Mike Dwight
VIP Member
- Jul 23, 2017
- 1,756
- 54
- 85
- Banned
- #1
I noticed that in about half Southern States, Robert E Lee Day is recognized as a State holiday at the same time as the Martin Luther King Jr. Federal holiday. Aren't these celebrations compatible and mutually affirming? I know Matin Luther King Jr. said his homestates were full of "vicious racists". I don't think that's how the Holiday is choosing to remember people. I don't think the Robert E Lee holiday is choosing a staunch Union interpretation, that African Americans, urgently had all their wishes and dreams met, stolen out of the Southland. Do you guys see a chance with Confederate African American progress?
I am in favor on this one. Seems like to me, we have to stop dumping everything on one particular people and story. What percent of an American's nationalism, an American's nationalism, is now, very recently, wrapped up in the Union argument? Chant "I pledge allegiance to the Flag, of the United States of America, and to the Republic, for which it stands, one Nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty, and Justice for All" until you fall over, right? How about "I pledge allegiance to the God of our Fathers, of the Confederate States In America, and to the Republic, for which He stands, 50 Nations, Under God, with Liberty, and Justice for All", I mean see, that's heavy handed.
They probably have the Exact same education system for North Koreans. The integral constant C is added to the square root. Also, nobody's ever heard of the English Civil War, the biggest events in Britain, because the Confederates drew direct inspiration from it. Not a single tiny word. If African Americans became interested in the entire British Colony story, native Americans, then everybody would be equal, respectful, and pro-immigration. I mean, how else does that happen anywhere else in the world, I ask you?
The difference between the National Socialist party book burnings and what we're doing as Unionists are near the same thing. We're twisting logic in little loops. When Andrew Jackson defended States interests as President with the Trail of Tears, doing so as a Presbyterian, the Church of Scotland, in a United Kingdom, where "United" should indicate the cooperative will of a Scottish State. When Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson was the spiritual leader among Jefferson Davis and Robert E Lee, he did so the most devout Presbyterian. When President Woodrow Wilson won a comeback Confederate-for-President ticket, he did so, as the biggest Presbyterian on this continent. 2 Years into Martin Luther King Jr. these are the Sorts of people, the True people I Don't understand, who said they stand for the Statue of Liberty, the Star Spangled Banner, when President Eisenhower joined. We're falling over ourselves in semi-truths I can't follow these semi-truths.
How is this a country of immigrants? Did English, Scots, and Dutch join the Iroquois Nations? They made a country that sounded like a good idea. They did that without the heavy penalty with disturbing religious order, like some sort of Napoleonic revolution. The firm model discussed since the 1776 and Articles of Confederation was modeling the previous leagues of Reformed Religion and Government European Nation-States, like Scotland, Netherlands, Switzerland, etc, which, is enough statement against the British tyranny, which deprived American Colonists of rights equal to that of State or recognizing State. The Pilgrim Fathers, the God of our Fathers, and the Pilgrim's Pride, and Puritans, was a Reformed Religion movement among English that journeyed to America, which is the natural inclination geopolitical inclination of those native peoples and their lands.They all somehow pick this part out as still teachable, by the way.
So finally, the reason these people identified with Presbyterianism, is its close association to the first Americans, the Reformed Puritan strain, the Confederate Cross like the Scottish St Andrews cross, or the Bonnie Blue Flag, Bonnie being the Scottish for Pretty, and these are sensitive enough topics enough now to "cast off the flock", I don't understand a lot of twisted logic these days.
I am in favor on this one. Seems like to me, we have to stop dumping everything on one particular people and story. What percent of an American's nationalism, an American's nationalism, is now, very recently, wrapped up in the Union argument? Chant "I pledge allegiance to the Flag, of the United States of America, and to the Republic, for which it stands, one Nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty, and Justice for All" until you fall over, right? How about "I pledge allegiance to the God of our Fathers, of the Confederate States In America, and to the Republic, for which He stands, 50 Nations, Under God, with Liberty, and Justice for All", I mean see, that's heavy handed.
They probably have the Exact same education system for North Koreans. The integral constant C is added to the square root. Also, nobody's ever heard of the English Civil War, the biggest events in Britain, because the Confederates drew direct inspiration from it. Not a single tiny word. If African Americans became interested in the entire British Colony story, native Americans, then everybody would be equal, respectful, and pro-immigration. I mean, how else does that happen anywhere else in the world, I ask you?
The difference between the National Socialist party book burnings and what we're doing as Unionists are near the same thing. We're twisting logic in little loops. When Andrew Jackson defended States interests as President with the Trail of Tears, doing so as a Presbyterian, the Church of Scotland, in a United Kingdom, where "United" should indicate the cooperative will of a Scottish State. When Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson was the spiritual leader among Jefferson Davis and Robert E Lee, he did so the most devout Presbyterian. When President Woodrow Wilson won a comeback Confederate-for-President ticket, he did so, as the biggest Presbyterian on this continent. 2 Years into Martin Luther King Jr. these are the Sorts of people, the True people I Don't understand, who said they stand for the Statue of Liberty, the Star Spangled Banner, when President Eisenhower joined. We're falling over ourselves in semi-truths I can't follow these semi-truths.
How is this a country of immigrants? Did English, Scots, and Dutch join the Iroquois Nations? They made a country that sounded like a good idea. They did that without the heavy penalty with disturbing religious order, like some sort of Napoleonic revolution. The firm model discussed since the 1776 and Articles of Confederation was modeling the previous leagues of Reformed Religion and Government European Nation-States, like Scotland, Netherlands, Switzerland, etc, which, is enough statement against the British tyranny, which deprived American Colonists of rights equal to that of State or recognizing State. The Pilgrim Fathers, the God of our Fathers, and the Pilgrim's Pride, and Puritans, was a Reformed Religion movement among English that journeyed to America, which is the natural inclination geopolitical inclination of those native peoples and their lands.They all somehow pick this part out as still teachable, by the way.
So finally, the reason these people identified with Presbyterianism, is its close association to the first Americans, the Reformed Puritan strain, the Confederate Cross like the Scottish St Andrews cross, or the Bonnie Blue Flag, Bonnie being the Scottish for Pretty, and these are sensitive enough topics enough now to "cast off the flock", I don't understand a lot of twisted logic these days.
Last edited:
