CDZ Riddle me this

[Divine Wind]

The server in question has been in pieces in an FBI evidence locker for months. How the fuck would anyone hack it?...

Scroll up. I already explained it's not the server being hacked.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

The server in question has been in pieces in an FBI evidence locker for months. How the fuck would anyone hack it?...

Scroll up. I already explained it's not the server being hacked.

He didn't ask for ANYTHING to be hacked. PERIOD. AND you are simply trying to derail my thread because you know that the left's position on this in untenable.

 

[Divine Wind]

He didn't ask for ANYTHING to be hacked. PERIOD. AND you are simply trying to derail my thread because you know that the left's position on this in untenable.

Incorrect. Wrong. Bullshit and I don't give a fuck about "the left's position on this". Truth is truth and for an American politician, much less a Presidential nominee, to ask the fucking Russians to do anything against an American, even Hillary Clinton, is deplorable. It's unAmerican.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

He didn't ask for ANYTHING to be hacked. PERIOD. AND you are simply trying to derail my thread because you know that the left's position on this in untenable.

Incorrect. Wrong. Bullshit and I don't give a fuck about "the left's position on this".

You misspelled "the facts" bro

 

[Auld Phart]

He didn't ask for ANYTHING to be hacked. PERIOD. AND you are simply trying to derail my thread because you know that the left's position on this in untenable.

Incorrect. Wrong. Bullshit and I don't give a fuck about "the left's position on this". Truth is truth and for an American politician, much less a Presidential nominee, to ask the fucking Russians to do anything against an American, even Hillary Clinton, is deplorable. It's unAmerican.

Truth is truth and for an American politician, much less a Presidential nominee, to ask the fucking Russians to do anything against an American, even Hillary Clinton, is deplorable

you're saying that if the Russians do have the Hillary emails, they shouldn't release them?

 

[Fair&Balanced]

He didn't ask for ANYTHING to be hacked. PERIOD. AND you are simply trying to derail my thread because you know that the left's position on this in untenable.

Incorrect. Wrong. Bullshit and I don't give a fuck about "the left's position on this". Truth is truth and for an American politician, much less a Presidential nominee, to ask the fucking Russians to do anything against an American, even Hillary Clinton, is deplorable. It's unAmerican.

That isn't what I asked in the OP. Why do you CONTINUE to spin? Just answer the question in the OP.

 

[Divine Wind]

you're saying that if the Russians do have the Hillary emails, they shouldn't release them?

No. I'm saying any American who asks the fucking Russians to do anything that weakens the United States of America is a fucking asshole and a traitor. It'd be bad enough if a regular citizen proposed such a thing but much worse for a person running for President.

 

[oldsoul]

you're saying that if the Russians do have the Hillary emails, they shouldn't release them?

No. I'm saying any American who asks the fucking Russians to do anything that weakens the United States of America is a fucking asshole and a traitor. It'd be bad enough if a regular citizen proposed such a thing but much worse for a person running for President.

A traitor? Really? So, to you Mr. Trump is on the same plane as Benedict Arnold? You can't really believe that could you?
Besides how is releasing information about what an American did weakening the US? To say that is akin to saying the truth weakens the country. IF, and I say if, Mrs. Clinton put something into those e-mails that weakens the country, I would say SHE is far closer to being a traitor than Mr. Trump.

 

[Divine Wind]

A traitor? Really? So, to you Mr. Trump is on the same plane as Benedict Arnold? You can't really believe that could you?
Besides how is releasing information about what an American did weakening the US? To say that is akin to saying the truth weakens the country. IF, and I say if, Mrs. Clinton put something into those e-mails that weakens the country, I would say SHE is far closer to being a traitor than Mr. Trump.

I'm sure you hate Hillary. Fuck her. The fact remains, if George Washington asked King George to undermine any fellow American, Benedict Arnold included, I'd think it to be a deplorable, traitorous act. You have to live with your convictions, I'll happily live with mine.

 

[Tresha91203]

Since when -- in the minds of "conservatives -- did government become so much more efficient/secure/better than the private sector? To hear Republicans talk nowadays, the government email system is totally unassailable, while any private sector server would be useless and hack-prone.

Sounds sort of like a liberal thing to say.

Good Lord Gary, it's not a matter of a government server being more suitable than a private server.

Here is the deal.


If you keep classified material on a government server and it is breached, you did nothing wrong b/c it was the government's server, if you put it on your private server and it is breached, then YOU are at fault.

One would avoid oversight with a private sever.

 

[Holos]

Still with the e-mails?

Even Democrats have a hard time trusting Hillary. Her dishonesty about the emails is part of the problem. This is one reason why so many support Bernie.

4 brutal poll numbers that greet Hillary Clinton at the Democratic National Convention

It seems to me that in the case you have mentioned of internal Democrat distrust the support for Bernie is not truly rational, but only an impulse for a temporary dishonest escape of the continuously disappointed electing citizens.

E-mails (electronic typed visual and textual messages) are concrete evidence, the so-called "hard time" in which any serious debate can be contrived from in benefit of an entire nation. Those documents, these documents, are reined by the significance of words by their advancing contextual value rather than spontaneous and potentially-exonerating emotional relay.

Within a cohesive society of industrial scale, established politics and fair government do not abide solely by documents either. In analyzing documents, material structure and infrastructure must be opted for in the benefit of national citizenship subsistence for any citizen to thrive in their observance of the law, of any working class.

Example of those materials are either in manufactured products or in products developed by the ecology. Computers take specific mineral components for their hardware that must be manipulated. Likewise, the data-base of computers also takes energy contrived from organic products that do not require human manipulation for their software, but rely solely on variant ecological circumstances and factors.

Those ecological products which provide access to programmed computer software, that is, contextual advancement beyond emotional relay, are relevant to citizenship and national cohesion through gastrointestinal digestion and soil decomposition processes, both which require maintaining attention to the distinction between manufactured and organic products as we proceed to refer and further analyze distributed or retained information as they may be efficient or deficient in progressive and conservative cooperation.

The case of e-mails and privacy is a good example for integrative analytical exercise, both political and governmental.

 

[Divine Wind]

It seems to me that in the case you have mentioned of internal Democrat distrust the support for Bernie is not truly rational, but only an impulse for a temporary dishonest escape of the continuously disappointed electing citizens.

E-mails (electronic typed visual and textual messages) are concrete evidence, the so-called "hard time" in which any serious debate can be contrived from in benefit of an entire nation. Those documents, these documents, are reined by the significance of words by their advancing contextual value rather than spontaneous and potentially-exonerating emotional relay.

Within a cohesive society of industrial scale, established politics and fair government do not abide solely by documents either. In analyzing documents, material structure and infrastructure must be opted for in the benefit of national citizenship subsistence for any citizen to thrive in their observance of the law, of any working class.

Example of those materials are either in manufactured products or in products developed by the ecology. Computers take specific mineral components for their hardware that must be manipulated. Likewise, the data-base of computers also takes energy contrived from organic products that do not require human manipulation for their software, but rely solely on variant ecological circumstances and factors.

Those ecological products which provide access to programmed computer software, that is, contextual advancement beyond emotional relay, are relevant to citizenship and national cohesion through gastrointestinal digestion and soil decomposition processes, both which require maintaining attention to the distinction between manufactured and organic products as we proceed to refer and further analyze distributed or retained information as they may be efficient or deficient in progressive and conservative cooperation.

The case of e-mails and privacy is a good example for integrative analytical exercise, both political and governmental.

Disagreed. The DNC definitely preferred Hillary aka Obama II aka DNC hardliner vs the quasi-Democrat aka self-acknowledged Democratic Socialist Bernie.

 

[Divine Wind]

you're saying that if the Russians do have the Hillary emails, they shouldn't release them?

Personally, I think they'd rather have Hillary as President than Trump. So, yes, they won't release them...at least not until after the election and at a time when it is most embarrassing to her and best for their own position. Putin isn't stupid. He won't play his best cards until the time is right.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

A traitor? Really? So, to you Mr. Trump is on the same plane as Benedict Arnold? You can't really believe that could you?
Besides how is releasing information about what an American did weakening the US? To say that is akin to saying the truth weakens the country. IF, and I say if, Mrs. Clinton put something into those e-mails that weakens the country, I would say SHE is far closer to being a traitor than Mr. Trump.

I'm sure you hate Hillary. Fuck her. The fact remains, if George Washington asked King George to undermine any fellow American, Benedict Arnold included, I'd think it to be a deplorable, traitorous act. You have to live with your convictions, I'll happily live with mine.

What are you talking about? Americans undermine each other all the time, that is NOT treason. Words have meanings you know.


I asked a SPECIFIC question. If the emails in question did not contain classified material (as Hillary assures us they did not) then how in the fuck could it be treason?

In fact , let me go further. Since this was a PRIVATE server, it would not have been a breach of national security had Trump himself hacked the god damned server , even if he later found classified material on it, now there ARE other laws that would apply, certainly. But a person's private server is NOT covered by national security laws, and THAT kids is exactly why the fuck there are rules and laws about the proper storage of classified fucking material.

 

[Divine Wind]

What are you talking about? Americans undermine each other all the time, that is NOT treason. Words have meanings you know.....

Awesome. Who else has asked the fucking Russians to undermine American interests? Take your time. I'll wait.

Comey has already reported some emails contained classified emails. What was in the emails that weren't recovered (so far) is unknown except to Hillary et al.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

What are you talking about? Americans undermine each other all the time, that is NOT treason. Words have meanings you know.....

Awesome. Who else has asked the fucking Russians to undermine American interests? Take your time. I'll wait.

Comey has already reported some emails contained classified emails. What was in the emails that weren't recovered (so far) is unknown except to Hillary et al.

Comey certainly did NOT report that some of the still missing emails contain classified materials, How the fuck could he ascertain that when he has not SEEN the missing emails? If he had, they wouldn't be missing, now would they?

So that brings us back to my original point. How are liberals both claiming that Hillary never lied about her emails AND claiming that Trump encouraged Russia to violate our national security?

 

[Divine Wind]

Comey certainly did NOT report that some of the still missing emails contain classified materials, ...

I didn't say that. Why are you purposely twisting my post? This isn't the first time either. At first I thought you simply misunderstood, but now it's clear you are doing this intentionally.

"Comey has already reported some emails contained classified emails. What was in the emails that weren't recovered (so far) is unknown except to Hillary et al."

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Comey certainly did NOT report that some of the still missing emails contain classified materials, ...

I didn't say that. Why are you purposely twisting my post?

I'm not twisting your post, your posts have all just continuously been off topic, Go back and reread the OP and try to stay on topic. Thanks.

 

[Divine Wind]

I'm not twisting your post, your posts have all just continuously been off topic, Go back and reread the OP and try to stay on topic. Thanks.

Disagreed on both points, but to save distress to you, I'll just leave the thread. Thanks. /unsubscribe

 

[Fair&Balanced]

I'm not twisting your post, your posts have all just continuously been off topic, Go back and reread the OP and try to stay on topic. Thanks.

Disagreed on both points, but to save distress to you, I'll just leave the thread. Thanks. /unsubscribe

LOL quite the topic avoidance technique there.