Rice admits she (they) were wrong (lied) yet we're supposed to not care

[The Infidel]

Rightwing lexicon additions:


Wrong = lied

Condemned = apologized


Fascinating stuff here.

Incompetent = racist

Chicago = racism

Any questioning of a black Democrat = racism

Waffling by Dems = "evolving"

 

[bodecea]

Rightwing lexicon additions:


Wrong = lied

Condemned = apologized


Fascinating stuff here.

Incompetent = racist

Chicago = racism

Any questioning of a black Democrat = racism

Waffling by Dems = "evolving"

You can add those too....just as funny.

 

[Wehrwolfen]

You should about 1/1000th as much as you cared about being lied into the Iraq war.

The intelligence reports of OTHER countries came to the conclusion that WMD's existed.

If Bush lied about OUR reports...exactly how did he get the intelligence people of GB and Austrailia and other countries to lie on his behalf?

Hmmm?

Wasn't Bush supposed to figure out that the intel was no good? Before he got 4000 Americans killed for nothing?

As opposed to what Susan Rice did? SHE"S the villain of the decade????

Let's not forget that it took Bush nearly 8 years and a war in Afghanistan and Iraq to amass 4000 KIA. It's taken Obama less that 4 years to acumulate more than 2,000 KIA in Afghanistan alone. As far as Rice is concerned, she's just a poor dupe of the Oblamer administration.

 

[Freewill]

Have we not figured it out yet? It is all apparently about body count to the liberals. They rent their clothes over Iraq and the sad death toll. Yet Obama and Afghanistan, no problem. 4 killed needlessly and Obama and his administration admittedly mislead the nation, and the world, and that is no problem. So apparently there is some magic number of dead that must be met for the liberal left to get upset. Oh and having an R after the name seems to play into the equation.

Of course they come back is that the right never cared about the death toll in Iraq which is a lie straight from the gates of Hell itself.

 

[Trajan]

well one thing certainty seems strange, why has hillary been overlooked, this all started with her shop..?

We don't have a copy of the relevant portions of the Presidents daily intel briefings from that 2 weeks, which as a cabinet member, ( it was elevated to the cabinet level spot by Obama btw) means she gets to see those briefings.

 

[AquaAthena]

BBC News - US envoy Susan Rice admits Benghazi attack error

I just don't understand why someone so political should represent our nation. Someone so high up in our govt should be able to speak honestly and from her own mind not off of supplied talking points like an uninformed press secretary.

Why is it that posters on the internet knew they were full of shit on day one but it took the administration 3 fucking weeks to come clean?

It seems Obama is throwing rice at republicans to keep the heat off of him and republicans are falling for it.

If she is so gullible as to allow politics to dictate so called facts given to the public there is no way in hell she should be allowed to represent us to others. If she is so willing to lie to us who the hell knows what she would say to our enemies and allies

The first thing a man will do for his ideals is lie.

--Joseph A. Schumpeter

 

[GoneBezerk]

I heard something interesting today.....Rice was working in the DoS as some Undersecretary for African Affairs during the AQ attacks on our Embassies there under Bill Clinton......very interesting.

 

[bodecea]

I heard something interesting today.....Rice was working in the DoS as some Undersecretary for African Affairs during the AQ attacks on our Embassies there under Bill Clinton......very interesting.

Hey! You found her out! She's an AQ operative!

 

[J.E.D]

Rice admits she (they) were wrong (lied) yet we're supposed to not care

I'll care about as much as Republicans did when Condi Rice did the same thing during the lead up to Bush's Iraq war.

 

[skye]

Parrots shouldn't become Secretary of State.

or sacrificial lambs or whatever!

Rice is morally unfit, Period.

 

[Wehrwolfen]

Have we not figured it out yet? It is all apparently about body count to the liberals. They rent their clothes over Iraq and the sad death toll. Yet Obama and Afghanistan, no problem. 4 killed needlessly and Obama and his administration admittedly mislead the nation, and the world, and that is no problem. So apparently there is some magic number of dead that must be met for the liberal left to get upset. Oh and having an R after the name seems to play into the equation.

Of course they come back is that the right never cared about the death toll in Iraq which is a lie straight from the gates of Hell itself.

Did you hear about the latest Rules of Engagement in Afghanistan? Seems the new ROE is to allow the Taliban and Haggani plant their IED's rather than to stop them in the process. Why? Because they might disturb the neighborhood. Great reasoning, right? Those are the orders coming down from Oblamer to the Pentagon to the troops in the field. And, we wonder why the KIA and WIA numbers have doubled or tripled under the Oblamer regime?

 

[GoneBezerk]

No asswipe, she is incompetent.

If she was responsible for Embassy security around Africa when AQ started blowing them up, that would show she is again shown to be a fucking moron like you.

I gurantee if Romney was a CEO of a company in the 90s that went out of business, you scumbags would've used it against him. Biut of course, your fellow lesbo is always involved with some major terrorist attack isn't a big deal to a scumbag like you.

I heard something interesting today.....Rice was working in the DoS as some Undersecretary for African Affairs during the AQ attacks on our Embassies there under Bill Clinton......very interesting.

Hey! You found her out! She's an AQ operative!

 

[GoneBezerk]

Shithead....US and British intel said Iraq had WMDs, so she reported what they told her.

The lesbo chimp Rice ignored what the CIA said about the Libya attack, even going out of her way to state AQ was actually dying.....which was a 100% lie.

Rice admits she (they) were wrong (lied) yet we're supposed to not care

I'll care about as much as Republicans did when Condi Rice did the same thing during the lead up to Bush's Iraq war.

 

[candycorn]

Being wrong and INTENTIONALLY misleading people for political purposes are two different things.

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"--Dr. Condi Rice. She got promoted.

Double-standard much?

 

[skye]

Being wrong and INTENTIONALLY misleading people for political purposes are two different things.

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"--Dr. Condi Rice. She got promoted.

Double-standard much?

All Rice is not equal, my dear!

 

[BlindBoo]

You should care about 1/1000th as much as you cared about being lied into the Iraq war.

No comparison... Everyone depended on the same intelligence.
That includes Dems/Repubix/Our allies... All of them.

Who lied???

On Sept. 18, 2002, CIA director George Tenet briefed President Bush in the Oval Office on top-secret intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, according to two former senior CIA officers. Bush dismissed as worthless this information from the Iraqi foreign minister, a member of Saddam’s inner circle, although it turned out to be accurate in every detail. Tenet never brought it up again.

Nor was the intelligence included in the National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002, which stated categorically that Iraq possessed WMD. No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the House of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq.

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction - Salon.com

 

[GoneBezerk]

Typical lie from a left-wing hack website.

Strange that Democraps voted for the invasion of Iraq after getting the same CIA briefings Bush got from the CIA....oh, but salon.com says they're all lying.

You should care about 1/1000th as much as you cared about being lied into the Iraq war.

No comparison... Everyone depended on the same intelligence.
That includes Dems/Repubix/Our allies... All of them.

Who lied???

On Sept. 18, 2002, CIA director George Tenet briefed President Bush in the Oval Office on top-secret intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, according to two former senior CIA officers. Bush dismissed as worthless this information from the Iraqi foreign minister, a member of Saddam’s inner circle, although it turned out to be accurate in every detail. Tenet never brought it up again.

Nor was the intelligence included in the National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002, which stated categorically that Iraq possessed WMD. No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the House of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq.

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction - Salon.com

 

[HUGGY]

BBC News - US envoy Susan Rice admits Benghazi attack error

I just don't understand why someone so political should represent our nation. Someone so high up in our govt should be able to speak honestly and from her own mind not off of supplied talking points like an uninformed press secretary.

Why is it that posters on the internet knew they were full of shit on day one but it took the administration 3 fucking weeks to come clean?

It seems Obama is throwing rice at republicans to keep the heat off of him and republicans are falling for it.

If she is so gullible as to allow politics to dictate so called facts given to the public there is no way in hell she should be allowed to represent us to others. If she is so willing to lie to us who the hell knows what she would say to our enemies and allies

Rice admits she (they) were wrong (lied) yet we're supposed to not care


What you are supposed to do is put it in perspective. There may very well be something about that attack that plays out very unflattering about the ambassador. In your wild ziel to attack Obama the RWers have lost all measure and perspective. You having a tantrum does not change some pretty important rules. You don't get to see classified information just because you scream and hold your breath and turn blue.

If you continue to act like selfish 2 year olds you will very well never get another intelligence report.

Some things the CIA and FBI uncover is above yours and my security clearance. You will not be allowed to temper tantrum your way to causing damage to our intelligence and investigative agencies. If you do not get right with that concept you may very well be on the outside looking in for a very long time.

 

[Wehrwolfen]

You should care about 1/1000th as much as you cared about being lied into the Iraq war.

No comparison... Everyone depended on the same intelligence.
That includes Dems/Repubix/Our allies... All of them.

Who lied???

The Unresolved Mystery of Syria’s ‘Iraqi’ Chemical Weapons​

On Sept. 18, 2002, CIA director George Tenet briefed President Bush in the Oval Office on top-secret intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, according to two former senior CIA officers. Bush dismissed as worthless this information from the Iraqi foreign minister, a member of Saddam’s inner circle, although it turned out to be accurate in every detail. Tenet never brought it up again.

Nor was the intelligence included in the National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002, which stated categorically that Iraq possessed WMD. No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the House of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq.

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction - Salon.com

Could be the biased MSM were the liars.

The existence of undeclared Iraqi W.M.Ds was President George W. Bush’s casus belli in 2003. The failure to find them after the collapse of the Saddam Hussein regime led to the conclusion that the U.S. and its British allies had cherry-picked and massaged intelligence reports of alleged hidden weapons in order to justify the war.

Claims of a secret transfer to Syria of chemical and other weapons have, broadly speaking, been embraced by those who supported the 2003 invasion and dismissed by those who opposed it.

Any discovery of a hidden Iraqi weapons cache that might turn up in a post-Assad Syria would necessarily have a retrospective impact on the history of the 2003 conflict.

James Clapper, the director of U.S. National Intelligence and formerly the director of the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, in 2003 cited satellite imagery suggesting materials had been moved out of Iraq in the months before the war.

Other more or less credible claims have followed, from international inspectors to Saddam-era dissidents.

[excerpt]

Read more:
The Unresolved Mystery of Syria's 'Iraqi' Chemical Weapons - NYTimes.com

 

[courseofhistory]

The info Rice had at the time wasn't WRONG in the sense that local witnesses at the scene said the attackers/terrorists said the video was a reason for the attacks. It may not have been the only or even major reason but that is what some of the perpetrators said. And because a crowd had gathered and some were lootinng, etc., the idea of a demonstration was born. It is difficult to determine what actually went on in chaos and sometimes there are no definitive answers. Also, witnesses tend to see things differently or hear different things being said depending on their location and perspective at the time. It isn't that big a deal for preliminary and even final information to be wrong to some extent.

NO BIG DEAL!