Romney won one debate by lying. But what does the Right have to be proud of?

He wants to disband PBS because he likes firing people. But 50 million people watch Big Bird. Will Americans support this?

Right after the debate, Eric Fehrnstrom, one of Romney's top advisers admitted that Mitt got it wrong. People are covered for pre existing condition ONLY if their coverage is continuous. If you lost your job and you coverage ended for a minute, you are out of luck.

Mitt said he wouldn't lower taxes for the rich, but he will say in the very same sentence, he wants to cut Corporate Tax, end the Estate Tax, and lower Capital Gains Tax which would lower his own taxes from 13% to 2%.

He said he wouldn't cut teachers after saying he would cut Police, Firemen and TEACHERS.

Right off the Romney video, here is he referring to the president:
“he wants to hire more government workers. He says we need more fireman, more policeman, more TEACHERS. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. It’s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.”

Because fewer police, firemen and teachers will "help" the American people?

And those pathetic stories about "Mrs. SoSad and her dozen sick babies" and how Romney "cared". Really? After the 47% video? He "cares"???? Republicans don't care. They come right out and say "let him die".

So OK, Romney "beat" Obama on one debate. After months of one of the worst campaigns in history. No doubt, as a businessman, he will say anything to "close the deal".

But what did Republicans take away? What is it they think he would do as "president"? How will his policies help the country? What will Mitt Romney do for the Middle Class? Do you guys on the right think Mitt Romney lied about "Anything"?

So what are you saying here, if Obama had lied more he would have won?

BTW here is Huffpo factchecking a few of Obama's claims and they said he lied his ass off:


Fact Check: Obama And Romney's Most Inaccurate Debate Claims
 
He wants to disband PBS because he likes firing people. But 50 million people watch Big Bird. Will Americans support this?

Right after the debate, Eric Fehrnstrom, one of Romney's top advisers admitted that Mitt got it wrong. People are covered for pre existing condition ONLY if their coverage is continuous. If you lost your job and you coverage ended for a minute, you are out of luck.

Mitt said he wouldn't lower taxes for the rich, but he will say in the very same sentence, he wants to cut Corporate Tax, end the Estate Tax, and lower Capital Gains Tax which would lower his own taxes from 13% to 2%.

He said he wouldn't cut teachers after saying he would cut Police, Firemen and TEACHERS.

Right off the Romney video, here is he referring to the president:
“he wants to hire more government workers. He says we need more fireman, more policeman, more TEACHERS. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. It’s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.”

Because fewer police, firemen and teachers will "help" the American people?

And those pathetic stories about "Mrs. SoSad and her dozen sick babies" and how Romney "cared". Really? After the 47% video? He "cares"???? Republicans don't care. They come right out and say "let him die".

So OK, Romney "beat" Obama on one debate. After months of one of the worst campaigns in history. No doubt, as a businessman, he will say anything to "close the deal".

But what did Republicans take away? What is it they think he would do as "president"? How will his policies help the country? What will Mitt Romney do for the Middle Class? Do you guys on the right think Mitt Romney lied about "Anything"?

Lose a debate and accuse the other side of lying. Where did you learn that tactic, in middle school?
 
Given your track record of trolling around here, I'm reticent to take the time to respond. One more time and let's see if we can keep this on point.

He wants to disband PBS because he likes firing people. But 50 million people watch Big Bird. Will Americans support this?

Yes. Sesame Street is a long standing, proved production and it's worth a fortune. It would THRIVE in the free market. Big Bird isn't going anywhere.

Right after the debate, Eric Fehrnstrom, one of Romney's top advisers admitted that Mitt got it wrong. People are covered for pre existing condition ONLY if their coverage is continuous. If you lost your job and you coverage ended for a minute, you are out of luck.

So you're against government meddling in the insurance market? Because that's exactly what you're bitching about. The federal government requires larger companies to provide health insurance. Why? Why not...milk? Repeal that Nixon era law to start. Let the people be paid a salary, which they are free to purchase any kind of insurance they like.

Mitt said he wouldn't lower taxes for the rich, but he will say in the very same sentence, he wants to cut Corporate Tax, end the Estate Tax, and lower Capital Gains Tax which would lower his own taxes from 13% to 2%.

Your questionable estimations of Mr Romeny's tax implications aside, you're missing the essence of the plan, which is to eliminate enough loopholes to offset the rate reduction. What happens to actual revenues is all about the overall economy.

He said he wouldn't cut teachers after saying he would cut Police, Firemen and TEACHERS.

State issues, state issue, and STATE ISSUE.

Because fewer police, firemen and teachers will "help" the American people?

If you want more of these local officials, why in the WORLD would you want to run those funds through the federal government? Keep it local, hire whoever you need.

It's worth noting that in the case of firefighters, the rate of fires has, and continues, to decrease steadily over time. This is not because of more firefighters, it is do to increased use of flame resistant materials and design in construction and automobiles. Something to consider when demanding more firemen.

Republicans don't care. They come right out and say "let him die".

The word of the day is...HYPERBOLE (noun)
The noun HYPERBOLE has 1 sense:
1. extravagant exaggeration

No doubt, as a businessman, he will say anything to "close the deal".

Still looking for that proof that he lied.

But what did Republicans take away?

Can't say, I tend to vote Libertarian.

What is it they think he would do as "president"?

One hopes he will demand a path to a balanced budget. We'll see. I expect he'll look to flatten and lower the income tax, reduce a number of loopholes, while demonstrating a modicum of respect for the capitalist/free market approach that allows even the poorest Americans to reside in the top quarter of worldwide wealth.

As a libertarian, I expect to be disappointed with the Romney presidency.

How will his policies help the country?

If...They'll hurt less than the central planning approach embraced by President Obama.

What will Mitt Romney do for the Middle Class?

We'll see, but he implies he'll get government out the way...a little bit anyway, which typically energizes spending and investment in the economy. While I choose to reject your attempts to impose a class status upon America, those in the middle quadrants of earnings benefit by the proliferation of job opportunities that follow.

The president's attempts to raise taxes and increase government meddling in markets has, as always, resulted in less investment in the economy, less consumer spending and less tax revenues.

Do you guys on the right think Mitt Romney lied about "Anything"?

Well, this really is the point of your post, isn't it? So I ask again, where is the lie? Be specific now.
 
You start your thread about lying by.... lying?


LOL

Where is the lie? He want's to stop funding PBS and he said he likes to fire people. Unless, Oh, are you saying he was "lying"?


He wants to stop funding PBS and he said he likes chocolate ice cream.

Does he want to disband PBS because he likes chocolate ice cream?

You are one stupid fuck.

God help us all if that's the best he's got.
 
I can never understand what you guys mean when you say "get government out of the way". What exactly is government in the way of?
 
I can never understand what you guys mean when you say "get government out of the way". What exactly is government in the way of?

Lower taxes, fewer additional regulations, less government intervention. Get's in the way of economic progress.

Now answer the question, where did he lie?
 
He wants to disband PBS because he likes firing people. But 50 million people watch Big Bird. Will Americans support this?

Right after the debate, Eric Fehrnstrom, one of Romney's top advisers admitted that Mitt got it wrong. People are covered for pre existing condition ONLY if their coverage is continuous. If you lost your job and you coverage ended for a minute, you are out of luck.

Mitt said he wouldn't lower taxes for the rich, but he will say in the very same sentence, he wants to cut Corporate Tax, end the Estate Tax, and lower Capital Gains Tax which would lower his own taxes from 13% to 2%.

He said he wouldn't cut teachers after saying he would cut Police, Firemen and TEACHERS.

Right off the Romney video, here is he referring to the president:
“he wants to hire more government workers. He says we need more fireman, more policeman, more TEACHERS. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. It’s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.”

Because fewer police, firemen and teachers will "help" the American people?

And those pathetic stories about "Mrs. SoSad and her dozen sick babies" and how Romney "cared". Really? After the 47% video? He "cares"???? Republicans don't care. They come right out and say "let him die".

So OK, Romney "beat" Obama on one debate. After months of one of the worst campaigns in history. No doubt, as a businessman, he will say anything to "close the deal".

But what did Republicans take away? What is it they think he would do as "president"? How will his policies help the country? What will Mitt Romney do for the Middle Class? Do you guys on the right think Mitt Romney lied about "Anything"?

Hey Dean.. Big Bird is a 1 percenter who doesn't pay taxes. Why do you want to give him government money?
 
I can never understand what you guys mean when you say "get government out of the way". What exactly is government in the way of?

Lower taxes, fewer additional regulations, less government intervention. Get's in the way of economic progress.

Now answer the question, where did he lie?

Useless piece of shit troll. Neg'd and ignored.
 
I can never understand what you guys mean when you say "get government out of the way". What exactly is government in the way of?

Lower taxes, fewer additional regulations, less government intervention. Get's in the way of economic progress.

Now answer the question, where did he lie?

Useless piece of shit troll. Neg'd and ignored.

You are going to miss a lot.

rdean is a constant reminder of the looney left wing. He serves the purpose of reminding us all of the dangers we face without due diligence.

Not to mention having someone to point and laugh at.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top