best way possible. He told them to go fuck themselves.

 

[Old Rocks]

President Obama +0.8

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval

President Obama +4.3

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

President Obama +7.5

RealClearPolitics - Obama & Romney: Favorable/Unfavorable

Governor Romney -10.4

RealClearPolitics - Obama & Romney: Favorable/Unfavorable

Congress -66.3

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - Congressional Job Approval

President Obama 227 Governor Romney 170

RealClearPolitics - 2012 Election Maps - Battle for White House

 

[J.E.D]

A Fox News poll

The propaganda arm of the GOP puts out a poll that shows (gasp!) Romney is beating Obama, and you want me to take it seriously?

You have got to be joking.

Even your sham of a Fox poll won't save Romney from that 18 point gender gap.

Yet almost every Fox News poll has had Obama ahead.

And?.......Faux News is still extremely biased towards the right.

Here you go:

RCP Average 3/20 - 4/11 -- 47.9 43.6 Obama +4.3

RealClearPolitics - President Obama vs. Republican Candidates

I know that you weren't paying attention in grade school, so you don't know what an average is. Where Romney was on 3/20 is not the same as where he is on 4/11.

I know you don't know shit about me and what I learned in school, but I understand that the ground you're standing on is extremely weak; so I see why you're going the route of somebody who has no intelligent retort. Carry on, dumb ass.

 

[IndependntLogic]

Hey LiberalNonsense:

Where do you come up with this junk that gallup leans right? They've been around forever and in fact they became popular when they predicted that FDR (a democrat) would win the presidency in 1936.

There's a reason you don't see the disclaimer *not a scientific poll on a gallup poll. They follow rigorous standards b/c they are exclusively in the business of polling and if they don't then their reputation would be sheeot.

And you think IBD/CSM/TIPP doesn't lean left? Currently on their tipponline.com website, there's a headline "How Detroit saved itself." And it connects to the Washington Post.

Ah yes. I forgot the ignorant whackjob definition of Liberal: Anyoen who doesn't agree with ALL Conservative views 100% of the time.
To people who aren't blithering idiots, that's called a Conservative.
For instance, if I point out that I know certain polls lean Left that's just not conservative enough for the mindless drones who are like 1984 and can tolerate zero deviation from what their Thought Masters have told them to think.
Therefore I must NOT point out what the non-whackjobs know: That Gallup and Rasmussen lean Right. pitiful.

Okay. Gallup doesn't lean Right. It's just a coincidence that in every poll, every week, their polls are more favorable for Republican candidates and Conservative positions! You betcha!

Gallup appears to favor Republicans if you use known left leaning polls like ABC/Washington post as baseline. Or pretend that IBD/CSM/Tipp (which really leans left) as a baseline. That's some seriously fraudulent stats.

Again, give me real evidence about gallup leaning right. You can't b/c they don't. They follow more rigorous standards than any polling source. Go to Gallup's site. You'll find that the language is quite neutral. They follow rigorous standards. Just b/c you've applied some sort of moronic scale and pretended that I'm a conservative loon; that doesn't prove your idiotic analysis.

Nah. You are indeed a Conservative loon and mindless drone. That's SO easy to prove but you would Cut & Run from that challenge pretty quickly.
As far as Gallup and Rasmussen leaning Right, I provided my reasoning for this. If you look at the polls week after week, you will see that their numbers always favor the GOP and Conservative views. If you would like proof, go to RCP and check it out.
Then again, you villify my observation and then in typical whackjob fashion, claim that another poll is "Left" without providing any reasoning whatsoever for your opinion. Weak. Stupid. Expected.
The differences between us are easy to identify. I was able to acknowledge that certain polls lean Left. When it comes to acknowledging that certain polls lean Right, you're too much of a lemming to do so. I can acknowledge and endorse several issues and topics in which Conservative ideology is right and that I agree with. You can't acknowledge any areas in which you think Conservative ideology is wrong because you're too weak to disagree with your Thought Masters. So you have little in the way of objectivity or credibility. It's that simple.

 

[hortysir]

The only poll that matters is the one that will be conducted Nov 6, 2012

 

[amrchaos]

I am calling it now

By the end of Summer, Romney is going to lead Obama by 10 points.

Put this in your signature if you don't believe me!

 

[8537]

A wee hint for the conservatorial crowd: You can't win elections by wrapping up the old white guy demographic anymore. We let women and minorities vote!

More us vs. them nonsense. The GOP welcomes women and minorities.

Ya must not do a very good job of welcoming them because they certainly don't support ya much.

 

[Peach]

A wee hint for the conservatorial crowd: You can't win elections by wrapping up the old white guy demographic anymore. We let women and minorities vote!

More us vs. them nonsense. The GOP welcomes women and minorities.

Ya must not do a very good job of welcoming them because they certainly don't support ya much.

The "ASPIRIN between the legs" man, Friess, who now supports Romney, spoke out about the President:
Foster Friess: I hope Obama's 'teleprompters are bulletproof' - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room

 

[Joshuatree]

This is what they have to fix. Because, frankly, with this economy, Obama should be losing if Republicans put up the Cheney/C'Thulhu ticket.

Obama is losing right now, rather soundly.

The 'likely voters' measures are what matters, which is what Rassmussen measures and has the two roughly tied, with 10% of the voters undecided. But winning that 10% is what winning elections are about.

Guess which way those 10% undecided break in an election when the incumbent POTUS has less than 50% approval?

Actually, they usually break for the incumbant. Incumbancy is a great advantage, which is why we usually return them.

In fact, in the last century, we've only turned out an incumbant ONCE when his party has only been in charge for 4 years. Usually, we are inclined to throw out an incumbant when his party has been in charge for a while.

But the bigger problem the GOP has is demographics. What was a winning coalition from 1968 to 1988 (where the GOP won five out of six elections) is now a losing coalition (where the GOP has lost four out of five elections since 1992.)

Lots of things change with time, buddy. In a not so remote past, it used to be an undisputed truth that the south would never vote republican. Because latino voters favor the democrats now it doesn't mean that it's always gonna be this way. And hispanics and any other demographic group also suffer when the country as a whole is suffering. I agree with the GOP stance of not pandering to each demographic group just to get their votes. That's something that shows honor.

 

[Toro]

Too early.

 

[Toro]

This is what they have to fix. Because, frankly, with this economy, Obama should be losing if Republicans put up the Cheney/C'Thulhu ticket.

Obama is losing right now, rather soundly.

The 'likely voters' measures are what matters, which is what Rassmussen measures and has the two roughly tied, with 10% of the voters undecided. But winning that 10% is what winning elections are about.

Guess which way those 10% undecided break in an election when the incumbent POTUS has less than 50% approval?

Obama is not losing "rather soundly." Rather soundly is by 8-10 points. Romney has been leading in the last two polls, one by less than the margin of error, the other on the edge of the margin of error. Obama was leading in the previous nine, and of the past 31 polls, Romney has led in exactly four. So it's nice that Romney has pulled ahead in the past two, but Obama is hardly "losing soundly."

 

[JoeB131]

No, midterms don't count because not many people vote in them.

The King Of Excuses is at it again.

Hey, guy, if you hadn't nominated the fucking Mormon, I'd be out there working for the GOP candidate right now.

You're a flaming lib that constantly lies. Who you kidding? You don't have a Republican bone in your body.

Well, that depends on how you define Republican.

If you define it as "letting the religious crazies get manipulated by the Wall Street Bloodsuckers", then, nope, I'm not that kind of Republican and never was.

I believe in limited government, but if you destroy the middle class so a few rich assholes like Romney can have a car elevator, you are really going to end up with more government when they ask government to do the things they can't do for themselves anymore.

 

[Liability]

Fox News Poll: Romney Edges Obama as Approval of President Drops | Fox News

New poll out today has Romney ahead of Obama. Looks like now that the Republican primaries are effectively over, the nation can get back to focusing on who the real villain is.

When The ONE is leading in the poll du jour, the leftists here trumpet it as important news worthy of dire misery for all Republicans and conservatives.

But when the apparent GOP opponent to the efforts of The ONE to get re-elected is the one who shows an early lead in the polls, we will be lectured by those same leftists as to how misleading such early polls are.

 

[JoeB131]

Lots of things change with time, buddy. In a not so remote past, it used to be an undisputed truth that the south would never vote republican. Because latino voters favor the democrats now it doesn't mean that it's always gonna be this way. And hispanics and any other demographic group also suffer when the country as a whole is suffering. I agree with the GOP stance of not pandering to each demographic group just to get their votes. That's something that shows honor.

But they are pandering, guy.

They are pandering to the dumb bubba rednecks who live in mortal fear their daughters might date a brown person.

They are pandering to the religious nutjobs who live in mortal fear that not everyone believes in their sky pixie.

They are pandering to the Wall Street Bloodsuckers who got us into this mess.

 

[JoeB131]

Revisionist history.

He lowered taxes overall, yet you Dems claim he raised taxes.

Unions were part of the problem back then and they still are. Reagan handled them the best way possible. He told them to go fuck themselves.

Uh, well, that was the point. He cut taxes, realized that was a really bad idea and then raised them again. But he called it "tax reform", closed a lot of the loopholes, (some good, some bad) and the end result the tax burden was shifted from the wealthy to the middle class.

As for unions, here's the problem, guy. When you get rid of good union salaries, you create more government dependency. This is what you morons don't realize. That if you are getting food stamps, Section 8 housing voucher and MedicAid, you are going to vote for more of that shit.

It's the wonderful self-destructive nature of you jokers that always amuses me.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Ah yes. I forgot the ignorant whackjob definition of Liberal: Anyoen who doesn't agree with ALL Conservative views 100% of the time.
To people who aren't blithering idiots, that's called a Conservative.
For instance, if I point out that I know certain polls lean Left that's just not conservative enough for the mindless drones who are like 1984 and can tolerate zero deviation from what their Thought Masters have told them to think.
Therefore I must NOT point out what the non-whackjobs know: That Gallup and Rasmussen lean Right. pitiful.

Okay. Gallup doesn't lean Right. It's just a coincidence that in every poll, every week, their polls are more favorable for Republican candidates and Conservative positions! You betcha!

Gallup appears to favor Republicans if you use known left leaning polls like ABC/Washington post as baseline. Or pretend that IBD/CSM/Tipp (which really leans left) as a baseline. That's some seriously fraudulent stats.

Again, give me real evidence about gallup leaning right. You can't b/c they don't. They follow more rigorous standards than any polling source. Go to Gallup's site. You'll find that the language is quite neutral. They follow rigorous standards. Just b/c you've applied some sort of moronic scale and pretended that I'm a conservative loon; that doesn't prove your idiotic analysis.

Nah. You are indeed a Conservative loon and mindless drone. That's SO easy to prove but you would Cut & Run from that challenge pretty quickly.
As far as Gallup and Rasmussen leaning Right, I provided my reasoning for this. If you look at the polls week after week, you will see that their numbers always favor the GOP and Conservative views. If you would like proof, go to RCP and check it out.
Then again, you villify my observation and then in typical whackjob fashion, claim that another poll is "Left" without providing any reasoning whatsoever for your opinion. Weak. Stupid. Expected.
The differences between us are easy to identify. I was able to acknowledge that certain polls lean Left. When it comes to acknowledging that certain polls lean Right, you're too much of a lemming to do so. I can acknowledge and endorse several issues and topics in which Conservative ideology is right and that I agree with. You can't acknowledge any areas in which you think Conservative ideology is wrong because you're too weak to disagree with your Thought Masters. So you have little in the way of objectivity or credibility. It's that simple.

It's clear to me that you never took a college course in statistics or critical thinking. If you had you would understand that they have rigors. Give me the rigors that make gallup lean right. Rigors are not comparing two polls on a superficial basis or saying that I'm a right wing nut so that it somehow backs your assertion. Right now, you can qualify your notion that gallup leans right as merely an opinion.

One girl posted a rigor about Gallup over sampling blacks to make Michelle Obama look good and also a rigor of covering transparency that they used to have. She actually made the scientific case that Gallup leans left.

Frankly, you're the lefty loon at this point. And you do it under the guise that you are "independent" while trying to "villify" people. Good job bud. You have nothing.

 

[IndependntLogic]

Gallup appears to favor Republicans if you use known left leaning polls like ABC/Washington post as baseline. Or pretend that IBD/CSM/Tipp (which really leans left) as a baseline. That's some seriously fraudulent stats.

Again, give me real evidence about gallup leaning right. You can't b/c they don't. They follow more rigorous standards than any polling source. Go to Gallup's site. You'll find that the language is quite neutral. They follow rigorous standards. Just b/c you've applied some sort of moronic scale and pretended that I'm a conservative loon; that doesn't prove your idiotic analysis.

Nah. You are indeed a Conservative loon and mindless drone. That's SO easy to prove but you would Cut & Run from that challenge pretty quickly.
As far as Gallup and Rasmussen leaning Right, I provided my reasoning for this. If you look at the polls week after week, you will see that their numbers always favor the GOP and Conservative views. If you would like proof, go to RCP and check it out.
Then again, you villify my observation and then in typical whackjob fashion, claim that another poll is "Left" without providing any reasoning whatsoever for your opinion. Weak. Stupid. Expected.
The differences between us are easy to identify. I was able to acknowledge that certain polls lean Left. When it comes to acknowledging that certain polls lean Right, you're too much of a lemming to do so. I can acknowledge and endorse several issues and topics in which Conservative ideology is right and that I agree with. You can't acknowledge any areas in which you think Conservative ideology is wrong because you're too weak to disagree with your Thought Masters. So you have little in the way of objectivity or credibility. It's that simple.

It's clear to me that you never took a college course in statistics or critical thinking. If you had you would understand that they have rigors. Give me the rigors that make gallup lean right. Rigors are not comparing two polls on a superficial basis or saying that I'm a right wing nut so that it somehow backs your assertion. Right now, you can qualify your notion that gallup leans right as merely an opinion.

One girl posted a rigor about Gallup over sampling blacks to make Michelle Obama look good and also a rigor of covering transparency that they used to have. She actually made the scientific case that Gallup leans left.

Frankly, you're the lefty loon at this point. And you do it under the guise that you are "independent" while trying to "villify" people. Good job bud. You have nothing.

Yes. It is simply my opinion that FOX, Gallup and Rasmussen lean right. Just as you are completely wrong about the pols you claim lean left - it is only your opinion. Oh wait. But you said they are Leftist! Ah. Forgot. What whackjobs claim about others doesn't apply to themselves. Of course.
So you're an entertaining little lemming but you cut & run like a cowardly little biotch, from the simple challenge I ffered to prove that I am indeed and Independent and you are a RW mindless drone who couldn't buy an original opinion with an AmEx.
I don't blame you. Keep slinging labels but do Cut & Run. That would be best for you junior.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Raggy! Romney's rup forty rate troo forty tree.

Gallup Presidential Election Trial Heat Results: Barack Obama vs. Mitt Romney