Roosevelt Wins 2nd Term With 20% Unemployment Rate, Not A Romney Brand!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
Mostly, even Real Clear Politics selected polling averages have Obama nearly three points ahead, involving several national polls. With a double-digit record of monthly employment gains, then How can Obama Hope to Win?

Anyone thinks back to the 1930's, and even to 2008-2009! Roosevelt was coming out of the collapse, and Obama was staving off the effects of the financial crisis and the crash.
______________________________

Average rate of unemployment
in 1929: 3.2%
in 1930: 8.9%
in 1931: 16.3%
in 1932: 24.1%
in 1933: 24.9%
in 1934: 21.7%
in 1935: 20.1%
in 1936: 16.9%
in 1937: 14.3%
in 1938: 19.0%
in 1939: 17.2%3
_____________________________

1936 was even before WWII, when Roosevelt won again. People can now be reminded that the Romney Brand, of the Reagan Trajectory, was not in too much detail all that different from Collidge/Hoover. The Rich were mainly prosperous among themselves. The market place suffered from a less-spending middle and lower income group of folks.

In Matthew 25:14-30, the outcome of the fixed percentage raise economy is shown. The lowest income servant might as well take the money, and bury it in the earth. It is useless even for paying the mortgage. Cast out that servant gets.

There is the Romney-Bush-Coolidge-Hoover-Boehner-Cantor-Paul Ryan brand at work! It doesn't(?)! Everyone thought the household had 8 new talents of riches. It only had seven, and looked a lot like an Ivy League Banking firm.

Many in South Chicago can believe that! President Barack Obama is actually a member of a small sect of Jews, known only to Washington, D. C.(?)(!)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Reverend Jeremiah Wright knows about the non-celebratory ambience, in America! University Professor universally only celebrate what they did to America! Anyone know that Barack Obama is famously, fomerly, actually one of them(?), and even a lawyer(?)!)
 
Yeah, and the NYT's Walter Duranty and the Times itself won Pulitzer Prizes for stories Duranty did on the Bolshevik's economic miracle in the Ukraine that was supposedly occurring in that part of the world when in reality millions in the Ukraine were being deliberately starved to death on the direct orders of Joseph Stalin. Some web site, today, even awards a yearly 'Duranty Prize' to the writer, editor, or media publication that dumps the most obvious and biggest load of horse sh!t onto the American Public during the course of the year. The NYT has yet to return its Pulitzer for lauding Joseph Stalin for his deliberately starving millions.
With that kind of horse sh!t going on, do you suppose the American voter then was even getting a smidgeon of truth from the media. Its been said, probably correctly, that Hitler could never have come to power today in the age of television because of the bizaareness of his appearance and mannerisms and the way they would have come across to the viewers on TV. The same could be said for Roosevelt's four terms in office, although that won't stop Barack Obama and his supporters from demanding the same from this country should he manage to gain his second.
 
Western Civilization is that enlighened: That an Ivy League then was not much different from an Ivy League, now!

Even many of the Nazi victims, famously civilian and disproportionately Jewish, were in fact supportive of the law. Dutifully they went to the camps. Even many of the Bush-Cheney/RNC victims, famously lower income and disporportinatley non-white: Were in fact supportive of the law, and dutifully left their housing behind.

The properous in both eras were supportive, and kept all the money they could. Mainly, anyone denies that: And in fact there are many who deny it altogether.

While nappy-headed ho's were celebrated on the basketball courts, Greece and Spain mounted increasing youth unemployment rates instead. That came about clearly with the support of the prosperous, and including at Sidwell Friends School--and the women's, college-level basketball courts. Anyone could bring up Haiti or East Africa in Drought. The Romney's don't, and somehow that seems to escape even DNC.

It all escapes ABC, CBS, CNBC, CNN--it also escapes even NBC, MSNBC, and Fantacize Along With FoxTV News! Then it's on to TNT, and then AP, The Vatican and even at the less prestigious, palace at Buckingham: Somewhere near to where Reuters is found. It all escapes them too, even then!

One of those groups is even owned by Disney, now famously entertainer of the North Korean elite(?)! Many now can wonder at the mental age. . .of some people, at last! Did, for example, Disney every find a replacement for Annette Funicello, age 14? Real life, every so often, really matters!

Reverend Jeremiah Wright may not have said it best, though likely better than McCawber said it.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes send rotted corn, and poison blankets: To Lands of Many Nations! Now Many White Eyes send what they hast, even what they hast not: To the Ivy League instead! Great Spirit now to be thought Great Poetic Justice: Of all Lands of Many Nations!)
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top