Ron Paul is a racist

He needs to show earnest contrition. I understand why it's frustrating for him to deal with. He's been hearing about these things for fifteen years. But most people haven't. Most people will need solid assurance that he's not a racist and that he deeply regrets that such nonsense got published in his newsletter. He also needs to provide a credible explanation of how it happened. "I didn't write them" is weak if he isn't willing to say who did. It's kind of hard to believe he doesn't know, or that he couldn't find out.

And even for those of us who are comfortable that he's not a racist, he needs to make the case that he won't run his administration the same way he ran his newsletter.
 
Last edited:
No one would have to assume you and CrackerJack have your hands down each other's pants, they just have to open their eyes.

There's an urban dictionary for hands down each others pants, you need to google that shit bro! :rolleyes:

I personally am not into spell checking message board posts no matter how egregious spelling is. The only time I've ever pointed out that or grammatical errors were on people who pointed it out on others. But if I were going to challenge a word in a post, you can be damned sure I'd Google the term before I did that. And if you or your your friend who's pecker is in your hand had done that, then the Urban Dictionary would have been at the top of the list.

Bad grammer ,misspelled words,slang and the use of emocons as literary and debating tools are all signs of greatness at the usmb...
 
This stuff is to be expected. He's despised by Socialists/Progressives & Neocons in both Parties. They will clearly work together to knock him out of the box. And that's what you're seeing right now. These are very well timed & coordinated attacks. The Status Quo Goons will never go down easily. They aren't just gonna willingly give up their power. They will work together to destroy anyone who threatens their status quo. And they control the MSM so it's pretty easy for them to do it. Hopefully the Good Doctor will survive this assault though. He's a good & honorable man. I got his back for sure.
 
He has my vote, but he will not receive the republican nod. The establishment has been crowing it from every rag mag, "news"paper and MSM TV show for months. And Dr. Paul will survive the onslaught just fine. i still think it was in his best interest to hold a conference and explain the newsletters in the public forum instead of letting the goons run all over it fallasciously.

He would have also served himself better to not walk off CNN when that bitch badgered him on the newsletters. He should have remained composed and just kept hitting the repeater button. He only gave these monkeys ammo when he did that.

The question will be, what happens when he doesn't get the nod (and if you look at how the establishment works, he def. wont) but wins Iowa, comes in first or 2nd in NH, so on......
 
Last edited:
Yes, the insanity of the US having boots on the ground in Australia..to defend us from China, all the while the US is borrowing money from China to accomplish this and other things....:cuckoo:

Many people don't know things like this, and are just too stupid to have the ability to vote responsibly IMO. There should be an IQ test about the issues before people should be entrusted with such a responsibility. Same goes with the candidates being able to run.
If not fully educated on the constitution and the issues that will be central to their decision making, they should be disqualified from being able to run and speak for the American people.

As for Paul actually getting some of his plans to pass through congress, well the American people will see quickly that those who make up congress are not representative of the American people even more then they do now, and hopefully vote them out as well.
What's the congress approval ratings nowadays, less then 10%?

Paul proposes to change many things that have been shown to not work or be beneficial to America, but are beneficial to the crooks in Washington and their backers...It's no wonder he is being attacked from all sides from them. Especially from the Federal Reserve, and the money junkies, that more Americans know about a lot more thanks to him.

If Americans really want to change their country for the better, Ron Paul being president is the first step, but it will take years to reverse the damage that has been done. The economy and monetary policy, and the phasing out of the Fed Reserve should be the first things to address on the road to recovery.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji_G0MqAqq8]Ron Paul on Federal Reserve, banking and economy - YouTube[/ame]

How often do you hear the other candidates talk about the economy
, the markets and the problems with jobs and productivity like Dr. Paul that make any real sense? Hardly ever..And when he does and starts to resonate and make sense, the naysayers think Americans are still stupid enough to fall for the BS of the smears against him.
Just a quick look at the other candidates and their backgrounds, and what they have done and said throughout the years, should be enough to know they are nothing but hypocritical puppets and flip floppers, who are being manipulated by big money and special interests, and who do not have the intelligence or have the capabilities to be president of the US or should even be running for the privilege.

If one looks they'll see who is really behind them, and how they will be at a disadvantage if Paul and his agenda of America first are endorsed by the citizens and implemented.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drVy5_3pCIU]Ron Paul & The Federal Reserve: End the Fed - YouTube[/ame]
 
He has my vote, but he will not receive the republican nod. The establishment has been crowing it from every rag mag, "news"paper and MSM TV show for months. And Dr. Paul will survive the onslaught just fine. i still think it was in his best interest to hold a conference and explain the newsletters in the public forum instead of letting the goons run all over it fallasciously.

He would have also served himself better to not walk off CNN when that bitch badgered him on the newsletters. He should have remained composed and just kept hitting the repeater button. He only gave these monkeys ammo when he did that.

The question will be, what happens when he doesn't get the nod (and if you look at how the establishment works, he def. wont) but wins Iowa, comes in first or 2nd in NH, so on......

He didnt walk off, it was the end of a eight and a half minute interview. To top it off he responded to her questions numerous times. Reporters should spend more time talking about relevant, factual events and forward thinking policy instead of running a smear campaign.

He has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of here.
 
I don't know if Ron Paul is a racist or not but I know he's fucking nuts.
Thank you so much for your wonderful, intelligent contribution to the thread.

And ... ignored.:fu:

:thewave:

Bam! Now that's what I'm talking about. You're such a limp dicked little bitch that you go the negative rep route. I got under your skin, Mr. No Balls.

You are a Paulie supporter aren't you? You can't convince someone who agrees with you 90% plus of the time because you're an asshole just like every other single Paul supporter and yes, Paul himself who has to resort to ad hominem attacks on his opponents he pulled out of his ass. The same place he found you...

Now back to lauging my ass off that I threatened your manhood so much that you can't discuss politics on a political forum without showing what a pussy you are. Pull your dress down, little girl, your twat is showing again...

:lmao:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPn0KFlbqX8&ob=av3e]Cyndi Lauper - True Colors - YouTube[/ame]
 
Or so rich people want you to think. I think the idea is laughable, considering many of his positions exist because of the poor and minorities. Here are a few examples, and I welcome any debate on the issue. It makes as much sense as calling the sky red. You cannot spend an hour looking up Ron Paul on the net and consider this attack as tangible.

-Position on the war on drugs. This is a clear effort for the poor and minorities, which is over 70% of the prison population.
-Opposition to capital punishment. Why? Because those being executed are disproportionately minority.
-In 2007 one of his top choices for a vice president was a black man.

Rich people want to make Paul look like a racist because he is a clear and present threat to the flow of money in this country. He is a threat to the military industrial complex, he is a threat to the corrupt banking cartels oligarchy, he is a threat to cheap labor with an actual plan to secure the borders, he is a threat to the corruption which is rooted in dismissal of the constitution and the rule of law, he is a threat to the legal plunder that the economy is a symptom of.

Your Point? using your Same Logic, America Elected Obama Even though we all knew he Hates white people, and anyone with money who does not tow the Liberal line.
 
Yes, the insanity of the US having boots on the ground in Australia..to defend us from China, all the while the US is borrowing money from China to accomplish this and other things....:cuckoo:

Many people don't know things like this, and are just too stupid to have the ability to vote responsibly IMO. There should be an IQ test about the issues before people should be entrusted with such a responsibility. Same goes with the candidates being able to run.
If not fully educated on the constitution and the issues that will be central to their decision making, they should be disqualified from being able to run and speak for the American people.

As for Paul actually getting some of his plans to pass through congress, well the American people will see quickly that those who make up congress are not representative of the American people even more then they do now, and hopefully vote them out as well.
What's the congress approval ratings nowadays, less then 10%?

Paul proposes to change many things that have been shown to not work or be beneficial to America, but are beneficial to the crooks in Washington and their backers...It's no wonder he is being attacked from all sides from them. Especially from the Federal Reserve, and the money junkies, that more Americans know about a lot more thanks to him.

If Americans really want to change their country for the better, Ron Paul being president is the first step, but it will take years to reverse the damage that has been done. The economy and monetary policy, and the phasing out of the Fed Reserve should be the first things to address on the road to recovery.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji_G0MqAqq8]Ron Paul on Federal Reserve, banking and economy - YouTube[/ame]

How often do you hear the other candidates talk about the economy
, the markets and the problems with jobs and productivity like Dr. Paul that make any real sense? Hardly ever..And when he does and starts to resonate and make sense, the naysayers think Americans are still stupid enough to fall for the BS of the smears against him.
Just a quick look at the other candidates and their backgrounds, and what they have done and said throughout the years, should be enough to know they are nothing but hypocritical puppets and flip floppers, who are being manipulated by big money and special interests, and who do not have the intelligence or have the capabilities to be president of the US or should even be running for the privilege.

If one looks they'll see who is really behind them, and how they will be at a disadvantage if Paul and his agenda of America first are endorsed by the citizens and implemented.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drVy5_3pCIU]Ron Paul & The Federal Reserve: End the Fed - YouTube[/ame]

If not President Ron Paul should be the chairman of the Federal reserve. Now that would really shake some shit up. More so than being President. :lol:
 
He has my vote, but he will not receive the republican nod. The establishment has been crowing it from every rag mag, "news"paper and MSM TV show for months. And Dr. Paul will survive the onslaught just fine. i still think it was in his best interest to hold a conference and explain the newsletters in the public forum instead of letting the goons run all over it fallasciously.

He would have also served himself better to not walk off CNN when that bitch badgered him on the newsletters. He should have remained composed and just kept hitting the repeater button. He only gave these monkeys ammo when he did that.

The question will be, what happens when he doesn't get the nod (and if you look at how the establishment works, he def. wont) but wins Iowa, comes in first or 2nd in NH, so on......

Like I mentioned before, just look at who is asking these questions, and why CNN at first edited the interview..The man has explained and it has been 20 years already, can't they come up with something else? Oh that's right they have nothing on this man. He is not a racist
and this shit is just a distraction to deceive the stupid people, who don't know shit about the real issues.

CNN has released the unedited interview. Ron Paul DID NOT STORM out. It was a creative editing HIT JOB!
| Ron Paul 2012 | Peace . Gold . Liberty
 
He has my vote, but he will not receive the republican nod. The establishment has been crowing it from every rag mag, "news"paper and MSM TV show for months. And Dr. Paul will survive the onslaught just fine. i still think it was in his best interest to hold a conference and explain the newsletters in the public forum instead of letting the goons run all over it fallasciously.

He would have also served himself better to not walk off CNN when that bitch badgered him on the newsletters. He should have remained composed and just kept hitting the repeater button. He only gave these monkeys ammo when he did that.

The question will be, what happens when he doesn't get the nod (and if you look at how the establishment works, he def. wont) but wins Iowa, comes in first or 2nd in NH, so on......

He didnt walk off, it was the end of a eight and a half minute interview. To top it off he responded to her questions numerous times. Reporters should spend more time talking about relevant, factual events and forward thinking policy instead of running a smear campaign.

He has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of here.

I agree. Looking deeper into who is asking these already answered questions.

Gloria Borger is Senior Political Analyst at CNN.
Gloria Borger is married to Lance Morgan.
500 - Error: 500...

Morgan is according to the web site of his employer, Powell
Tate, "chief communications strategist at Powell Tate in Washington, D.C.
He specializes in developing and executing communications strategies for public policy debates, crisis communications
and media training."

So who might be the clients of Powell Tate, where Borger's husband is "chief communications strategist and crisis communications" adviser for?

Just about every part of the military industrial-complex that Ron Paul wants to shrink or shutdown. According to the Powell Tate web site, they are strategic communications for among others:

The U.S. Army
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
The U.S Agency for International Development
The U.S.
Chamber of Commerce
and, I'm not joking, The National Pork Board.

Bottom line Gloria Borger's husband is as inside Washington DC as you can get.

This was a total hit job, bringing up decades old accusations about a newsletter that everyone agrees was written by others, while Dr. Paul was practicing medicine.

CNN Caught Red-Handed in Outright Lies Over Ron Paul Interview – Did Not Walk Out – Dec 21 2011 | Ron Paul videos - Ron Paul Flix
 
He has my vote, but he will not receive the republican nod. The establishment has been crowing it from every rag mag, "news"paper and MSM TV show for months. And Dr. Paul will survive the onslaught just fine. i still think it was in his best interest to hold a conference and explain the newsletters in the public forum instead of letting the goons run all over it fallasciously.

He would have also served himself better to not walk off CNN when that bitch badgered him on the newsletters. He should have remained composed and just kept hitting the repeater button. He only gave these monkeys ammo when he did that.

The question will be, what happens when he doesn't get the nod (and if you look at how the establishment works, he def. wont) but wins Iowa, comes in first or 2nd in NH, so on......

He didnt walk off, it was the end of a eight and a half minute interview. To top it off he responded to her questions numerous times. Reporters should spend more time talking about relevant, factual events and forward thinking policy instead of running a smear campaign.

He has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of here.

I agree. Looking deeper into who is asking these already answered questions.

Gloria Borger is Senior Political Analyst at CNN.
Gloria Borger is married to Lance Morgan.
500 - Error: 500...

Morgan is according to the web site of his employer, Powell
Tate, "chief communications strategist at Powell Tate in Washington, D.C.
He specializes in developing and executing communications strategies for public policy debates, crisis communications
and media training."

So who might be the clients of Powell Tate, where Borger's husband is "chief communications strategist and crisis communications" adviser for?

Just about every part of the military industrial-complex that Ron Paul wants to shrink or shutdown. According to the Powell Tate web site, they are strategic communications for among others:

The U.S. Army
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
The U.S Agency for International Development
The U.S.
Chamber of Commerce
and, I'm not joking, The National Pork Board.

Bottom line Gloria Borger's husband is as inside Washington DC as you can get.

This was a total hit job, bringing up decades old accusations about a newsletter that everyone agrees was written by others, while Dr. Paul was practicing medicine.

CNN Caught Red-Handed in Outright Lies Over Ron Paul Interview – Did Not Walk Out – Dec 21 2011 | Ron Paul videos - Ron Paul Flix

What I think is great about this whole situation is that if you watch the full unedited tape its clear to see empathy in the reporter at the end when she continues to press him over and over. Her feeble attempts at making it sound legitimate even though she knows its not. I think at the end she was embarrassed and ashamed that she had to behave in such a disrespectful way.
 
"Rich people want to make Paul look like a racist because he is a clear and present threat to the flow of money in this country. He is a threat to the military industrial complex, he is a threat to the corrupt banking cartels oligarchy, he is a threat to cheap labor with an actual plan to secure the borders, he is a threat to the corruption which is rooted in dismissal of the constitution and the rule of law, he is a threat to the legal plunder that the economy is a symptom of."


Youth's support for Ron Paul is misplaced, according to this author and speaker, for whom I have much respect; Star Parker.

SNIP:

"In the 20-plus years that I have worked as a conservative activist, I’ve spoken on almost 200 university campuses — usually to Republican and conservative groups.

Over time, I have observed changes in attitude among many young Republicans — and I believe these shifts help explain the rise of Ron Paul.

"When I first started lecturing early in the 1990s, leading heroes of Republican youth were Ronald Reagan and William F. Buckley Jr.

"Individual freedom, respect for constitutional limitations on government and traditional values was the message. There was a sense of purpose. America was a “shining city on a hill,” as Reagan so often quoted the Puritan pilgrim John Winthrop.

"Now, increasing numbers of my campus hosts ask that I not talk about “values.” Leave out the stuff about marriage, family and abortion, please, and just talk about the economy.

"The materialism and moral relativism that created our left-wing culture is now infecting our youth on the right. Young Republicans may be pushing back on government, but too often their motivation is like that of their left-wing contemporaries: a sense of entitlement and a desire to claim rights, with little interest in corresponding personal responsibilities."

http://www.dakotavoice.com/2011/12/...utm_campaign=Feed:+DakotaVoice+(Dakota+Voice)
 
"Rich people want to make Paul look like a racist because he is a clear and present threat to the flow of money in this country. He is a threat to the military industrial complex, he is a threat to the corrupt banking cartels oligarchy, he is a threat to cheap labor with an actual plan to secure the borders, he is a threat to the corruption which is rooted in dismissal of the constitution and the rule of law, he is a threat to the legal plunder that the economy is a symptom of."


Youth's support for Ron Paul is misplaced, according to this author and speaker, for whom I have much respect; Star Parker.

SNIP:

"In the 20-plus years that I have worked as a conservative activist, I’ve spoken on almost 200 university campuses — usually to Republican and conservative groups.

Over time, I have observed changes in attitude among many young Republicans — and I believe these shifts help explain the rise of Ron Paul.

"When I first started lecturing early in the 1990s, leading heroes of Republican youth were Ronald Reagan and William F. Buckley Jr.

"Individual freedom, respect for constitutional limitations on government and traditional values was the message. There was a sense of purpose. America was a “shining city on a hill,” as Reagan so often quoted the Puritan pilgrim John Winthrop.

"Now, increasing numbers of my campus hosts ask that I not talk about “values.” Leave out the stuff about marriage, family and abortion, please, and just talk about the economy.


"The materialism and moral relativism that created our left-wing culture is now infecting our youth on the right. Young Republicans may be pushing back on government, but too often their motivation is like that of their left-wing contemporaries: a sense of entitlement and a desire to claim rights, with little interest in corresponding personal responsibilities."

http://www.dakotavoice.com/2011/12/...utm_campaign=Feed:+DakotaVoice+(Dakota+Voice)


My ass. The attention on the economy is because its in the toilet, and its caused by to much government. Its not materialism, or moral relativism. Its about a days work deserves a days pay. Its about the rich using legal plunder to rob us blind and the poor taking advantage of the humanity of working people.

Its about freedom to choose your own destiny. Its about freedom and returning to the rule of law. Its about accountability and justice. Its about never ending perpetual war and the example we set for the world.
 
Walter Williams briefly addressed the Ron Paul racism accusations on air. He doesn't seem to think that Paul is racist, quite the opposite. But then, Williams is an oreo/Uncle Tom/sellout:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRZd56bWSfY]Ron Paul is NOT a Racist. Walter Williams defends Dr. Paul on Rush Limbaugh Show - YouTube[/ame]
 
I think fretting about moral values is something we have the luxury of doing when the economy is going well. The social cons were on their highest horses during the booms of the mid-80's and late 90's.

I personally feel the two are intertwinned. You can't have a strong economy unless you have strong families, or vice versa.
 
I think fretting about moral values is something we have the luxury of doing when the economy is going well. The social cons were on their highest horses during the booms of the mid-80's and late 90's.

I personally feel the two are intertwinned. You can't have a strong economy unless you have strong families, or vice versa.

And government creates strong families? Government guns, the path to God, morality and the American way. Exactly what you mock liberals for. Frankly government guns have a better chance of achieving socialism then they do morality.

:lmao:
 

Forum List

Back
Top