Rhode Island sues the oil industry for climate change damages.

Discussion in 'Environment' started by TroglocratsRdumb, Jul 3, 2018.

  1. TroglocratsRdumb
    Offline

    TroglocratsRdumb Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2017
    Messages:
    7,878
    Thanks Received:
    1,639
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +11,642
    The companies named in the Rhode Island complaint include Chevron, Exxon Mobil, BP PLC, Shell, Citgo, ConocoPhillips, Marathon Oil and Royal Dutch Shell.

    Lindsey de la Torre, executive director of the manufacturing accountability project at the National Association of Manufacturers, called for politicians and lawyers to “put an end to this frivolous litigation” and pointed out that no such climate nuisance claims have ever succeeded.

    The Oil Corps. should force the crazy Left Wingers to prove that there is manmade global warming.

    Manmade global warming doesn’t even rise to the level of a scientific hypothesis.

    BTW, what will RI do if the Oil Corps. decide to stop selling their products in the liberal crackpot states?



    Rhode Island sues oil industry over climate change
     
  2. DarkFury
    Offline

    DarkFury BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2015
    Messages:
    27,260
    Thanks Received:
    8,166
    Trophy Points:
    940
    Location:
    Sun, Sand And Palm Trees
    Ratings:
    +39,826
    Stop ALL gas sales to those states. Let them gnaw on that bone a while.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    31,583
    Thanks Received:
    3,627
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +12,189
    Stop fossil fuel energy to that state this winter and the people will be burning down the doors to the state Capitol offices!!:2up::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:. By November!

    Morons in that state are aplenty.
     
  4. task0778
    Offline

    task0778 Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    3,534
    Thanks Received:
    784
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Texas hill country
    Ratings:
    +3,527
    The city of San Francisco tried the same thing, suing the big oil companies for damages from climate change. The judge threw out the case as bullshit, which it was. The Rhode Island case is the same thing, nothing more than political posturing to appease the base.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. flacaltenn
    Offline

    flacaltenn Senior Mod Staff Member Senior USMB Moderator Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    49,247
    Thanks Received:
    8,329
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
    Ratings:
    +29,668
    It'll end up the same way this one did. Completely dismissed.

    Judge boots global warming cases of San Francisco, Oakland against oil industry | Legal Newsline

    WHY? Because they complainers are citing things like the Exxon internal research on GW in the 80s and SUGGESTING that EXXON was knowingly hiding the damages from their product. Not a chance that's a case. For one thing, the EXXON internal report now released was FAR MORE ACCURATE in it's 1980s projections than James Hansen or the IPCC.

    But ALL internal research is Intellectual Property and hidden unless the company wants publicity.

    And the dismissed case above charged the companies with PUBLIC NUISANCE which the judge tore apart by questioning the USEFULLNESS of their products.

    Lawyers looking for deep pockets and politicians looking for battle ribbons.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    14,712
    Thanks Received:
    3,078
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +14,066
    Sadly they picked a state with an activist judge (one in my opinion should be disbarred and removed for his activist and non law based decisions). It will probably have to be a court of appeals that strikes it down.
     

Share This Page