Romney Anti gay Ad lol for the south

You cant be honest enough to admit that there is a huge difference between opposing gays and opposing gay marriage can you?

LOL Why don't you tell us what the difference is?

Are you telling us you think gays should be allowed to live their lives.......as second class citizens?

That's bullshit.

a better quesstion would be why don't you ask bill clinton why he signed into law the Defense of Marriage Act

Really, you have no idea?

He signed DOMA in order to avert a US Constitutional amendment. It was called a compromise. A term Republicans are completely incapable of understanding.
 
:rolleyes:
Not at all... Why should a gay man who isn't going to produce children have more Rights than a single unmarried man who isn't going to produce children? Marriage benefits are for those who Marry and procreate... Not for gay people to take advantage of a Tax break... Effectively trampling the Rights of heterosexual unmarried people by getting preference over them, which of course is Unconstitutional.

Who gives a crap about whether gays produce children or not?

Gays adopt these days. Pull your head and your ass out of the 18th century.

Marriage benefits are for those who tie their finances together too, you know.

Gays are simply a loud mouthed minority who want to redefine other people's belief systems simply so that they can get a Tax break... Despicable.
 
Who gives a crap about whether gays produce children or not?

Gays adopt these days. Pull your head and your ass out of the 18th century.

Marriage benefits are for those who tie their finances together too, you know.

Gays are simply a loud mouthed minority who want to redefine other people's belief systems simply so that they can get a Tax break... Despicable.

that is what people said about blacks in the south also

I think they were called dixie democrats
 
Not at all... Why should a gay man who isn't going to produce children have more Rights than a single unmarried man who isn't going to produce children? Marriage benefits are for those who Marry and procreate... Not for gay people to take advantage of a Tax break... Effectively trampling the Rights of heterosexual unmarried people by getting preference over them, which of course is Unconstitutional.

Who gives a crap about whether gays produce children or not?

Gays adopt these days. Pull your head and your ass out of the 18th century.

Marriage benefits are for those who tie their finances together too, you know.

Gays are simply a loud mouthed minority who want to redefine other people's belief systems simply so that they can get a Tax break... Despicable.

You're becoming a loud-mouthed minority who younger generations don't want to listen to anymore.
 
And in all those states that have civil unions, can a gay married couple file a federal married tax return?

Are they eligible for each other's Social Security death benefits?

Didn't think so.

So they aren't exactly equal, now are they.


.

I dont think so........ In fact I like that.


They want my taxes raised and the result is they dont get to participate.


Sounds fair to me.

Gays want your taxes raised?

.

That group identifies with what party?
 
You cant be honest enough to admit that there is a huge difference between opposing gays and opposing gay marriage can you?

actually it is, when you fight against someone right for equality, it is. Just like in 1967 it was illigal for a Black person to merry a white person, because of racism. So by your logic. you support the 1967 law that would does not allow a black to merry a white, correct?
 
You cant be honest enough to admit that there is a huge difference between opposing gays and opposing gay marriage can you?

LOL Why don't you tell us what the difference is?

Are you telling us you think gays should be allowed to live their lives.......as second class citizens?

That's bullshit.
No. Gay couples (called...garried people) should be given the same benefits as married couples. This does NOT require that they be called "married". They can be called "garried" or "narried" or parried" or jarried" or "scarried" or ..... anything BUT "married".

LOL Why don't you tell us what the difference is?

Are you telling us you think gays should be allowed to live their lives.......as second class citizens?

That's bullshit.

So unless the government regulates your relationships you are a second class citizen? Do you really believe that?

They have every right any straight individual has. You see the law doesnt look at sexual preference. The law is the law.

Gays aren't asking government to regulate their relationships. They're asking government to grant them the same benefits when they get married by religious institutions.... and there are lots of religious institutions that marry gay couples. Equal benefits, the law is the law.
They should be granted the same benefits. That does not change the definition of "married".
 
Who gives a crap about whether gays produce children or not?

Gays adopt these days. Pull your head and your ass out of the 18th century.

Marriage benefits are for those who tie their finances together too, you know.

Gays are simply a loud mouthed minority who want to redefine other people's belief systems simply so that they can get a Tax break... Despicable.

that is what people said about blacks in the south also

Um... No they really didn't.
 
You cant be honest enough to admit that there is a huge difference between opposing gays and opposing gay marriage can you?

LOL Why don't you tell us what the difference is?

Are you telling us you think gays should be allowed to live their lives.......as second class citizens?

That's bullshit.
No. Gay couples (called...garried people) should be given the same benefits as married couples. This does NOT require that they be called "married". They can be called "garried" or "narried" or parried" or jarried" or "scarried" or ..... anything BUT "married".

So unless the government regulates your relationships you are a second class citizen? Do you really believe that?

They have every right any straight individual has. You see the law doesnt look at sexual preference. The law is the law.

Gays aren't asking government to regulate their relationships. They're asking government to grant them the same benefits when they get married by religious institutions.... and there are lots of religious institutions that marry gay couples. Equal benefits, the law is the law.
They should be granted the same benefits. That does not change the definition of "married".

Sorry, you're wrong. If a gay couple gets married by a religious institution, it's called marriage. And there are lots of religious institutions which marry gay couples.

http://www.gaychurch.org/Find_a_Church/united_states/united_states.htm
 
I think they were called dixie democrats

A dixie democrat, or a southern democrat, is in today terms a republican. thats a FACT.

Based upon what...

A piss poor imagination?.....

Based upon, the fact the the SOUTH is pure RED=republican and the laws that they support which used to be the southern democrat platform are now the REPUBLICAN plat form.

so by your logic, the south will go all blue, mississippi, georga, south carolina, north carolina, texas, alabama, tennesse, west virginia, kentucky, see these states WERE repsented by they southern democrats. I WISH they were still Democrat states, shit if that was the case romney should just head home now.
 

Forum List

Back
Top