- Banned
- #1
Also democrats are down 10% in registerd voters from 2008 while republican remain about the same and independents rise.
Obama should be very worried
Obama should be very worried
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
nothing has changed in ohio except for rasmussen.
nice try, though.
nothing has changed in ohio except for rasmussen.
nice try, though.
Honest question for ya:
What do you think the turnout split will be in OH on election night?
Give it in D/R/I numbers.
nothing has changed in ohio except for rasmussen.
nice try, though.
Honest question for ya:
What do you think the turnout split will be in OH on election night?
Give it in D/R/I numbers.
i think the dems have a great ground game.
and nate says that obama has a seventy-five percent chance of taking ohio.
all things being equal... i'll go with nate... whose interest is in being dead-on again...
Election Forecasts - FiveThirtyEight Blog - NYTimes.com
1. Nate isn’t very good at calling close elections.
2. People make their minds up at the last minute, which confuses the outcome of close elections.
3. Nate weights polls, meaning that he picks and chooses which data sets to run through his model.
4. Nate ignores polls that contradict him. So PPP is right and Gallup is wrong.
5. Politics is even riskier than baseball and “stuff happens.”
Rasmussen was one of two pollsters not to call an Obama victory in Ohio in 2008. Let's see if they are wrong again.
Also democrats are down 10% in registerd voters from 2008 while republican remain about the same and independents rise.
Obama should be very worried
Rasmussen was one of two pollsters not to call an Obama victory in Ohio in 2008. Let's see if they are wrong again.
Different time...
People want change, but that's not good for Barry...
I can see the cons are back to believing the polls again today. This is only the third thread with the same OP on the first two pages of the Election Forums.
Rasmussen was one of two pollsters not to call an Obama victory in Ohio in 2008. Let's see if they are wrong again.
Different time...
People want change, but that's not good for Barry...
Barry?
The Rasmussen poll showed a big split between those who voted early and those who plan to vote on or closer to Election Day. For the one-third of voters who already cast their ballots, Obama was leading 62-36 percent. Romney, though, had a big lead among those who haven't voted yet.
Read more: Poll gives Romney edge in Ohio as battleground contest tightens | Fox News
nothing has changed in ohio except for rasmussen.
nice try, though.
On Nate "Lefty" Silver:
Nate Silver is partisan and wrong. The voters will decide Romney v Obama, not The New York Times Telegraph Blogs
1. Nate isnt very good at calling close elections.
2. People make their minds up at the last minute, which confuses the outcome of close elections.
3. Nate weights polls, meaning that he picks and chooses which data sets to run through his model.
4. Nate ignores polls that contradict him. So PPP is right and Gallup is wrong.
5. Politics is even riskier than baseball and stuff happens.
On Nate "Lefty" Silver:
Nate Silver is partisan and wrong. The voters will decide Romney v Obama, not The New York Times – Telegraph Blogs
1. Nate isn’t very good at calling close elections.
2. People make their minds up at the last minute, which confuses the outcome of close elections.
3. Nate weights polls, meaning that he picks and chooses which data sets to run through his model.
4. Nate ignores polls that contradict him. So PPP is right and Gallup is wrong.
5. Politics is even riskier than baseball and “stuff happens.”
On Nate "Lefty" Silver:
Nate Silver is partisan and wrong. The voters will decide Romney v Obama, not The New York Times Telegraph Blogs
1. Nate isnt very good at calling close elections.
2. People make their minds up at the last minute, which confuses the outcome of close elections.
3. Nate weights polls, meaning that he picks and chooses which data sets to run through his model.
4. Nate ignores polls that contradict him. So PPP is right and Gallup is wrong.
5. Politics is even riskier than baseball and stuff happens.
maybe truth has a liberal bias.
funny how y'all looooove gallup right now.
until you don't.
and i haven't seen any reason to believe your post. particularly given that nate is the one that is spot on. but then again, i don't gauge the accuracy of a statistician by whether they tell me what i want to hear.