Roeder Found Guilty of Murder

I am amazed that anyone defends this disgusting piece of trash who deserves to be wiped off of the bottom of our shoes...

I have zero respect for anyone who thinks a doctor should be murdered for performing a LEGAL procedure (or any procedure) on a patient.

Why is every liberal's defense of murder (abortion) is that it's "legal"? If it were legal for a husband to kill his wife, or for an employee to kill his boss, would you defend that as well?

Aborton is NOT murder. Abortion is a Constitutionally protect medical procedure. Shooting Dr. Tiller, whiile in church was murder and Roeder got what he deserved.

On one hand the cons don't the "Government Option." because that would be putting the government in the Doctor's Office, interfering with the decision making process between doctor and patient. But on the other hand, they want the government in the doctor's officer, interfering with the decision making process between a doctor and patient when it comes to one of the most personal decisions a woman has to make.

Yet another example of Ye Olde Conservative Thought Process, or in this case....the lack there of.

In the case of abortion for convenience, legal or not, it is not murder only if you do not consider the unborn baby to be a human life. If you can rationalize that it is not, then it is not murder. If you consider it as the early phases of human life, then it is quite easy to see the willful, unnecessary destruction of it as murder.

It's the same with the death penalty. Some see that as the lawful consequence of the law; some see it as murder even though it is entirely legal.

In the case of war, some see death of innocents as inevitable and tragic even as they see the war as necessary. Others see any form of killing in war as murder even though it is legal by the proper decision of Congress and the President.

So don't presume to judge motives as just 'the old conservative thought process'.
 

Forum List

Back
Top