Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by dilloduck, Mar 9, 2006.
We might get lucky and see "pro-abortion" wing be exposed as the feminist agenda that it REALLY is.
I wonder if he could sue her for fraud, misrepresentation, etc.
Seems like a logical extension of this perverse and unholy "law."
It does----maybe the logic will reflect back on the original mistake with a light that-----enlightens ! :teeth:
One can always hope...
I've been arguing for years that as soon as men are OPENLY DENIED any "benefit" from ROE v WADE, the true intent of it will be exposed.
I can see the reasoning behind this.
Abortion REMOVES choice. A man cannot decide to kill the baby simply because it is inconvenient for HIM. On the other hand, a man cannot legally coerce a woman into carrying the child to term if he WANTS it. Completely unfair.
When a man and a woman have sex is when the decision to be willing to become a parent is made. When ROE V WADE was being argued the feminists insisted that this was NOT so in the case of a woman. Now the opponents to this action are using the VERY SAME ARGUMENT to try to defeat the mans' decision to choose. Not only unfair--it's blatant gender discrimination.
Separate names with a comma.