Revolt! Now Democrats want Obama OFF BALLET!!

[bodecea]

I'm not a fan of the ballet, but I definitely don't need to see Obama in tights and a tutu.

The sight and/or sound of him makes me ill as is. I'm sure the sight of him in tights or a tutu would possibly cause instant, uncontrollable projectile vomiting.

You poor boy, so easily upset.

So funny!

Hi, you have received -217 reputation points from Wicked Jester.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
Still can\'t abide by the terms of the bet....You\'re such a dishonest loser of a perverted dyke!

Regards,
Wicked Jester

Note: This is an automated message.

The Cowardly Guttersnipe does what he does best, insult in the shadows.

 

[jillian]

I'm not a fan of the ballet, but I definitely don't need to see Obama in tights and a tutu.

The sight and/or sound of him makes me ill as is. I'm sure the sight of him in tights or a tutu would possibly cause instant, uncontrollable projectile vomiting.

i hear they have meds for that type of derangement.

 

[jillian]

I'm not a fan of the ballet, but I definitely don't need to see Obama in tights and a tutu.

The sight and/or sound of him makes me ill as is. I'm sure the sight of him in tights or a tutu would possibly cause instant, uncontrollable projectile vomiting.

You poor boy, so easily upset.

Warren Zevon - Excitable Boy - YouTube

 

[paulitician]

Ballet is not my thing but if the man wants to dance,i say let em. Keeps him off the Golf Course.

 

[paulitician]

I can't picture him doing ballet. I'm trying. I can't stop laughing, but I'm trying.

Nice.

 

[blastoff]

He definitely is no Barryishnikov.

This Barry looks like package-wise Michele might prefer him over her Barry.

 

[Zoom-boing]

He definitely is no Barryishnikov.

This Barry looks like package-wise Michele might prefer him over her Barry.

I'm enjoying looking at Barryishnikov's big, meaty . . . . thighs.

 

[Listening]

The GOP put up all forms of regulation cuts. Nothing to create jobs.

Naming a bill that cuts EPA regulations "The Brand Spanking New Sure Fire GOP Job Creating Bill" still means they are trying to pass EPA regulation cuts.

Wrong again.....

It wasn't a good jobs bill IME, but it did more than cut regulations.

It gave tax breaks to large companies....something I am not sure makes any sense.

 

[Sallow]

The GOP put up all forms of regulation cuts. Nothing to create jobs.

Naming a bill that cuts EPA regulations "The Brand Spanking New Sure Fire GOP Job Creating Bill" still means they are trying to pass EPA regulation cuts.

Wrong again.....

It wasn't a good jobs bill IME, but it did more than cut regulations.

It gave tax breaks to large companies....something I am not sure makes any sense.

Even better!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Revolt! Now Democrats want Obama off ballot.


ELECTION 2012
Stunning percentage seeking 1-term status for president

Posted: November 06, 2011
5:08 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WND

The newest poll about the 2012 presidential election says one-third of Democrats and independents who lean to the left side of the field are unhappy with Barack Obama as the party's standard-bearer and are looking for some new faces to enter the race.

The startling results are from the newest WND/Wenzel Poll conducted by Wenzel Strategies. The telephone survey was conducted Oct. 22-25 and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.

Responding to a question about how satisfied they are with Obama as the nominee, only 55 percent said they were very satisfied. Another 24 percent said they were somewhat satisfied, but that group apparently started falling away quickly, because fully one-third (35 percent) said that would "prefer that someone else enter the race" for the nomination.

Read more: Revolt! Now Democrats want Obama off ballot

The Democrats see the same polls, and would replace this windbag in a hot New York second.....except that it would be the end of the Democrat Party.

1. "But, the Dems can's take a chance on losing the black constituency....so, here we are.
They're pretty much saddled with this donkey.


"...what would happen if a smaller percentage of blacks turned out:

- At 90 percent black turn-out, Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes slide into the GOP column.

- At 75 percent black turn-out, Pennsylvania’s 21 electoral votes go Republican.

- At 70 percent Michigan’s 17 electoral votes turn from blue to red.

- At 50 percent the GOP collects Delawre’s three electoral votes.

I don’t know what a realistic number to project is for the effects of angry black apathy, but I’ll stop at 50 percent. It may be that going as low as 75 percent is unrealistic. Most likely it’s impossible to say. (And this doesn’t take into account things like congressional districts where black voters make the margin of difference.)"

Do Democrats need the black vote? | RobertEmmet

2. "But what exactly would that mean? In how many states do black voters make the difference? I ran some rough numbers over at Robert Emmet -- check them out. Depending on how much of a drop-off you assume, it could cost the Democrats 10 to 76 electoral votes."
Robert Schlesinger: The Democrats and the Black Vote


Think for a moment, who are the folks on this board who can't wait to vote for this President...what does that tell you?

 

[Claudette]

Nice.

LMAO Good one.

Barishnikov looks way better though. LOL

 

[Avatar4321]

Im seriously shocked that the Democrats cant find anyone to run against him when he is so unfavorable.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The best the GOP can hope for re: the black vote is that it is depressed in turn out, because BHO as he is to them is far more desirable than the Republican Party. No significant % will cross over. However, a significant % may simply not vote this time.

 

[Inthemiddle]

Im seriously shocked that the Democrats cant find anyone to run against him when he is so unfavorable.

There were plenty of Republicans in 2004 who would have liked to see someone challenge Bush in a primary. None of this is remarkable. Just because someone is a Democrat does not mean they automatically endorse Obama, just like people being Republican didn't automatically mean they endorsed Bush. It's only the partisan hacks who think that any of this matters. Those who are able to think for themselves without having a political party first tell them how to think really don't blink at this.

 

[naturegirl]

I can't picture him doing ballet. I'm trying. I can't stop laughing, but I'm trying.

Awww, come on, I was expecting a Tutu.

 

[idb]

A lot of Dems and Liberals have been saying someone, ANYONE should run in the Primaries against Obama but no one has the guts apparently.

They could very easily run a Palooka against him to make him look good. Someone with the looks of Janet Napalitano and the brainpower of Joe Biden.

He's lost his magic. Most people that voted for him last time listen to him now and think, "the guy really is one stupid sons a bitch. He's fucked more shit up than he fixed. What in the hell did I vote for him for?" It's only the purest, most died in the wool dem sheeple, radicals, socialists, union thugs, retarded liberals and racists that still support him.

Ummm...so why do the stats that you've posted show that 79% are satisfied with him?

 

[Listening]

Wrong again.....

It wasn't a good jobs bill IME, but it did more than cut regulations.

It gave tax breaks to large companies....something I am not sure makes any sense.

Even better! [/QUOTE]

We agree on two things....

First, giving those tax breaks isn't good.

Second, your first statement was wrong.