Romney Already Lost the Debates

[AceRothstein]

So you all are the victims Romney was talking about in his 47% comment?

More fraudulent spin on what Romney did say.

What a surprise. A mindless lib shill hack like deuce deliberately distorting things to make his petty dishonest talking pointless.

It was sarcasm, dummy.

Cons love calling people victims. Cons also love whining about how everyone is against them. Try to stay with us.

 

[rightwinger]

Why don't YOU figure it out by quoting what he said (however in-artfully he may have said it the first time) and what he said when he took the opportunity to discuss it more coherently.
I am pretty sick of your churlish style of asking faux "questions."

You mean when it came time to cover his ass?

No. That's just your plodding, predictable and cavalier dishonest spin.

What Romney said....

There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what.

Very True, Romney would have been correct if he stopped here


All right, there are 47 percent who are with him who are dependent upon government,

No, 47% are not dependent on government. 2/3 of them work, many are retired, many are in the military


who believe that they are victims,

47% of Americans do not believe they are victims

who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them.

The majority of that 47% are taking care of themselves. They DO NOT expect the government should pay their healthcare, food, housing or whatever. They work, have retirement checks, serve their country. They just don't make enough to pay federal taxes.

And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax. "

Again true...based on what Mitt said about them, why would they vote otherwise?

 

[Dick Tuck]

I can't believe how gullible people are. It's been a strategy for a very long time, to dumb down expectations, so the candidates always exceed them. I doubt that either candidate will wind their watch or tsk every answer. They'll both do well, assuming that Romney doesn't go all cowboy on foreign policy questions. There's so few undecided less that I doubt if a full mooning of the audience or a sacrificial puppy would matter.

 

[nodoginnafight]

I think the whole "skewed" media, "skewed" polls, and "skewed" world talking points have been worn ragged by now hasn't they?

 

[Liability]

I think the whole "skewed" media, "skewed" polls, and "skewed" world talking points have been worn ragged by now hasn't they?

Nobraininyourhead, you dopey illiterate motherfucker, why is noting how badly the main stream media's polling is skewed a ragged talking point when it has barely even been discussed in the real world?

And why is that offensive to you but accepting the idiotic skewed polls and their results not in the slightest bit disturbing to you?

Oh. Yeah. That's right. You're just an ignorant willfully blind biased hack.

 

[Liability]

So you all are the victims Romney was talking about in his 47% comment?

More fraudulent spin on what Romney did say.

What a surprise. A mindless lib shill hack like deuce deliberately distorting things to make his petty dishonest talking pointless.

It was sarcasm, dummy.

Cons love calling people victims. Cons also love whining about how everyone is against them. Try to stay with us.

You are a mental pygmy, ya pissant motherfucker.

Your sarcasm was lame and limp, like you.

But it was premised on your idiotic acceptance of the underlying dishonest talking pointless, you fucktard.

 

[hazlnut]

 

[L.K.Eder]

i repeat, you sissies


waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

and

hahahahhahahahahahhahahaha

 

[sealadaigh]

We are already prepared for the warped perception the media will convey about the debates. But the media has lost it's power with those of us who see them for what they are, liars, manipulators, and in the bag for Obama.

Some of us are more ready than others.

The media has lost the power over us who see them for what they are, liars, manipulators, and keeping status quo with the democrats and republicans.

Some of us are woken up to reality. And we are trying to shake others awake as well.

lolol...you don't know jack, jack.

 

[Shelzin]

We are already prepared for the warped perception the media will convey about the debates. But the media has lost it's power with those of us who see them for what they are, liars, manipulators, and in the bag for Obama.

Some of us are more ready than others.

The media has lost the power over us who see them for what they are, liars, manipulators, and keeping status quo with the democrats and republicans.

Some of us are woken up to reality. And we are trying to shake others awake as well.

lolol...you don't know jack, jack.

ok

 

[nodoginnafight]

I think the whole "skewed" media, "skewed" polls, and "skewed" world talking points have been worn ragged by now hasn't they?

Nobraininyourhead, you dopey illiterate motherfucker, why is noting how badly the main stream media's polling is skewed a ragged talking point when it has barely even been discussed in the real world?

And why is that offensive to you but accepting the idiotic skewed polls and their results not in the slightest bit disturbing to you?

Oh. Yeah. That's right. You're just an ignorant willfully blind biased hack.

Oh yeah, I forgot. Foul language and name - calling can substitute for logic and sound reasoning when that's all you got.

And you wonder why you're losing????????

 

[L.K.Eder]

I think the whole "skewed" media, "skewed" polls, and "skewed" world talking points have been worn ragged by now hasn't they?

Nobraininyourhead, you dopey illiterate motherfucker, why is noting how badly the main stream media's polling is skewed a ragged talking point when it has barely even been discussed in the real world?

And why is that offensive to you but accepting the idiotic skewed polls and their results not in the slightest bit disturbing to you?

Oh. Yeah. That's right. You're just an ignorant willfully blind biased hack.

Oh yeah, I forgot. Fou anguage and name - calling can substitute for logic and sound reasoning when that's al you got.

And you wonder why you're losing????????

be kind to liability, he has to lash out all he can.

it is off stage for him after the election.

 

[candycorn]

I think Romney wins the first debate simply because he's on the stage and gets a bump from simply getting up there. Obama simply has to battle to a draw and he'll walk away with the Presidency.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Why bother?

Forget all the fuss and feathers.

Tomorrow night's presidential debate between President Obama and Governor Romney has already been settled.

Obama wins. Romney loses. Case closed.

One had only to attend another recent event to know this.

That event was the Media Research Center's 25th Anniversary Gala. Held last week in Washington to celebrate Brent Bozell's ingenious idea-turned-reality to document liberal media bias in the glossy chapter-by-chapter, newscast-by-newscast way in which it actually unfolds in real time. The evening, attended by almost a thousand, was a glittery affair populated by conservatives in and out of the New Media, a considerable tribute to Mr. Bozell. The Master of Ceremonies was talk radio's Chris Plante of Washington's WMAL. The evening's presenters were talk radio and Fox star Laura Ingraham, the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes, and National Review's Jonah Goldberg, with a presentation by columnist Cal Thomas. The crowd feasted on a complete menu that ranged from good food to an uproarious collection of biased liberal media video clips that, well aside from their always unintentional hilarity, were stunning in their reality.

While the subject of the presidential debates never came up -- those video clips made plain what the outcome of the presidential debates will be.

If Mitt Romney turned in the best debate performance since Lincoln took Douglas, Kennedy clobbered Nixon, or Reagan trounced Carter, it would not matter. If Barack Obama forgot not only the size of the debt (as he did on the David Letterman show), but admitted that, well, yes, he knew the attacks in Benghazi were coming about six months earlier but had a golf game scheduled and forgot to warn anybody -- it would not matter.

No matter what happens tomorrow night -- Barack Obama will be declared the winner of not only this debate but the two that follow........


The American Spectator : Romney Has Already Lost the Debate

It seems republicans are going to grow more tedious and petulant as Romney’s loss draws near.

We are already prepared for the warped perception the media will convey about the debates. But the media has lost it's power with those of us who see them for what they are, liars, manipulators, and in the bag for Obama.

It’s remarkable how you and other rightists are clueless as to why you’re losing this election: birth certificates and teleprompters, conspiracy theories and cover ups – and of course the all-time classic myth: the ‘left-biased media.’

 

[L.K.Eder]

Why bother?

Forget all the fuss and feathers.

Tomorrow night's presidential debate between President Obama and Governor Romney has already been settled.

Obama wins. Romney loses. Case closed.

One had only to attend another recent event to know this.

That event was the Media Research Center's 25th Anniversary Gala. Held last week in Washington to celebrate Brent Bozell's ingenious idea-turned-reality to document liberal media bias in the glossy chapter-by-chapter, newscast-by-newscast way in which it actually unfolds in real time. The evening, attended by almost a thousand, was a glittery affair populated by conservatives in and out of the New Media, a considerable tribute to Mr. Bozell. The Master of Ceremonies was talk radio's Chris Plante of Washington's WMAL. The evening's presenters were talk radio and Fox star Laura Ingraham, the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes, and National Review's Jonah Goldberg, with a presentation by columnist Cal Thomas. The crowd feasted on a complete menu that ranged from good food to an uproarious collection of biased liberal media video clips that, well aside from their always unintentional hilarity, were stunning in their reality.

While the subject of the presidential debates never came up -- those video clips made plain what the outcome of the presidential debates will be.

If Mitt Romney turned in the best debate performance since Lincoln took Douglas, Kennedy clobbered Nixon, or Reagan trounced Carter, it would not matter. If Barack Obama forgot not only the size of the debt (as he did on the David Letterman show), but admitted that, well, yes, he knew the attacks in Benghazi were coming about six months earlier but had a golf game scheduled and forgot to warn anybody -- it would not matter.

No matter what happens tomorrow night -- Barack Obama will be declared the winner of not only this debate but the two that follow........


The American Spectator : Romney Has Already Lost the Debate

It seems republicans are going to grow more tedious and petulant as Romney’s loss draws near.

We are already prepared for the warped perception the media will convey about the debates. But the media has lost it's power with those of us who see them for what they are, liars, manipulators, and in the bag for Obama.

It’s remarkable how you and other rightists are clueless as to why you’re losing this election: birth certificates and teleprompters, conspiracy theories and cover ups – and of course the all-time classic myth: the ‘left-biased media.’

it is delicious to watch the scrambling and rambling.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Why bother?

Forget all the fuss and feathers.

Tomorrow night's presidential debate between President Obama and Governor Romney has already been settled.

Obama wins. Romney loses. Case closed.

One had only to attend another recent event to know this.

That event was the Media Research Center's 25th Anniversary Gala. Held last week in Washington to celebrate Brent Bozell's ingenious idea-turned-reality to document liberal media bias in the glossy chapter-by-chapter, newscast-by-newscast way in which it actually unfolds in real time. The evening, attended by almost a thousand, was a glittery affair populated by conservatives in and out of the New Media, a considerable tribute to Mr. Bozell. The Master of Ceremonies was talk radio's Chris Plante of Washington's WMAL. The evening's presenters were talk radio and Fox star Laura Ingraham, the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes, and National Review's Jonah Goldberg, with a presentation by columnist Cal Thomas. The crowd feasted on a complete menu that ranged from good food to an uproarious collection of biased liberal media video clips that, well aside from their always unintentional hilarity, were stunning in their reality.

While the subject of the presidential debates never came up -- those video clips made plain what the outcome of the presidential debates will be.

If Mitt Romney turned in the best debate performance since Lincoln took Douglas, Kennedy clobbered Nixon, or Reagan trounced Carter, it would not matter. If Barack Obama forgot not only the size of the debt (as he did on the David Letterman show), but admitted that, well, yes, he knew the attacks in Benghazi were coming about six months earlier but had a golf game scheduled and forgot to warn anybody -- it would not matter.

No matter what happens tomorrow night -- Barack Obama will be declared the winner of not only this debate but the two that follow........


The American Spectator : Romney Has Already Lost the Debate

It seems republicans are going to grow more tedious and petulant as Romney’s loss draws near.

We are already prepared for the warped perception the media will convey about the debates. But the media has lost it's power with those of us who see them for what they are, liars, manipulators, and in the bag for Obama.

It’s remarkable how you and other rightists are clueless as to why you’re losing this election: birth certificates and teleprompters, conspiracy theories and cover ups – and of course the all-time classic myth: the ‘left-biased media.’

At some point you'd have to assume that sane people would stop expecting different results from repeating the same mistakes over and over...

 

[L.K.Eder]

Why bother?

Forget all the fuss and feathers.

Tomorrow night's presidential debate between President Obama and Governor Romney has already been settled.

Obama wins. Romney loses. Case closed.

One had only to attend another recent event to know this.

That event was the Media Research Center's 25th Anniversary Gala. Held last week in Washington to celebrate Brent Bozell's ingenious idea-turned-reality to document liberal media bias in the glossy chapter-by-chapter, newscast-by-newscast way in which it actually unfolds in real time. The evening, attended by almost a thousand, was a glittery affair populated by conservatives in and out of the New Media, a considerable tribute to Mr. Bozell. The Master of Ceremonies was talk radio's Chris Plante of Washington's WMAL. The evening's presenters were talk radio and Fox star Laura Ingraham, the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes, and National Review's Jonah Goldberg, with a presentation by columnist Cal Thomas. The crowd feasted on a complete menu that ranged from good food to an uproarious collection of biased liberal media video clips that, well aside from their always unintentional hilarity, were stunning in their reality.

While the subject of the presidential debates never came up -- those video clips made plain what the outcome of the presidential debates will be.

If Mitt Romney turned in the best debate performance since Lincoln took Douglas, Kennedy clobbered Nixon, or Reagan trounced Carter, it would not matter. If Barack Obama forgot not only the size of the debt (as he did on the David Letterman show), but admitted that, well, yes, he knew the attacks in Benghazi were coming about six months earlier but had a golf game scheduled and forgot to warn anybody -- it would not matter.

No matter what happens tomorrow night -- Barack Obama will be declared the winner of not only this debate but the two that follow........


The American Spectator : Romney Has Already Lost the Debate

It seems republicans are going to grow more tedious and petulant as Romney’s loss draws near.

We are already prepared for the warped perception the media will convey about the debates. But the media has lost it's power with those of us who see them for what they are, liars, manipulators, and in the bag for Obama.

It’s remarkable how you and other rightists are clueless as to why you’re losing this election: birth certificates and teleprompters, conspiracy theories and cover ups – and of course the all-time classic myth: the ‘left-biased media.’

At some point you'd have to assume that sane people would stop expecting different results from repeating the same mistakes over and over...

it is all media bias, over-sampling and stuff. yeah, that is the ticket.

 

[HUGGY]

You are being kind of unfair to the main stream media, LogikAndReazon.

The media has a job to do.

That job is to SHAPE public perception in favor of their preferred candidate (in this instance, the incumbent), regardless of fact, logic, reason or objective reality.

Big business owns 90% of the media. Big business likes stability. Big business's profits have been at an all time high. Why would they want to change that?

 

[Old Rocks]

So you all are the victims Romney was talking about in his 47% comment?

More fraudulent spin on what Romney did say.

What a surprise. A mindless lib shill hack like deuce deliberately distorting things to make his petty dishonest talking pointless.

Full Transcript of the Mitt Romney Secret Video | Mother Jones

There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what. And I mean, the president starts off with 48, 49, 48—he starts off with a huge number. These are people who pay no income tax. Forty-seven percent of Americans pay no income tax. So our message of low taxes doesn't connect. And he'll be out there talking about tax cuts for the rich. I mean that's what they sell every four years. And so my job is not to worry about those people—I'll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives. What I have to do is convince the 5 to 10 percent in the center that are independents that are thoughtful, that look at voting one way or the other depending upon in some cases emotion, whether they like the guy or not, what it looks like. I mean, when you ask those people…we do all these polls—I find it amazing—we poll all these people, see where you stand on the polls, but 45 percent of the people will go with a Republican, and 48 or 4…

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Surely the "progressive" pussies and maddow over at pmsnbc have already decided............