Retroactive Retirement Argument Deserves Criticism & Ridicule

[Procrustes Stretched]

Retroactive Retirement Argument Deserves Criticism & Ridicule

What the hell is retroactive retirement, and why is that the new Romney line explaining how Romney can head a company, but not be in charge?

And what is it about Romney, who Texas GOP Governor Rick Perry called a Vulture Capitalist, that makes him think he can bullshit the American people on wealth and finance?

We have a new line, retroactive retirement, with a new red herring, day to day decisions. America ain't buying it.

The concept of “retroactive retirement” is well-established.

the straw-man attack articulated by former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove -- “that [Romney] didn’t take a leave of absence to go run the Olympic Committee and continued to run Bain.”

The real question is not about whether Romney had day-to-day involvement with Bain Capital but about whether he had any involvement at all.

Rove noted correctly that like Jobs, Romney stepped away from the day-to-day decisions of his company.

The questions now are coming from people who suspect Romney’s leave of absence resembled that of Jobs, who continued to participate in major Apple moments, such as the release of the iPad 2 and the company’s Mac Lion operating system.

Mitt Romney and backers use ‘day-to-day’ to reshape questions about Bain

 

[asaratis]

The desperation must be mind-boggling to all you fidgety liberals. Obama can't run on his miserable fuckin' record so you're all stuck with trying to keep the conversation going about some inconsequential things that Romney may or may not have done.

Not only is your little boy king Obama killing oil field jobs in the US, he's backing other countries to pay China to do their oil drilling for them so China can buy the oil.

You people are literally OUT OF YOUR HEADS!

Liberalism is a mental disorder!

 

[onecut39]

The desperation must be mind-boggling to all you fidgety liberals. Obama can't run on his miserable fuckin' record so you're all stuck with trying to keep the conversation going about some inconsequential things that Romney may or may not have done.

Not only is your little boy king Obama killing oil field jobs in the US, he's backing other countries to pay China to do their oil drilling for them so China can buy the oil.

You people are literally OUT OF YOUR HEADS!

Liberalism is a mental disorder!

For a market oriented conservative you don't know squat about the oil market. What you said is so stupid it cannot be argued with. Much like saying red is blue or trying to convince a 3 year old the bogeyman is not under the bed.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Retroactive Retirement Argument Deserves Criticism & Ridicule

What the hell is retroactive retirement, and why is that the new Romney line explaining how Romney can head a company, but not be in charge?

And what is it about Romney, who Texas GOP Governor Rick Perry called a Vulture Capitalist, that makes him think he can bullshit the American people on wealth and finance?

We have a new line, retroactive retirement, with a new red herring, day to day decisions. America ain't buying it.

The concept of “retroactive retirement” is well-established.

the straw-man attack articulated by former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove -- “that [Romney] didn’t take a leave of absence to go run the Olympic Committee and continued to run Bain.”

The real question is not about whether Romney had day-to-day involvement with Bain Capital but about whether he had any involvement at all.

Rove noted correctly that like Jobs, Romney stepped away from the day-to-day decisions of his company.

The questions now are coming from people who suspect Romney’s leave of absence resembled that of Jobs, who continued to participate in major Apple moments, such as the release of the iPad 2 and the company’s Mac Lion operating system.

Mitt Romney and backers use ‘day-to-day’ to reshape questions about Bain

What the hell is retroactive retirement?