Riots in the 1960's

So it comes down to this. Your evidence that our government is full of the people that participated in the 1968 riots is some shots of trash on the mall.

I hope you aren't religious because lying is a sin.

They ALWAYS forget that part.
....Or, insist it's....



handjob.gif
 
:confused:

Are you telling us that you're going to assassinate Obama?


do you even have a brain at all?
Yes, but apparently you don't.

Those riots were a reaction to the assassination of MLK.

Maybe you should try to explain your point a little better.

And then explain who in congress was involved in the riots.

Now tell us dear, is that what MLK would have wanted done in his name? now aren't you ashamed of yourself?
 
While those on the Right sit and wring their hands over some potential civil unrest, they have forgotten the motivations for the unrest of the 1960s. One motivation was the lack of civil rights protection. It seems there were social conservatives in the south unwilling to loose the reigns of power and grant African Americans the simple civil rights we take for granted today.

Another motivation was the draft. The meat grinder that was Vietnam took some of the best and brightest away to fight in that protracted and ultimately unwinnable war. Imagine if we had a draftee military today. Would people sit back and be as relatively indifferent to the two, protracted and ultimately unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan after ten years of combat and loss?

the riots weren't in the south dipshirtfartblossom, they were in LA San Fran, Chicargo.. all bastions of stupid assed liberalism. :lol::cuckoo:
 
do you even have a brain at all?
Yes, but apparently you don't.

Those riots were a reaction to the assassination of MLK.

Maybe you should try to explain your point a little better.

And then explain who in congress was involved in the riots.

Now tell us dear, is that what MLK would have wanted done in his name? now aren't you ashamed of yourself?
Is this your way of admitting that only liberals supported MLK?

We know you didn't.
 
Liberal protests;
G20 riots in US. No comment. - YouTube
Destruction of property and sanitation workers need to clean up the streets


Conservative protests;
The DC Tea Party Protest - YouTube
Was there any destruction of property? NO and even the trash was cleaned up by them. city sanitation workers did not need to clean.
The G-20 protests were done by anarchists, you idiot.

How do you remember to breathe being so stupid?

anarchists are always liberal dummie ask obie wan he sought them out.
 
Yes, but apparently you don't.

Those riots were a reaction to the assassination of MLK.

Maybe you should try to explain your point a little better.

And then explain who in congress was involved in the riots.

Now tell us dear, is that what MLK would have wanted done in his name? now aren't you ashamed of yourself?
Is this your way of admitting that only liberals supported MLK?

We know you didn't.

you don't know your wide ass from a hole in the ground. can you answer the question or can you knot?
 
While those on the Right sit and wring their hands over some potential civil unrest, they have forgotten the motivations for the unrest of the 1960s. One motivation was the lack of civil rights protection. It seems there were social conservatives in the south unwilling to loose the reigns of power and grant African Americans the simple civil rights we take for granted today.

Another motivation was the draft. The meat grinder that was Vietnam took some of the best and brightest away to fight in that protracted and ultimately unwinnable war. Imagine if we had a draftee military today. Would people sit back and be as relatively indifferent to the two, protracted and ultimately unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan after ten years of combat and loss?

the riots weren't in the south dipshirtfartblossom, they were in LA San Fran, Chicargo.. all bastions of stupid assed liberalism. :lol::cuckoo:

The riots in the south were led by those wearing uniforms, manning fire hoses and holding attack dogs....freaking conservatives
 
While those on the Right sit and wring their hands over some potential civil unrest, they have forgotten the motivations for the unrest of the 1960s. One motivation was the lack of civil rights protection. It seems there were social conservatives in the south unwilling to loose the reigns of power and grant African Americans the simple civil rights we take for granted today.

Another motivation was the draft. The meat grinder that was Vietnam took some of the best and brightest away to fight in that protracted and ultimately unwinnable war. Imagine if we had a draftee military today. Would people sit back and be as relatively indifferent to the two, protracted and ultimately unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan after ten years of combat and loss?

the riots weren't in the south dipshirtfartblossom, they were in LA San Fran, Chicargo.. all bastions of stupid assed liberalism. :lol::cuckoo:
Montgomery. Birmingham. Selma. Atlanta. Memphis. Jackson. Baton Rouge. Little Rock. According to the official Conservative re-write of American history, these places never experienced any rioting in the 1960s. Was there a 20th century Paul Revere shootin' guns and ringin' bells to warn the all white Sheriff's departments of the impending revolution?
 
Last edited:
The RACE RIOTS of the 60s were a reaction to the frustrations of the Blacks at the time.


Ya sort of had to be there to understand their frustration.

At the time I didn't get it.

Years later I sort of do.
 
The RACE RIOTS of the 60s were a reaction to the frustrations of the Blacks at the time.


Ya sort of had to be there to understand their frustration.

At the time I didn't get it.

Years later I sort of do.

What is to understand?

How would any of us have reacted if someone bombed your church and was not prosecuted?

How would you react if a family member was taken by a mob and lynched and nobody would do anything about it?

How would you react if you were peacefully protesting and you were beaten unconscious?

How would you react if your children were spit upon for trying to attend school?
 
These are the very same people that is in the house and senate right now and are Liberal Dem's.
Lead by Al Sharpton and Rev. Jackson back in the 60's

WASHINGTON, D.C. ENGINE CO. 4, "1960's" - YouTube

The film is taken from actual footage of the devastation but the music is War that hit the charts in 1970.

Why do you Dem's want these hateful people representing you?
All they have ever wanted is power and control over you.

Yeah, cause lord knows, there was NO reason whatsoever for that uprising...wait a minute:eek:
 
These are the very same people that is in the house and senate right now and are Liberal Dem's.
Lead by Al Sharpton and Rev. Jackson back in the 60's

WASHINGTON, D.C. ENGINE CO. 4, "1960's" - YouTube

The film is taken from actual footage of the devastation but the music is War that hit the charts in 1970.

Why do you Dem's want these hateful people representing you?
All they have ever wanted is power and control over you.
The 60's was a time in which young peope rebelled against the 50's style repression of women, minorites, and goody goody morality. It was naive...but they weren't hateful, controlling, evil people.

I think that conservative media has taken it's toll on your objectivity and ability to understand the motives of the people you think are terrible.

People are people....every group of ten people, in any place on the earth are the same. There will be 5 ordinary people who just want to work and live, 1 criminal, 1 saint, 1 leader, 1 dreamer, and 1 loser.

Either that, or he's Jim Crowe reborn.:lol:
 
They were destructive rioters that destroyed public and private property and are now your wonderful controller's, that has destroyed this nation with their unsustainable social programs
I am talking about all socialists be they Repubs or Dems.

I watched that on TV when it actually happened and it had nothing to do with conservative media of today.

They have never been peaceful protesters and have always been dividers of Americans by labels.
And their destruction of property did not end the Viet Nam War. The fall of Saigon did.

Your grammar is terrible, as is your recall of history...unless...When did fox noise first air? LOL
 
The RACE RIOTS of the 60s were a reaction to the frustrations of the Blacks at the time.


Ya sort of had to be there to understand their frustration.

At the time I didn't get it.

Years later I sort of do.

What is to understand?

How would any of us have reacted if someone bombed your church and was not prosecuted?

How would you react if a family member was taken by a mob and lynched and nobody would do anything about it?

How would you react if you were peacefully protesting and you were beaten unconscious?

How would you react if your children were spit upon for trying to attend school?

Like I already said, at the time I didn't get it.

It wasn't until I was in the NAV that I really began to understand the systemic racism that Blacks were facing.
 
While those on the Right sit and wring their hands over some potential civil unrest, they have forgotten the motivations for the unrest of the 1960s. One motivation was the lack of civil rights protection. It seems there were social conservatives in the south unwilling to loose the reigns of power and grant African Americans the simple civil rights we take for granted today.

Another motivation was the draft. The meat grinder that was Vietnam took some of the best and brightest away to fight in that protracted and ultimately unwinnable war. Imagine if we had a draftee military today. Would people sit back and be as relatively indifferent to the two, protracted and ultimately unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan after ten years of combat and loss?

Those conservatives you speak of back in the 60s were Democrats. They couldn't keep the Civil Rights law from passing so now they are attempting to control the blacks by convincing them they can't be successful and they need THEM (the Democrats) to take care of them. The blacks who ignore this advice and make something of themselves are Republican.[/QUOTE

Actually, while you're trying (and failing) to revise history. Those dems you speak of, are now the states that are red. Check your history. Texas, mississippi, alabama, georgia, you name a red one I can tell you when it was blue. (Special note) The dems used to be known as the party of the KKK. I can just see Harry Reid in a klan robe now. OY
 
These are the very same people that is in the house and senate right now and are Liberal Dem's.
Lead by Al Sharpton and Rev. Jackson back in the 60's

WASHINGTON, D.C. ENGINE CO. 4, "1960's" - YouTube

The film is taken from actual footage of the devastation but the music is War that hit the charts in 1970.

Why do you Dem's want these hateful people representing you?
All they have ever wanted is power and control over you.

The Son's of the Confederacy have held elected positions in the Congress for generations. Sharpton and Jackson have never been violent and the violence committed by the SDS and other leftists during the Vietnam fiasco were minor relative to the violence of the civil war and the hate and violence of their progeny during the civil rights era.
 
Lyndon Johnson was certainly spot on when he said that the passage of the civil rights laws would give the GOP control of the SOUTH for generations to come, wasn't he?
 
The RACE RIOTS of the 60s were a reaction to the frustrations of the Blacks at the time.


Ya sort of had to be there to understand their frustration.

At the time I didn't get it.

Years later I sort of do.

What is to understand?

How would any of us have reacted if someone bombed your church and was not prosecuted?

How would you react if a family member was taken by a mob and lynched and nobody would do anything about it?

How would you react if you were peacefully protesting and you were beaten unconscious?

How would you react if your children were spit upon for trying to attend school?

Like I already said, at the time I didn't get it.

It wasn't until I was in the NAV that I really began to understand the systemic racism that Blacks were facing.

I was talking rhetorically not to you personally
 

Forum List

Back
Top