Req't for being a Repub according to a Libertarian

[Avorysuds]

Nothing on your mind as much as libertarians are can possibly be irrelevant. The very definition of that word is case in point.

I enjoy pointing out that Libertarians are just extreme Liberals who happen to dislike government.

Freaks, if you will.

Again, why should a Republican care what a Libertarian's 'requirements' are to be a Republican, and why do you think it out of line for a Republican to join in a thread to discredit your lame take on the matter?

Bump for any Libtardtarian who wants to address this.

It's not out of line, you simply don't know what a libertarian is. You still think libertarian = Anarchist. You asked me to provide a Government in the world that ever came of libertarians and I gave you the United States of America seeing as it’s undoubtedly libertarian at its foundation. When I ask you to provide a single country or society created off the modern day Republican ideas you run away… So how about it, do you have a country that has ever been created off Republican ideas alone? We already know was not America as it didn't start out as a socialist country as Republican policy would imply.

 

[Too Tall]

So what is the alternative?
Just let Jihadists go around the world killing all who don't conform to the Koran and Allah?

Mr. Dumb Fuck Sir:

Did the Jihadists blow up Switzerland's Tallest Buidlings?

Wonder why?

.

They haven't got around to the tiny country of Switzerland, YET!

 

[Oddball]

So what is the alternative?
Just let Jihadists go around the world killing all who don't conform to the Koran and Allah?

Mr. Dumb Fuck Sir:

Did the Jihadists blow up Switzerland's Tallest Buidlings?

Wonder why?

.

They haven't got around to the tiny country of Switzerland, YET!

Or, just maybe, because the Swiss mind their own damned business.

 

[Dot Com]

I enjoy pointing out that Libertarians are just extreme Liberals who happen to dislike government.

Freaks, if you will.

Again, why should a Republican care what a Libertarian's 'requirements' are to be a Republican, and why do you think it out of line for a Republican to join in a thread to discredit your lame take on the matter?

You must not be that proud of a Repub after you just finished saying the Teapartiers had to drag big gov't GOP back from the abyss.

No, I was not very proud of the Republicans. But this is why we have elections.

But Libertarians will always, always be radical Liberals who just happen to dislike government.

WRONG!!! That is the basis of their platform genius You big gov't conservatives crack me up lol

 

[Paulie]

Mr. Dumb Fuck Sir:

Did the Jihadists blow up Switzerland's Tallest Buidlings?

Wonder why?

.

They haven't got around to the tiny country of Switzerland, YET!

Or, just maybe, because the Swiss mind their own damned business.

And being armed to the bone doesn't hurt either.

 

[dblack]

So what is the alternative?
Just let Jihadists go around the world killing all who don't conform to the Koran and Allah?

Really? That's the only alternative you can think of?

 

[Dot Com]

So what is the alternative?
Just let Jihadists go around the world killing all who don't conform to the Koran and Allah?

You a Repub are you? How much blood & treasure (borrowed treasure at that) are you willing to expend on this never- ending, world police :mod: action & what metrics will you use to declare victory?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Libertarians, of course, are irrelevant.

You happy w/ the GOP are you?

Yes. Tea Party has put them back on course very nicely.

Ron Paul supporters started the Tea Party. You know, the irrelevant libertarian leaning REPUBLICAN congressman from texas. Currently running for the GOP nomination? The one you claim is so irrelevant?

You need to pull the log out of your eye.

 

[whitehall]

Is C-Span still on? They must have 2 or 3 hundred viewers. Interesting they would be talking to a Libertarian instead of the usual socialist drivel.

 

[konradv]

you know foreign entanglements not only often end badly but also cost a fortune. Someone needs to tell the Repubs that.

How many have the socialists got America out of?

Nice try, but anyone familiar with American politics knows Socialists have never had that kind of power. If it's the left that's responsible, why are the members of the war party called neo-cons and not neo-libs?

 

[konradv]

You happy w/ the GOP are you?

Yes. Tea Party has put them back on course very nicely.

Ron Paul supporters started the Tea Party. You know, the irrelevant libertarian leaning REPUBLICAN congressman from texas. Currently running for the GOP nomination? The one you claim is so irrelevant?

What's relevant about him? He's the right's Nader. The best he can do is cost Romney the election, like Nader did to Gore in '00.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

There is a socialist president in power right now. Yet he isn't ending wars. He started one though...

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Yes. Tea Party has put them back on course very nicely.

Ron Paul supporters started the Tea Party. You know, the irrelevant libertarian leaning REPUBLICAN congressman from texas. Currently running for the GOP nomination? The one you claim is so irrelevant?

What's relevant about him? He's the right's Nader. The best he can do is cost Romney the election, like Nader did to Gore in '00.

Seems you aren't so bright either. The psuedo-conservative claims Paul is irrelevant, yet supports a movement created by Ron Paul supporters in govt. Ron Paul is relevant. You just have to see beyond his presidential bid to understand why. Not that it would or should matter to a socialsit.

Why does it matter to you anyway, comrade?

 

[Contumacious]

What's relevant about him? He's the right's Nader. The best he can do is cost Romney the election, like Nader did to Gore in '00.

1- the ONLY candidate who supports restoring then enforcing the US Constitution

2- the ONLY candidate who supports individual freedom and Capitalism

3- the ONLY candidate who is not owned by the welfare/warfare state

'nuff said.

.

 

[Dot Com]

You happy w/ the GOP are you?

Yes. Tea Party has put them back on course very nicely.

Ron Paul supporters started the Tea Party. You know, the irrelevant libertarian leaning REPUBLICAN congressman from texas. Currently running for the GOP nomination? The one you claim is so irrelevant?

You need to pull the log out of your eye.

Sniper is a riot

There is a socialist president in power right now. Yet he isn't ending wars. He started one though...

You made a good post above & then this? How many combat troops are in Iraq?
Iraq PM: Immunity issue scuttled US troop deal - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq - msnbc.com

BAGHDAD — Iraq's prime minister said Saturday that U.S. troops are leaving Iraq after nearly nine years of war because Baghdad rejected American demands that any U.S. military forces to stay would have to be shielded from prosecution or lawsuits.
The comments by Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, made clear that it was Iraq who refused to let the U.S. military remain under the Americans' terms.

were you misspeaking or the other thing?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

He gets no credit for ending Iraq on Bush timetable. Especially since leading up to the withdraw, the administration was trying hard to keep forces in Iraq after the withdraw date. Those negotiations failed. We left because Iraq as all done with our "help".

Obama would have kept troops there if granted immunity to Iraqi law. They were not. So we pulled out on Bush timetable. No points awarded to Obama.

 

[Dot Com]

He gets no credit for ending Iraq on Bush timetable. Especially since leading up to the withdraw, the administration was trying hard to keep forces in Iraq after the withdraw date. Those negotiations failed. We left because Iraq as all done with our "help".

Obama would have kept troops there if granted immunity to Iraqi law. They were not. So we pulled out on Bush timetable. No points awarded to Obama.

The occupation ended on his watch as was enunciated during his campaign. Nice try though

 

[TakeAStepBack]

No, sorry. He can not attain credit for something that happened by default rather than by choice. But go ahead and give him credit for a Bush policy. You want to talk about Libya now?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

How about assassinating US citizens abroad via drone strikes in sovereign nations?
Troops added to the southeast asian waterways?
Troops added in Afghan?
Troops added in Africa?
No closing GITMO?
Extending the patriot act?
Signing NDAA 2012?

 

[Dot Com]

There is a socialist president in power right now. Yet he isn't ending wars. He started one though...

No, sorry. He can not attain credit for something that happened by default rather than by choice. But go ahead and give him credit for a Bush policy. You want to talk about Libya now?

He ran on getting out of Iraq, among other things, and we are out. Call it what you will.