Republicans storm closed-door hearing to protest impeachment inquiry

[Jitss617]

House Republicans stormed a closed-door hearing Wednesday morning to protest Democrats' impeachment inquiry process, breaking up the deposition of a top Defense Department official who was testifying about President Trump's dealings with Ukraine.

Republicans storm closed-door hearing to protest impeachment inquiry

Awww, poor, unruly Republicans. Crying like babies because they don't have access to those hearings -- even though there are Republicans who serve on the investigating committees; and whining that this isn't an official impeachment inquiry because there was no House vote -- even though there's never been a House rule mandating a full House vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry.

Why hide?

Mic drop

You mean like Trump's taxes? Or his conversations with world leaders?

What about his extramarital affairs? Those are not illegal, but to hide them while running for POTUS is.

In fact, let's have full transparency. Let's see how his businesses are profiting off his presidency.

His sex life and taxes are none of you business.. he’s been very transparent with everything else

What did he talk about with Putin?

Diplomacy what else

 

[xyz]

House Republicans stormed a closed-door hearing Wednesday morning to protest Democrats' impeachment inquiry process, breaking up the deposition of a top Defense Department official who was testifying about President Trump's dealings with Ukraine.

Republicans storm closed-door hearing to protest impeachment inquiry

Awww, poor, unruly Republicans. Crying like babies because they don't have access to those hearings -- even though there are Republicans who serve on the investigating committees; and whining that this isn't an official impeachment inquiry because there was no House vote -- even though there's never been a House rule mandating a full House vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry.

Why hide?

Mic drop

You mean like Trump's taxes? Or his conversations with world leaders?

What about his extramarital affairs? Those are not illegal, but to hide them while running for POTUS is.

In fact, let's have full transparency. Let's see how his businesses are profiting off his presidency.

His sex life and taxes are none of you business.. he’s been very transparent with everything else

What did he talk about with Putin?

Diplomacy what else

Is blackmail and shady deals part of your definition of diplomacy?

 

[Jitss617]

Its called investigating corruption by the previous administration and well within trumps authority as president

LOLOL

No, it's not within a president's authority if it violates U.S. law. Jeez, you cultists are fucked in the head to block that out.

How does it violate U.S. law?

It's illegal to solicit campaign help from a foreign national.

What’s your point
?

If you were American, you'd know, comrade.

Are you a democrat?

 

[Jitss617]

Why hide?

Mic drop

You mean like Trump's taxes? Or his conversations with world leaders?

What about his extramarital affairs? Those are not illegal, but to hide them while running for POTUS is.

In fact, let's have full transparency. Let's see how his businesses are profiting off his presidency.

His sex life and taxes are none of you business.. he’s been very transparent with everything else

What did he talk about with Putin?

Diplomacy what else

Is blackmail and shady deals part of your definition of diplomacy?

What deal!? OMG WAIT YOU HAVE EVIDENCE.. of a shady deal!?

Omg please share

 

[Lakhota]

Obama asked the FBI to investigate Trump. What law did that violate?

What law did Trump violate asking the Ukraine to investigate Biden?

What difference does it make? You don’t even know if Trumpy is lying or not. Or reality or fake. Just because Trumpy told you windmill can cause cancer. Doesn’t mean it’s true.

Why does Trump need to ask Ukraine to investigate a political economy Biden?
What crime did Biden committed?

Trump might not had violate any law when he asked Ukraine ....... but asking a favor in exchange for political gain. Is a sign of corruptness.

Using your political office to enrich your family is what is corrupt. Trump hasn't done that. It appears that Biden did.

No, it doesn't appear Biden did that, lying con tool.

Oh, so you're buying into the concept that a Ukrainian energy company would pay Hunter Biden...someone with ZERO experience in the energy field big money to sit on it's board...and it's because of Hunters "qualifications" and not because his father was the Vice President of the United States? Again...funny stuff, Faun!

What was the quid pro quo? Did it relate to national security?

 

[charwin95]

You are confused.
Impeachment inquiries and the economy is totally different animal.

The impeachment inquiry is about Trump corruptness.

The impeachment "inquiry" is about focusing the nation's attention away from the robust economy, low unemployment and low inflation to something else! If it was REALLY about impeachment then the House would vote for impeachment and the Senate would be conducting an investigation as we speak! That will never happen because this has never been about Trump corruption...it's about Democrats trying desperately to find something...ANYTHING...that they can run on in 2020!

That’s what Trumpy told you. The robust Economy has nothing to do with this lying bastard piece of shit POTUS. The most corrupted disgusting POTUS ever.

Impeachment process? There’s got to be a a law somewhere.

We get that you don't like Trump, Charwin! (eye roll) That doesn't change the fact that his policies have been very good for the American economy. It is what it is...and calling him names won't change that! Neither will running candidates that don't have a clue how to create jobs or keep an economy growing!

What policies did this inept POTUS that is very good to the economy?

Name me what policy are you talking about that created jobs?

Calling him names? Look at your buddies here..... calling names.

"Trump’s economic program was very simple: an attack on taxes and regulations with an extra dose of spending on infrastructure and the military that would create a supply shock to a moribund economy.

On the tax side, the White House pushed through a massive $1.5 trillion reform plan that sliced the highest-in-the-world corporate tax from 35 percent to 21 percent and lowered rates for millions of taxpayers, though the cuts for individuals will expire in 2025.

On deregulation, Trump ordered that rules be pared back or eliminated across the board. During his time in office, Congress has cut back on the Dodd-Frank banking reforms, particularly in areas affecting regional and community institutions, rolled back a multitude of environmental protections that he said were killing jobs and took a hatchet to dozens of other rules. (The left-leaning Brookings Institution think tank has a rolling deregulation tracker that can be viewed here.)

During the first year of his administration, “significant regulatory activity” had declined 74 percent from where it was in the same period of the Obama administration, according to data collected by Bridget Dooling, research professor at GW’s Regulatory Studies Center."
Trump has set economic growth on fire. Here is how he did it

I don’t think you understand most of what you just posted.

Like Dodd-Frank..... this is design to protect consumers. So bank like Wells Fargo and to prevent a major economic disaster like collapse of the real estates.

Just because Trumpy told you this and did that doesn’t mean it’s good or real.

 

[charwin95]

People like Charwin can't seem to understand that this "investigation" by the Democrats isn't designed to lead to an impeachment vote. If it was then Nancy Pelosi would have done that months ago! This is about keeping the narrative on alleged corruption instead of an economy that is doing extremely well and a Democratic field that is appallingly bad!

You are confused.
Impeachment inquiries and the economy is totally different animal.

The impeachment inquiry is about Trump corruptness.

The impeachment "inquiry" is about focusing the nation's attention away from the robust economy, low unemployment and low inflation to something else! If it was REALLY about impeachment then the House would vote for impeachment and the Senate would be conducting an investigation as we speak! That will never happen because this has never been about Trump corruption...it's about Democrats trying desperately to find something...ANYTHING...that they can run on in 2020!

That’s what Trumpy told you. The robust Economy has nothing to do with this lying bastard piece of shit POTUS. The most corrupted disgusting POTUS ever.

Impeachment process? There’s got to be a a law somewhere.

We get that you don't like Trump, Charwin! (eye roll) That doesn't change the fact that his policies have been very good for the American economy. It is what it is...and calling him names won't change that! Neither will running candidates that don't have a clue how to create jobs or keep an economy growing!

What policies did this inept POTUS that is very good to the economy?

Name me what policy are you talking about that created jobs?

Calling him names? Look at your buddies here..... calling names.

Are you denying that Trumpy is not a hypocrite pathological liar?

Oldstyle my dear. I am giving you a second chance to prove your self.

What policies did this inept POTUS that is very good to the economy?

Name me what policy are you talking about that created jobs?

Be specifics.

 

[Mac-7]

Ah, so you think Trump WAS correct in asking the Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden and Hunter Biden for possible influence peddling?

No, I didn't say that either, lying con tool.

Do you understand English??

Ah, so you DO think Obama was correct in asking for an investigation into Trump when HE was running for President...

But you DON'T think it's correct for Trump to ask for an investigation into Biden when HE is running for President?

Still waiting, lying con tool.... what law did Obama break by asking the FBI to look into Trump's connections with Russia?

what law did Obama break by asking the FBI to look into Trump's connections with Russia?

Using fake news supplied by russia to obtain FISA warrants for spying on trump is a good place to start

Nope. The investigation into Trump's Russian connections began before the FBI learned about the dossier .

Nope. The investigation into Trump's Russian connections began before the FBI learned about the dossier .

I guess you mean obama flunkies inside the white house started peeking through keyholes before sicing the FBI on trump

 

[Mac-7]

Why hide?

Mic drop

You mean like Trump's taxes? Or his conversations with world leaders?

What about his extramarital affairs? Those are not illegal, but to hide them while running for POTUS is.

In fact, let's have full transparency. Let's see how his businesses are profiting off his presidency.

His sex life and taxes are none of you business.. he’s been very transparent with everything else

What did he talk about with Putin?

Diplomacy what else

Is blackmail and shady deals part of your definition of diplomacy?

Is blackmail and shady deals part of your definition of diplomacy?

It always has been

Nations dont play bean bag with other nations

 

[sartre play]

Storming a hearing, one more lack of dignity & self control perpetrated by our out of control political party's.

 

[WEATHER53]

The only evidence Dems have since the instant Trump won is their own self evidence of feelings that because it was a stone cold lock that Hillary would win, then Trump must have committed and be committing grave illegalities
No evidence, no indications, just the sentiment of feelings.

 

[Faun]

The only evidence Dems have since the instant Trump won is their own self evidence of feelings that because it was a stone cold lock that Hillary would win, then Trump must have committed and be committing grave illegalities
No evidence, no indications, just the sentiment of feelings.

Of course there's evidence. We have Trump confessing to solicitation of a foreign national to help his campaign.

 

[Auld Phart]

11 posts deleted

no content pertaining to OP

 

[bripat9643]

What?? Don't I see Democrats, or at least Left-wingers, constantly protesting? Constantly demanding to be heard? Do not you people on the left, always say "Freedom of Speech!" and "Power to the people!" and so on?

Are not you people the ones that say every time there is a protest, that we should listen to what protesters have to say?

What is different now? Do only the left-wingers, and people you agree with, have the right to protest and make their voices heard?

There are high ranking Republicans in that impeachment inquiry.

What part of that don’t you understand?

Again..... so what? What does that matter?

What, in your world, if there is a high ranking Republican, then freedom of speech is suspended, and we are not allow to protest anything anymore?

Did that ever stop Democraps from protesting stuff, when 'high ranking democraps' were involved? No, I don't think so.

Read post #510. Don’t stare at it.
Republicans are allowed to question the witnesses.

What does that matter? It does matter because you are insinuating that a very important inquiry should be an open door.

Republicans that tried to demonstrate was only there to confused people like you.

Being important is the reason it should be open to the public, shit for brains. You Tramp hating turds have a million reasons for supporting this circus, and they all get shot down in a matter of seconds.

Wrong again.
Why should it be open to the public? When republicans has these inquiries it’s a closed door. Only committee members are allowed. That’s the rules.

Let me repeat it again. There are high ranking Republicans members in that impeachment inquiry. Its not like the Republicans are blacked out.
What part of that don’t you understand?

Utter bullshit. Theonly time they are behind closed doors is when the subject of the discussion is classified. The taxpers are paying for this. They deserve to see it.

Do you actually support Soviet style secret star chambers?

We know you do, because your a Dim douchebag.

 

[bripat9643]

The only evidence Dems have since the instant Trump won is their own self evidence of feelings that because it was a stone cold lock that Hillary would win, then Trump must have committed and be committing grave illegalities
No evidence, no indications, just the sentiment of feelings.

Of course there's evidence. We have Trump confessing to solicitation of a foreign national to help his campaign.

No we don't.

 

[bripat9643]

The rules that House Democrats are following were passed in 2015 under Speaker John Boehner and a Republican majority.

Really? Can you point to the document where it says that?

 

[bripat9643]

What law did Trump violate asking the Ukraine to investigate Biden?

What difference does it make? You don’t even know if Trumpy is lying or not. Or reality or fake. Just because Trumpy told you windmill can cause cancer. Doesn’t mean it’s true.

Why does Trump need to ask Ukraine to investigate a political economy Biden?
What crime did Biden committed?

Trump might not had violate any law when he asked Ukraine ....... but asking a favor in exchange for political gain. Is a sign of corruptness.

Using your political office to enrich your family is what is corrupt. Trump hasn't done that. It appears that Biden did.

Your proof of Biden enrich family? Is what?

The money that Ukrainian energy company paid Hunter Biden? The stock equity that Hunter Biden now holds from the massive deal he got pushed through in China? Do you really not know about these things, Charwin?

Read my post. Don’t stare at it.
If Hunter got overpaid and unqualified. What and where is crime committed?

China? give me something that did not came from your messiah.

His father committed the crime, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

Oh? Imploring other nations to find dirt on political opponents is the American way?

You mean asking other nations to investigate whether a sitting Vice President enriched his son?

There's nothing wrong with asking that as long as the target of the investigation isn't also running in an election against the one asking for the investigation.

So Dims are immune from prosecution if they are running for office?

Seriously?

So Dims are immune from prosecution if they are running for office?

They seem to think so

And yet, not a single person said that. Are you always this stupid to fall for your own strawmen?

You did, moron:

"There's nothing wrong with asking that as long as the target of the investigation isn't also running in an election against the one asking for the investigation."

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

A closed door impeachment hearing is pure corruption and an abuse of power

 

[bripat9643]

Did you know that impeachment is explained in the constitution?

I do know that

Do you know how serious that is?

Liberals have trivialized impeachment by calling to remove ytump before he was even sworn in

And for three years democrats have searched for an excuse to do so

Thats not the American way

Oh? Imploring other nations to find dirt on political opponents is the American way?

You mean asking other nations to investigate whether a sitting Vice President enriched his son?

There's nothing wrong with asking that as long as the target of the investigation isn't also running in an election against the one asking for the investigation.

So Dims are immune from prosecution if they are running for office?

Seriously?

LOLOL

No one said that, ya fucking moron.

You're now the third brain-dead con to repeat that nonsense in this thread -- demonstrating how you cultists have a herd mentality.

You said it, moron:

"There's nothing wrong with asking that as long as the target of the investigation isn't also running in an election against the one asking for the investigation."