Rising Sea Levels Reshape Miami’s Housing Market

[Sunsettommy]

This has been going on in many places in the nation for decades.
Now one of the biggest victims of AGW showing evidence of what is to come.
For all you warming deniers: you Clowns who say "it's colder than normal in Chicago today, so it can't be warming".
Would you write a 30 year mortgage on a Miami waterfront house?

Rising Sea Levels Reshape Miami’s Housing Market
Properties on the coast now trade at Discounts as flood waters and ‘king tides’ damp enthusiasm for oceanfront living
By Laura Kusisto and Arian Campo-Flores
Wall Street Journal - April 20, 2018
Rising Sea Levels Reshape Miami’s Housing Market

MIAMI—Concerns over rising sea levels and floods are beginning to reshape one of the country’s largest housing markets, with properties closer to sea level now trading at discounts to those at higher elevations.

Research published Friday in the journal of Environmental Research Letters shows that single-family homes in Miami-Dade County are rising in value more slowly near sea level than at higher elevations, as buyers weigh the possibilities of more-frequent minor flooding in the short term and the challenge of reselling...
[....]​

balance by subscription, but you get the picture.
`

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Miami has been barely above sea level for at least 5000 years, Humans planted themselves into places like this, then cry over it a few decades later is stupid.

Why did they start New Orleans, which was from day one below sea level?

The really funny part is that just a few thousand years ago, sea was at least ONE METER higher than now. Here are a few published science papers for you warmists to ignore,

Song et al., 2018 South Korea, +1 to +2 m higher than present (rate: +1.4 meters per century)

“A sea-level curve for the west coast of South Korea was reconstructed. Sea level rose rapidly at a rate of ~1.4 cm yr–1 from 9.8–8.4 cal kyr B.P. [1.4 meters per century] and rose gradually until the mid-Holocene, after which it fell gradually to the present. There is a sea-level highstand of 1–2 m [above present] from 7–4 cal kyr B.P., likely due to hydro-isostatic effects. The rapid sea-level rise during the early Holocene is clearly a manifestation of polar ice sheet decay. The results were supported by the GIA model. The Holocene RSL change on the west coast of South Korea was closely linked to global temperature and ice sheet decay, especially during the early Holocene.”

and,

Cooper et al., 2017 Northern Ireland, +2 to +3 m higher than present

“Whitepark Bay is located on the paraglacial north coast of Northern Ireland. … After deglaciation sea-level fell to a low of -30 m by ca. 13.5 ka cal yr BP (Cooper et al., 2002; Kelley et al., 2006) before rising to a mid-Holocene highstand of 2-3 m above present around 6 cal kay r BP (Carter, 1982; Orford et al., 2006).”

and,

Yoon et al., 2017 South Korea, +6 m higher than present

“Songaksan is the youngest eruptive centre on Jeju Island, Korea, and was produced by a phreatomagmatic eruption in a coastal setting c. 3.7 ka BP [3,700 years before present]. The 1 m thick basal portion of the tuff ring shows an unusually well-preserved transition of facies from intertidal to supratidal, from which palaeo-high-tide level and a total of 13 high-tide events were inferred. Another set of erosion surfaces and reworked deposits in the middle of the tuff ring, as high as 6 m above present mean sea level, is interpreted to be the product of wave reworking during a storm-surge event that lasted approximately three tidal cycles. … The reworked deposits alternate three or four times with the primary tuff beds of Units B and C and occur as high as 6 m above present mean sea level or 4 m above high-tide level (based on land-based Lidar terrain mapping of the outcrop surface).”

and,

Miklavič et al., 2017 Northern Philippine Sea, +3 m higher than present

“Holocene relative sea level history from phreatic overgrowths on speleothems (POS) on Minami Daito Island, Northern Philippine Sea… The results show that SL [sea level] reached its Holocene maximum between ca. 5.1 and 4.6 ka cal BP [4,600 to 5,100 years ago], after which it remained more or less stable till the present day, with a possible minor sea-level drawdown of ca. 30–35 cm…. The mid Holocene highstand is commonly assumed to have been ca. 3 m above the modern SL [sea level], although the observed heights range between +0.5 m and +4 m.”

I have a lot more.

 

[abu afak]

duplicate

 

[abu afak]

Absolutely if I can sell it in 30.. If it can't stand 1.8" of supposed "global warming" SLRise, you're gonna be DEAD MEAT...

LOLuddite!

https://gizmodo.com/why-are-sea-levels-in-miami-rising-so-much-faster-than-1797733450

Sea levels in South Florida have gone up about a Foot since the 1930s, but around 2011, the slow upward creep of the ocean seemed to kick into high gear, with tidal gauges recording much faster rates of sea level rise and residents noting a stark uptick in so-called “nuisance” floods.
A new study confirms that this was not Floridians’ imaginations: From 2011 to at least 2015, the rate of sea level rise across the Southeastern US shot up by a factor of Six, from 3-4 millimeters a year to 20, and a combination of oceanic and atmospheric processes seem to be responsible
[.....]
“The Miami area started getting almost an inch of sea level [rise] a year,” Hal Wanless, a coastal geologist at the University of Miami, told Gizmodo. “People noticed that.”



[png] Image/Graph won't post but Link:
https://www.greenpolicy360.net/mw/images/Sea_level_rise_Miami_area_tide_data_1996-2015.png
`

​

Actually, the uptick LUDDITE coincided COMPLETELY with the switch from using coastal TIDE GUAGES to satellite measurements. The rate was about 1.8 mm per year ALONG THE COASTS. And the tide gauges are NOT WRONG.

Since you don't know this shit -- the oceans are NOT FLAT and NOT uniform. So when you add in all the other surface area -- you;'re measuring tidal pools , currents, and weather a LOT more. But what's GERMANE to MIAMI is the measurements AT THE COAST..

Let's be clear Moron.
I made mincemeat of you and your idiotic post.
One should NOT write a 30 year mortage on a Miami Waterfront prpoerty, and sea Level rise will NOT be "1.8" over that period. :^)

Further, my numbers were good for NOT just Miami but in good extent the whole Southeast. Of course, and as MY article said, SL rise is not even planet-wise due to many factors on the spinning ball we live on.

YOU LOST CLOWN.

I might add because of your position here..
You must have come across/Partisanly/DISINGENUOUSLY/DISHONESTLY Ignored all the real data such as I posted on the way to your BS reply
ie
https://www.google.com/search?q=mia...0l3j69i65j0.3259j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Despicable.
`

 

[flacaltenn]

One should N\OT write a 30 year mortage on a Miami Waterfront prpoerty and sea Level rise will NOT be "1.8" over that period.

REALLY? who's estimating? the 50 year forecast has an almost 2.5 times bound on the confidence bracket.

And YES -- most SLR graphs are now MERGED satellite and tide gauge data for SPECIFIC areas. And they DO take the satellite over-all MSL into account so EVERY slope changed at coastal stations during the time period of your graph.

 

[Sunsettommy]

I have visited Tacloban Leyte in the Philippines, a large city that is less than a foot above sea level, and right at the edge of the coastline.

I still remember that Air strip in the airport being less than a foot above sea level and right at the edge of the ocean too. The city has been SMASHED by tropical storms many times, sometimes catastrophic as it was in 1887, 1912 and 2012. Yet they just rebuild and go on, never thinking may be it is better to move a lot of it inland a couple miles and build a storm wall. Most of the cities business was right next to the coastline, thus getting economically smashed is a going to be a forgone conclusion.

Houston was founded in a MARSHY area in the 1830's yet complain that it gets flooded many times, and warmists stupidly attribute global warming to their flooding problem.

New Orleans was founded on unstable land below sea level, no surprise that it has been smashed by big storms, yet warmists cry about it.

The point is that Cities get founded in the wrong places, then ignore repeated smashing's from storms, then hypocritically cry about it.

 

[Sunsettommy]

duplicate

What is funny about my post with a number of published science papers showing higher sea levels earlier in the Holocene?

 

[abu afak]

What is funny about my post with a number of published science papers showing higher sea levels earlier in the Holocene?

It's anecdotal/local and omits/ignores ie, tectonic/subsidence forces. Duh.
What is clear is sea level is rising GLOBALLY Now, and at an increasing rate.
(And of course, the OP claim was for Miami and S-E, and it's relatively faster rate)

`

 

[Sunsettommy]

duplicate

What is funny about my post with a number of published science papers showing higher sea levels earlier in the Holocene?

It's anecdotal. Duih.
`

The papers?

Here are more you plan to ignore?

Marwick et al., 2017 (full paper) Thailand, +4 to +5 m higher than present

“Sinsakul (1992) has summarised 56 radiocarbon dates of shell and peat from beach and tidal locations to estimate a Holocene sea level curve for peninsula Thailand that starts with a steady rise in sea level until about 6 k BP, reaching a height of +4 m amsl (above [present]mean sea level). Sea levels then regressed until 4.7 k BP, then rising again to 2.5 m amsl at about 4 k BP. From 3.7 k to 2.7 k BP there was a regressive phase, with transgression starting again at 2.7 k BP to a maximum of 2 m amsl at 2.5 k BP. Regression continued from that time until the present sea levels were reached at 1.5 k BP. … Tjia (1996) collected over 130 radiocarbon ages from geological deposits of shell in abrasion platforms, sea-level notches and oyster beds and identified a +5 m [above present] highstand at ca. 5 k BP in the Thai-Malay Peninsula. … Sathiamurthy and Voris (2006) summarise the evidence described above as indicating that between 6 and 4.2 k BP, the sea level rose from 0 m to +5 m [above present] along the Sunda Shelf [+2.8 mm/yr], marking the regional mid-Holocene highstand. Following this highstand, the sea level fell gradually and reached the modern level at about 1 k BP.”

and,

Jiang et al., 2017 Southern China, +2.4 to +4.26 m higher than present

“[T]hree coastal sediments with 4 m, 3.7 m, and 2 m higher than present sea-level were deposited at 2.40 ± 0.05 ka, 2.92 ± 0.17 ka, and 4.26 ± 0.10 ka, respectively [2,400, 2,920, and 4,260 years before present], which indicate that the height of highstand relative sea-level are higher than both mean global sea-level eustacy and those records offshore southern China. … In conclusion, a beach ridge and two marine terraces sediments have been dated at eastern Hainan Island. They were well bleached and can be taken as good indicators of paleo-RSL [relative sea level] highstand records of late Holocene. Three highstand RSL [relative sea level] events occurred at 0.02-0.05 ka [200-500 years ago], 2.40-2.92 ka [2,400 to 2,920 years ago] and ~4.26 ka [4,260 years ago] with the sea-level heights of 0.5-1.5 m, 4 m, 3.7-4.0 m and 2 m [above present levels],respectively. The height of highstand RSLs are higher than both mean global sea-level euastacy and those of offshore southern China.”

and,

Khan et al., 2017 Caribbean, ~+1 m above present (rate: 1.09 meters per century)

“Only Suriname and Guyana [Caribbean] exhibited higher RSL[relative sea level] than present (82% probability), reaching a maximum height of ∼1 m [above present] at 5.2 ka [5,200 years ago]. … Because of meltwater input, the rates of RSL [relative sea level] change were highest during the early Holocene, with a maximum of 10.9 ± 0.6 m/ka [1.09 meters per century] in Suriname and Guyana and minimum of 7.4 ± 0.7 m/ka [0.74 meters per century] in south Florida from 12 to 8 ka [12,000 to 8,000 years ago].”

and,

Sander et al., 2016 Denmark, +2.2 m higher than present

“The data show a period of RSL [relative sea level] highstand at c. 2.2 m above present MSL [mean sea level] between c. 5.0 and 4.0 ka BP [5,000 to 4,000 years before present]. “

and,

Long et al., 2016 Scotland, < +1 m higher than present

“RSL [relative sea level] data from Loch Eriboll and the Wick River Valley show that RSL [relative sea level] was <1 m above present for several thousand years during the mid and late Holocene before it fell to present.”

and,

Lokier et al., 2015 Persian Gulf, > +1 m above present

“Mid-Holocene transgression of the Gulf surpassed today’s sea level by 7100–6890 cal yr BP [~7000 years ago], attaining a highstand of > 1 m above current sea level shortly after 5290–4570 cal yr BP before falling back to current levels by 1440–1170 cal yr BP. These new ages refine previously reported timings for the mid- to late Holocene sea-level highstand published for other regions.”

and,

Stategger et al., 2013 South Vietnam, +1.4 m higher than present

“The rates of sea-level rise decreased sharply after the rapid early Holocene rise and stabilized at a rate of 4.5 mm/year between 8.0 and 6.9 ka. Southeast Vietnam beachrocks reveal that the mid-Holocene sea-level highstand slightly above +1.4 m was reached between 6.7 and 5.0 ka, with a peak value close to +1.5 m around 6.0 ka.”

and,

Carson, 2011 Guam, Western Pacific, +1.5 to +2 m higher than present

“The case study in Guam may be viewed as representative of a broader region of the Remote Oceanic islands in the western Pacific, where first human settlement occurred around 1500-1000 B.C. (Bellwood, 1997; Kirch, 2000, 2010; Spriggs, 2007), generally at sites that today are broad sandy beaches but once had been small offshore islets, sand berms or spits, narrow beach fringes, and strand-like swampy settings around the end of a mid-Holocene highstand of sea level about 1.5-2 m above the present level (Carson, 2008a, 2008b; Dickinson and Burley, 2007; Gosden and Webb, 1994; Kirch, 1997; Nunn, 2005, 2007; Wickler, 2001).”

and,

Wündsch et al., 2018 South Africa, +3 m higher than present

“Holocene sea level reconstructions suggest a reduction of the speed of the sea level rise during this time [~7900–6400 cal BP]. The sea level likely reached and exceeded the height of the PSL [present sea level] by as much as 3 m .”

Is that enough for you?

Now have covered many nations coastlines in my two paper filled postings.

I have a lot more.

 

[abu afak]

duplicate

What is funny about my post with a number of published science papers showing higher sea levels earlier in the Holocene?

It's anecdotal. Duih.
`

The papers?

Here are more you plan to ignore?

Marwick et al., 2017 (full paper) Thailand, +4 to +5 m higher than present

“Sinsakul (1992) has summarised 56 radiocarbon dates of shell and peat from beach and tidal locations to estimate a Holocene sea level curve for peninsula Thailand that starts with a steady rise in sea level until about 6 k BP, reaching a height of +4 m amsl (above [present]mean sea level). Sea levels then regressed until 4.7 k BP, then rising again to 2.5 m amsl at about 4 k BP. From 3.7 k to 2.7 k BP there was a regressive phase, with transgression starting again at 2.7 k BP to a maximum of 2 m amsl at 2.5 k BP. Regression continued from that time until the present sea levels were reached at 1.5 k BP. … Tjia (1996) collected over 130 radiocarbon ages from geological deposits of shell in abrasion platforms, sea-level notches and oyster beds and identified a +5 m [above present] highstand at ca. 5 k BP in the Thai-Malay Peninsula. … Sathiamurthy and Voris (2006) summarise the evidence described above as indicating that between 6 and 4.2 k BP, the sea level rose from 0 m to +5 m [above present] along the Sunda Shelf [+2.8 mm/yr], marking the regional mid-Holocene highstand. Following this highstand, the sea level fell gradually and reached the modern level at about 1 k BP.”

and,

Jiang et al., 2017 Southern China, +2.4 to +4.26 m higher than present

“[T]hree coastal sediments with 4 m, 3.7 m, and 2 m higher than present sea-level were deposited at 2.40 ± 0.05 ka, 2.92 ± 0.17 ka, and 4.26 ± 0.10 ka, respectively [2,400, 2,920, and 4,260 years before present], which indicate that the height of highstand relative sea-level are higher than both mean global sea-level eustacy and those records offshore southern China. … In conclusion, a beach ridge and two marine terraces sediments have been dated at eastern Hainan Island. They were well bleached and can be taken as good indicators of paleo-RSL [relative sea level] highstand records of late Holocene. Three highstand RSL [relative sea level] events occurred at 0.02-0.05 ka [200-500 years ago], 2.40-2.92 ka [2,400 to 2,920 years ago] and ~4.26 ka [4,260 years ago] with the sea-level heights of 0.5-1.5 m, 4 m, 3.7-4.0 m and 2 m [above present levels],respectively. The height of highstand RSLs are higher than both mean global sea-level euastacy and those of offshore southern China.”

and,

Khan et al., 2017 Caribbean, ~+1 m above present (rate: 1.09 meters per century)

“Only Suriname and Guyana [Caribbean] exhibited higher RSL[relative sea level] than present (82% probability), reaching a maximum height of ∼1 m [above present] at 5.2 ka [5,200 years ago]. … Because of meltwater input, the rates of RSL [relative sea level] change were highest during the early Holocene, with a maximum of 10.9 ± 0.6 m/ka [1.09 meters per century] in Suriname and Guyana and minimum of 7.4 ± 0.7 m/ka [0.74 meters per century] in south Florida from 12 to 8 ka [12,000 to 8,000 years ago].”

and,

Sander et al., 2016 Denmark, +2.2 m higher than present

“The data show a period of RSL [relative sea level] highstand at c. 2.2 m above present MSL [mean sea level] between c. 5.0 and 4.0 ka BP [5,000 to 4,000 years before present]. “

and,

Long et al., 2016 Scotland, < +1 m higher than present

“RSL [relative sea level] data from Loch Eriboll and the Wick River Valley show that RSL [relative sea level] was <1 m above present for several thousand years during the mid and late Holocene before it fell to present.”

and,

Lokier et al., 2015 Persian Gulf, > +1 m above present

“Mid-Holocene transgression of the Gulf surpassed today’s sea level by 7100–6890 cal yr BP [~7000 years ago], attaining a highstand of > 1 m above current sea level shortly after 5290–4570 cal yr BP before falling back to current levels by 1440–1170 cal yr BP. These new ages refine previously reported timings for the mid- to late Holocene sea-level highstand published for other regions.”

and,

Stategger et al., 2013 South Vietnam, +1.4 m higher than present

“The rates of sea-level rise decreased sharply after the rapid early Holocene rise and stabilized at a rate of 4.5 mm/year between 8.0 and 6.9 ka. Southeast Vietnam beachrocks reveal that the mid-Holocene sea-level highstand slightly above +1.4 m was reached between 6.7 and 5.0 ka, with a peak value close to +1.5 m around 6.0 ka.”

and,

Carson, 2011 Guam, Western Pacific, +1.5 to +2 m higher than present

“The case study in Guam may be viewed as representative of a broader region of the Remote Oceanic islands in the western Pacific, where first human settlement occurred around 1500-1000 B.C. (Bellwood, 1997; Kirch, 2000, 2010; Spriggs, 2007), generally at sites that today are broad sandy beaches but once had been small offshore islets, sand berms or spits, narrow beach fringes, and strand-like swampy settings around the end of a mid-Holocene highstand of sea level about 1.5-2 m above the present level (Carson, 2008a, 2008b; Dickinson and Burley, 2007; Gosden and Webb, 1994; Kirch, 1997; Nunn, 2005, 2007; Wickler, 2001).”

and,

Wündsch et al., 2018 South Africa, +3 m higher than present

“Holocene sea level reconstructions suggest a reduction of the speed of the sea level rise during this time [~7900–6400 cal BP]. The sea level likely reached and exceeded the height of the PSL [present sea level] by as much as 3 m .”

Is that enough for you?

Now have covered many nations coastlines in my two paper filled postings.

I have a lot more.

Your new, and apparently Bury-em-with BS (Probably PLAGIARIZED from some denier Blog like WUWT. ) reply, does NOT change my last post Porking your Link Dump. No, size does NOT count clown.

It's anecdotal/local and omits/ignores ie, tectonic/subsidence forces. Duh.
What is clear is sea level is rising GLOBALLY Now, and at an increasing rate.
(And of course, the OP claim was for Miami and S-E, and it's relatively faster rate)​

`

 

[Sunsettommy]

The following nations coastlines covered in the papers I posted:

South Korea
Northern Ireland
Northern Philippine Sea
Thailand
Southern China
Caribbean
Denmark
Scotland
Persian Gulf
South Vietnam
Guam
South Africa

There are many more, but I see that you are a typical brain dead warmist loon, who has made it clear you are determined ignore what the papers says.

 

[Sunsettommy]

duplicate

What is funny about my post with a number of published science papers showing higher sea levels earlier in the Holocene?

It's anecdotal. Duih.
`

The papers?

Here are more you plan to ignore?

Marwick et al., 2017 (full paper) Thailand, +4 to +5 m higher than present

“Sinsakul (1992) has summarised 56 radiocarbon dates of shell and peat from beach and tidal locations to estimate a Holocene sea level curve for peninsula Thailand that starts with a steady rise in sea level until about 6 k BP, reaching a height of +4 m amsl (above [present]mean sea level). Sea levels then regressed until 4.7 k BP, then rising again to 2.5 m amsl at about 4 k BP. From 3.7 k to 2.7 k BP there was a regressive phase, with transgression starting again at 2.7 k BP to a maximum of 2 m amsl at 2.5 k BP. Regression continued from that time until the present sea levels were reached at 1.5 k BP. … Tjia (1996) collected over 130 radiocarbon ages from geological deposits of shell in abrasion platforms, sea-level notches and oyster beds and identified a +5 m [above present] highstand at ca. 5 k BP in the Thai-Malay Peninsula. … Sathiamurthy and Voris (2006) summarise the evidence described above as indicating that between 6 and 4.2 k BP, the sea level rose from 0 m to +5 m [above present] along the Sunda Shelf [+2.8 mm/yr], marking the regional mid-Holocene highstand. Following this highstand, the sea level fell gradually and reached the modern level at about 1 k BP.”

and,

Jiang et al., 2017 Southern China, +2.4 to +4.26 m higher than present

“[T]hree coastal sediments with 4 m, 3.7 m, and 2 m higher than present sea-level were deposited at 2.40 ± 0.05 ka, 2.92 ± 0.17 ka, and 4.26 ± 0.10 ka, respectively [2,400, 2,920, and 4,260 years before present], which indicate that the height of highstand relative sea-level are higher than both mean global sea-level eustacy and those records offshore southern China. … In conclusion, a beach ridge and two marine terraces sediments have been dated at eastern Hainan Island. They were well bleached and can be taken as good indicators of paleo-RSL [relative sea level] highstand records of late Holocene. Three highstand RSL [relative sea level] events occurred at 0.02-0.05 ka [200-500 years ago], 2.40-2.92 ka [2,400 to 2,920 years ago] and ~4.26 ka [4,260 years ago] with the sea-level heights of 0.5-1.5 m, 4 m, 3.7-4.0 m and 2 m [above present levels],respectively. The height of highstand RSLs are higher than both mean global sea-level euastacy and those of offshore southern China.”

and,

Khan et al., 2017 Caribbean, ~+1 m above present (rate: 1.09 meters per century)

“Only Suriname and Guyana [Caribbean] exhibited higher RSL[relative sea level] than present (82% probability), reaching a maximum height of ∼1 m [above present] at 5.2 ka [5,200 years ago]. … Because of meltwater input, the rates of RSL [relative sea level] change were highest during the early Holocene, with a maximum of 10.9 ± 0.6 m/ka [1.09 meters per century] in Suriname and Guyana and minimum of 7.4 ± 0.7 m/ka [0.74 meters per century] in south Florida from 12 to 8 ka [12,000 to 8,000 years ago].”

and,

Sander et al., 2016 Denmark, +2.2 m higher than present

“The data show a period of RSL [relative sea level] highstand at c. 2.2 m above present MSL [mean sea level] between c. 5.0 and 4.0 ka BP [5,000 to 4,000 years before present]. “

and,

Long et al., 2016 Scotland, < +1 m higher than present

“RSL [relative sea level] data from Loch Eriboll and the Wick River Valley show that RSL [relative sea level] was <1 m above present for several thousand years during the mid and late Holocene before it fell to present.”

and,

Lokier et al., 2015 Persian Gulf, > +1 m above present

“Mid-Holocene transgression of the Gulf surpassed today’s sea level by 7100–6890 cal yr BP [~7000 years ago], attaining a highstand of > 1 m above current sea level shortly after 5290–4570 cal yr BP before falling back to current levels by 1440–1170 cal yr BP. These new ages refine previously reported timings for the mid- to late Holocene sea-level highstand published for other regions.”

and,

Stategger et al., 2013 South Vietnam, +1.4 m higher than present

“The rates of sea-level rise decreased sharply after the rapid early Holocene rise and stabilized at a rate of 4.5 mm/year between 8.0 and 6.9 ka. Southeast Vietnam beachrocks reveal that the mid-Holocene sea-level highstand slightly above +1.4 m was reached between 6.7 and 5.0 ka, with a peak value close to +1.5 m around 6.0 ka.”

and,

Carson, 2011 Guam, Western Pacific, +1.5 to +2 m higher than present

“The case study in Guam may be viewed as representative of a broader region of the Remote Oceanic islands in the western Pacific, where first human settlement occurred around 1500-1000 B.C. (Bellwood, 1997; Kirch, 2000, 2010; Spriggs, 2007), generally at sites that today are broad sandy beaches but once had been small offshore islets, sand berms or spits, narrow beach fringes, and strand-like swampy settings around the end of a mid-Holocene highstand of sea level about 1.5-2 m above the present level (Carson, 2008a, 2008b; Dickinson and Burley, 2007; Gosden and Webb, 1994; Kirch, 1997; Nunn, 2005, 2007; Wickler, 2001).”

and,

Wündsch et al., 2018 South Africa, +3 m higher than present

“Holocene sea level reconstructions suggest a reduction of the speed of the sea level rise during this time [~7900–6400 cal BP]. The sea level likely reached and exceeded the height of the PSL [present sea level] by as much as 3 m .”

Is that enough for you?

Now have covered many nations coastlines in my two paper filled postings.

I have a lot more.

Your new, and apparently Bury-em-with BS (Probably PLAGIARIZED from some denier Blog. ) reply, does NOT change my last post Porking your Link Dumps.

It's anecdotal/local and omits/ignores ie, tectonic/subsidence forces. Duh.
What is clear is sea level is rising GLOBALLY Now, and at an increasing rate.
(And of course, the OP claim was for Miami and S-E, and it's relatively faster rate)​

`

You are a truly stupid man, because I have a VISIBLE link for every single paper I posted, it is right there in front of you!

Here is the very first paper I posted, that you never read and will show that you are a close minded fool:

Holocene relative sea-level changes inferred from multiple proxies on the west coast of South Korea
Abstract
Understanding past relative sea-level (RSL) changes is crucial for predicting future coastal evolution, particularly within the context of accelerated melting of polar ice sheets due to global warming. RSL records are scarce in many regions along the Pacific coast. Here, we present a Holocene RSL curve for the west coast of South Korea based on detailed analyses of four sediment cores and the synthesis of existing sea-level index points without correction by tectonic, sediment compaction and other effects. Our record shows that the local sea level rose rapidly during the early Holocene and then fell gradually toward the present position during the late Holocene. An apparent sea-level highstand of ca. 1–2 m occurred 7–4 cal kyr B.P. A rapid sea-level rise of ~1.4 cm yr−1 during the early Holocene is a manifestation of polar ice sheet decay, while the apparent mid-Holocene sea-level highstand appears to be a signal of the hydro-isostasy of the far-field continental shelf. The result was confirmed by a glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) model. Holocene RSL change on the west coast of South Korea was closely linked to global temperature and ice sheet decay, especially during the early Holocene. There is a close relationship between sea-level change in the study area and Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) decay."

bolding mine

 

[abu afak]

High Ground Is Becoming Hot Property as Sea Level Rises
Climate change may now be a part of the gentrification story in Miami real estate
By Erika Bolstad, ClimateWire
May 1, 2017
Scientific American
High Ground Is Becoming Hot Property as Sea Level Rises
`

 

[abu afak]

Sea Level Rise Will Flood Hundreds of Cities in the Near Future

Many shore communities in the U.S. face inundation in the coming decades.
Sea Level Rise Will Flood Hundreds of Cities in the Near Future
National Geographic - July 2017
`

 

[SSDD]

The following nations coastlines covered in the papers I posted:

South Korea
Northern Ireland
Northern Philippine Sea
Thailand
Southern China
Caribbean
Denmark
Scotland
Persian Gulf
South Vietnam
Guam
South Africa

There are many more, but I see that you are a typical brain dead warmist loon, who has made it clear you are determined ignore what the papers says.

See the quote in my sig regarding an unwillingness to debate facts because they have consensus? That describes the mind set of most of these brain dead wack jobs...they couldn't think for themselves if their lives depended on it and they believe that anyone who can tack a couple of letters behind their signature is inherently smarter than they are so they believe that relieves them of the responsibility to actually think.

 

[Sunsettommy]

This Abu fella fails to understand that these cities he is wailing over were founded in high risk places to start with, Miami is on a shallow state land with a long history of massive storms going over it.

We used to have Doggerland, Bering's land bridge and more earlier in the Holocene.

The sea increase has been slow and unsurprising since we have been warming up since the END of the LIA phase.

 

[SSDD]

Sea Level Rise Will Flood Hundreds of Cities in the Near Future

Many shore communities in the U.S. face inundation in the coming decades.
Sea Level Rise Will Flood Hundreds of Cities in the Near Future
National Geographic - July 2017
`

That passes for scientific evidence in your mind? Do a search within your linked articles for buzzwords like might...may...could...possible...all the links you provided are chock full of weasel words...they are opinion pieces, not science based on hard un-cherrypicked evidence...Laughable.

 

[eagle1462010]

We are all going to drown........We are all going to die...........Fire and Brimestone...........

blah blah blah

 

[SSDD]

This Abu fella fails to understand that these cities he is wailing over were founded in high risk places to start with, Miami is on a shallow state land with a long history of massive storms going over it.

We used to have Doggerland, Bering's land bridge and more earlier in the Holocene.

The sea increase has been slow and unsurprising since we have been warming up since the END of the LIA phase.

He also can't seem to grasp the difference between sinking land and rising seas either...all one need do is look at historic photographs going back to the 1800s of the shorelines in those areas to see that there has been little, if any change.

 

[abu afak]

Sea Level Rise Will Flood Hundreds of Cities in the Near Future

Many shore communities in the U.S. face inundation in the coming decades.
Sea Level Rise Will Flood Hundreds of Cities in the Near Future
National Geographic - July 2017

That passes for scientific evidence in your mind? Do a search within your linked articles for buzzwords like might...may...could...possible...all the links you provided are chock full of weasel words...they are opinion pieces, not science based on hard un-cherrypicked evidence...Laughable.

"Will" is NOT "Might," May," etc.

And many "Already Are."
Like, but not limited to, Miami!
WTF! LOFL
Oooops
`

 

[Sunsettommy]

The following nations coastlines covered in the papers I posted:

South Korea
Northern Ireland
Northern Philippine Sea
Thailand
Southern China
Caribbean
Denmark
Scotland
Persian Gulf
South Vietnam
Guam
South Africa

There are many more, but I see that you are a typical brain dead warmist loon, who has made it clear you are determined ignore what the papers says.

See the quote in my sig regarding an unwillingness to debate facts because they have consensus? That describes the mind set of most of these brain dead wack jobs...they couldn't think for themselves if their lives depended on it and they believe that anyone who can tack a couple of letters behind their signature is inherently smarter than they are so they believe that relieves them of the responsibility to actually think.

The scary part is that many of them are completely unaware that they are actually lunatics, since they constantly ignore the published science and other credible data that provides a good picture on what is going on.

They don't know what the NULL Hypothesis is. Many hear it for the first time when I bring it up.

They don't realize that climate models to year 2100 fails the Falsification test. The Scientific Method doesn't work with Pseudoscience claims.

They don't realize that the AGW conjecture comes in two parts, the first part generally agreed on by both skeptical and warmist scientists, but the second part where most of the argument centers on will never happen because it is IMPOSSIBLE for it to happen, not as long as the water cycle continues and the Earth rotates.