Romney vs. the Negro

I wish it was something different, but that is what it really boils down to in the minds of the right wing nutters.

If the Negro wins, does that mean white males will be the next recipients of AA?

:eusa_eh:

Some people, including most minorities, voted for Obama because he WAS Black, and I categorize that as blatant racism. A lot of Whites voted for “the negro” and they did so because they thought he was the better candidate. Bush was very unpopular even among republicans. He abandoned even his conservative base with his drunken-sailor spending. Plus, McCain was a terrible candidate; an old, tired career politician who was too closely associated with Bush. The Obama campaign was brilliant in portraying McCain as just another Bush and Obama seemed like a much-needed breath of fresh air. “Change” was an exiting and promising word and it resonated with the majority of voters. A job well done for Obama's team.

But a lot has happened since that time. Obama has had ample time to demonstrate whether or not he is up to the task. There are racists out there who will vote against him solely because he is Black; however, I am convinced that most people will judge him on his performance. Not everyone will agree that his performance earned him another term. If he is not reelected, it will not be because he's Black, but because he has not performed as expected or because his campaign failed to motivate and energize the voters.

I think that Whites deserve a little more credit. The fact they voted for him in 2008 tends to prove that they were not racist. Since Obama's skin is just as dark - no more and no less - then it was during the 2008 election, a change in the voting pattern
would be more reasonably attributed to his job performance than his race.

In my opinion it's not about racism, at least not for most people. Some will vote for him because he is Black, and some will vote against him for the same foolish reason. However, I still have faith that the majority of people are not so shallow and will judge him fairly.
 
So you're for their violence??? 52.2% of all murders???

That would just prove my fucking point about them. They're no better than monsters that can do no better then destroy a persons life.

O'yesss, you're all for these monsters that think the entire fucking world owes them something.

I take it you are too afraid to do as I said.

hey white woman

Why don't you go to southeast Wash DC about midnight tonight and walk down the street and see what happens.

She'll bump into all the other white people who live there.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: del
Do us a favor. Go to a black neighbourhood, tell them exactly what you just said here, and take a photo of yourself when they are finished with you.

So you're for their violence??? 52.2% of all murders???

That would just prove my fucking point about them. They're no better than monsters that can do no better then destroy a persons life.

O'yesss, you're all for these monsters that think the entire fucking world owes them something.

I take it you are too afraid to do as I said.

Hey Noomi, I dare you to go to that same neighborhood and get out of your car, take a walk...... send us a photo of what happens to you.
 
I wish it was something different, but that is what it really boils down to in the minds of the right wing nutters.

If the Negro wins, does that mean white males will be the next recipients of AA?

:eusa_eh:

Some people, including most minorities, voted for Obama because he WAS Black, and I categorize that as blatant racism. A lot of Whites voted for “the negro” and they did so because they thought he was the better candidate. Bush was very unpopular even among republicans. He abandoned even his conservative base with his drunken-sailor spending. Plus, McCain was a terrible candidate; an old, tired career politician who was too closely associated with Bush. The Obama campaign was brilliant in portraying McCain as just another Bush and Obama seemed like a much-needed breath of fresh air. “Change” was an exiting and promising word and it resonated with the majority of voters. A job well done for Obama's team.

But a lot has happened since that time. Obama has had ample time to demonstrate whether or not he is up to the task. There are racists out there who will vote against him solely because he is Black; however, I am convinced that most people will judge him on his performance. Not everyone will agree that his performance earned him another term. If he is not reelected, it will not be because he's Black, but because he has not performed as expected or because his campaign failed to motivate and energize the voters.

I think that Whites deserve a little more credit. The fact they voted for him in 2008 tends to prove that they were not racist. Since Obama's skin is just as dark - no more and no less - then it was during the 2008 election, a change in the voting pattern
would be more reasonably attributed to his job performance than his race.

In my opinion it's not about racism, at least not for most people. Some will vote for him because he is Black, and some will vote against him for the same foolish reason. However, I still have faith that the majority of people are not so shallow and will judge him fairly.


Sorry but this is BS

For starters many people vote because they want a candidate that reflects their values. Did majority of blacks vote for Obama because of his ethnicity, sure, but its not racism its choosing the candidate people believe he will reflect their interest that includes a candidate that looks like a specific population.

Give whites credit for what exactly?

There were many whites who didn't vote for Obama because of his name. Hell, white folks are still debating whether Obama is an American citizen. Sorry my community does not credit anyone. Theoretically, the only reason (and this is my view) why some white Americans voted for Obama is because he is bi-racial, and at least there is some ethnic relevance for whites to relate to.
 
Romney vs. the Negro......nope.....too race baiting


I think of it more as.....


Pillsbury Doughboy vs Gingerbread Man
 
You really are a retard.
I'm glad you think so. Do you stand with Matthew, Aruix, and Billy Boy?
If you've paid any attention at all to my posts instead of letting your irrational hatred for conservatives do your thinking for you, you'd know I've given them all massive criticism for their racism.

But your attempt to narrow your definition of "right wing nutters" is both obvious and lame.

I cannot help it if you have a chip on your shoulder. I like conservatives. Very few of them post on this message board. We get the social cons and the rightwingnutters for the most part.
 
I wish it was something different, but that is what it really boils down to in the minds of the right wing nutters.

If the Negro wins, does that mean white males will be the next recipients of AA?

:eusa_eh:

Bullshit, Ravi.

Hysterical race baiting might sound like a legitimate weapon - but only in the minds of fools.
 
Anyone else be glad when Obama is gone and we don't have to see ignorant threads like this anymore?
 
I'm glad you think so. Do you stand with Matthew, Aruix, and Billy Boy?
If you've paid any attention at all to my posts instead of letting your irrational hatred for conservatives do your thinking for you, you'd know I've given them all massive criticism for their racism.

But your attempt to narrow your definition of "right wing nutters" is both obvious and lame.

I cannot help it if you have a chip on your shoulder. I like conservatives. Very few of them post on this message board. We get the social cons and the rightwingnutters for the most part.
No chip present or required. If you'll notice, it's not me who's desperately redefining words.

You don't get to decide who is and who isn't a conservative. Your judgement is seriously flawed.

Are you ever going to accept the simple reality that opposition to Obama's agenda and policies isn't motivated by racism?

I kinda doubt it.
 
If you've paid any attention at all to my posts instead of letting your irrational hatred for conservatives do your thinking for you, you'd know I've given them all massive criticism for their racism.

But your attempt to narrow your definition of "right wing nutters" is both obvious and lame.

I cannot help it if you have a chip on your shoulder. I like conservatives. Very few of them post on this message board. We get the social cons and the rightwingnutters for the most part.
No chip present or required. If you'll notice, it's not me who's desperately redefining words.

You don't get to decide who is and who isn't a conservative. Your judgement is seriously flawed.

Are you ever going to accept the simple reality that opposition to Obama's agenda and policies isn't motivated by racism?

I kinda doubt it.

I kinda doubt that you've ever had a coherent thought in your life.
 

Forum List

Back
Top