Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Michelle Bachmann was asked a question at the debates.............
Garrett Kling Op-Ed: Give Me a Submissive President in 2012 - Op-Ed - Fox Nation
Now......let's look at what Dictionary.com has to say...........
Now...........not for nothing, but if Bachmann has repeatedly stated that a woman is to submit to her husband (according to her beliefs in the Bible), shouldn't we be electing her husband to be president rather than his wife?
I mean..........he's the ultimate "head" of the woman, according to her. Do we really want that in a president?
I dont want my president to have ANYONE I didnt have a chance to vote for telling them what to do.
If she doesnt know the differance between being respectful and Obeying then maybe she wont RESPECT what the American people send her to do.
Then I suppose you were yelling at the top of your lungs when Clinton put Hillary in charge of changing our health care, or MaBell Obama sticking her nose in how our kids are fed in schools? They weren't ELECTED
And when Hillary Stood by Billy boy and his affair with Monica, wasn't she being SUBMISSIVE as you all like to go on about.
what a friggen joke. They WOULD NEVER ask a man that question who was running for President.
Bachmann won't scare me until she's elected.
Until then? She's just a goofy bitch on the television screen.
Bachmann won't scare me until she's elected.
Until then? She's just a goofy bitch on the television screen.
And she is, indeed, a goofy bitch.
I don't think she'll ever get elected. But what she might do is get Obama elected.
The loser of this contest could beat Obama in 15 months.
Bachmann won't scare me until she's elected.
Until then? She's just a goofy bitch on the television screen.
And she is, indeed, a goofy bitch.
I don't think she'll ever get elected. But what she might do is get Obama elected.
The loser of this contest could beat Obama in 15 months.
And she is, indeed, a goofy bitch.
I don't think she'll ever get elected. But what she might do is get Obama elected.
Does this mean you're throwing you hat into the ring, loser?
Bachmann won't scare me until she's elected.
Until then? She's just a goofy bitch on the television screen.
It frightens me for our country that this ridiculous woman (Bachmann) is even being discussed in a serious manner. She's not quite as scary as Sarah Palin, but she's pretty scary.
It frightens me for our country that this ridiculous woman (Bachmann) is even being discussed in a serious manner. She's not quite as scary as Sarah Palin, but she's pretty scary.
For crying out loud, and having a Inexperienced Jr. Senator community organizer as President didn't frighten you.
you have a real problem with women, don't you?
If CaliGirl submits to me, I'll respect her...I swear I will!
And yet, Bachmann has repeatedly stated that wive's must submit to their husbands.
Shit dude.........they've got a wife carry, I wonder if this is the next extreme sport? Think that if Bachmann is elected, she's gonna take a carriage ride as well?
Respect and submission, are they the same?
No. Respect is what those in submission feel towards their masters.
Like Republican politicians towards CEO's.
Or like the Republican base to rich people.
She answered, "Well it is in my house."
A real slick one that Bachmann.
Bachmann won't scare me until she's elected.
Until then? She's just a goofy bitch on the television screen.
Like Hillary Clinton, she's too controversial to be elected.....but she is fun to watch.
Because Bachmann has gone on record stating that wives must be submissive to their husbands, the question posed to her as a candidate for president was appropriate. She dodged the answer.
Respect and submission are not the same. In fact, they are polar opposites. Respect is garnered between equals. The only respect a person who must submit to a superior garners would be if she was exceptionally good at being submissive.
Voters have a right to know if she, as president, will submit to her husband's wishes when making presidential decisions. That she refused to answer says volumes.
Because Bachmann has gone on record stating that wives must be submissive to their husbands, the question posed to her as a candidate for president was appropriate. She dodged the answer.
Respect and submission are not the same. In fact, they are polar opposites. Respect is garnered between equals. The only respect a person who must submit to a superior garners would be if she was exceptionally good at being submissive.
Voters have a right to know if she, as president, will submit to her husband's wishes when making presidential decisions. That she refused to answer says volumes.
Oh, for pity's sake. What an absolutely retarded question. As though her job has ANYTHING to do with her marriage. Why do some people automatically assume that OF COURSE men can separate the two, but OF COURSE women can't?
And you can all spare me this New Age, feminist rant about "submission? Ohmigod, how AWFUL! It's like SLAVERY! That's not what respect is about!" It's not your marriage, so it is not - repeat, NOT - your place to define it for the participants. If that's how Michelle and her husband define "marital respect", then mind your own fucking business.
