Richard Dawkins Hits The GOP On The Head

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Sundial, Sep 1, 2011.

  1. Sundial
    Offline

    Sundial Class Warrior

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,231
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +106
    Uneducated fools can be found in every country and every period of history, and they are not unknown in high office. What is unusual about today’s Republican party (I disavow the ridiculous ‘GOP’ nickname, because the party of Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt has lately forfeited all claim to be considered ‘grand’) is this: In any other party and in any other country, an individual may occasionally rise to the top in spite of being an uneducated ignoramus. In today’s Republican Party ‘in spite of’ is not the phrase we need. Ignorance and lack of education are positive qualifications, bordering on obligatory. Intellect, knowledge and linguistic mastery are mistrusted by Republican voters, who, when choosing a president, would apparently prefer someone like themselves over someone actually qualified for the job.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    he was great on hogan's heroes

    [​IMG]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    You should provide links instead of just copying things from other forums.

    Attention Governor Perry: Evolution is a fact - On Faith - The Washington Post

    By the way, Dawkins is wrong.

    Again.

    Evolution is a theory that is accepted because it works. If someone proved that evolution does not fit all the evidence science would discard it in a heartbeat, and go with another theory that works. There is no more room for dogmatic beliefs in science than there is in anything else, and Dawkins insists on approaching the debate with the dogmatic belief that he has all the answers. The real problem with Dawkins is he set himself up as "The expert" on evolution, and the less educated public goes along.

    Science is about doubt. Everything in science is up for debate, that is how it works. Even facts are debatable, and evolution is not a fact.

    For the less educated here that will attack me for this, fuck off. I am not saying evolution, or something like it, did not happen. I am just saying that Dawkins is wrong when he claims there is no doubt about it being a fact.

    For the ignorant that will praise me for this, you can fuck off too. Doubt is the one certainty in life, and the only thing you can be sure of is you will never have the answers. If your dod cannot stand up to the universe being a few billion years old than He is not really God. If you are not willing to question your beliefs you should not defend them.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. bripat9643
    Offline

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    67,699
    Thanks Received:
    8,057
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +27,237
    Apparently Dawkins hasn't payed attention to U.S. politics and noticed intellectual heavyweights like Maxine Waters, Joe Biden, Algore, Anthony Wiener, Sheila Jackson Lee . . . . and the list goes on.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Afanasy
    Offline

    Afanasy Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1
    Dawkins' tone here of condescension and elitism is contrary to the democratic spirit. I do not mean here the Democratic Party, but the spirit leading to an advocation of democracy. This spirit is clear on a few things. One is that the everyday citizen is a better advocate for the people's rights and a better depository of the power to maintain those rights than any other. Whereas elitist intellectuals insist on their superiority in deciding what is best for the people, the people know full well that the most dangerous people on the planet are intellectual elitists. Now, the people may be wrong in their reasoning, and humble attempts to gently inform them of this can be needed at times, but where they are rationally less qualified to lead or choose their leaders, they are generally poetically and intuitively right. They rightly believe that it is more important to them and their rights to elect someone who has their heart in the right place than has their head on straight. Minds are easier to correct in good-hearted people than hearts are to correct in elitist prigs.
     
  6. JoeB131
    Offline

    JoeB131 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    80,325
    Thanks Received:
    6,863
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Location:
    Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
    Ratings:
    +14,963
    Dawkins strikes me as another British liberal who just sits there tsk-tsking when the parade has passed his miserable little Island by.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Warrior102
    Offline

    Warrior102 Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    16,554
    Thanks Received:
    4,019
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Ratings:
    +4,029
    Who the fuck is Richard Dawkins ?
     
  8. Warrior102
    Offline

    Warrior102 Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    16,554
    Thanks Received:
    4,019
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Ratings:
    +4,029
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_PgHG-1tl0&feature=fvst]funniest family fued answers/bloopers - YouTube[/ame]
     
  9. Mr.Nick
    Offline

    Mr.Nick VIP Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    Messages:
    9,604
    Thanks Received:
    682
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +682
    Richard Dawkins? of the same element er crystals of David Ike and Noam Chomsky?

    Remember when Ben Stein embarrassed him?

    "crystals"

    Really??
     
  10. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    America has a history of periodically going through periods of KNOW-NOTHINGISM.

    Americans have always had a heathy disrespect for intellectuals.

    We generally don't want intellectuals for leaders.

    Ideally what we need are folks who are leaders, first, but who are also intellectuals.

    But NOW, during this period of anti-nllectualism, intellectualism is thought a flaw of character, rather than a benefit in leadership.

    Hence we get people who think that folks like Palin, or Bachman can make good leaders.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2011

Share This Page