Right-wing Blame Game Continues: Blaze Insinuates Trayvon Martin Was A Troublemaker

J.E.D

Gold Member
Jul 28, 2011
14,159
2,229
280
Is there no shame on the fringes of the right? A boy's life tragically ended at the hands of a community watchman who was told by police to back off - a teen armed with only a bag of Skittles and a can of tea (oh, and of course the hoodie that Fox's Heraldo Rivera blames for the incident) - and all the right can do is look for excuses to defend the alleged shooter and reasons to blame the victim. Glenn Beck's The Blaze website has stooped to a new low.

Sharpton Calls for Arrest of George Zimmerman After Shooting of Trayvon Martin in ‘Self-Defense’ | Video | TheBlaze.com

We’re also learning more about Trayvon Martin. According to reporters he had been suspended from school. The International Business Times says Martin’s suspension was due to last for 10 days. But what exactly was he suspended for in the first place? Sources sympathetic to Martin say he was suspended for “excessive tardiness.” However, a quick review of both the local policies for Martin’s school, the Dr. Michael M. Krop Senior High School, and of the Miami-Dade school district’s district-wide policies, raise some doubts. According to Miami-Dade policy, in order to get a suspension of 10 days, Martin would have had to either commit “repeated, serious or habitual” acts of the following:

• Cheating/Misrepresentation
• Confrontation with a staff member
• Defiance of school personnel
• Distribution of items or materials that are inappropriate
for an educational setting*
• Failure to comply with previously prescribed corrective
strategies
• False accusation
• Fighting (minor)
• Harassment (non-sexual or isolated)
• Instigative behavior
• Leaving school grounds without permission
• Joining clubs or groups not approved by the School Board
• Libel
• Petty theft (under $300.00)
• Use of profane or provocative language directed at someone
• Prohibited sales on school grounds (other than
controlled substances)
• Possession and/or use of tobacco products
• Slander
• Vandalism (minor)

Or even occasional offenses from the following:
• Assault/Threat against a non-staff member
• Breaking and Entering/Burglary
• Bullying (repeated harassment)*
• Disruption on campus/Disorderly conduct
• Fighting (serious)
• Harassment (Civil Rights)**
• Hazing (misdemeanor)
• Possession or use of alcohol and/or controlled
substances
• Possession of simulated weapons
• Sexual harassment**
• Trespassing
• Vandalism (major)

Or of the following:
• Grand theft (over $300.00)
• Hate crime
• Hazing (felony)
• Motor vehicle theft
• Other major crimes/incidents
• Sale and/or distribution of alcohol and/or controlled substances
• Sex offenses (other) (including possession and/or
distribution of obscene or lewd materials)

Or possibly even of the following, each of which carries a minimum suspension of ten days:

• Aggravated assault
• Aggravated battery against a non-staff member
• Armed robbery
• Arson
• Assault/Threat against M-DCPS employees or persons
conducting official business
• Battery or Aggravated battery against M-DCPS employees
or persons conducting official business*
• Homicide
• Kidnapping/Abduction
• Making a false report/threat against the school*
• Sexual battery
• Possession, use, sale, or distribution of firearms, explosives,
destructive devices, and other weapons.

But whatever the reason, it‘s a case that you’ll probably be hearing more about in the future.

Notice the last sentence. They've just called into question Trayvon's character, questioning the reason for his suspension followed by a list of serious crimes that could get a student suspended, but "whatever the reason". You know, we're not saying that Trayvon Martin was a dangerous teen who got suspended from school for committing criminal acts, but here's a list of serious crimes - including rape and murder - that could get a teen suspended from school.....just sayin'.

What's next - drag his parents into it? Let's see if they have a criminal record; if they raised that boy right.
 
It's a horrible tragedy. Shooter is a **** son of a magistrate.

The whole story is horrid beyond.

How about that white kid for just being whte got acid thrown in his face last weeK? Did the President Obama mention that poor white kid?

Are only blacks counting now? I'm asking for a reason.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
It's a horrible tragedy. Shooter is a **** son of a magistrate.

The whole story is horrid beyond.

How about that white kid for just being whte got acid thrown in his face last weeK? Did the President Obama mention that poor white kid?

Are only blacks counting now? I'm asking for a reason.

And the reason is, deflection. Thanks. Deflection noted.
 
Is there no shame on the fringes of the right? A boy's life tragically ended at the hands of a community watchman who was told by police to back off - a teen armed with only a bag of Skittles and a can of tea (oh, and of course the hoodie that Fox's Heraldo Rivera blames for the incident) - and all the right can do is look for excuses to defend the alleged shooter and reasons to blame the victim. Glenn Beck's The Blaze website has stooped to a new low.

Sharpton Calls for Arrest of George Zimmerman After Shooting of Trayvon Martin in ‘Self-Defense’ | Video | TheBlaze.com

We’re also learning more about Trayvon Martin. According to reporters he had been suspended from school. The International Business Times says Martin’s suspension was due to last for 10 days. But what exactly was he suspended for in the first place? Sources sympathetic to Martin say he was suspended for “excessive tardiness.” However, a quick review of both the local policies for Martin’s school, the Dr. Michael M. Krop Senior High School, and of the Miami-Dade school district’s district-wide policies, raise some doubts. According to Miami-Dade policy, in order to get a suspension of 10 days, Martin would have had to either commit “repeated, serious or habitual” acts of the following:

• Cheating/Misrepresentation
• Confrontation with a staff member
• Defiance of school personnel
• Distribution of items or materials that are inappropriate
for an educational setting*
• Failure to comply with previously prescribed corrective
strategies
• False accusation
• Fighting (minor)
• Harassment (non-sexual or isolated)
• Instigative behavior
• Leaving school grounds without permission
• Joining clubs or groups not approved by the School Board
• Libel
• Petty theft (under $300.00)
• Use of profane or provocative language directed at someone
• Prohibited sales on school grounds (other than
controlled substances)
• Possession and/or use of tobacco products
• Slander
• Vandalism (minor)

Or even occasional offenses from the following:
• Assault/Threat against a non-staff member
• Breaking and Entering/Burglary
• Bullying (repeated harassment)*
• Disruption on campus/Disorderly conduct
• Fighting (serious)
• Harassment (Civil Rights)**
• Hazing (misdemeanor)
• Possession or use of alcohol and/or controlled
substances
• Possession of simulated weapons
• Sexual harassment**
• Trespassing
• Vandalism (major)

Or of the following:
• Grand theft (over $300.00)
• Hate crime
• Hazing (felony)
• Motor vehicle theft
• Other major crimes/incidents
• Sale and/or distribution of alcohol and/or controlled substances
• Sex offenses (other) (including possession and/or
distribution of obscene or lewd materials)

Or possibly even of the following, each of which carries a minimum suspension of ten days:

• Aggravated assault
• Aggravated battery against a non-staff member
• Armed robbery
• Arson
• Assault/Threat against M-DCPS employees or persons
conducting official business
• Battery or Aggravated battery against M-DCPS employees
or persons conducting official business*
• Homicide
• Kidnapping/Abduction
• Making a false report/threat against the school*
• Sexual battery
• Possession, use, sale, or distribution of firearms, explosives,
destructive devices, and other weapons.

But whatever the reason, it‘s a case that you’ll probably be hearing more about in the future.

Notice the last sentence. They've just called into question Trayvon's character, questioning the reason for his suspension followed by a list of serious crimes that could get a student suspended, but "whatever the reason". You know, we're not saying that Trayvon Martin was a dangerous teen who got suspended from school for committing criminal acts, but here's a list of serious crimes - including rape and murder - that could get a teen suspended from school.....just sayin'.

What's next - drag his parents into it? Let's see if they have a criminal record; if they raised that boy right.

Sharpton should fade away.
 
Interesting that the more investigation gets done, the less 'innocent' Trayvon looks...
 
Is there no shame on the fringes of the right? A boy's life tragically ended at the hands of a community watchman who was told by police to back off - a teen armed with only a bag of Skittles and a can of tea (oh, and of course the hoodie that Fox's Heraldo Rivera blames for the incident) - and all the right can do is look for excuses to defend the alleged shooter and reasons to blame the victim. Glenn Beck's The Blaze website has stooped to a new low.

Sharpton Calls for Arrest of George Zimmerman After Shooting of Trayvon Martin in ‘Self-Defense’ | Video | TheBlaze.com

We’re also learning more about Trayvon Martin. According to reporters he had been suspended from school. The International Business Times says Martin’s suspension was due to last for 10 days. But what exactly was he suspended for in the first place? Sources sympathetic to Martin say he was suspended for “excessive tardiness.” However, a quick review of both the local policies for Martin’s school, the Dr. Michael M. Krop Senior High School, and of the Miami-Dade school district’s district-wide policies, raise some doubts. According to Miami-Dade policy, in order to get a suspension of 10 days, Martin would have had to either commit “repeated, serious or habitual” acts of the following:

• Cheating/Misrepresentation
• Confrontation with a staff member
• Defiance of school personnel
• Distribution of items or materials that are inappropriate
for an educational setting*
• Failure to comply with previously prescribed corrective
strategies
• False accusation
• Fighting (minor)
• Harassment (non-sexual or isolated)
• Instigative behavior
• Leaving school grounds without permission
• Joining clubs or groups not approved by the School Board
• Libel
• Petty theft (under $300.00)
• Use of profane or provocative language directed at someone
• Prohibited sales on school grounds (other than
controlled substances)
• Possession and/or use of tobacco products
• Slander
• Vandalism (minor)

Or even occasional offenses from the following:
• Assault/Threat against a non-staff member
• Breaking and Entering/Burglary
• Bullying (repeated harassment)*
• Disruption on campus/Disorderly conduct
• Fighting (serious)
• Harassment (Civil Rights)**
• Hazing (misdemeanor)
• Possession or use of alcohol and/or controlled
substances
• Possession of simulated weapons
• Sexual harassment**
• Trespassing
• Vandalism (major)

Or of the following:
• Grand theft (over $300.00)
• Hate crime
• Hazing (felony)
• Motor vehicle theft
• Other major crimes/incidents
• Sale and/or distribution of alcohol and/or controlled substances
• Sex offenses (other) (including possession and/or
distribution of obscene or lewd materials)

Or possibly even of the following, each of which carries a minimum suspension of ten days:

• Aggravated assault
• Aggravated battery against a non-staff member
• Armed robbery
• Arson
• Assault/Threat against M-DCPS employees or persons
conducting official business
• Battery or Aggravated battery against M-DCPS employees
or persons conducting official business*
• Homicide
• Kidnapping/Abduction
• Making a false report/threat against the school*
• Sexual battery
• Possession, use, sale, or distribution of firearms, explosives,
destructive devices, and other weapons.

But whatever the reason, it‘s a case that you’ll probably be hearing more about in the future.

Notice the last sentence. They've just called into question Trayvon's character, questioning the reason for his suspension followed by a list of serious crimes that could get a student suspended, but "whatever the reason". You know, we're not saying that Trayvon Martin was a dangerous teen who got suspended from school for committing criminal acts, but here's a list of serious crimes - including rape and murder - that could get a teen suspended from school.....just sayin'.

What's next - drag his parents into it? Let's see if they have a criminal record; if they raised that boy right.


You tell me. This is a heartbreaker.

Two people being afraid of one another. I want to bazooka barf on it. Two young men in fear of each other that sums it up sadly.

One dies.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Interesting that the more investigation gets done, the less 'innocent' Trayvon looks...

Not surprisingly, you fail to see the point of the thread. There is no proof that Trayvon was suspended for a criminal act; and his alleged suspension (for whatever reason) has nothing to do with his killing. His being allegedly suspended from school doesn't excuse his killing or his killer's reasoning for shooting him.
 
It's a horrible tragedy. Shooter is a **** son of a magistrate.

The whole story is horrid beyond.

How about that white kid for just being whte got acid thrown in his face last weeK? Did the President Obama mention that poor white kid?

Are only blacks counting now? I'm asking for a reason.

Yeah, what would that be? You seem to be missing something here and I'd like to know, if it's willful blindness or mere stupidity. Would the acid-thrower be sent home without being arrested? :doubt:
 
Two young men? A 17 year old at 140 lbs with a bag of skittles and a can of tea, and a 28 year old at 250 lbs, with a 9 mm. One follows the other without reason, then confronts him, the person doing the confronting being the big fellow. A fight ensues and the big fellow kills the kid with his gun.

And there is no arrest. In spite of the fact that the police told the big fellow to back off. Suppose the big fellows skin had been black, and the kid had been white or half hispanic. The police would not have arrested him? Yaaahh sure, Wilson.
 
Interesting that the more investigation gets done, the less 'innocent' Trayvon looks...

Not surprisingly, you fail to see the point of the thread. There is no proof that Trayvon was suspended for a criminal act; and his alleged suspension (for whatever reason) has nothing to do with his killing. His being allegedly suspended from school doesn't excuse his killing or his killer's reasoning for shooting him.

The Blaze article lists ALL the possible reasons that a student can get a 10 day suspension. One or more of those reasons would therefore apply to this individual. Unless and until the school releases the EXACT reason for his suspension, we'll never know the WHY of it. However, if you can use Zimmerman's prior acts to determine his frame of mind, then isn't it fair to use Trayvon's prior acts to ascertain HIS frame of mind, as well?
 
It's a horrible tragedy. Shooter is a **** son of a magistrate.

The whole story is horrid beyond.

How about that white kid for just being whte got acid thrown in his face last weeK? Did the President Obama mention that poor white kid?

Are only blacks counting now? I'm asking for a reason.

Very stupid. But expected. What we have here is confirmation of how the 'stand your ground' laws were intended to work. They are intended to give the gun nutters excuses to shoot those they dislike, and the police an excuse to look the other way.
 
It's a horrible tragedy. Shooter is a **** son of a magistrate.

The whole story is horrid beyond.

How about that white kid for just being whte got acid thrown in his face last weeK? Did the President Obama mention that poor white kid?

Are only blacks counting now? I'm asking for a reason.

And the reason is, deflection. Thanks. Deflection noted.

A... I hope after due process, the truth is determined, and the guilty punished.
B... my condolences to Trayvon's family on their loss
C... how is it deflection to wonder why the same outrage was not show in the other case? Are not both equally wrong? Are not both racial crimes (so far as it would seem at the moment)?
 
I also note that the OP has taken liberty not to mention that the article also casts doubt on the shooter...AND Al Sharpton's role in the fracus.

I note the BIASED cherrypicking by the OP.
Note the size of the doubt cast on Trayvon, vs. the size of the doubt cast on Zimmerman. Huge difference.
 
I also note that the OP has taken liberty not to mention that the article also casts doubt on the shooter...AND Al Sharpton's role in the fracus.

I note the BIASED cherrypicking by the OP.
Note the size of the doubt cast on Trayvon, vs. the size of the doubt cast on Zimmerman. Huge difference.

Note the amount of DEAD on Trayvon and the amount of arrest on Zimmerman...only one of them was drug tested after the incident. Guess which one?
 
So because the blaze is actually looking into the facts of the case, rather than simply presuming that Zimmerman is guilty and should be put to death by the first mob available, you are claiming it's some right wing attempt to blame the victim?

I guess you just think we should be hastily drawing conclusions and hanging someone from a nearby tree instead? When exactly did learning all the facts ever hurt justice? How is it possible without the facts?

There are alot of people trying to paint Trayvon as some innocent victim. I dont know whether he is or not. But dont you think that evidence showing otherwise is relevant to determine whether he is or not?

Thank God we have Due Process. Mob justice is downright scary.
 
It's a horrible tragedy. Shooter is a **** son of a magistrate.

The whole story is horrid beyond.

How about that white kid for just being whte got acid thrown in his face last weeK? Did the President Obama mention that poor white kid?

Are only blacks counting now? I'm asking for a reason.

And the reason is, deflection. Thanks. Deflection noted.

No, the reason is massive hypocrisy: yours and Obama's.
 
So because the blaze is actually looking into the facts of the case, rather than simply presuming that Zimmerman is guilty and should be put to death by the first mob available, you are claiming it's some right wing attempt to blame the victim?

I guess you just think we should be hastily drawing conclusions and hanging someone from a nearby tree instead? When exactly did learning all the facts ever hurt justice? How is it possible without the facts?

There are alot of people trying to paint Trayvon as some innocent victim. I dont know whether he is or not. But dont you think that evidence showing otherwise is relevant to determine whether he is or not?

Thank God we have Due Process. Mob justice is downright scary.
icon14.gif
 
So because the blaze is actually looking into the facts of the case, rather than simply presuming that Zimmerman is guilty and should be put to death by the first mob available, you are claiming it's some right wing attempt to blame the victim?

I guess you just think we should be hastily drawing conclusions and hanging someone from a nearby tree instead? When exactly did learning all the facts ever hurt justice? How is it possible without the facts?

There are alot of people trying to paint Trayvon as some innocent victim. I dont know whether he is or not. But dont you think that evidence showing otherwise is relevant to determine whether he is or not?

Thank God we have Due Process. Mob justice is downright scary.

Put to death by a mob? How about just fucking arrested? I think most people would just like to see the shooter arrested. A kid who, by all evidence, was doing nothing more than walking was shot and killed by a man who called him a coon, chased him and shot him and THAT guy wasn't even arrested.
 
Last edited:
So because the blaze is actually looking into the facts of the case, rather than simply presuming that Zimmerman is guilty and should be put to death by the first mob available, you are claiming it's some right wing attempt to blame the victim?

I guess you just think we should be hastily drawing conclusions and hanging someone from a nearby tree instead? When exactly did learning all the facts ever hurt justice? How is it possible without the facts?

There are alot of people trying to paint Trayvon as some innocent victim. I dont know whether he is or not. But dont you think that evidence showing otherwise is relevant to determine whether he is or not?

Thank God we have Due Process. Mob justice is downright scary.

what does a list of suspendable offenses from the kids school have to do with the facts of the case???
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top