Romney earned Zero Votes in some Urban Areas

libs expect us to believe that their god obama is so great that he'd naturally receive 100 percent of the vote. His heathen wouldn't stuff boxes and rip up Romney ballots.
 
It ain't FRUAD (sic) when 100% of the voters of a precinct are of the 47% that Romney clearly said he doesn't care about...they don't pay Federal taxes, feel entitled to healthcare and housing etc.etc.etc.

BUT THEY VOTE. Romney's own mouth threw away ALL those votes...every single one, as well as turning out 47%ers in droves.

Then silly RWers act surprised and butthurt when people Romney insults ALL vote Obama.

Don't fret....RW memory loss and shortsightedness are not contagious.

FRUAD indeed! LOLOL!

Regards from Rosie

Except they don't vote. Historically, urban areas are defunct when it comes to voter turnout. But when there's nothing to stop his minions from filling out ballots for him then the turnout is high.
 
libs expect us to believe that their god obama is so great that he'd naturally receive 100 percent of the vote. His heathen wouldn't stuff boxes and rip up Romney ballots.

and you got NOTHING...just a lot of talk:clap2:
 
It ain't FRUAD (sic) when 100% of the voters of a precinct are of the 47% that Romney clearly said he doesn't care about...they don't pay Federal taxes, feel entitled to healthcare and housing etc.etc.etc.

BUT THEY VOTE. Romney's own mouth threw away ALL those votes...every single one, as well as turning out 47%ers in droves.

Then silly RWers act surprised and butthurt when people Romney insults ALL vote Obama.

Don't fret....RW memory loss and shortsightedness are not contagious.

FRUAD indeed! LOLOL!

Regards from Rosie

Except they don't vote. Historically, urban areas are defunct when it comes to voter turnout. But when there's nothing to stop his minions from filling out ballots for him then the turnout is high.

Historically, yes. But having a new kind of candidate and having a major push to get voters to the polls worked to turn history into the new way to win: pinpoint voter targeting coupled with extended voting time coupled with actually transporting "souls to the polls".

Dems are voting smarter thanks to the Obama ground game which did not stop in 2009. If cons are honest they will give the Obama campaign credit where credit is due.

Major Republican gaffes helped tons, too!

Regards from Rosie
 
It ain't FRUAD (sic) when 100% of the voters of a precinct are of the 47% that Romney clearly said he doesn't care about...they don't pay Federal taxes, feel entitled to healthcare and housing etc.etc.etc.

BUT THEY VOTE. Romney's own mouth threw away ALL those votes...every single one, as well as turning out 47%ers in droves.

Then silly RWers act surprised and butthurt when people Romney insults ALL vote Obama.

Don't fret....RW memory loss and shortsightedness are not contagious.

FRUAD indeed! LOLOL!

Regards from Rosie

Except they don't vote. Historically, urban areas are defunct when it comes to voter turnout. But when there's nothing to stop his minions from filling out ballots for him then the turnout is high.

Historically, yes. But having a new kind of candidate and having a major push to get voters to the polls worked to turn history into the new way to win: pinpoint voter targeting coupled with extended voting time coupled with actually transporting "souls to the polls".

Dems are voting smarter thanks to the Obama ground game which did not stop in 2009. If cons are honest they will give the Obama campaign credit where credit is due.

Major Republican gaffes helped tons, too!

Regards from Rosie

There's probably something to that ground game stuff. But it's over hyped. Don't put it past his morally bankrupt minions to skip the middle man and just fill out ballots for people.
 
He got them to get out an vote for REVENGE. That's a magical word to the libs...anything to help their party!
 
libs expect us to believe that their god obama is so great that he'd naturally receive 100 percent of the vote. His heathen wouldn't stuff boxes and rip up Romney ballots.

Saddam Hussein routinely got 100% of the vote. So did Mubarak. Kim Jong Il was elected time and time again unanimously. Despite a huge outcry from the public, Ahmad Ahmadinejad got 62% of the vote in a field of three candidates.

Iran's tenth presidential election was held on 12 June 2009, with incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad running against three challengers. The next morning the Islamic Republic News Agency, Iran's official news agency, announced that with two-thirds of the votes counted, Ahmadinejad had won the election with 62% of the votes cast, and that Mir-Hossein Mousavi had received 34% of the votes cast. There were large irregularities in the results and people were surprised by them, which resulted in protests gathering millions of Iranians in every Iranian city and around the world.
 
Romney earned zero votes in some urban precincts - CBS News

Wow! The guy just never appeal to many in Cities. And actually, I don't think he ever tried.
Admit it, if Romney had won and got 100% of the vote in certain districts you'd be claiming Election Fraud and rightly so.

It would be racism if Romney or any Republican had won like this...

You would have to put a blow torch to their ass to get the truth out of them...

They have no interest in the truth, look who that voted for...
 
libs expect us to believe that their god obama is so great that he'd naturally receive 100 percent of the vote. His heathen wouldn't stuff boxes and rip up Romney ballots.

Saddam Hussein routinely got 100% of the vote. So did Mubarak. Kim Jong Il was elected time and time again unanimously. Despite a huge outcry from the public, Ahmad Ahmadinejad got 62% of the vote in a field of three candidates.

Iran's tenth presidential election was held on 12 June 2009, with incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad running against three challengers. The next morning the Islamic Republic News Agency, Iran's official news agency, announced that with two-thirds of the votes counted, Ahmadinejad had won the election with 62% of the votes cast, and that Mir-Hossein Mousavi had received 34% of the votes cast. There were large irregularities in the results and people were surprised by them, which resulted in protests gathering millions of Iranians in every Iranian city and around the world.

Yeah...go with that...and then lament over why you can't win National Elections . :rolleyes:
 
and they really want people to believe this happened without any fraud..

boy that Obama be...god or sumthing

I'm sure there was some fraud on both sides, but probably not enough to really effect the election.


So as long as there was more fraud on the Democrat side, it's okay with you. :clap2:

Meh.... you really haven't provided evidence of fraud at all, much less who is doing more of it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top