Roosevelt....the Un-Reagan

Reagan was no FDR

Reagan: Mr Gorbachev....please tear down this wall

FDR kicked the fucking wall down


WTF???? FDR gave Stalin almost half of Europe, read a history book will ya...

Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.


"There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan blah blah blah...."
Surely you mean 'contrast,' don't you.

But there is.....

Franklin Roosevelt rejected the Constitution, accepted communism and revered the collective...the true American President, Ronald Reagan, venerated the Constitution, stood for the individual and despised Communism..

Franklin Roosevelt saved the farmers of America, while the GOP was letting them go out of business.
Franklin Roosevelt did not accept 'communism'- any more than Nixon 'accepted communism.
FDR worked with Communists while defeating Germany and Japan- two countries which were actually at war with the United States- Reagan never defeated any country.
FDR led the country from 24.75 unemployment in 1933 to 9.66 in 1941- a drop of 16%- Reagan led the country from 10.8 to 5.3% unemployment- a drop of 5.5%.

But I do understand why you hate FDR so much

He brought Social Security to Americans.
And Unemployment Insurance
And bank stability

No wonder you hate FDR.

He was pro-American.


You appear to be quite the fool.
.

Coming from a fool- that is faint praise.

Nice cut and paste by the way.

LIke I said- no wonder you hate FDR- he was pro-American.
 
WTF???? FDR gave Stalin almost half of Europe, read a history book will ya...

Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.

Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.
.

I am looking for your alternative PC- do you think FDR should have declared war against the USSR while we were at war with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan?

Or perhaps just not assist the USSR, so that Nazi Germany could kill millions more Soviet citizens- and perhaps defeat the Soviet Union- so Hitler could link up with Imperial Japan in the east?

Tell us your alternative?



"....Nazi Germany could kill millions more Soviet citizens- and perhaps defeat the Soviet Union-..."

I look for educated people on the other side, and fools like you are what I find.

Hitler defeat Stalin???

What sort of fool are you???? Stalin gave Hitler the resources for his Wehrmacht.

1. "Between June 22, 1941, and January 31, 1942, the Germans had lost 6,000 airplanes and more than 3,200 tanks and similar vehicles; and no less than 918,000 men had been killed, wounded, or gone missing in action, amounting to 28.7 percent of the average strength of the army, namely, 3,2 million men.[33]

(In the Soviet Union, Germany would lose no less than 10 million of its total 13.5 million men killed, wounded, or taken prisoner during the entire war; andthe Red Army would end up claiming credit for 90 per cent of all Germans killedin the Second World War.)
Clive Ponting, 'Armageddon: The Second World War,' p. 130; Stephen E. Ambrose 'Americans at War,' p. 72. ”



2. And this, the only logical conclusion:

"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger USSR in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence(comment)


Clearly, any explanation of Roosevelt's pro-Soviet policy cannot rely on the fear of Stalin quitting the war.
 
Last edited:
WTF???? FDR gave Stalin almost half of Europe, read a history book will ya...

Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.


"There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan blah blah blah...."
Surely you mean 'contrast,' don't you.

But there is.....

Franklin Roosevelt rejected the Constitution, accepted communism and revered the collective...the true American President, Ronald Reagan, venerated the Constitution, stood for the individual and despised Communism..

Franklin Roosevelt saved the farmers of America, while the GOP was letting them go out of business.
Franklin Roosevelt did not accept 'communism'- any more than Nixon 'accepted communism.
FDR worked with Communists while defeating Germany and Japan- two countries which were actually at war with the United States- Reagan never defeated any country.
FDR led the country from 24.75 unemployment in 1933 to 9.66 in 1941- a drop of 16%- Reagan led the country from 10.8 to 5.3% unemployment- a drop of 5.5%.

But I do understand why you hate FDR so much

He brought Social Security to Americans.
And Unemployment Insurance
And bank stability

No wonder you hate FDR.

He was pro-American.


You appear to be quite the fool.
.

Coming from a fool- that is faint praise.

Nice cut and paste by the way.

LIke I said- no wonder you hate FDR- he was pro-American.



Anytime one of your refers to 'cut and paste' it means you can't contest what I have posted.
It is a dodge used by Liberal dunces.


Clearly, FDR was pro-Stalin, not pro-America.

1. The result of FDR's efforts include a disaster for America.
On April 5, 1951, Judge Irving R. Kaufman sentenced the Rosenbergs to death for theft of atomic secrets, and, resulted in "the communist aggression in Korea, with the resultant casualties exceeding 50,000 and who knows but that millions more of innocent people may pay the price of your treason." Judge Kaufman's Sentencing Statement in the Rosenberg Case

a. It is clear today, based on archival evidence, unearthed by researchers in Russia and released in the United States, that Kaufman was correct. "Absent an atomic bomb, Stalin would not have released Pyongyang's army to conquer the entire Korean peninsula. Confident that his possession of atomic weapons neutralized America's strategic advantage, Stalin was emboldened to unleash war in Korea in 1950."
Haynes, Klehr, and Vassiliev, "Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America," p. 143, 545. And Romerstein and Breindel,"The Venona Secrets," p. xv, 253.

b. It is important to connect the treachery with the impact of that treachery: the theft of the nuclear technology with 36,940 Americans killed, 91,134 wounded, and 8,176 still missing, and this does not include at least two million civilian lives claimed on both sides.
Bruce Cumings, "The Korean War: A History.'

Included were 1.3 million South Korean casualties, including 400,000 dead. North Korea, 2 million casualties, and 900,000 Chinese soldiers killed.


And....the fact that there ever was a Communist China....a direct result of Stalin's spies in Roosevelt's administration.
 
Reagan was no FDR

Reagan: Mr Gorbachev....please tear down this wall

FDR kicked the fucking wall down


WTF???? FDR gave Stalin almost half of Europe, read a history book will ya...

Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.

Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.


Killing and putting one's own citizens in concentration camps appears to be the hallmark of totalitarians such as Stalin, Hitler, and Roosevelt.
I know it is difficult for you, but please try to keep up with your own thread

The question was whether the US should have invaded the USSR after Berlin...your response has NOTHING to do with that

You really did get through college by cut and paste didn't you?
 
WTF???? FDR gave Stalin almost half of Europe, read a history book will ya...

Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.

Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.


Killing and putting one's own citizens in concentration camps appears to be the hallmark of totalitarians such as Stalin, Hitler, and Roosevelt.
I know it is difficult for you, but please try to keep up with your own thread

The question was whether the US should have invaded the USSR after Berlin...your response has NOTHING to do with that

You really did get through college by cut and paste didn't you?



I've ripped you and your god to shreds,huh?

You ain't seen nuthin' yet.
 
Reagan was no FDR

Reagan: Mr Gorbachev....please tear down this wall

FDR kicked the fucking wall down


WTF???? FDR gave Stalin almost half of Europe, read a history book will ya...

Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.

Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

Fuck you and your ilk that are upset that millions of American GI's didn't die because of your anti-Communist zeal.


My ass you pinko commie that millions would have died, we could have been in Moscow under a month.

The prick gave away half of fucking Europe for over 40 years.

Are you really this absolutely fucking ignorant?

I have tremendous respect for the American military of WW2- FDR had built up our military from being smaller than Portugal's in 1938 to the most powerful navy and air force in the world in 1945.

In 1945- we were in the middle of a 2 front war- the Soviet Union was our erstwhile ally- driving the majority of the German military back all the way to Berlin- while we fought our way(with our British/Canadian/Australian/French allies) from Normandy to the Rhine- against I believe about 1/3 of the German military.

At the same time- we were busy fighting Imperial Japan.

The Soviet Army coming at the Germans at the time were the most powerful Army in the world- sorry if you don't like that- but it was. The Soviet's had more- and better tanks than the Americans. The main American tank- the Sherman- was not even a match for the Soviet T-34/85, let alone the JS-1 and JS-2 or the Soviet SU-122 and SU-152. The Soviets had masses of artillery- masses. And their army was a veteran force that had just fought its way from Moscow to Berlin- they knew the terrain- and the weather.

America had a superior air force- but the Soviets still had a very capable air force- so there would not have been a cake walk- and without American air support- our ground forces would have been wiped out.

So exactly why would you have wanted millions of American troops to die- to beat the Soviets at a time we were still trying to defeat Imperial Japan?
 
WTF???? FDR gave Stalin almost half of Europe, read a history book will ya...

Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.

Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

Fuck you and your ilk that are upset that millions of American GI's didn't die because of your anti-Communist zeal.


My ass you pinko commie that millions would have died, we could have been in Moscow under a month.

The prick gave away half of fucking Europe for over 40 years.

Are you really this absolutely fucking ignorant?

I have tremendous respect for the American military of WW2- FDR had built up our military from being smaller than Portugal's in 1938 to the most powerful navy and air force in the world in 1945.

In 1945- we were in the middle of a 2 front war- the Soviet Union was our erstwhile ally- driving the majority of the German military back all the way to Berlin- while we fought our way(with our British/Canadian/Australian/French allies) from Normandy to the Rhine- against I believe about 1/3 of the German military.

At the same time- we were busy fighting Imperial Japan.

The Soviet Army coming at the Germans at the time were the most powerful Army in the world- sorry if you don't like that- but it was. The Soviet's had more- and better tanks than the Americans. The main American tank- the Sherman- was not even a match for the Soviet T-34/85, let alone the JS-1 and JS-2 or the Soviet SU-122 and SU-152. The Soviets had masses of artillery- masses. And their army was a veteran force that had just fought its way from Moscow to Berlin- they knew the terrain- and the weather.

America had a superior air force- but the Soviets still had a very capable air force- so there would not have been a cake walk- and without American air support- our ground forces would have been wiped out.

So exactly why would you have wanted millions of American troops to die- to beat the Soviets at a time we were still trying to defeat Imperial Japan?



Vulgarity is the Liberal white flag.
 
Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.

Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.


Killing and putting one's own citizens in concentration camps appears to be the hallmark of totalitarians such as Stalin, Hitler, and Roosevelt.
I know it is difficult for you, but please try to keep up with your own thread

The question was whether the US should have invaded the USSR after Berlin...your response has NOTHING to do with that

You really did get through college by cut and paste didn't you?



I've ripped you and your god to shreds,huh?

You ain't seen nuthin' yet.

Oh I know that 'arguing' with you is as fruitless as arguing with a pig.

But showing what an idiot you are does provide some amusement.
 
Reagan was no FDR

Reagan: Mr Gorbachev....please tear down this wall

FDR kicked the fucking wall down


WTF???? FDR gave Stalin almost half of Europe, read a history book will ya...

Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.

Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

Fuck you and your ilk that are upset that millions of American GI's didn't die because of your anti-Communist zeal.


My ass you pinko commie that millions would have died, we could have been in Moscow under a month.

The prick gave away half of fucking Europe for over 40 years.

The Soviets had better tanks than we did and were more experienced, They also showed a willingness to fight to the death which Americans never would have tolerated

Your way would have resulted in hundreds of thousands of additional deaths. FDRs way resulted in the USSR folding without us firing a shot
 
Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.

Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.


Killing and putting one's own citizens in concentration camps appears to be the hallmark of totalitarians such as Stalin, Hitler, and Roosevelt.
I know it is difficult for you, but please try to keep up with your own thread

The question was whether the US should have invaded the USSR after Berlin...your response has NOTHING to do with that

You really did get through college by cut and paste didn't you?



I've ripped you and your god to shreds,huh?

You ain't seen nuthin' yet.

Self declared victories are so shallow...wouldn't you agree?

You still can't stay on topic in your own thread
 
Clearly you have never read a history book.

The Soviet Union defeated the entire eastern half of German controlled Europe- controlled Poland, and all of what became the Eastern block countries- and was still considered at that time our ally- AND we wanted the USSR to go to war against Japan.

Do you think that the United States should have gone to war with the USSR to free Poland in 1945?

IF you look at history- by containing the Soviets where they were- the Soviet empire eventually collapsed under its own weight.

There really is no comparison between Roosevelt and Reagan- except for one thing- both were extremely charismatic- and both were extremely popular with American voters.

Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.
.

I am looking for your alternative PC- do you think FDR should have declared war against the USSR while we were at war with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan?

Or perhaps just not assist the USSR, so that Nazi Germany could kill millions more Soviet citizens- and perhaps defeat the Soviet Union- so Hitler could link up with Imperial Japan in the east?

Tell us your alternative?


"I am looking for your alternative PC..."
No prob!

1. When the (anticipated) event that Hitler would attack Stalin's Russia, as they did June 21st, 1941,America should have done nothing...no more than relaxing restrictions on exports to the Russians...but at the same time securing a quid pro quo for further assistance! Lend-Lease should not have been the automatic and unlimited buffet that it turned into!

"Finally, should the Soviet regime fall,...we should refuse to recognize a Communist government-in-exile,leaving the path clear for establishment for a non-Communist government in Russia after the war." These were the words of Loy Henderson, Soviet and Eastern European affairs expert and Foreign Service officer, as quoted by Martin Weil in "A pretty good club: The founding fathers of the U.S. Foreign Service," p. 106."

So you would have preferred that the Nazi's defeat the USSR- so that the Nazi's could establish a non-Communist Nazi government in Russia.

Well that would have help the United States- and Americans so very much......
 
Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.


Killing and putting one's own citizens in concentration camps appears to be the hallmark of totalitarians such as Stalin, Hitler, and Roosevelt.
I know it is difficult for you, but please try to keep up with your own thread

The question was whether the US should have invaded the USSR after Berlin...your response has NOTHING to do with that

You really did get through college by cut and paste didn't you?



I've ripped you and your god to shreds,huh?

You ain't seen nuthin' yet.

Oh I know that 'arguing' with you is as fruitless as arguing with a pig.

But showing what an idiot you are does provide some amusement.



Your attempt to save face?

You can't save what you never had.

I don't argue....I teach. I document why I'm correct.
And it wasn't me revealing those facts.....it was those dozens of direct quotes that you couldn't contend with or dispute.

You have yet to find a single thing I've posted that wasn't true,accurate and correct..
And you never will.
 
Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.


Killing and putting one's own citizens in concentration camps appears to be the hallmark of totalitarians such as Stalin, Hitler, and Roosevelt.
I know it is difficult for you, but please try to keep up with your own thread

The question was whether the US should have invaded the USSR after Berlin...your response has NOTHING to do with that

You really did get through college by cut and paste didn't you?



I've ripped you and your god to shreds,huh?

You ain't seen nuthin' yet.

Self declared victories are so shallow...wouldn't you agree?

You still can't stay on topic in your own thread


Ripped you and your god to shreds, Leftwinger.
 
Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.
.

I am looking for your alternative PC- do you think FDR should have declared war against the USSR while we were at war with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan?

Or perhaps just not assist the USSR, so that Nazi Germany could kill millions more Soviet citizens- and perhaps defeat the Soviet Union- so Hitler could link up with Imperial Japan in the east?

Tell us your alternative?


"I am looking for your alternative PC..."
No prob!

1. When the (anticipated) event that Hitler would attack Stalin's Russia, as they did June 21st, 1941,America should have done nothing...no more than relaxing restrictions on exports to the Russians...but at the same time securing a quid pro quo for further assistance! Lend-Lease should not have been the automatic and unlimited buffet that it turned into!

"Finally, should the Soviet regime fall,...we should refuse to recognize a Communist government-in-exile,leaving the path clear for establishment for a non-Communist government in Russia after the war." These were the words of Loy Henderson, Soviet and Eastern European affairs expert and Foreign Service officer, as quoted by Martin Weil in "A pretty good club: The founding fathers of the U.S. Foreign Service," p. 106."

So you would have preferred that the Nazi's defeat the USSR- so that the Nazi's could establish a non-Communist Nazi government in Russia.

Well that would have help the United States- and Americans so very much......



"So you would have preferred that the Nazi's defeat the USSR- so that the Nazi's could establish a non-Communist Nazi government in Russia."

Either find a quote where I said that or admit that you're a lying sack of sewage.
 
How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.


Killing and putting one's own citizens in concentration camps appears to be the hallmark of totalitarians such as Stalin, Hitler, and Roosevelt.
I know it is difficult for you, but please try to keep up with your own thread

The question was whether the US should have invaded the USSR after Berlin...your response has NOTHING to do with that

You really did get through college by cut and paste didn't you?



I've ripped you and your god to shreds,huh?

You ain't seen nuthin' yet.

Oh I know that 'arguing' with you is as fruitless as arguing with a pig.

But showing what an idiot you are does provide some amusement.


I don't argue....I teach. I document why I'm correct.
.

You provide some meager amusement with your pro-Nazi rants.
 
Fuck you and your ilk for the mayhem you let FDR get away with....

They should have never stopped at Berlin and drove right into Moscow.

How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.
.

I am looking for your alternative PC- do you think FDR should have declared war against the USSR while we were at war with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan?

Or perhaps just not assist the USSR, so that Nazi Germany could kill millions more Soviet citizens- and perhaps defeat the Soviet Union- so Hitler could link up with Imperial Japan in the east?

Tell us your alternative?


"I am looking for your alternative PC..."
No prob!

1. When the (anticipated) event that Hitler would attack Stalin's Russia, as they did June 21st, 1941,America should have done nothing...no more than relaxing restrictions on exports to the Russians...but at the same time securing a quid pro quo for further assistance! Lend-Lease should not have been the automatic and unlimited buffet that it turned into!

"Finally, should the Soviet regime fall,...we should refuse to recognize a Communist government-in-exile,leaving the path clear for establishment for a non-Communist government in Russia after the war." These were the words of Loy Henderson, Soviet and Eastern European affairs expert and Foreign Service officer, as quoted by Martin Weil in "A pretty good club: The founding fathers of the U.S. Foreign Service," p. 106."

So you would have preferred that the Nazi's defeat the USSR- so that the Nazi's could establish a non-Communist Nazi government in Russia.

Well that would have help the United States- and Americans so very much......

She has already posted several threads where she supported allowing the Nazis to win
 
How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.
.

I am looking for your alternative PC- do you think FDR should have declared war against the USSR while we were at war with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan?

Or perhaps just not assist the USSR, so that Nazi Germany could kill millions more Soviet citizens- and perhaps defeat the Soviet Union- so Hitler could link up with Imperial Japan in the east?

Tell us your alternative?


"I am looking for your alternative PC..."
No prob!

1. When the (anticipated) event that Hitler would attack Stalin's Russia, as they did June 21st, 1941,America should have done nothing...no more than relaxing restrictions on exports to the Russians...but at the same time securing a quid pro quo for further assistance! Lend-Lease should not have been the automatic and unlimited buffet that it turned into!

"Finally, should the Soviet regime fall,...we should refuse to recognize a Communist government-in-exile,leaving the path clear for establishment for a non-Communist government in Russia after the war." These were the words of Loy Henderson, Soviet and Eastern European affairs expert and Foreign Service officer, as quoted by Martin Weil in "A pretty good club: The founding fathers of the U.S. Foreign Service," p. 106."

So you would have preferred that the Nazi's defeat the USSR- so that the Nazi's could establish a non-Communist Nazi government in Russia.

Well that would have help the United States- and Americans so very much......



"So you would have preferred that the Nazi's defeat the USSR- so that the Nazi's could establish a non-Communist Nazi government in Russia."

Either find a quote where I said that or admit that you're a lying sack of sewage.

Here you go- what you suggested

. When the (anticipated) event that Hitler would attack Stalin's Russia, as they did June 21st, 1941,America should have done nothing..

"Finally, should the Soviet regime fall,...we should refuse to recognize a Communist government-in-exile,leaving the path clear for establishment for a non-Communist government in Russia after the war."
 
Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.


Killing and putting one's own citizens in concentration camps appears to be the hallmark of totalitarians such as Stalin, Hitler, and Roosevelt.
I know it is difficult for you, but please try to keep up with your own thread

The question was whether the US should have invaded the USSR after Berlin...your response has NOTHING to do with that

You really did get through college by cut and paste didn't you?



I've ripped you and your god to shreds,huh?

You ain't seen nuthin' yet.

Oh I know that 'arguing' with you is as fruitless as arguing with a pig.

But showing what an idiot you are does provide some amusement.


I don't argue....I teach. I document why I'm correct.
.

You provide some meager amusement with your pro-Nazi rants.



"....your pro-Nazi rants."

So stipulated that you're a lying sack of sewage.
 
How many millions of deaths would you have tolerated?

The Nazis lost around 8 million trying to do the same thing


Stuck your foot in your mouth again:
Stalin killed 60 million of his own citizens, yet Roosevelt made him is BFF.
.

I am looking for your alternative PC- do you think FDR should have declared war against the USSR while we were at war with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan?

Or perhaps just not assist the USSR, so that Nazi Germany could kill millions more Soviet citizens- and perhaps defeat the Soviet Union- so Hitler could link up with Imperial Japan in the east?

Tell us your alternative?


"I am looking for your alternative PC..."
No prob!

1. When the (anticipated) event that Hitler would attack Stalin's Russia, as they did June 21st, 1941,America should have done nothing...no more than relaxing restrictions on exports to the Russians...but at the same time securing a quid pro quo for further assistance! Lend-Lease should not have been the automatic and unlimited buffet that it turned into!

"Finally, should the Soviet regime fall,...we should refuse to recognize a Communist government-in-exile,leaving the path clear for establishment for a non-Communist government in Russia after the war." These were the words of Loy Henderson, Soviet and Eastern European affairs expert and Foreign Service officer, as quoted by Martin Weil in "A pretty good club: The founding fathers of the U.S. Foreign Service," p. 106."

So you would have preferred that the Nazi's defeat the USSR- so that the Nazi's could establish a non-Communist Nazi government in Russia.

Well that would have help the United States- and Americans so very much......

She has already posted several threads where she supported allowing the Nazis to win



"She has already posted several threads where she supported allowing the Nazis to win."

That has never happened.

It is what one expects starting from the lie in your avi.
 
I know it is difficult for you, but please try to keep up with your own thread

The question was whether the US should have invaded the USSR after Berlin...your response has NOTHING to do with that

You really did get through college by cut and paste didn't you?



I've ripped you and your god to shreds,huh?

You ain't seen nuthin' yet.

Oh I know that 'arguing' with you is as fruitless as arguing with a pig.

But showing what an idiot you are does provide some amusement.


I don't argue....I teach. I document why I'm correct.
.

You provide some meager amusement with your pro-Nazi rants.



"....your pro-Nazi rants."

So stipulated that you're a lying sack of sewage.

So says the idiot who would prefer the Nazi's defeat the USSR just so you can be 'anti-communist'
 

Forum List

Back
Top