Nobdoy in their right mind (except drug addled, conservative radio talkers), defends a health insurance system in a major industrialized nation, that is the primary cause for most of the bankruptcy filings in the nation
I'm not saying that there isn't anything we can do to improve the healthcare system. I'm just saying that waiving your insurance policy at the Grim Reaper doesn't change his mind.
Practitioners, themselves, kill more people than what die from lack of insurance. And Obama's plan won't even provide policies to everyone anyway. It's a con job, that's sole purpose is to increase the size of government and the scope of government intrusion.
It is a Con job in the sense that it is very similar to what Massachusets has. Yes that conservative health care reform put forth by the former Governor of Massachusetts, .Republican Weld...and yes... Scott Brown (the latest idol of the right)...voted for it before he said he'd vote against it.
If you truly believe the main reason people like me want a government option is to increase the size of government you are crazy. The backing of a government option is the result of the failure of private enterprise to adequately address the needs of health care policy.. The fact that it will increase the size of government is a consequence of this...not the reason.
Affordable and accessable health care is now being viewed as a right in a civilized society.
Those who choose to not carry Health Insurance because they are young and do not feel sick will not carry it under the new plan.
Those with pre-existing conditions will carry insurance if they can get it, but can't. It is this group that needs help. This could be handled with a government subsidy or by a policy rider funded by the government.
Those who need and want it, but can't pay for it will be out in the cold whether under the current system or the proposed system.
I think these three general groups cover about all of the people who are uninsured. The proposed program costs a bundle and really only helps the second of the three groups above.
Why not solve the problem that exists and leave the problems that don't exist outside the consideration?