Ron Paul On Iran: Fox News Interview...

[Oddball]

Ohhhhhh so the Iranian people are going to RISE UP and throw the mullahs out! Did Ron Paul tell you that or was it the voices in your head? The Iranian people are not muslim at all, is that what you mean to say? They aren't muslim and it's a few muslims oppressing the many non-muslims who don't belive in islam, don't believe the koran and don't believe in islamic prophecy.

Off hand, it's this kind of thinking that would persuade Iran that Americans would rise up instead and get rid of our government and replace it with a fundamentalisim islamic government.

Non sequitur.

The entire population of Iran -74 million- are not suicidal....Were that the case, they may well have risen up to try and overthrow the mullahs already.

And speaking of the mullahs...Have you noticed that none of them ever strap bombs to themselves?...Do you think that just maybe their political power is just a tad more dear to them than those 72 virgins?

That's probably only because they want to be here when the Mahdi comes...so they get others to do the bombing for them.

And no, the entire population are not suicidal...and they know they're in danger, so they should get the hell out of there....

Or maybe they're just a bunch of loud-mouthed punks, who are shooting off their big fat yaps.

They send a suicide bomber with a nuke and they can kiss their political power, along with their lives, goodbye....Period.

 

[Oddball]

Ohhhhhh so the Iranian people are going to RISE UP and throw the mullahs out! Did Ron Paul tell you that or was it the voices in your head? The Iranian people are not muslim at all, is that what you mean to say? They aren't muslim and it's a few muslims oppressing the many non-muslims who don't belive in islam, don't believe the koran and don't believe in islamic prophecy.

Off hand, it's this kind of thinking that would persuade Iran that Americans would rise up instead and get rid of our government and replace it with a fundamentalisim islamic government.

Non sequitur.

The entire population of Iran -74 million- are not suicidal....Were that the case, they may well have risen up to try and overthrow the mullahs already.

And speaking of the mullahs...Have you noticed that none of them ever strap bombs to themselves?...Do you think that just maybe their political power is just a tad more dear to them than those 72 virgins?

Ron Paul’s isolationist foreign policy views echo Neville Chamberlain « Wintery Knight

More pure bullshit.

The tired out cliché Chamberlain comparison doesn't even wash, as Iran has neither the industrial capacity nor the military wherewithal to wage such a war.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Can someone, anyone tell me why we NEED to attack Iran? It seems we're provoking them into attacking us with all the economic sanctions were putting on them. FFS the justification for invading Iraq was greater and how did that turn out?

Leon Panetta says they don't have a nuke and are a long ways away from one. Why can't we just leave them alone?

It's all about Globalism/Imperialism for our Nation now. We've been meddling with and bombing Nations around the World for the last 70yrs. straight. And that's all most Americans know. The Military Industrial Complex and the Global Elite run the show in the end. Our Soldiers & Citizens are mere pawns in their game.

"Military Men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." - New World Order Globalist scumbag Henry Kissinger.

many of the american sheepies here just dont get that.

 

[skookerasbil]

Non sequitur.

The entire population of Iran -74 million- are not suicidal....Were that the case, they may well have risen up to try and overthrow the mullahs already.

And speaking of the mullahs...Have you noticed that none of them ever strap bombs to themselves?...Do you think that just maybe their political power is just a tad more dear to them than those 72 virgins?

Ron Paul’s isolationist foreign policy views echo Neville Chamberlain « Wintery Knight

More pure bullshit.

The tired out cliché Chamberlain comparison doesn't even wash, as Iran has neither the industrial capacity nor the military wherewithal to wage such a war.

It doesnt wash..........but only to the Paul k00ks who represent a distinct minority. This is a POLITICS forum s0n. Fringe views FTL.

 

[skookerasbil]

Non sequitur.

The entire population of Iran -74 million- are not suicidal....Were that the case, they may well have risen up to try and overthrow the mullahs already.

And speaking of the mullahs...Have you noticed that none of them ever strap bombs to themselves?...Do you think that just maybe their political power is just a tad more dear to them than those 72 virgins?

Ron Paul’s isolationist foreign policy views echo Neville Chamberlain « Wintery Knight

More pure bullshit.

The tired out cliché Chamberlain comparison doesn't even wash, as Iran has neither the industrial capacity nor the military wherewithal to wage such a war.

Hmmm........and where do you hail from cheesedick? Bumfook USA? Scratchmyassville? Irrrelevantstown? You'll find lots and lots of Paul drones come from places where the biggest target for terror in their town is the local fcukking cornfield or the local water tower!!! They'll live their whole lives and never come within 500 miles of a terror attack. Of course they can embrace a what the fuck attitude on national security.

Me? Im a stones throw from lower Manhattan.........and their are millions and millions like me who arent all that enamoured with waking up one moring to a gigantic flash of light and 5 mintues later, everybodys skin is falling off. Jackasses who live in the middle of nowhere in places nobody cares about never have to worry.........the biggest ordanance these assholes ever see in their lives is an M-80 firecracker at the town 4th of JUly celebration.


So fcuk all these meatheads............and really, this is a fun as hell post because it simply paints these assholes for what they are: Disney drones with the political IQ's of a small soap dish. Thankfully for the majority..........they continue to be uber-fringe.

 

[Full-Auto]

Ron Paul’s isolationist foreign policy views echo Neville Chamberlain « Wintery Knight

More pure bullshit.

The tired out cliché Chamberlain comparison doesn't even wash, as Iran has neither the industrial capacity nor the military wherewithal to wage such a war.

Hmmm........and where do you hail from cheesedick? Bumfook USA? Scratchmyassville? Irrrelevantstown? You'll find lots and lots of Paul drones come from places where the biggest target for terror in their town is the local fcukking cornfield or the local water tower!!! They'll live their whole lives and never come within 500 miles of a terror attack. Of course they can embrace a what the fuck attitude on national security.

Me? Im a stones throw from lower Manhattan.........and their are millions and millions like me who arent all that enamoured with waking up one moring to a gigantic flash of light and 5 mintues later, everybodys skin is falling off. Jackasses who live in the middle of nowhere in places nobody cares about never have to worry.........the biggest ordanance these assholes ever see in their lives is an M-80 firecracker at the town 4th of JUly celebration.


So fcuk all these meatheads............and really, this is a fun as hell post because it simply paints these assholes for what they are: Disney drones with the political IQ's of a small soap dish. Thankfully for the majority..........they continue to be uber-fringe.

So which side are you supporting.

Democrats and soon to be 20 trillion in debt or republicans with soon to be 20 trillion in debt.

What flavor of debt sir?

 

[skookerasbil]

More pure bullshit.

The tired out cliché Chamberlain comparison doesn't even wash, as Iran has neither the industrial capacity nor the military wherewithal to wage such a war.

Hmmm........and where do you hail from cheesedick? Bumfook USA? Scratchmyassville? Irrrelevantstown? You'll find lots and lots of Paul drones come from places where the biggest target for terror in their town is the local fcukking cornfield or the local water tower!!! They'll live their whole lives and never come within 500 miles of a terror attack. Of course they can embrace a what the fuck attitude on national security.

Me? Im a stones throw from lower Manhattan.........and their are millions and millions like me who arent all that enamoured with waking up one moring to a gigantic flash of light and 5 mintues later, everybodys skin is falling off. Jackasses who live in the middle of nowhere in places nobody cares about never have to worry.........the biggest ordanance these assholes ever see in their lives is an M-80 firecracker at the town 4th of JUly celebration.


So fcuk all these meatheads............and really, this is a fun as hell post because it simply paints these assholes for what they are: Disney drones with the political IQ's of a small soap dish. Thankfully for the majority..........they continue to be uber-fringe.

So which side are you supporting.

Democrats and soon to be 20 trillion in debt or republicans with soon to be 20 trillion in debt.

What flavor of debt sir?

From my library of gay MS PAINT Photobucket Classics..............

 

[ScienceRocks]

Russia: Attack on Tehran is Attack on Moscow
israelnationalnews.com ^ | 1/15/2012 | Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

Russia: Attack on Tehran is Attack on Moscow - Global Agenda - News - Israel National News

Russia has given Iran its bear hug and warns Israel and the West that an attack on Tehran would be considered an attack on Moscow. The threat heightens the prospect of World War III in the event of a military strike on Iran.

“Iran is our neighbor,” Russia's outgoing ambassador to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, told reporters in Brussels. “And if Iran is involved in any military action, it’s a direct threat to our security.”


(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...

Yet another reason to elect Ron Paul as our next president...We're starting to piss off the bigger players and could get into something big if not careful.

 

[The Rabbi]

Can someone, anyone tell me why we NEED to attack Iran? It seems we're provoking them into attacking us with all the economic sanctions were putting on them. FFS the justification for invading Iraq was greater and how did that turn out?

Leon Panetta says they don't have a nuke and are a long ways away from one. Why can't we just leave them alone?

The "provocation" thing is standard fodder for the Left. I remember them saying exactly the same about the Soviet Union: the only reasons the Soviets had expansions going on was because we were provoking them. Bullshit then, bullshit now.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hLDjGdJC0Q]Ahmadinejad: Israel Will Disappear From Map - YouTube[/ame]

 

[drippinhun]

It's odd that when I was telling others how we had just became a debtor nation during the early days of the Reagan Administration, and how the horrendous ongoing monthly trade deficits were going to bite us, few people listened. Then in the early 1990s, for a brief period, the nutty Ross Perot was able to get some attention parroting the same message. Now, all of a sudden, when we are in a major economic downturn, the only time when the government should be increasing expenditures, the genius right wing decides deficit spending is a problem.

 

[Full-Auto]

It's odd that when I was telling others how we had just became a debtor nation during the early days of the Reagan Administration, and how the horrendous ongoing monthly trade deficits were going to bite us, few people listened. Then in the early 1990s, for a brief period, the nutty Ross Perot was able to get some attention parroting the same message. Now, all of a sudden, when we are in a major economic downturn, the only time when the government should be increasing expenditures, the genius right wing decides deficit spending is a problem.

Increasing expenditures.

Simple question.

When do democrats intend to pay down the debt?


Can we cue up the Smugglers Blues. The lour of easy money and all that.

 

[The Rabbi]

It's odd that when I was telling others how we had just became a debtor nation during the early days of the Reagan Administration, and how the horrendous ongoing monthly trade deficits were going to bite us, few people listened. Then in the early 1990s, for a brief period, the nutty Ross Perot was able to get some attention parroting the same message. Now, all of a sudden, when we are in a major economic downturn, the only time when the government should be increasing expenditures, the genius right wing decides deficit spending is a problem.

We've run a trade deficit for most of our history. So what?

 

[skookerasbil]

It's odd that when I was telling others how we had just became a debtor nation during the early days of the Reagan Administration, and how the horrendous ongoing monthly trade deficits were going to bite us, few people listened. Then in the early 1990s, for a brief period, the nutty Ross Perot was able to get some attention parroting the same message. Now, all of a sudden, when we are in a major economic downturn, the only time when the government should be increasing expenditures, the genius right wing decides deficit spending is a problem.

s0n..........enjoy the next 10 months because the Keynesian model is about to be mothballed for at least two generations. Make some plans to do some museum visits.......it'll be propped up in a big glass case like a relic of a former era!!!

I love when the meatheads with the policital IQ of a handball come in here and pwn themselves!!!

 

[Katzndogz]

Iran doesn't have to wage war. Just incite war. There are plenty of loyal muslims around the world to wage war.

 

[rhodescholar]

"This idea that they're looking for a fight, I think that is all a concoction of the West so as to prepare the people for a war that is likely to come when we have a policy like this. I think it makes the perfect argument for my non-intervention foreign policy. We shouldn't be engaged and stirring up trouble."

On his BEST day, ron paul is a fucking moron, and has no clue. No wonder he is the recipient of all of the lyndon larouche psychotics.

 

[rhodescholar]

If Iran attacks us the blood is on your hands and people like you who feel it is your right to fuck with any and all countries.Thank you for making the US a unsafe place to live by supporting Terrorism.

"If" iran attacks us? Where the fuck have you been for the last 30 years?

1980 hostage crisis, Beirut 83, Khobar towers - how many thousands of wounded and killed US troops in iraq because of iran?

More on ira: running one of the world's biggest gulags, helping ass-ad slaughter more of his people, fomenting wars across the middle east, sponsoring terrorist proxy armies across the world...and ignoring FOUR legally-binding UNSC resolutions requiring it stop building nuclear weapons.

Do try and read some history before making any more idiotic statements.

 

[rhodescholar]

Why not just withdraw and let them do whatever they want, which is what Ron Paul would do. Iran doesn't really want to close the Strait of Hormuz, the west is just saying that, lying, to pressure war. If we leave them alone, naturally they won't do it.

Let Iran develop whatever nuclear weapons they want. Trust that they are just lying, blowing smoke, when they threaten to use those weapons. On what basis should we believe them, when Ron Paul clearly says they don't mean it. Ron Paul says that Iran has no committment to the domination of Islam. Iran says they do. Dither dither, who to believe. Hmmm Ron Paul or Iran?

Ron Paul says that the cold war methods of mutually assured destruction will work against muslims who say "we crave death" as it did against the Russians. Who to believe? Hmmm. Ron Paul or suicide bombers? That's a hard one because the Russians never used suicide bombers.

Iran doesn't really mean to kill all the Jews. No matter how many times they say it, not even when it is a mandate of the koran. How do we know that they are lying when they say they would? Because RON PAUL says differently. That's how we know. Ron Paul says if we just let them overrun Israel the muslims will be happy and there will be peace in the whole world forever after. I never heard any of that from Iran or any other muslm. What I do remember, quite clearly, is that the last time the world "sacrificed" one country for the good of all, it was Poland handed over to the Nazis and we got "Peace in our time".

Factually those who support Ron Paul's isolationism do so because they hold as a hope or article of faith that he is right and the proponents of islamic domination or worse yet, the ones who are working toward a Mahdeic chaos, are lying. They don't really mean it. The west is just using all these awful threats to manufacture another fun war.

This is why Ron Paul is a lunatic. I know Paul is wishful thinking out of his own delusions. There is NO REASON to disbelieve Iran. None. Name one.

You have to understand, ron paul is mentally ill, and many of his followers are as well. 99% of the lyndon larouche lunatics switched over to paul when larouche opted not to run for president for the 100th time this year.

Listening to ron paul psychotics is as nauseating as listening to the Far left; neither is lucid or sane and neither has any facts or a clue - their whole premise is built purely on emotions and dreams of the deformed prism in which they view the world.

 

[The Rabbi]

Why not just withdraw and let them do whatever they want, which is what Ron Paul would do. Iran doesn't really want to close the Strait of Hormuz, the west is just saying that, lying, to pressure war. If we leave them alone, naturally they won't do it.

Let Iran develop whatever nuclear weapons they want. Trust that they are just lying, blowing smoke, when they threaten to use those weapons. On what basis should we believe them, when Ron Paul clearly says they don't mean it. Ron Paul says that Iran has no committment to the domination of Islam. Iran says they do. Dither dither, who to believe. Hmmm Ron Paul or Iran?

Ron Paul says that the cold war methods of mutually assured destruction will work against muslims who say "we crave death" as it did against the Russians. Who to believe? Hmmm. Ron Paul or suicide bombers? That's a hard one because the Russians never used suicide bombers.

Iran doesn't really mean to kill all the Jews. No matter how many times they say it, not even when it is a mandate of the koran. How do we know that they are lying when they say they would? Because RON PAUL says differently. That's how we know. Ron Paul says if we just let them overrun Israel the muslims will be happy and there will be peace in the whole world forever after. I never heard any of that from Iran or any other muslm. What I do remember, quite clearly, is that the last time the world "sacrificed" one country for the good of all, it was Poland handed over to the Nazis and we got "Peace in our time".

Factually those who support Ron Paul's isolationism do so because they hold as a hope or article of faith that he is right and the proponents of islamic domination or worse yet, the ones who are working toward a Mahdeic chaos, are lying. They don't really mean it. The west is just using all these awful threats to manufacture another fun war.

This is why Ron Paul is a lunatic. I know Paul is wishful thinking out of his own delusions. There is NO REASON to disbelieve Iran. None. Name one.

You have to understand, ron paul is mentally ill, and many of his followers are as well. 99% of the lyndon larouche lunatics switched over to paul when larouche opted not to run for president for the 100th time this year.

Listening to ron paul psychotics is as nauseating as listening to the Far left; neither is lucid or sane and neither has any facts or a clue - their whole premise is built purely on emotions and dreams of the deformed prism in which they view the world.

Despite their rhetoric the narco-libertarians are actually second cousins to communists through the anarchist movement of the 19th century. They are the spiritual heirs of Emma Goldman, not Thomas Jefferson.

 

[Katzndogz]

I love that term, narco-libertarians. Do you mind if I steal it?

 

[The Rabbi]

I love that term, narco-libertarians. Do you mind if I steal it?

Just like narco-terrorists who rely on the drug trade to support themselves so too the narco-libertarians snag people who would rather be smoking dope.