Discussion in 'Politics' started by Avatar4321, Dec 28, 2011.
Romney: I Would Vote for Ron Paul over Obama | Video | TheBlaze.com
As would I.
There aren't too many people that I wouldn't vote for before I would vote for Barry.
Smart move for Mitt. Newt hurt himself by saying he wouldn't.
Newt is a liar and that was one of the big issues with him.
Newt claimed "anyone of us would make a far better President than Obama." Then Newt flip flops and attacks Paul claiming he wouldn’t vote for Paul.
Newt claimed "I will do a Positive campaign and not attack, like Ronald Reagan’s rule!" Then Newt crashes in the polls and goes on an attack frenzy attacking Paul and Mitt. I guess Newt does not like Reagan’s rule that he alone claimed he would follow when he thought it would win him voters.
Newt has proven to be a liar, while he thinks he is being clever when calling an obvious attack an "observation," hordes of voters turn away.
Mitt is now trying to gain favor with Paul’s base in hopes he does not lose to Obama in a landslide…
One more thing.
If the primaries go well for Paul and they just might... In a month we might be looking at a Paul VS Mitt race only. If that is the case, and Paul is only pulling 35ish% of the vote to Mitt's 60ish%, I bet Mitt seriously thinks about asking Paul to be his VP...
Not that I would support that ticket nor do I think Paul would take it.
Ron Paul is about the only one running that is serious about charging course. Ron paul would seriously fight to reduce the debt, remove the fed and remove our troops from the middle east. He would be a great president and the only one that should be even considered.
It really is too bad, Paul doesn't stand a chance
Mitt has lied about everything else so why not this too?
Mitt changes his "position" more often than the weather. Stick around. The real Mitt - IF there is one - will eventually resurface and we all know that that is.
Big Business, Big Military, a new war every year or so (he said it) and -
People, with everything you know about Mitt, it should bother you that he SAYS he has no real convictions. Yeah, yeah, I know we already know he has no real convictions but, here he is, actually saying it and all you can do is dutifully nod your heads up and down?
Jeeeez. Ya gotta love the obedient rw's.
The others plan to charge us as well. They will charge us plenty and then some.
And you all know it.
And what evidence do you have that Mitt has lied about this?
And contrary to your claim, he hasn't changed his positions nearly that often. You'd think that if he is such a liar, you wouldnt need to lie to go up against him.
I do agree with what he said to a degree, Mitt said this to do a sub attack on Newt and win favor with Paul supporters, not to be honest. Do I believe Mitt would vote for Paul over Ovama? Honestly I think Mitt would do a write in for himself.
Separate names with a comma.