Republicans should own it.

Democrats don't need to call Republicans, racist.

They just need to let them talk.

Thank you, thank you Swollow for once again showing the inbred racism of the Democrat party. Romney not once mentioned race in your little video, not once that I heard. But you naturally connect being poor, being on welfare and being dependent to being black. Oops the real racism once again rears its ugly head.

Everything Romney said was true but there was no racism involved, until you.

Don't correct democrats anymore let them keep showing how racist they are through their own words.
 
louis-farrakhan.jpg


malik_shabazz03-15-2005-b.jpg


shabazz-black-panther.jpg


rev_wright.jpeg


110228.jpeg


art.benjamin.jealous.cnn.jpg


no racists in the dem party at all.

move along
 
Democrats don't need to call Republicans, racist.

They just need to let them talk.

Thank you, thank you Swollow for once again showing the inbred racism of the Democrat party. Romney not once mentioned race in your little video, not once that I heard. But you naturally connect being poor, being on welfare and being dependent to being black. Oops the real racism once again rears its ugly head.

Everything Romney said was true but there was no racism involved, until you.


It's because you too fucking slow to hear the underlying point about the 47percent. Becky our one of the worst when it comes to following a conversation second to only freewilly nilly over here
 
You are a liar, what was said is that he KKK was a product of the democrat party. You continue lying. You accused me of saying a whole lot I did not and I challenged you to prove I did, you did not, you are a liar. Now you wish to change what I said into something you think is truth, but being a liar I seriously doubt you know the difference.

Everything racist in this country emanated from the Democrat party that is the truth. Why any black would belong to the party of slavery is simply beyond comprehension.


Your shitty op post on another thread that I beat that back, Since you don't want to listen I will say it again, political parties in this country have switched of the years, the kkk is a conservative group the NOW aligns it self the republican party, the reason blacks vote democratic is because that's the party that now represents them, your to stupid to understand that.

Your contention is 100 million Republicans all got together in 1968 and decided to be racists?

So they could represent 5,000 KKK members?

And you think you're SMART?


Once again you fail to follow the conversation, explaining it again is pointless, you lost in your own little world of ignorance.
 
Your shitty op post on another thread that I beat that back, Since you don't want to listen I will say it again, political parties in this country have switched of the years, the kkk is a conservative group the NOW aligns it self the republican party, the reason blacks vote democratic is because that's the party that now represents them, your to stupid to understand that.

Your contention is 100 million Republicans all got together in 1968 and decided to be racists?

So they could represent 5,000 KKK members?

And you think you're SMART?




Once again you fail to follow the conversation, explaining it again is pointless, you lost in your own little world of ignorance.

perhaps you should clean out your own closet first
 
Berry excuse me? What's in my closet? Nothing. See I have an open mind and I am able to call it like I see it, right or wrong

YouTube
 
I have been on these forums and heard some of the craziest stuff.


The kkk is a left wing group
Nazis were socialists
Voter Id laws are good, remember Jim Crowe
Disaster relief should be equaled with spending cuts
Welfare is a inner city problem
We are going to start rationing healthcare
Public radio is a bad thing
The media is a liberal machine
Civil rights was a conservative movement



I can keep going on, but I think everyone gets the point. For us to go forward we need to understand the history and learn from it.
Too many libtards have forgotten the history of socialism, they embrace it and call it good. They hate common sense and embrace corruption. Good luck.
 
Democrats don't need to call Republicans, racist.

They just need to let them talk.

Thank you, thank you Swollow for once again showing the inbred racism of the Democrat party. Romney not once mentioned race in your little video, not once that I heard. But you naturally connect being poor, being on welfare and being dependent to being black. Oops the real racism once again rears its ugly head.

Everything Romney said was true but there was no racism involved, until you.

Don't correct democrats anymore let them keep showing how racist they are through their own words.

Don't worry, no one has the power to correct racist liberals.
 
Freewill your the definition of hypocrite and the funny thing is you don't even know you are, all of your argument are weak if they are even an argument.
 
Freewill your the definition of hypocrite and the funny thing is you don't even know you are, all of your argument are weak if they are even an argument.

Up yours liar The only reason I don't put you on ignore is so I can tell you what you are, a lying hypocrite.
 
The KKK came into being after the civil war in the south which was largely Democrat during that time the clan propaganda and recruiting film Birth of a Nation was screened By Woodrow Wilson at the White House and Wilson was said to have praised the film after seeing it though there are questions about that. The clan continued it's rise in power and influence still in the Democratic South from the 20s through the 60s it's power and influence began to wane in the 70s and continued in the 80s and beyond during which time the South started to be come more Republican than Democrat people can make their own judgement about if there is a connection between the two. Today the KKK is a marginal fringe group that is not associated in a major way with either party but it's beginnings and it's history have closer tie's to the Democrats than the Republicans.

Once again, the term "liberal" and "conservative" hinges soley upon which one in which party did what. I find this amusing.

Woodrow Wilson was a statist. As such he despised limited government and would be the type to throw Japanese Americans in jail like FDR did, just because of the color of their skin.

However, turn back the clock to Jefferson, the first Democrat, and what we see is the polar opposite. He stood up to the powers that be and returned power to the people by opposing laws such as the Sedition Acts. In addition, although Jefferson owned slaves, he originally wanted to add to the Declaration of Independence the fact that the slaves needed to be freed, but this was shot down by the group think tank.

Liberal and Conservative are pretty clearly defined philosophical view points.

Where it becomes muddled is when conservatives try to justify their greed, racism and reactionary stances by finding equivalence.

Just as your post illustrates.

Harry Reid once referred to Obama as light skinned without a negro dialect and he is the leading democrat in the Senate, yet you call me a racist as well as anyone else who is not a democrat? Also, why are you implying I am greedy? What from my post illustrates this?

If you would like to have an adult conversation I would be glad to do so, but if all you want to do is act like a partisan prick then please don't respond.
 
Last edited:
So you're having a slow day at work sucking dicks for $1 a pop.....

I have been on these forums and heard some of the craziest stuff.


The kkk is a left wing group
Nazis were socialists
Voter Id laws are good, remember Jim Crowe
Disaster relief should be equaled with spending cuts
Welfare is a inner city problem
We are going to start rationing healthcare
Public radio is a bad thing
The media is a liberal machine
Civil rights was a conservative movement



I can keep going on, but I think everyone gets the point. For us to go forward we need to understand the history and learn from it.
 
Once again, the term "liberal" and "conservative" hinges soley upon which one in which party did what. I find this amusing.

Woodrow Wilson was a statist. As such he despised limited government and would be the type to throw Japanese Americans in jail like FDR did, just because of the color of their skin.

However, turn back the clock to Jefferson, the first Democrat, and what we see is the polar opposite. He stood up to the powers that be and returned power to the people by opposing laws such as the Sedition Acts. In addition, although Jefferson owned slaves, he originally wanted to add to the Declaration of Independence the fact that the slaves needed to be freed, but this was shot down by the group think tank.

Liberal and Conservative are pretty clearly defined philosophical view points.

Where it becomes muddled is when conservatives try to justify their greed, racism and reactionary stances by finding equivalence.

Just as your post illustrates.

Harry Reid once referred to Obama as light skinned without a negro dialect and he is the leading democrat in the Senate, yet you call me a racist as well as anyone else who is not a democrat? Also, why are you implying I am greedy? What from my post illustrates this?

If you would like to have an adult conversation I would be glad to do so, but if all you want to do is act like a partisan prick then please don't respond.

I had forgot about that your post did bring this one back to me though it came from the current Vice President and his description of Obama when both were looking for the Democratic nomination it just goes to show stupid and racially charged comments can come from anyone.

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."
 

Forum List

Back
Top