Romney's 47% Are Only 9%! The Others Are Old, And Now Likely Very Liberal!

[mascale]

Earlier in the cycle, the Republicans were famously railing at the concept of a giant Entitlements welfare state. So earlier in the Cycle, others looked at the source of the complaint. Romney was essentially bashing his own, and now less likely, source of voter turnout. Old Sucks! Deeper than that. Old Sucks don't get a lot of the money. Doctors get a lot of the money! The already properous get a lot of the money. Obama-Biden capped that in the Health Care Reform. Rep. Ryan nearly accused of them of Grand Theft Larceny! The Budget Committee Chairman essentially called budgeting, a criminal act!

Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households — Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Most of the "Entitlements Society" money goes to doctors--aka, medical care. The funnel are the Old Sucks, drawing down what was paid in. So excluding all the old, disabled, and destroyed: Then 9% of "Entitlements Society" goes to the unemployed--also drawing down what was paid in!

Rep. Ryan famously did call attention to what became of all the Obama Campaign posters, recycled now as ceiling decorations. In the alternative, the college-educated little surfers and skateboarders might be expected to do something innovative and creative on their own. Romney himself railed at them: To go out and bum from mom and dad, for a start-up loan!

Rep. Ryan seems to know what actually became of that money(?)! That advice may have already been taken to heart, and mind, and soul!

In Matthew 25:14-30, the "victim" concept is clearly shown. The servant with one talent cannot possibly be expected to do as well, as the people with the more money to put to the money changers. The Money-Changers had been around before. They even around now. The money-changers are more the Conservative Brand than are anyone. So the bottom tier become computing "victims."

Over in Matthew 20:1-16, the "good" householder turns the already prosperous into "victims." They get the same money as the relatively less prosperous, at work all day long. Obama-Biden-Pelosi-Reid provided that alternative in "The Make-Work-Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," at about $400.00 regardless if anyone had worked all the year or not!

That is actually a pay methodology, not an entitlement.

The Republicans took that methodology away, as soon as they could, after the midterms. So victims they intended, and now they reap what they have sown!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes come to Lands of Many Nations: Not knowing that "Seven Come Eleven" can also create a class of victims(?)!--like in the campaign of the Two Stupid Guys for President and Vice President, GOP!)

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Earlier in the cycle, the Republicans were famously railing at the concept of a giant Entitlements welfare state. So earlier in the Cycle, others looked at the source of the complaint. Romney was essentially bashing his own, and now less likely, source of voter turnout. Old Sucks! Deeper than that. Old Sucks don't get a lot of the money. Doctors get a lot of the money! The already properous get a lot of the money. Obama-Biden capped that in the Health Care Reform. Rep. Ryan nearly accused of them of Grand Theft Larceny! The Budget Committee Chairman essentially called budgeting, a criminal act!

Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households — Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Most of the "Entitlements Society" money goes to doctors--aka, medical care. The funnel are the Old Sucks, drawing down what was paid in. So excluding all the old, disabled, and destroyed: Then 9% of "Entitlements Society" goes to the unemployed--also drawing down what was paid in!

Rep. Ryan famously did call attention to what became of all the Obama Campaign posters, recycled now as ceiling decorations. In the alternative, the college-educated little surfers and skateboarders might be expected to do something innovative and creative on their own. Romney himself railed at them: To go out and bum from mom and dad, for a start-up loan!

Rep. Ryan seems to know what actually became of that money(?)! That advice may have already been taken to heart, and mind, and soul!

In Matthew 25:14-30, the "victim" concept is clearly shown. The servant with one talent cannot possibly be expected to do as well, as the people with the more money to put to the money changers. The Money-Changers had been around before. They even around now. The money-changers are more the Conservative Brand than are anyone. So the bottom tier become computing "victims."

Over in Matthew 20:1-16, the "good" householder turns the already prosperous into "victims." They get the same money as the relatively less prosperous, at work all day long. Obama-Biden-Pelosi-Reid provided that alternative in "The Make-Work-Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," at about $400.00 regardless if anyone had worked all the year or not!

That is actually a pay methodology, not an entitlement.

The Republicans took that methodology away, as soon as they could, after the midterms. So victims they intended, and now they reap what they have sown!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes come to Lands of Many Nations: Not knowing that "Seven Come Eleven" can also create a class of victims(?)!--like in the campaign of the Two Stupid Guys for President and Vice President, GOP!)

Incoherent, mistaken, idiotic, English. Is English your 4th language? Cant you have Mom edit before you post pure gibberish?

 

[mascale]

A rich young ruler once left the presence of the famous Heb from Nazareth, sorely distressed, since he had great riches.

Jews would eventually get a chance to participate in the execution of the sayer, in fact, saying: "Give Us Barabas!" The Romans had more or less taken away the "stoning" option from the Jewish leadership. Instead, a choice would be offered, consistent with the penalty option, set up following the Stupid Laws of Moses. The Jews could have the thief executed, or the sayer executed!

Consistent with the Stupid Laws of Moses, the sayer was famously executed, via crucifixion methodology. Billions worldwide actually celebrate that, to this time!

The Vatican, somehow, seems to think that there were no Jews at the time! It is not clear, in fact, just how the Vatican regards the Stupid Laws of Moses, even now!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(For real English language problems: Anyone goes to marks on paper, signed off under marks of Warrior Chiefs!)

 

[Wroberson]

Romney also insulted retirees with his 47% don't pay taxes comments.
It's not so much as a tax problem, as it is an income problem.
They didn't earn enough money to pay taxes. Can't blame them for that.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

They didn't earn enough money to pay taxes. Can't blame them for that.

of course not !! if someone drops out of HS and cant earn enough to pay taxes we cant blame them for that!! In fact, we should give them welfare, medicaid, food stamps, Schip, and disability.

 

[RosieS]

They didn't earn enough money to pay taxes. Can't blame them for that.

of course not !! if someone drops out of HS and cant earn enough to pay taxes we cant blame them for that!! In fact, we should give them welfare, medicaid, food stamps, Schip, and disability.

Disability is earned, not given. Drunks & druggies need not apply. Sowwy!

Regards from Rosie

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

They didn't earn enough money to pay taxes. Can't blame them for that.

of course not !! if someone drops out of HS and cant earn enough to pay taxes we cant blame them for that!! In fact, we should give them welfare, medicaid, food stamps, Schip, and disability.

Disability is earned, not given. Drunks & druggies need not apply. Sowwy!

Regards from Rosie

according to Mort Zuckerman in the WSJ Barry has doubled those on disability from 5 million to 11 million indicating it is not earned but rather just more liberal welfare entitlements.

 

[mascale]

Famously, and especially from the "education" of the Ivy League: The Planet is now in the throes created by the death grip of. . ."The Reagan Trajectory!" Ron started sending money mainly to the rich. Minority youth set about shooting one another. Bush-Cheney sent them into two hapless nations, to do the same thing and create a hot-bed of Moslem hatred of anything USA.

In the Link:
____________________
Distribution of Tax Expenditure Benefits Differs Greatly, and Is Much Less Favorable to the Middle Class and Low-Incomes Families

The distribution of entitlement benefits stands in sharp contrast to the distribution of benefits for tax expenditures, which former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has called “tax entitlements.” The Tax Policy Center finds that under current tax policy:a
■The top fifth of the population receives 66 percent of tax-expenditure benefits (compared to 10 percent of entitlement benefits).
■The middle 60 percent of the population receives a little over 31 percent of tax-expenditure benefits (compared to 58 percent of entitlement benefits).
■The bottom fifth receives just 2.8 percent of tax-expenditure benefits (compared to 32 percent of entitlement benefits).b
■The top 1 percent of the population receives 23.9 percent of tax-expenditure benefits — more than eight times as much as the bottom fifth of the population, and nearly as much as the middle 60 percent of the population.
____________________

The famous mission of the "Curiosity" vehicle, looking for life on Mars: Can be lampooned suggesting that "Curiosity II" will more likely be directed to only ten miles away from JPL, which is in the rich neighborhood of La Canada/Flintridge. The idea will be to see if any carbon life-forms exist, even, in South El Monte. Even high in the foothills, you cannot see South El Monte from La Canada/Flintridge.

The already prosperous get most of the federal money, directed at anything. Bain Capital does itself provide zero grants to South El Monte, in California. The Bain Capital business plan is of the Reagan Trajectory. The already prosperous, get all the money.

Anyone sane has to believe in "redistribution" of the tax money--as a counter to its current "trajectory," of being spent on the already prosperous in major and mega abundance!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations even understand the concept, "victims," even now!)

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Famously, and especially from the "education" of the Ivy League:

too stupid!! Reagan did not go to the Ivy League nor did he take his philosopy from the Ivy League!!

Ron started sending money mainly to the rich.

under Reagan the top 1% paid 20 % of all federal taxes, under Bush 43 they paid 40%. I guess as a liberal you get most things backwards?

 

[mascale]

The incredibly incompetent even fail at history. Some of Reagan's Ivy League Economic Clowns are active comentators and participants to this date. Likely the Mrs. still directs them to the astrologers that actually ran that Administration. Against that, there was also a federal Congress to work with, filled with the Ivy League. Reagan himself had likely developed his philosophy, as an alcoholic, years before that. This was a gun-toting, former SAG President, and formerly a New Deal Democrat. Between California, The Federal Congress, and as a buffer to the Nancy Brand: The Ivy League was everywhere engaged in the making of the "Reagan Trajectory!" The New Deal was no stranger to the Ivy League! Reagan had seen deficits under Roosevelt. His contention was that the Democratic Party left him!

The 1986 Tax Reform raised and Indexed the standard deduction and personal exemptions in the tax code. The math of a national COLA was in place, but wrongly applied. With more tax cuts under Clinton, then by the time Bush II, Terms I & II was in office: Tax Cuts were no longer a viable economic stimulus. Year after year, the rich started paying a greater percentage of the total of taxes. Year after year, everyone else paid less and then paid nothing.

Reagan-Cheney tried tax cuts twice, and finally had to resort to basis-free invasions of hapless nations instead. The stimulus tax cuts could not work. Spenders had no income tax liability. The tax cuts didn't work. The War Spending still went to the already prosperous. Everyone else had trouble with the mortgage payments. TARP became the necessary outcome.

What did TARP have in Common With Reagan and Bush I, Term I? Deficit Spending Exploded way past the usual province of Nancy's astrologers! Out toward the beginning of Time went the numbers, without the Canary doing a "Once Upon A Time," kind of event.

What the rich pay in they still get way more back! It's Reagan Trajectory, bogus bucks!
Greece discovered this on their own, fact..

Reagan is Bogus! Nancy is Bogus. The Ivy League is Bogus. The absence of historical perspective is rendering the commentaries bogus!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
(Who was Mascale, Anyway! "He's the Lo-o-o-ne White Man! Tune In , And see if he's dead yet!" Millions actually recall the Golden Years of Television, even almost as though they were only yesterday(?)! The head-sot-in-charge was famous for so-remarking, along with some microphone-purchasing fetish, that seemed to along with it!)

 

[beagle9]

of course not !! if someone drops out of HS and cant earn enough to pay taxes we cant blame them for that!! In fact, we should give them welfare, medicaid, food stamps, Schip, and disability.

Disability is earned, not given. Drunks & druggies need not apply. Sowwy!

Regards from Rosie

according to Mort Zuckerman in the WSJ Barry has doubled those on disability from 5 million to 11 million indicating it is not earned but rather just more liberal welfare entitlements.

The reasons for the spike in disability, has been determined already as workers over 50 who were hit hard by the resession, and had basically given up trying to get a job in fields where they were not wanted anylonger, created a handi cap as is found in their older mentality, where they are not excepted to then adapt and/or be allowed to adapt in acceptance there of, and this by companies who are un-willing to give them a break in such an economy before another who is a tad bit younger, so they had to resort to "disability" as a mental handi cap caused by the resession upon them after their unemployment ran out, and jobs became more and more scarce in their areas in which they have become stuck in.

If this was not worked out for them somehow, what would they have done or could they have done in order to survive ? A better economy would have bred opportunity again for all, but the stalemate or slow process can be a killer literally for these people. The nations economy has got to be restored, but I don't think that we have the right kind of people in charge or possibly soon to be in charge maybe, in order to fix it. I will go with Romney on the economy over Obama though, because Obama is to agenda oriented, and thus I feel because of his catering to radicals and extremist in his base, we have not gotten the bang for our buck out of this guy, and so we are in trouble still in this nation because of.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Disability is earned, not given. Drunks & druggies need not apply. Sowwy!

Regards from Rosie

according to Mort Zuckerman in the WSJ Barry has doubled those on disability from 5 million to 11 million indicating it is not earned but rather just more liberal welfare entitlements.

The reasons for the spike in disability, has been determined already as workers over 50 who were hit hard by the resession,

you disappointed Rosie with that one. Good for you!

I will go with Romney on the economy over Obama though, because Obama is to agenda oriented,

in short, because he is more capitalist oriented while Barry had two communist parents and governs accordingly.

 

[Rshermr]

Earlier in the cycle, the Republicans were famously railing at the concept of a giant Entitlements welfare state. So earlier in the Cycle, others looked at the source of the complaint. Romney was essentially bashing his own, and now less likely, source of voter turnout. Old Sucks! Deeper than that. Old Sucks don't get a lot of the money. Doctors get a lot of the money! The already properous get a lot of the money. Obama-Biden capped that in the Health Care Reform. Rep. Ryan nearly accused of them of Grand Theft Larceny! The Budget Committee Chairman essentially called budgeting, a criminal act!

Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households — Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Most of the "Entitlements Society" money goes to doctors--aka, medical care. The funnel are the Old Sucks, drawing down what was paid in. So excluding all the old, disabled, and destroyed: Then 9% of "Entitlements Society" goes to the unemployed--also drawing down what was paid in!

Rep. Ryan famously did call attention to what became of all the Obama Campaign posters, recycled now as ceiling decorations. In the alternative, the college-educated little surfers and skateboarders might be expected to do something innovative and creative on their own. Romney himself railed at them: To go out and bum from mom and dad, for a start-up loan!

Rep. Ryan seems to know what actually became of that money(?)! That advice may have already been taken to heart, and mind, and soul!

In Matthew 25:14-30, the "victim" concept is clearly shown. The servant with one talent cannot possibly be expected to do as well, as the people with the more money to put to the money changers. The Money-Changers had been around before. They even around now. The money-changers are more the Conservative Brand than are anyone. So the bottom tier become computing "victims."

Over in Matthew 20:1-16, the "good" householder turns the already prosperous into "victims." They get the same money as the relatively less prosperous, at work all day long. Obama-Biden-Pelosi-Reid provided that alternative in "The Make-Work-Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," at about $400.00 regardless if anyone had worked all the year or not!

That is actually a pay methodology, not an entitlement.

The Republicans took that methodology away, as soon as they could, after the midterms. So victims they intended, and now they reap what they have sown!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes come to Lands of Many Nations: Not knowing that "Seven Come Eleven" can also create a class of victims(?)!--like in the campaign of the Two Stupid Guys for President and Vice President, GOP!)

Incoherent, mistaken, idiotic, English. Is English your 4th language? Cant you have Mom edit before you post pure gibberish?

which is eds method of saying "this is way to complex. Let me suggest some con dogma to post. Much easier" And that is eds job.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Earlier in the cycle, the Republicans were famously railing at the concept of a giant Entitlements welfare state. So earlier in the Cycle, others looked at the source of the complaint. Romney was essentially bashing his own, and now less likely, source of voter turnout. Old Sucks! Deeper than that. Old Sucks don't get a lot of the money. Doctors get a lot of the money! The already properous get a lot of the money. Obama-Biden capped that in the Health Care Reform. Rep. Ryan nearly accused of them of Grand Theft Larceny! The Budget Committee Chairman essentially called budgeting, a criminal act!

Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households — Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Most of the "Entitlements Society" money goes to doctors--aka, medical care. The funnel are the Old Sucks, drawing down what was paid in. So excluding all the old, disabled, and destroyed: Then 9% of "Entitlements Society" goes to the unemployed--also drawing down what was paid in!

Rep. Ryan famously did call attention to what became of all the Obama Campaign posters, recycled now as ceiling decorations. In the alternative, the college-educated little surfers and skateboarders might be expected to do something innovative and creative on their own. Romney himself railed at them: To go out and bum from mom and dad, for a start-up loan!

Rep. Ryan seems to know what actually became of that money(?)! That advice may have already been taken to heart, and mind, and soul!

In Matthew 25:14-30, the "victim" concept is clearly shown. The servant with one talent cannot possibly be expected to do as well, as the people with the more money to put to the money changers. The Money-Changers had been around before. They even around now. The money-changers are more the Conservative Brand than are anyone. So the bottom tier become computing "victims."

Over in Matthew 20:1-16, the "good" householder turns the already prosperous into "victims." They get the same money as the relatively less prosperous, at work all day long. Obama-Biden-Pelosi-Reid provided that alternative in "The Make-Work-Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," at about $400.00 regardless if anyone had worked all the year or not!

That is actually a pay methodology, not an entitlement.

The Republicans took that methodology away, as soon as they could, after the midterms. So victims they intended, and now they reap what they have sown!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes come to Lands of Many Nations: Not knowing that "Seven Come Eleven" can also create a class of victims(?)!--like in the campaign of the Two Stupid Guys for President and Vice President, GOP!)

Incoherent, mistaken, idiotic, English. Is English your 4th language? Cant you have Mom edit before you post pure gibberish?

which is eds method of saying "this is way to complex. Let me suggest some con dogma to post. Much easier" And that is eds job.

of course if it makes sense you would not be so afraid to say exactly where it makes good sense to you. What does your fear tell you about the liberal character and IQ?

 

[edthecynic]

of course not !! if someone drops out of HS and cant earn enough to pay taxes we cant blame them for that!! In fact, we should give them welfare, medicaid, food stamps, Schip, and disability.

Disability is earned, not given. Drunks & druggies need not apply. Sowwy!

Regards from Rosie

according to Mort Zuckerman in the WSJ Barry has doubled those on disability from 5 million to 11 million indicating it is not earned but rather just more liberal welfare entitlements.

I already nailed you on that lie in 2 other threads, challenging you to back up that lie with your favorite amount of $10,000. You, knowing you were lying and only 1.5 million disabled were added under President Obama, refused to back up your lie in either thread. So like the dishonest POS you are, you slink over to this thread and lie some more!

What does your fear say about your dishonesty and lack of character?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Disability is earned, not given. Drunks & druggies need not apply. Sowwy!

Regards from Rosie

according to Mort Zuckerman in the WSJ Barry has doubled those on disability from 5 million to 11 million indicating it is not earned but rather just more liberal welfare entitlements.

I already nailed you on that lie in 2 other threads, challenging you to back up that lie with your favorite amount of $10,000. You, knowing you were lying and only 1.5 million disabled were added under President Obama, refused to back up your lie in either thread. So like the dishonest POS you are, you slink over to this thread and lie some more!

What does your fear say about your dishonesty and lack of character?

if you have evidence that I lied I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.

 

[edthecynic]

All you are proving is America-hating Lying CON$ervoFascist scum lie in packs.

And still you will not back your lie with $10,000.

"At this time in the election cycle four years ago, 7.2 million workers were on social security disability. Today, the number is 8.7 million – an increase of 1.5 million, or twenty percent. The 1.5 million disability recipients under Obama are “no longer in the labor force.” They are, it appears, safely shelved outside the labor force, which they no longer reenter to potentially swell the ranks of the unemployed."
Paul Gregory, Forbes 6/4/12

1.5 million is a long way off from 5.4 million, but thank you for proving yourself a premeditated liar. As I said, you wouldn't back your lie with $10,000 because you knew it was a lie all along.

BTW, Bush added almost 3 million disabled during his 8 years so Obama's 1.5 in 4 is about the same.

according to Mort Zuckerman in the WSJ Barry has doubled those on disability from 5 million to 11 million indicating it is not earned but rather just more liberal welfare entitlements.

I already nailed you on that lie in 2 other threads, challenging you to back up that lie with your favorite amount of $10,000. You, knowing you were lying and only 1.5 million disabled were added under President Obama, refused to back up your lie in either thread. So like the dishonest POS you are, you slink over to this thread and lie some more!

What does your fear say about your dishonesty and lack of character?

if you have evidence that I lied I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.

Above is YOUR own quote from Forbes in the other thread that admits that the disabled increased by only 1.5 million under Obama, so you knew you were lying when you made your post in this thread.
Pay up you lying POS or crawl back into your spider hole.

 

[beagle9]

The Obama way is not the right way, because he figures to make bold statements about his blanket beliefs rooted in redistribution ideals for all he thinks qualify, but the problem with government picking winners and losers, is that it has a nasty habbit of bringing up or holding up the wrong ones with the good ones when it does this, especially when it does this sort of thing as it does. It should always be earned or based on incentives to earn, instead of this just take and take stuff for free, and off of the backs of others forever & ever, thus the side affect of it all, is that it is empowering bad characters in these kinds of ways, along with the good ones as well all the same, but we should never be empowering bad characters in our society, so I wish someone would finally go and tell the government that.

WE MUST SEPERATE GOOD CHARACTERS FROM BAD CHARACTERS, BEFORE GIVING ANYTHING AWAY ANYMORE, AND THE ONLY WAY TO DO THIS IS TO CHANGE THIS PRESIDENT OUT FOR A NEW ONE. WE MUST DO THIS BECAUSE HE CAN'T HELP BUT USE BLANKETING TERMS OR BROAD BRUSHES TO PAINT PEOPLE AS ALL GOOD, AND ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE NEEDY IN HIS EYES, WHEN HE DOESN'T REALLY KNOW WHY THEY ARE NEEDY, GOOD, BAD OR HURTING IN THEIR LIVES ACCURATELY.

INSTEAD OF SEPERATING AS IT SHOULD ALWAYS BE IN AMERICA "THE BAD FROM THE GOOD" UNTIL EARNED AS IT SHOULD BE, AND THIS NO MATTER WHAT COLOR ONE IS OR NATIONALITY ONE IS IN LIFE, THE GOVERNMENT GOES AND DOES THE OPPOSITE. THE BARACK OBAMA GOVERNMENT WOULD RATHER GIVE ALL A FREE SHOT, AND THIS NO MATTER WHAT CHARACTER A MAN IS HIDING BEHIND OR HAS IN HIM OR HER WHEN THE GOVERNMENT IS THEN GIVING TO THEM SO FREELY, IN WHICH HAS PROVEN OVER AND OVER AGAIN TO BE WRONG HEADED WHEN DO THIS, BUT WILL IT EVER LEARN?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The Obama way is not the right way, because he figures to make bold statements about his blanket beliefs rooted in redistribution ideals, but the problem with government picking winners and losers, is that it has a nasty habbit of bringing or holding up the wrong ones with the good ones, and this when it does this sort of thing, especially when it is not earned or based on incentives to earn, instead of this just take and take stuff, thus the side affect of it all, is that it is empowering bad characters in these kinds of ways, along with the good ones as well all the same, but we should never be empowering bad characters in our society, so I wish someone would finally go and tell the government that.

WE MUST SEPERATE GOOD CHARACTERS FROM BAD CHARACTERS, BEFORE GIVING ANYTHING AWAY ANYMORE, AND THE ONLY WAY TO DO THIS IS TO CHANGE THIS PRESIDENT OUT FOR A NEW ONE. WE MUST DO THIS BECAUSE HE CAN'T HELP BUT USE BLANKETING TERMS OR BROAD BRUSHES TO PAINT PEOPLE AS ALL GOOD, AND ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE NEEDY, AND IS THIS BASED UPON TO BROAD OF AN OPINION AND THEN WITH AN EVEN BROADER BRUSH WHEN USED UPON IT ALL IN THESE WAYS.

INSTEAD OF SEPERATING AS IT SHOULD ALWAYS BE IN AMERICA "THE BAD FROM THE GOOD", AND THIS NO MATTER WHAT COLOR ONE IS OR NATIONALITY ONE IS, BECAUSE ALL THAT SORT OF THING DOESN'T MATTER WHEN WE ARE HELPING JUST A GOOD PERSON OUT IN THEIR LIFE. THE BARACK OBAMA GOVERNMENT WOULD RATHER GIVE ALL A FREE SHOT, AND THIS NO MATTER WHAT CHARACTER A MAN IS HIDING BEHIND OR HAS IN HIM OR HER WHEN THE GOVERNMENT IS THEN GIVING TO THEM SO FREELY, AND THIS AS IS FOUND IN THE EYES OF OBAMA.

good points! To a liberal, if a man has bad character it is not his fault it is the society that nurtured him that is at fault and so that society must support and rehabilitate him.

 

[beagle9]

The Obama way is not the right way, because he figures to make bold statements about his blanket beliefs rooted in redistribution ideals, but the problem with government picking winners and losers, is that it has a nasty habbit of bringing or holding up the wrong ones with the good ones, and this when it does this sort of thing, especially when it is not earned or based on incentives to earn, instead of this just take and take stuff, thus the side affect of it all, is that it is empowering bad characters in these kinds of ways, along with the good ones as well all the same, but we should never be empowering bad characters in our society, so I wish someone would finally go and tell the government that.

WE MUST SEPERATE GOOD CHARACTERS FROM BAD CHARACTERS, BEFORE GIVING ANYTHING AWAY ANYMORE, AND THE ONLY WAY TO DO THIS IS TO CHANGE THIS PRESIDENT OUT FOR A NEW ONE. WE MUST DO THIS BECAUSE HE CAN'T HELP BUT USE BLANKETING TERMS OR BROAD BRUSHES TO PAINT PEOPLE AS ALL GOOD, AND ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE NEEDY, AND IS THIS BASED UPON TO BROAD OF AN OPINION AND THEN WITH AN EVEN BROADER BRUSH WHEN USED UPON IT ALL IN THESE WAYS.

INSTEAD OF SEPERATING AS IT SHOULD ALWAYS BE IN AMERICA "THE BAD FROM THE GOOD", AND THIS NO MATTER WHAT COLOR ONE IS OR NATIONALITY ONE IS, BECAUSE ALL THAT SORT OF THING DOESN'T MATTER WHEN WE ARE HELPING JUST A GOOD PERSON OUT IN THEIR LIFE. THE BARACK OBAMA GOVERNMENT WOULD RATHER GIVE ALL A FREE SHOT, AND THIS NO MATTER WHAT CHARACTER A MAN IS HIDING BEHIND OR HAS IN HIM OR HER WHEN THE GOVERNMENT IS THEN GIVING TO THEM SO FREELY, AND THIS AS IS FOUND IN THE EYES OF OBAMA.

good points! To a liberal, if a man has bad character it is not his fault it is the society that nurtured him that is at fault and so that society must support and rehabilitate him.

Yes, and so they (the government) will then give and expect all to give, and then give & give to him some more, and even more, until it finally dawns on the government or it finally realizes that it was duped by the person found in the situation that it was helping or trying to help, but it mattered not to the government that it was duped in this way, because it wasn't the governments money in which was being used in the failed rehibilitation game that it had embarked on in the wrong way when dealing with the situation found in such a bad character.

We must restore the lifting up of good character in this nation once again only, and quit with these excuses that people are bad because of their surroundings or lives that they were supposedly forced to live by another. Being poor does not warrant being bad (never has), but it instead should warrant being good and humble in the sight of the Lord, who should be looked to by those in need only in their lives or to look also to Godly men in their lives, and this in order to hope that the good lord will send a messenger or a helping hand found in these Godly men, to lift one up in faith there of, and to help him if he is good while found within his poverty.

The government is not God, and it plays God very badly, where as if the government we know today or have known for a while now, if it were up in Heaven, it would have been kicked out long ago, and this because of it's idiocy and arrogance found in doing the wrong things when it acts, so that is one to think about isn't it, and this as based upon your words written. So I agree !