- Jun 4, 2011
- 33,567
- 7,077
- 1,130
Doesn't work that way..Nice deflection, but totally irrelevant to whether Romney paid taxes or not
If you want to prove Reid lied........provide some returns
Obama has done it
Romney is innocent until proof is provide otherwise. It is codified in our highest laws.
Provide the accuser to be questioned, or pay the price of bearing false witness.
Actually, if you are going to accuse Reid of making a false statement the first step is to prove he made a false statement. You see, mittens would not be on trial, it would be reid who is being accused in a court for making false statements.
2 things here, first you cant prove a negative....Kinda of like prove to me you're not gay...you cant do it....
Second, Reid made the accusation...it's up to him to prove it....IT's not up to the accused to prove innocense until there is some evidence of wrong doing...unless we changed into Soviet Russia, have we?
After they prove that then they need to prove that Reid did not know those claims were false, to which i am sure they can find a fall guy to come forward and take the blame for supposedly lying to reid. In the end you would never be able to prove reid knowingly gave a false statement. That is, of course, if they were to first prove that Mittens paid his taxes by releasing the tax returns. It will never get that far because mittens will not release them because he knows it will be a death blow to his campaign.
Well if Harry Reid doesnt have anything, he should be prosecuted, if he has a witness, lets see who it is....What if the guy at Bain told Reid, because he knew of Reid's hyperpartisanship and he did it to make Reid look bad....well it's working.
One has to also note that bullshit claims to the public or to the senate when not under oath are completely free of charges. We all know mittens made claims he was not at Bain when his signature clearly shows he is managing director at the times he made those claims. Had those signatures been a lie he would face charges of fraud, but since he did not lie to the SEC so it is not fraud or illegal. Of course, it is a lie to the american public, but mittens was never sworn to tell the truth.
Who said anything about under oath. You can accuse anyone of anything, which is what Reid did....where's the beef?