Ron Paul is the only one who can beat Obama

Ron Paul is the only one with enough support. Most polls put Ron Paul ahead of Obama.

Unless gas goes to $5 or the economy crashes, I don't think Obama can be beaten this time around.

There's statistically proven incumbent advantage and the republican are spending time and money fighting themselves and Obama is sitting there whistling with a huge $1B war chest.

I think Paul would do better than Santorum and possibly Newt, but worse than Romney, as that newsletter nonsense will be pulled out every step of the way by Obama & Co.

I agree, Obama wins in a landslide.

As americans we're mostly numb to debt, deficits, spending, warmongering and crushing gas prices.

That's why half of americans don't vote, and the ones that do about 20-25% of americans vote republicrats and 20-25% vote democans. How many of those voters are admittedly voting for evil, using the lessor of 2 evils method? I'd say a big chunk of them. So there's really only a tiny minority of americans who view either party as a good one.
 
Romney wins CPAC Straw-Poll? Yeah right, no rig-job there. My God, what have the Neocon Globalist assholes done to the Republican Party? I guess the Neocon Globalists and Socialist/Progessive Globalists really do play on the same team in the end. This Republican mess really does guarantee an easy win for Obama in November. But i guess they all want it that way. This 'Two-Party' System is really just a 'One-Party' System. They just take turns swapping power with each other. They're all on the same team. I'm convinced of that now. It's very sad.
 
Ron Paul is the only one with enough support. Most polls put Ron Paul ahead of Obama.

They all can beat Obama if the dynamics are right. Paul is the only one I would trust, however, to actually start solving our problems.
 
He wrote those things?


Can I have one of 2 things please;

1.) A link of him writing those things.
2.) You admitting that you're lying.


thanks

Ron Paul's Skeleton Closet -- political scandals, quotes and character

After looking at the link my request remains, as the link didn't do what I asked.

Can I have one of 2 things please;

1.) A link of him writing those things.
2.) You admitting that you're lying.

There is plenty of dirt in that link on RP. Choose to ignore it if you want.
 
I love how Ronulans have an answer for everything.

If Ron Paul is not well liked, that's because of the Media bias against him!

Not because of what he has actually wrote...
WilfordBrimley_01.gif

He wrote those things?


Can I have one of 2 things please;

1.) A link of him writing those things.
2.) You admitting that you're lying.


thanks

So, now that YOUR criteria has been met, I'd like some things answered about YOUR allegiance to Ron Paul.

Why do you support a politician who takes money from Neo-Nazis?

Why do support a politician who takes money from anonymous internet sources, most likely foreigners? Remember when Barry wouldn't release all THOSE names?
 
Paul Campaign Points To Anomalies In Romney Maine “Victory”

Slams mainstream media, suggests Romney may have had a hand in canceling key county caucuses

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Paul Campaign Points To Anomalies In Romney Maine “Victory”

Slams mainstream media, suggests Romney may have had a hand in canceling key county caucuses

MSNBC Cuts Off Ron Paul 4 Minutes Into His Maine 2012 Caucus Night Speech - YouTube

So sad. And Romney wins the CPAC Staw-Poll too? Man, what a big rig-job. The Republican Party is such a fraud. There is no difference between a Neocon Globalist and a Socialist/Progressive Globalist. They really do all play on the same team in the end. The fix is in for sure.
 

After looking at the link my request remains, as the link didn't do what I asked.

Can I have one of 2 things please;

1.) A link of him writing those things.
2.) You admitting that you're lying.

There is plenty of dirt in that link on RP. Choose to ignore it if you want.

The only quote from him personally i didn't like in there was about evolution, and him having a stupid view on evolution has nothing to do with morals.

Did the newsletter say some stupid stuff? Yes. But Paul of course wasn't the one who wrote those things, which is what the liar Decepticon was saying. That'd be like me applying all of Reverend Wright's quotes to Obama since he supported the church, which would be stupid of course.

He gave free healthcare to the poor, worked in a charity-based hospital, always returns money to the treasury.

I'll happily take his morals over any of the media-propped up puppets.

Ron Paul to Win Charity Award that went to Ronald Reagan

The Charity Awards Committee announced today that U. S Representative, Ron Paul of Texas, will be presented with its distinguished Lifetime Achievement Award at its annual banquet at the Dulles Hyatt in Washington, D.C. on December 3, 2010. The Charity Awards is a bi-partisan event that has been hosted by the White House in both Democrat and Republican administrations. It first presented its Lifetime Achievement Award to President Ronald Reagan in the East Room in 1982.

Citing his lifetime of work in promoting the rights of private sector charities, entertainer Pat Boone, Co-Chairman of the Awards Committee, described Congressman Ron Paul as America’s foremost champion of the Constitutional rights of nongovernmental organizations.
 
Reading comprehension problems?

Here's another cite.

'Racist newsletter' timeline: What Ron Paul has said - CSMonitor.com


While Ron Paul himself might not be racist, racists are lining up to support Ron Paul.

Is that the kind of company you like to keep?

Thanks for the link, and I see you still won't admit you were lying in your original post in this thread. You certainly haven't provided proof of your accusation.

In the interview, he says he enjoys strong support from blacks, for a Republican, in part because of his stands on the Iraq war and the so-called war on drugs. "In all [military] wars minorities suffer the most … so they join me," he said. Regarding the war on drugs, he says "I am the only candidate, Republican or Democrat who would protect the minority against these vicious drug laws."


"These were sentences that were put in – I think it was a total of about eight or ten sentences, and it was bad stuff," he told host Jan Mickelson. But, he added, "it wasn't a reflection of my views at all, so it got in the letter, I think it was terrible, it was tragic."




It is you who is supporting a party who supports Jim Crow laws and takes no issue with having a higher % of blacks dying for their warmongering, and a higher % of blacks thrown in jail for being non-violent drug users.
 
Ron Paul is the only one with enough support. Most polls put Ron Paul ahead of Obama.

Interesting that you say that, since he can't seem to beat Romney, Santorum or even Gingrich in any state primary!

What He can't beat is Diebold voting Machines

Not even sure what that means!

I personally think Ron Paul would be the best governor for any state he is in. I would vote for him in IL over anyone. I waver back and forth in the Presidency though.

Point is. It doesn't matter how he will do against Obama if he can't beat Santorum, Romney or Gingrich. Something he hasn't done yet!
 
If Ron Paul had enough support to beat obama, he would certainly have enough support to beat Mitt Romney or even Rick Santorum.

He doesn't.

That's not true at all. The polling indicates that Ron Paul would do much better in the general election than the Republican primary.
 
Reading comprehension problems?

Here's another cite.

'Racist newsletter' timeline: What Ron Paul has said - CSMonitor.com


While Ron Paul himself might not be racist, racists are lining up to support Ron Paul.

Is that the kind of company you like to keep?

Let's assume that Mitt Romney wins the Republican nomination. Who are racist people going to vote for in the general election, Mitt Romney or Barack Obama? How about in 2008, do you think the racist vote went for McCain or Obama? Does that make Mitt Romney, or John McCain, or any of his other supporters racist? Should Romney be forced to repudiate every single racist person who votes for him or donates to him?
 
Reading comprehension problems?

Here's another cite.

'Racist newsletter' timeline: What Ron Paul has said - CSMonitor.com


While Ron Paul himself might not be racist, racists are lining up to support Ron Paul.

Is that the kind of company you like to keep?

Let's assume that Mitt Romney wins the Republican nomination. Who are racist people going to vote for in the general election, Mitt Romney or Barack Obama? How about in 2008, do you think the racist vote went for McCain or Obama? Does that make Mitt Romney, or John McCain, or any of his other supporters racist? Should Romney be forced to repudiate every single racist person who votes for him or donates to him?

Look at the screen name of the idiot you're arguing with, he's STILL playing with his Transformers... :cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top