Roberts craps on freedom. romney campaign down the crapper

[Too Tall]

people can say what they want about reps now being energized, this re-elected obama.

There are a lot of independents in the 61% that opposed Obamacare, and I suggest that a lot of them will vote for Romney to get this job killing tax repealed by the Congress.

 

[Ernie S.]

this ends freedom as we know it. it also undercuts the argument we need romney to nominate more robert's. there never was any enthusiasm for romney and there will be less now.

I disagree. If anything, this will work in Romney's favor. It will energize Conservatives and make libs fat and happy.

hahahahahahahahahahahahah


your point of veiw cant be maintained by a thinking right leaner.

roberts just proved that

Roberts voted his conscience. I may disagree, but that's the way it is. 2/3 of the country is against the individual mandate and they are PISSED!

 

[regent]

The realism of a democracy, is that it is difficult to write complete foolproof laws the first time around, they are usually compromises.
As time passes, however, the law may be smoothed out, changes made and the end result will be like we see Social Security today? It may even come to pass that the Tea Party philosophy will eventually prevail: KEEP SOCIALISM OUT OF MY MEDICARE.

 

[Intense]

The realism of a democracy, is that it is difficult to write complete foolproof laws the first time around, they are usually compromises.
As time passes, however, the law may be smoothed out, changes made and the end result will be like we see Social Security today? It may even come to pass that the Tea Party philosophy will eventually prevail: KEEP SOCIALISM OUT OF MY MEDICARE.

 

[bobgnote]

people can say what they want about reps now being energized, this re-elected obama.

There are a lot of independents in the 61% that opposed Obamacare, and I suggest that a lot of them will vote for Romney to get this job killing tax repealed by the Congress.

I don't think independents are going to vote for Obamney, white or black. I think you supporters of the sack-racers are going to go down to the wire, with your candidates locked together, in a dead-heat, in which case Mitt is dead meat.

OR, Meat proves he doesn't have CRS, he isn't just a hack CEO, and he develops some sort of plan, to combat global climate change, which would undercut black Obamney, for his audacity, to co-opt white Obamney's healthcare idea. But the wingpunks who make up today's pub-party aren't like the occasional standouts, of the past.

So white Obamney won't get VALUE or GREEN ENERGY or CLIMATE CHANGE up. He just can't. What white Obamney did at Bain was re-finance, cut jobs, outsource, and collect $13 million, in the last two years. He doesn't appeal, to independents. White Obamney would need to get VALUE, in the bogus economy, but hey. He can't. He's a toad! His right leg is in a sack, with black Obamney's left leg. Hippity-hop, hoppity-hip. You think these assholes would do something, to REALLY lead, which would attract independent voters, while instructing their committed constituents. But nooooo.

On white Obamney's side, black Obamney sucks, and he doesn't appeal to independents. Black Obamney completely blows off independent voters. So what we have is a standoff. Both Obamneys are unacceptable assholes. But whose supporters are more obnoxious? Are the black Obamnists a cult of DDD, or are the white Obamnists a cult of ugly fucktardiness? Or both? (The correct answer is BOTH!)

I vote NEITHER. Too bad Ralph Nader isn't running, in 2012.