Ron Pual supporters. I have this question about the dept. of education

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Nov 10, 2011
31,733
12,504
1,560
Colorado
Do you not see how ridiculous it would be if Paul got rid of not only the Dept. of Education, but any PRIVATE bank lending as well? He expects students to pay for their education out of their own pockets. Which, of course, would be impossible.

Why in the hell would that be a good idea?

I'm all for making some changes in the Dept of Ed, but to get rid of it entirely is just nonsense.
 
Do you not see how ridiculous it would be if Paul got rid of not only the Dept. of Education, but any PRIVATE bank lending as well? He expects students to pay for their education out of their own pockets. Which, of course, would be impossible.

Why in the hell would that be a good idea?

I'm all for making some changes in the Dept of Ed, but to get rid of it entirely is just nonsense.

Please explain.
 
Do you not see how ridiculous it would be if Paul got rid of not only the Dept. of Education, but any PRIVATE bank lending as well? He expects students to pay for their education out of their own pockets. Which, of course, would be impossible.

Why in the hell would that be a good idea?

I'm all for making some changes in the Dept of Ed, but to get rid of it entirely is just nonsense.

Please explain.
Billy is one of those OWS types that wants something for nothing. Taxpayers pay for everything as they are allergic to hard work.

I wait with baited breath to hear his whopper as well.
 
Do you not see how ridiculous it would be if Paul got rid of not only the Dept. of Education, but any PRIVATE bank lending as well? He expects students to pay for their education out of their own pockets. Which, of course, would be impossible.

Why in the hell would that be a good idea?

I'm all for making some changes in the Dept of Ed, but to get rid of it entirely is just nonsense.

Please explain.
Billy is one of those OWS types that wants something for nothing. Taxpayers pay for everything as they are allergic to hard work.

I wait with baited breath to hear his whopper as well.

I would be willing to wager he doesnt have a clue as to why the cost of education is where it is either.
 
Please explain.
Billy is one of those OWS types that wants something for nothing. Taxpayers pay for everything as they are allergic to hard work.

I wait with baited breath to hear his whopper as well.

I would be willing to wager he doesnt have a clue as to why the cost of education is where it is either.
It will be fun to read that as well. As a matter of course he doesn't know...otherwise he wouldn't post such tripe.
 
Please explain.
Billy is one of those OWS types that wants something for nothing. Taxpayers pay for everything as they are allergic to hard work.

I wait with baited breath to hear his whopper as well.

I would be willing to wager he doesnt have a clue as to why the cost of education is where it is either.
What does he have a clue about? Nothing, as far as I've seen.

This is another "stake a ridiculous position and defend it from all comers" thread of his. Pretty much only deserves ridicule.
 
Do you not see how ridiculous it would be if Paul got rid of not only the Dept. of Education, but any PRIVATE bank lending as well? He expects students to pay for their education out of their own pockets. Which, of course, would be impossible.

Why in the hell would that be a good idea?

I'm all for making some changes in the Dept of Ed, but to get rid of it entirely is just nonsense.
If it's impossible then how did my Father manage to pay for his college education out of his own pocket in 1965?

If it's impossible, how did I manage to pay for both my Community College AND University out of my own pocket?

Do a little reading about the Dept. of Education then get back to us.
Federal Role in Education
 
Billy is one of those OWS types that wants something for nothing. Taxpayers pay for everything as they are allergic to hard work.

I wait with baited breath to hear his whopper as well.

I would be willing to wager he doesnt have a clue as to why the cost of education is where it is either.
It will be fun to read that as well. As a matter of course he doesn't know...otherwise he wouldn't post such tripe.

I generally don't even bother with his threads anymore. But today 5 of the top 8 were his so I chimed in.
 
I would be willing to wager he doesnt have a clue as to why the cost of education is where it is either.
It will be fun to read that as well. As a matter of course he doesn't know...otherwise he wouldn't post such tripe.

I generally don't even bother with his threads anymore. But today 5 of the top 8 were his so I chimed in.
I look at them when I need to remind myself of the outrageous stupidity...Billy-Bub is prime candidate.

*Merry Christmas* :)
 
Do you not see how ridiculous it would be if Paul got rid of not only the Dept. of Education, but any PRIVATE bank lending as well? He expects students to pay for their education out of their own pockets. Which, of course, would be impossible.

Why in the hell would that be a good idea?

I'm all for making some changes in the Dept of Ed, but to get rid of it entirely is just nonsense.

He has never said anything about private bank lending. He doesnt expect students to pay for education out of pocket either. He has a plan to cut the budget by 1 trillion doing away with 5 departments. Student loans will still exist but will be shifted to another department.
 
Stop spamming the board. You trying to replace BDBoop?

You should talk lol

I am talking. I don't create 3 to 5 threads a day every other day. I create 2 or 3 a WEEK and sometimes not even that many.

I do have to give you credit tho. That's the most coherent post I've ever seen you write even if it isn't accurate.

I'm sorry, is there some limit to the amount of threads created each day? I didn't think so. Hey, I have a lot of things to discuss. You don't have to answer.
 
Do you not see how ridiculous it would be if Paul got rid of not only the Dept. of Education, but any PRIVATE bank lending as well? He expects students to pay for their education out of their own pockets. Which, of course, would be impossible.

Why in the hell would that be a good idea?

I'm all for making some changes in the Dept of Ed, but to get rid of it entirely is just nonsense.

He has never said anything about private bank lending. He doesnt expect students to pay for education out of pocket either. He has a plan to cut the budget by 1 trillion doing away with 5 departments. Student loans will still exist but will be shifted to another department.

I heard it on one of the GOP debates. It's possible he no longer holds that position. I do not know.
 
It will be fun to read that as well. As a matter of course he doesn't know...otherwise he wouldn't post such tripe.

I generally don't even bother with his threads anymore. But today 5 of the top 8 were his so I chimed in.

You don't bother because you cannot hold your own.

I post in many liberal threads, just not yours. You see your threads almost always comprise of nothing but generalizations and insults of the right. Your nothing but a troll with mindless nonsense to spread and this thread is proof.
 

Forum List

Back
Top