Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But illegals are, as the saying goes, undocumentedso it is almost impossible to prove how long theyve been in the country. (Anyway, why reward some people for breaking our laws longer than others?) Similarly, because illegals are usually paid under the table, it will be nearly impossible to prove that they owe taxes.
But illegals are, as the saying goes, undocumentedso it is almost impossible to prove how long theyve been in the country. (Anyway, why reward some people for breaking our laws longer than others?) Similarly, because illegals are usually paid under the table, it will be nearly impossible to prove that they owe taxes.
Clearly this concern with regard to undocumented immigration has little or nothing to do with laws being violated or the integrity of our borders; it has only to do with the hate and ignorance exhibited by racists opposed to more brown people who speak Spanish coming to America.
But illegals are, as the saying goes, undocumentedso it is almost impossible to prove how long theyve been in the country. (Anyway, why reward some people for breaking our laws longer than others?) Similarly, because illegals are usually paid under the table, it will be nearly impossible to prove that they owe taxes.
Clearly this concern with regard to undocumented immigration has little or nothing to do with laws being violated or the integrity of our borders; it has only to do with the hate and ignorance exhibited by racists opposed to more brown people who speak Spanish coming to America.
But illegals are, as the saying goes, undocumentedso it is almost impossible to prove how long theyve been in the country. (Anyway, why reward some people for breaking our laws longer than others?) Similarly, because illegals are usually paid under the table, it will be nearly impossible to prove that they owe taxes.
Clearly this concern with regard to undocumented immigration has little or nothing to do with laws being violated or the integrity of our borders; it has only to do with the hate and ignorance exhibited by racists opposed to more brown people who speak Spanish coming to America.
What those numbers tell us is that the labor demand is not being met with an adequate labor supply.
Rubio's family got in no questions asked so I'm always amazed that he has the nerve to talk about hoops for others to jump through.
This is a great article and proofs how any amnesty proposal is ridiculous for many reasons!
Rubio?s Ridiculous Immigration Plan: So Bad, It Might Sink Amnesty | VDARE.com
But illegals are, as the saying goes, undocumentedso it is almost impossible to prove how long theyve been in the country. (Anyway, why reward some people for breaking our laws longer than others?) Similarly, because illegals are usually paid under the table, it will be nearly impossible to prove that they owe taxes.
Clearly this concern with regard to undocumented immigration has little or nothing to do with laws being violated or the integrity of our borders; it has only to do with the hate and ignorance exhibited by racists opposed to more brown people who speak Spanish coming to America.
Last I looked, ones language doesn't specify or define race.
Violating our borders is against the law. It has nothing to do with racism or hate, it's a law.
What those numbers tell us is that the labor demand is not being met with an adequate labor supply.
I favor some form of legalization for illegals here now, but I must take issue with that statement as I believe it to be incomplete. I think it should read thusly:
What those numbers tell us is that the labor demand is not being met with an adequate labor supply AT THE WAGES AND BENEFITS BUSINESS OWNERS WANT TO PAY.
The point is that in most cases, domestic labor would be readily available if not for the relentless downward pressure on wages exerted by business owners in the search for one more penny's profit. Sure, a business has to make a profit to stay in business, but it doesn't HAVE to make every single, solitary penny it can make to be profitable. It must be noted that it is not the illegals who came here with the idea of undercutting American wages, but the business owners themselves who have recruited illegals and brought them here because they don't want to pay American workers a living wage.
Illegals are as much victims of corporate greed as are the domestic workers they've replaced and the solution isn't to go after the illegals, but to go after those businesses which hire them.
What those numbers tell us is that the labor demand is not being met with an adequate labor supply.
I favor some form of legalization for illegals here now, but I must take issue with that statement as I believe it to be incomplete. I think it should read thusly:
What those numbers tell us is that the labor demand is not being met with an adequate labor supply AT THE WAGES AND BENEFITS BUSINESS OWNERS WANT TO PAY.
The point is that in most cases, domestic labor would be readily available if not for the relentless downward pressure on wages exerted by business owners in the search for one more penny's profit. Sure, a business has to make a profit to stay in business, but it doesn't HAVE to make every single, solitary penny it can make to be profitable. It must be noted that it is not the illegals who came here with the idea of undercutting American wages, but the business owners themselves who have recruited illegals and brought them here because they don't want to pay American workers a living wage.
Illegals are as much victims of corporate greed as are the domestic workers they've replaced and the solution isn't to go after the illegals, but to go after those businesses which hire them.
I agree. It always amazes me the level of greed exhibited by some business owners. Let's say a business owner is making $500,000 a year, and is looking at the possibility of making only $450,000 next year. He would be quick to lay off workers, and cut wages and hours to not only maintain the salary he was already making, but to increase his salary next year. To hell with the people he laid off who may not be able to support their families now. Every penny of profit counts. It's legal, and perfectly within the rights of the business owner, but it doesn't make it any less immoral.
Very true.I favor some form of legalization for illegals here now, but I must take issue with that statement as I believe it to be incomplete. I think it should read thusly:
What those numbers tell us is that the labor demand is not being met with an adequate labor supply AT THE WAGES AND BENEFITS BUSINESS OWNERS WANT TO PAY.
The point is that in most cases, domestic labor would be readily available if not for the relentless downward pressure on wages exerted by business owners in the search for one more penny's profit. Sure, a business has to make a profit to stay in business, but it doesn't HAVE to make every single, solitary penny it can make to be profitable. It must be noted that it is not the illegals who came here with the idea of undercutting American wages, but the business owners themselves who have recruited illegals and brought them here because they don't want to pay American workers a living wage.
Illegals are as much victims of corporate greed as are the domestic workers they've replaced and the solution isn't to go after the illegals, but to go after those businesses which hire them.
I agree. It always amazes me the level of greed exhibited by some business owners. Let's say a business owner is making $500,000 a year, and is looking at the possibility of making only $450,000 next year. He would be quick to lay off workers, and cut wages and hours to not only maintain the salary he was already making, but to increase his salary next year. To hell with the people he laid off who may not be able to support their families now. Every penny of profit counts. It's legal, and perfectly within the rights of the business owner, but it doesn't make it any less immoral.
What's ironic, and profoundly funny to me, is that those who cry the most about illegal immigrants are the same ones who support killing off unions.
I'm sure most of them were not in the work force 40 or 50 years ago, but those of us who were know we didn't have an illegal problem back then because the unions kept illegals out of their workspace. Oh, sure, we've always had illegals hired for seasonal farm work (except in California and south Florida where the "season" is year round), but illegal workers did not start moving into industrial and construction jobs until the 1980's, when Ronald Reagan began the assault on unions.
If you want to find the root cause of the massive invasion of illegals into just about every job category, you need look no further than the death of unions. Killing off the unions allowed business owners to cut pay and benefits to their workers, and maximize profit, and it didn't take them long to figure out that Mexican's would work even cheaper than non-union American's.
I favor some form of legalization for illegals here now, but I must take issue with that statement as I believe it to be incomplete. I think it should read thusly:
What those numbers tell us is that the labor demand is not being met with an adequate labor supply AT THE WAGES AND BENEFITS BUSINESS OWNERS WANT TO PAY.
The point is that in most cases, domestic labor would be readily available if not for the relentless downward pressure on wages exerted by business owners in the search for one more penny's profit. Sure, a business has to make a profit to stay in business, but it doesn't HAVE to make every single, solitary penny it can make to be profitable. It must be noted that it is not the illegals who came here with the idea of undercutting American wages, but the business owners themselves who have recruited illegals and brought them here because they don't want to pay American workers a living wage.
Illegals are as much victims of corporate greed as are the domestic workers they've replaced and the solution isn't to go after the illegals, but to go after those businesses which hire them.
I agree. It always amazes me the level of greed exhibited by some business owners. Let's say a business owner is making $500,000 a year, and is looking at the possibility of making only $450,000 next year. He would be quick to lay off workers, and cut wages and hours to not only maintain the salary he was already making, but to increase his salary next year. To hell with the people he laid off who may not be able to support their families now. Every penny of profit counts. It's legal, and perfectly within the rights of the business owner, but it doesn't make it any less immoral.
What's ironic, and profoundly funny to me, is that those who cry the most about illegal immigrants are the same ones who support killing off unions.
I'm sure most of them were not in the work force 40 or 50 years ago, but those of us who were know we didn't have an illegal problem back then because the unions kept illegals out of their workspace. Oh, sure, we've always had illegals hired for seasonal farm work (except in California and south Florida where the "season" is year round), but illegal workers did not start moving into industrial and construction jobs until the 1980's, when Ronald Reagan began the assault on unions.
If you want to find the root cause of the massive invasion of illegals into just about every job category, you need look no further than the death of unions. Killing off the unions allowed business owners to cut pay and benefits to their workers, and maximize profit, and it didn't take them long to figure out that Mexican's would work even cheaper than non-union American's.
