Ron Paul the Uncorruptible

The Swiss have legalized drugs and they don't spend $40,000 a year housing drug prisoners.

We could learn a lot from the europeans.


It is a waste of resources and many cops agree. In fact, the war on drugs increase violence (just ask Holder once he becomes honest) and disrupts families who need help.

Plus, most drugs are not nearly as deadly as alcohol.
 
The Swiss have legalized drugs and they don't spend $40,000 a year housing drug prisoners.

We could learn a lot from the europeans.


It is a waste of resources and many cops agree. In fact, the war on drugs increase violence (just ask Holder once he becomes honest) and disrupts families who need help.

Plus, most drugs are not nearly as deadly as alcohol.

Not to mention it finances gangs and terrorists.
 
I loved it when Ron Paul stood up in the debate and said...

"If heroin was legal, how many people here would become heroin addicts???"
 
I loved it when Ron Paul stood up in the debate and said...

"If heroin was legal, how many people here would become heroin addicts???"

That was great and I was surprised from the crowd, especially coming from S.C. Yet, when it mattered, they preferred the fucktard Gingrich.
 
Sure disagree with Paul's policies and you're stupid.

And you wonder why you aren't persuading people to support him? Come on. Be freaking mature.

And Ron Paul is hardly uncorruptable. In fact, i consider pretending to oppose earmarks by sliding them in bills you know are going to pass and voting against them just so you can decieve people as pretty damn corrupt. As is arguing for limited government while growing it.

And it's posts like this that make the Paul haters look outright dishonest and stupid. How the fuck is what Paul did in any way "corrupt?" Paul is a fucking congressman working under the rulkes that are in place, you sound like the dumb ass fucks that attack Paul for not dropping out of politics because he would like there to be term limits.

If Paul didn't get money back to his area that was taken out through taxes he would have never been elected. Paul wants to change the way things are done, he is one of the few that even talks about it.

How the fuck did Paul argue limited Government then grow it? Do you have even one example? Hurry up and get back to supporting the second biggest Progressive liberal running for President, fucking Mitt fucking Romney. Yeah theres a guy that believes in small Government, lolz.

We don't wonder why people are not persuaded to support Paul, we kno9w why... It's near impossible to get people off the Governments tit, people like you that support people like Mitt.
 
Last edited:
The Swiss have legalized drugs and they don't spend $40,000 a year housing drug prisoners.

We could learn a lot from the europeans.


It is a waste of resources and many cops agree. In fact, the war on drugs increase violence (just ask Holder once he becomes honest) and disrupts families who need help.

Plus, most drugs are not nearly as deadly as alcohol.

Not to mention it finances gangs and terrorists.

You mean governments and big banks?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug0IL7k3elQ]Oliver North Questioned - Rex 84 Exposed During Iran Contra - YouTube[/ame]


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs
 
Last edited:
Sure disagree with Paul's policies and you're stupid.

And you wonder why you aren't persuading people to support him? Come on. Be freaking mature.

And Ron Paul is hardly uncorruptable. In fact, i consider pretending to oppose earmarks by sliding them in bills you know are going to pass and voting against them just so you can decieve people as pretty damn corrupt. As is arguing for limited government while growing it.

if he is earmarking his state's money back to the state (where it belongs), what is the problem?
 
Ron Paul the unelectable

War loving, NDAA/Patriot act/Homeland security supporting, deficit spenders like you very much hope that is true.

BTW almost all polling has Ron Paul tied with Obama in the GE, Paul also pulls (wins) more independents than Obama, he even pulls Democrats.
 
Last edited:
Ron Paul the unelectable

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most money from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy ….”

Durham W. Ellis,

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top