Romney Just Lost the Embassy Talking Point

Maybe Obama should just always have that fat ass moderator with him to petulantly say Obama is always right even when he is lying his arrogant as off.
 
And, unlike Bin Laden who got a free seven years under Bush, they will be looking over their shoulders constantly. Whether by Marines, Seals, CIA operatives, or drones, their lives are now forfiet. This President goes after people that kill Americans. Had he been in office when that Marine barracks was bombed in Lebenon, there would be no Hezbolah today.

A more accurate description after Bengazi would be that...this President's ineptness gets Americans killed and THEN he has to go after the people that did it. How about if we put someone in the Oval Office that has a clue in the first place?

That inneptness of which you speak was the republicans in congress denying the state department half a billion in funds to beef up foriegn service security. The president does not authorize spending. BTW.. your post shows your inneptness in understanding how government works.

The State Department and the President ultimately decide where troops are to be stationed. If Hilary Clinton didn't have her head up her ass she would have realized that a handful of local Libyans as security is not the same as a detachment of US Marines. Bengazi wasn't a debacle because there wasn't enough money to spend of security...Bengazi was a debacle because the people in charge of our government were naive enough to think that a token security force would suffice in a troubled area like Libya. It's the kind of progressive "let's be nice and everyone will be nice in return" bullshit that ALWAYS gets you liberals into trouble.
 
Link to the sphinc. Feel your troubles melt away.

Vote Obama... melt into nothingness...

melt yourselves into a congealed morass of worry-free happiness.

Float above the rooftops.
 
Maybe Obama should just always have that fat ass moderator with him to petulantly say Obama is always right even when he is lying his arrogant as off.

dawson-crying-452x339.jpg
 
Spin it how you wish, but in the context of the debate, Obama clearly won that exchange.

How can an "exchange" be clearly won, clearly premised with a failure?

The exchange was clearly won by Obama because he clarified the escense of the matter by telling Romney that to politicize the deaths of four people he was responsible for was offensive....which it is. Your continuation of that politicization is the offense he was refering to.

The facts of the event were made more clear as the two weeks unfolded. There is nothing odd about associating the atttack at Bengazi with the riots all through North Africa immediately previous to that terrorist attack. It took a few days to sort it out. That's just the way things unfold sometimes. To act like Obama was negligent is outrageous.

The bad guys were the terrorists that took advantage of the confusion of the riots to perpetrate their plan. Blaming Obama for this attack is sick. He said he will keep after these terrorists and make them pay. End of story. That is unless YOU support the terrorists because you think it gives you something to blame on Obama.

oh give us all a break, you people still bring up the 3000 people lost in 9/11 AND BLAME BUSH ..Your bullshit of this is being POLITICIZED ...EVERYTHING is political at one time or another..You on the left can't just make up your own rules whenever the hell you feel something should or should NOT be politicized..
 
Last edited:
How can an "exchange" be clearly won, clearly premised with a failure?

The exchange was clearly won by Obama because he clarified the escense of the matter by telling Romney that to politicize the deaths of four people he was responsible for was offensive....which it is. Your continuation of that politicization is the offense he was refering to.

The facts of the event were made more clear as the two weeks unfolded. There is nothing odd about associating the atttack at Bengazi with the riots all through North Africa immediately previous to that terrorist attack. It took a few days to sort it out. That's just the way things unfold sometimes. To act like Obama was negligent is outrageous.

The bad guys were the terrorists that took advantage of the confusion of the riots to perpetrate their plan. Blaming Obama for this attack is sick. He said he will keep after these terrorists and make them pay. End of story. That is unless YOU support the terrorists because you think it gives you something to blame on Obama.

oh give us all a break, you people still bring up the 3000 people lost in 9/11 AND BLAME BUSH ..Your bullshit of this is being POLITICIZED ...EVERYTHING is political at one time or another..You on the left can't just make up your own rules whenever the hell you feel something should or should NOT be politicized..
both left and right make thing political like this. But despite messing up it up last night which romney did, he will still have more time to hit obama over it next week. that will help him i think. i think president need to be ready with more detail as they are going to spend a lot more time talking about it
 
This administration flat out LIED to you on this attack and blamed it all on a American citizen and some film..I don't care how much they cry they are Offended..tough shit

If that is what you want PROTECTING you then vote for them again..
 
Spin it how you wish, but in the context of the debate, Obama clearly won that exchange.

After Mrs. Moderator had to help him.

After Romney insisted on pushing the assertion that Obama didn't refer to the attack as terrorism. He marched right up to the moderator and basically demanded that she affirm his claim. So, she corrected him. What choice did she have?
 
Spin it how you wish, but in the context of the debate, Obama clearly won that exchange.

After Mrs. Moderator had to help him.

After Romney insisted on pushing the assertion that Obama didn't refer to the attack as terrorism. He marched right up to the moderator and basically demanded that she affirm his claim. So, she corrected him. What choice did she have?

Oh please, the games you people have to play for your Dear Leader..
 
oh give us all a break, you people still bring up the 3000 people lost in 9/11 AND BLAME BUSH ..Your bullshit of this is being POLITICIZED ...EVERYTHING is political at one time or another..You on the left can't just make up your own rules whenever the hell you feel something should or should NOT be politicized..

that's just... different. And you know it!
 
:clap2:

Presidential Debate 2012: Live Updates From Barack Obama-Mitt Romney Showdown

"The suggestion that anybody in my team, the secretary of State, the UN Ambassador [Susan Rice] -- anybody on my team -- would play politics or mislead when we lost four people on our team is offensive."

He is right by default it has been offensive

Why was Susan Rice sent out too no less then 5 sunday morning shows trying to sell it was all about a video??

Why was that done??

The question I would like to know, is who sent her out with this misinformation? Was it the President or Hillary?
 
Spin it how you wish, but in the context of the debate, Obama clearly won that exchange.

Only if you believe Obama lie about what he said in the Rose Garden.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.

Obama first sentence was a clear reference to the attack on 9-11-2001. The second highlighted Obama sentence was a clear reference to Libya and no mention of any teorrist act is there.
 
Poor Jose, Obama screamed for Crowley to verify from the transcript....which she JUST happened to have on the desk there.

Idiot.
 
And, unlike Bin Laden who got a free seven years under Bush, they will be looking over their shoulders constantly. Whether by Marines, Seals, CIA operatives, or drones, their lives are now forfiet. This President goes after people that kill Americans. Had he been in office when that Marine barracks was bombed in Lebenon, there would be no Hezbolah today.

A more accurate description after Bengazi would be that...this President's ineptness gets Americans killed and THEN he has to go after the people that did it. How about if we put someone in the Oval Office that has a clue in the first place?

Not so sure that Obama is that worries about going after the attacker in Libya, I think its about attacking Romney.

Obama just wants this to go away until after election day along with F&F and the WH leaks.
 
A more accurate description after Bengazi would be that...this President's ineptness gets Americans killed and THEN he has to go after the people that did it. How about if we put someone in the Oval Office that has a clue in the first place?

That inneptness of which you speak was the republicans in congress denying the state department half a billion in funds to beef up foriegn service security. The president does not authorize spending. BTW.. your post shows your inneptness in understanding how government works.

The State Department and the President ultimately decide where troops are to be stationed. If Hilary Clinton didn't have her head up her ass she would have realized that a handful of local Libyans as security is not the same as a detachment of US Marines. Bengazi wasn't a debacle because there wasn't enough money to spend of security...Bengazi was a debacle because the people in charge of our government were naive enough to think that a token security force would suffice in a troubled area like Libya. It's the kind of progressive "let's be nice and everyone will be nice in return" bullshit that ALWAYS gets you liberals into trouble.

I think the Libyan security forces were there....taking pictures.
 

Forum List

Back
Top