Ruh Roh.....D.O.J. Find Christopher Steele

Steele is indeed credible when he told them he faked it and made it up.
 
Trump dossier author Steele gets 16-hour D.O.J grilling.

Trump dossier author Steele gets 16-hour DOJ grilling/

The interview was contentious at first, according to two people familiar with the matter, but investigators ultimately found his testimony credible and even surprising.

Christopher Steele, the former British spy behind the infamous “Dossier” on President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia, was interviewed for 16 hours in June by the Justice Department’s internal watchdog, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The interview is part of an ongoing investigation that the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, has been conducting for the past year. Specifically, Horowitz has been examining the FBI’s efforts to surveil a one-time Trump campaign adviser based in part on infoIrmation from Steele, an ex-British MI6 agent who had worked with the bureau as a confidential source since 2010.

The Dossier was originally commissioned by an RW'er seeking dirt on 45. Realizing that 45 was going to win, he refused it and it was sent to HRC's Campaign, which did NOT use it. Steele then show the report Senator John McCain who informed the F.B.I.

Over 90% of the Dossier has proven to be true.

Cons will call still it "Fake News".

They really hate the truth.






Ummm, 90% has been proven to be false you moronic twit.

Hell, the moron claimed the Russians had a consulate in Florida.
Virtually NOTHING has been proven to be false


Got proof? Links? Evidence?

Otherwise SHUT THE FUCK UP.
 
Last edited:
It's ludicrous to suggest that the Steele dossier was accurate or that it was paid for by anyone but the Hillary campaign. This is junk news based on an op-ed by somebody named Natasha Bertrand but the angry incoherent left falls for it every freaking time.
 
I wonder if you even realize that none of the dossier has been proven true?

Probably not.

Ah well. Some people baaa all the way to the trough...

Actually over 90% of Dossier has been proven to be true.

You need to stop watching Fucked Lies.
Show us. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Steele found to be credible.

Horowitz interviewed Steele in person.
"Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation. Its completion date is now unclear."
 
I wonder if you even realize that none of the dossier has been proven true?

Probably not.

Ah well. Some people baaa all the way to the trough...

Actually over 90% of Dossier has been proven to be true.

You need to stop watching Fucked Lies.
Show us. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Steele found to be credible.

Horowitz interviewed Steele in person.
"Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation. Its completion date is now unclear."
You're source is highly suspect. Still waiting.
 
The believe he made the shit up and was paid by Hillary. It’s a good thing for America.
 
I wonder if you even realize that none of the dossier has been proven true?

Probably not.

Ah well. Some people baaa all the way to the trough...

Actually over 90% of Dossier has been proven to be true.

You need to stop watching Fucked Lies.
Show us. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Steele found to be credible.

Horowitz interviewed Steele in person.
"Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation. Its completion date is now unclear."
You're source is highly suspect. Still waiting.
Washington Monthly has a reputation of factual reporting.

But its not necessary, Reuters reports the same thing: "One of the two sources said Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation."
 
I wonder if you even realize that none of the dossier has been proven true?

Probably not.

Ah well. Some people baaa all the way to the trough...

Actually over 90% of Dossier has been proven to be true.

You need to stop watching Fucked Lies.
Show us. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Steele found to be credible.

Horowitz interviewed Steele in person.
"Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation. Its completion date is now unclear."

The fact that the FBI don't believe he's lying to them doesn't mean anything in the dossier has been verified. The "information" isn't necessarily what's in the dossier. You have no idea what the questions were. You're only proving that you lack the capacity to commit logic.
 
I wonder if you even realize that none of the dossier has been proven true?

Probably not.

Ah well. Some people baaa all the way to the trough...

Actually over 90% of Dossier has been proven to be true.

You need to stop watching Fucked Lies.
Show us. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Steele found to be credible.

Horowitz interviewed Steele in person.
"Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation. Its completion date is now unclear."
You're source is highly suspect. Still waiting.
Washington Monthly has a reputation of factual reporting.

But its not necessary, Reuters reports the same thing: "One of the two sources said Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation."
Again, you're a sucker who has been conned with fake news.
 
Actually over 90% of Dossier has been proven to be true.

You need to stop watching Fucked Lies.
Show us. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Steele found to be credible.

Horowitz interviewed Steele in person.
"Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation. Its completion date is now unclear."
You're source is highly suspect. Still waiting.
Washington Monthly has a reputation of factual reporting.

But its not necessary, Reuters reports the same thing: "One of the two sources said Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation."
Again, you're a sucker who has been conned with fake news.
If the IG had found problems with Steele, we would have know about it by now. Because Horowitz has been looking into this since 2017.

Reuters reports: "One of the two sources said Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation."

Reuters is in the top 10 for reliable news sources.
 
I wonder if you even realize that none of the dossier has been proven true?

Probably not.

Ah well. Some people baaa all the way to the trough...

Actually over 90% of Dossier has been proven to be true.

You need to stop watching Fucked Lies.
Show us. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Steele found to be credible.

Horowitz interviewed Steele in person.
"Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation. Its completion date is now unclear."






Yeah, credible AGAINST mueller, you fool. However, unlike mewler, they are doing the proper due diligence to determine who it is that is lying.
 
Trump dossier author Steele gets 16-hour D.O.J grilling.

Trump dossier author Steele gets 16-hour DOJ grilling/

The interview was contentious at first, according to two people familiar with the matter, but investigators ultimately found his testimony credible and even surprising.

Christopher Steele, the former British spy behind the infamous “Dossier” on President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia, was interviewed for 16 hours in June by the Justice Department’s internal watchdog, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The interview is part of an ongoing investigation that the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, has been conducting for the past year. Specifically, Horowitz has been examining the FBI’s efforts to surveil a one-time Trump campaign adviser based in part on infoIrmation from Steele, an ex-British MI6 agent who had worked with the bureau as a confidential source since 2010.

The Dossier was originally commissioned by an RW'er seeking dirt on 45. Realizing that 45 was going to win, he refused it and it was sent to HRC's Campaign, which did NOT use it. Steele then show the report Senator John McCain who informed the F.B.I.

Over 90% of the Dossier has proven to be true.

Cons will call still it "Fake News".

They really hate the truth.






Ummm, 90% has been proven to be false you moronic twit.

Hell, the moron claimed the Russians had a consulate in Florida.
Virtually NOTHING has been proven to be false





Provide links to things that have been proven correct.
 
Show us. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Steele found to be credible.

Horowitz interviewed Steele in person.
"Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation. Its completion date is now unclear."
You're source is highly suspect. Still waiting.
Washington Monthly has a reputation of factual reporting.

But its not necessary, Reuters reports the same thing: "One of the two sources said Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation."
Again, you're a sucker who has been conned with fake news.
If the IG had found problems with Steele, we would have know about it by now. Because Horowitz has been looking into this since 2017.

Reuters reports: "One of the two sources said Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation."

Reuters is in the top 10 for reliable news sources.
Again, they aren't specifying the "information" they are referring to. You're assuming it's the dossier. I see no justification for that assumption. He could be saying that the dossier is a total pile of bull crap, and they are saying that statement is credible.

Furthermore, the phrase "found problems with Steele" is so vague that it's meaningless.
 
We keep asking for specific proof of what has been proven true in the dossier.

We get nothing. No specifics.
 
Provide links to things that have been proven correct.

The Dossier was started and paid for by GOP Billionaire Paul Singer and his 'Washington Free Beacon' as Republican campaign Oppo research.
Only later picked up by the Democrats/Hillary Campiagn

Much of the Dossier has been Verified: Dates, times, Meetings.. much will never be, especially the salacious parts.
`
 
Provide links to things that have been proven correct.

The Dossier was started and paid for by GOP Billionaire Paul Singer and his 'Washington Free Beacon' as Republican campaign Oppo research.
Only later picked up by the Democrats/Hillary Campiagn

Much of the Dossier has been Verified: Dates, times, Meetings.. much will never be, especially the salacious parts.
`
What "dates, times, meetings" have been verified?
 

Forum List

Back
Top