Romney's 47% Are Only 9%! The Others Are Old, And Now Likely Very Liberal!

Discussion in 'Economy' started by mascale, Sep 18, 2012.

  1. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    Earlier in the cycle, the Republicans were famously railing at the concept of a giant Entitlements welfare state. So earlier in the Cycle, others looked at the source of the complaint. Romney was essentially bashing his own, and now less likely, source of voter turnout. Old Sucks! Deeper than that. Old Sucks don't get a lot of the money. Doctors get a lot of the money! The already properous get a lot of the money. Obama-Biden capped that in the Health Care Reform. Rep. Ryan nearly accused of them of Grand Theft Larceny! The Budget Committee Chairman essentially called budgeting, a criminal act!

    Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households — Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

    Most of the "Entitlements Society" money goes to doctors--aka, medical care. The funnel are the Old Sucks, drawing down what was paid in. So excluding all the old, disabled, and destroyed: Then 9% of "Entitlements Society" goes to the unemployed--also drawing down what was paid in!

    Rep. Ryan famously did call attention to what became of all the Obama Campaign posters, recycled now as ceiling decorations. In the alternative, the college-educated little surfers and skateboarders might be expected to do something innovative and creative on their own. Romney himself railed at them: To go out and bum from mom and dad, for a start-up loan!

    Rep. Ryan seems to know what actually became of that money(?)! That advice may have already been taken to heart, and mind, and soul!

    In Matthew 25:14-30, the "victim" concept is clearly shown. The servant with one talent cannot possibly be expected to do as well, as the people with the more money to put to the money changers. The Money-Changers had been around before. They even around now. The money-changers are more the Conservative Brand than are anyone. So the bottom tier become computing "victims."

    Over in Matthew 20:1-16, the "good" householder turns the already prosperous into "victims." They get the same money as the relatively less prosperous, at work all day long. Obama-Biden-Pelosi-Reid provided that alternative in "The Make-Work-Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," at about $400.00 regardless if anyone had worked all the year or not!

    That is actually a pay methodology, not an entitlement.

    The Republicans took that methodology away, as soon as they could, after the midterms. So victims they intended, and now they reap what they have sown!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Many White Eyes come to Lands of Many Nations: Not knowing that "Seven Come Eleven" can also create a class of victims(?)!--like in the campaign of the Two Stupid Guys for President and Vice President, GOP!)
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2012
  2. EdwardBaiamonte
    Offline

    EdwardBaiamonte Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,636
    Thanks Received:
    1,133
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,067
    Incoherent, mistaken, idiotic, English. Is English your 4th language? Cant you have Mom edit before you post pure gibberish?
     
  3. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    A rich young ruler once left the presence of the famous Heb from Nazareth, sorely distressed, since he had great riches.

    Jews would eventually get a chance to participate in the execution of the sayer, in fact, saying: "Give Us Barabas!" The Romans had more or less taken away the "stoning" option from the Jewish leadership. Instead, a choice would be offered, consistent with the penalty option, set up following the Stupid Laws of Moses. The Jews could have the thief executed, or the sayer executed!

    Consistent with the Stupid Laws of Moses, the sayer was famously executed, via crucifixion methodology. Billions worldwide actually celebrate that, to this time!

    The Vatican, somehow, seems to think that there were no Jews at the time! It is not clear, in fact, just how the Vatican regards the Stupid Laws of Moses, even now!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (For real English language problems: Anyone goes to marks on paper, signed off under marks of Warrior Chiefs!)
     
  4. Wroberson
    Offline

    Wroberson VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    228
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Oak Park, IL.
    Ratings:
    +32
    Romney also insulted retirees with his 47% don't pay taxes comments.
    It's not so much as a tax problem, as it is an income problem.
    They didn't earn enough money to pay taxes. Can't blame them for that.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. EdwardBaiamonte
    Offline

    EdwardBaiamonte Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,636
    Thanks Received:
    1,133
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,067
    of course not !! if someone drops out of HS and cant earn enough to pay taxes we cant blame them for that!! In fact, we should give them welfare, medicaid, food stamps, Schip, and disability.
     
  6. RosieS
    Offline

    RosieS Partisan Courtesan Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,203
    Thanks Received:
    544
    Trophy Points:
    165
    Location:
    Southwest FL
    Ratings:
    +747
    Disability is earned, not given. Drunks & druggies need not apply. Sowwy!

    Regards from Rosie
     
  7. EdwardBaiamonte
    Offline

    EdwardBaiamonte Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,636
    Thanks Received:
    1,133
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,067

    according to Mort Zuckerman in the WSJ Barry has doubled those on disability from 5 million to 11 million indicating it is not earned but rather just more liberal welfare entitlements.
     
  8. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    Famously, and especially from the "education" of the Ivy League: The Planet is now in the throes created by the death grip of. . ."The Reagan Trajectory!" Ron started sending money mainly to the rich. Minority youth set about shooting one another. Bush-Cheney sent them into two hapless nations, to do the same thing and create a hot-bed of Moslem hatred of anything USA.

    In the Link:
    ____________________
    Distribution of Tax Expenditure Benefits Differs Greatly, and Is Much Less Favorable to the Middle Class and Low-Incomes Families

    The distribution of entitlement benefits stands in sharp contrast to the distribution of benefits for tax expenditures, which former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has called “tax entitlements.” The Tax Policy Center finds that under current tax policy:a
    ■The top fifth of the population receives 66 percent of tax-expenditure benefits (compared to 10 percent of entitlement benefits).
    ■The middle 60 percent of the population receives a little over 31 percent of tax-expenditure benefits (compared to 58 percent of entitlement benefits).
    ■The bottom fifth receives just 2.8 percent of tax-expenditure benefits (compared to 32 percent of entitlement benefits).b
    ■The top 1 percent of the population receives 23.9 percent of tax-expenditure benefits — more than eight times as much as the bottom fifth of the population, and nearly as much as the middle 60 percent of the population.
    ____________________

    The famous mission of the "Curiosity" vehicle, looking for life on Mars: Can be lampooned suggesting that "Curiosity II" will more likely be directed to only ten miles away from JPL, which is in the rich neighborhood of La Canada/Flintridge. The idea will be to see if any carbon life-forms exist, even, in South El Monte. Even high in the foothills, you cannot see South El Monte from La Canada/Flintridge.

    The already prosperous get most of the federal money, directed at anything. Bain Capital does itself provide zero grants to South El Monte, in California. The Bain Capital business plan is of the Reagan Trajectory. The already prosperous, get all the money.

    Anyone sane has to believe in "redistribution" of the tax money--as a counter to its current "trajectory," of being spent on the already prosperous in major and mega abundance!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Lands of Many Nations even understand the concept, "victims," even now!)
     
  9. EdwardBaiamonte
    Offline

    EdwardBaiamonte Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,636
    Thanks Received:
    1,133
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,067
    too stupid!! Reagan did not go to the Ivy League nor did he take his philosopy from the Ivy League!!

    under Reagan the top 1% paid 20 % of all federal taxes, under Bush 43 they paid 40%. I guess as a liberal you get most things backwards?
     
  10. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    The incredibly incompetent even fail at history. Some of Reagan's Ivy League Economic Clowns are active comentators and participants to this date. Likely the Mrs. still directs them to the astrologers that actually ran that Administration. Against that, there was also a federal Congress to work with, filled with the Ivy League. Reagan himself had likely developed his philosophy, as an alcoholic, years before that. This was a gun-toting, former SAG President, and formerly a New Deal Democrat. Between California, The Federal Congress, and as a buffer to the Nancy Brand: The Ivy League was everywhere engaged in the making of the "Reagan Trajectory!" The New Deal was no stranger to the Ivy League! Reagan had seen deficits under Roosevelt. His contention was that the Democratic Party left him!

    The 1986 Tax Reform raised and Indexed the standard deduction and personal exemptions in the tax code. The math of a national COLA was in place, but wrongly applied. With more tax cuts under Clinton, then by the time Bush II, Terms I & II was in office: Tax Cuts were no longer a viable economic stimulus. Year after year, the rich started paying a greater percentage of the total of taxes. Year after year, everyone else paid less and then paid nothing.

    Reagan-Cheney tried tax cuts twice, and finally had to resort to basis-free invasions of hapless nations instead. The stimulus tax cuts could not work. Spenders had no income tax liability. The tax cuts didn't work. The War Spending still went to the already prosperous. Everyone else had trouble with the mortgage payments. TARP became the necessary outcome.

    What did TARP have in Common With Reagan and Bush I, Term I? Deficit Spending Exploded way past the usual province of Nancy's astrologers! Out toward the beginning of Time went the numbers, without the Canary doing a "Once Upon A Time," kind of event.

    What the rich pay in they still get way more back! It's Reagan Trajectory, bogus bucks!
    Greece discovered this on their own, fact..

    Reagan is Bogus! Nancy is Bogus. The Ivy League is Bogus. The absence of historical perspective is rendering the commentaries bogus!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
    (Who was Mascale, Anyway! "He's the Lo-o-o-ne White Man! Tune In , And see if he's dead yet!" Millions actually recall the Golden Years of Television, even almost as though they were only yesterday(?)! The head-sot-in-charge was famous for so-remarking, along with some microphone-purchasing fetish, that seemed to along with it!)
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2012

Share This Page