Republicans say they want to "save" money, but Democrats actually "make" money

[rdean]

Follow GOP and Democratic Policies and the difference between the two parties is startling when it comes to economics.

Democrats know you need to make money to pay off debt and that requires investment. Investment in R&D, infrastructure, education and so on. We know that companies with minimum wage jobs have moved to Texas, but companies that require the highly skilled or modern technology have move to Silicon Valley or other expensive places with high tech workers.

Republicans think you can pay off the debt that came from the Bush Tax Cuts and the unpaid for wars and the tens of thousands of wounded from Iraq simply by not spending. Companies have found out that simply moving someplace where they don't pay taxes isn't enough.

For instance, Republicans say that poor people in their states support Democrats. Well, poor people in Democratic states support Democrats. But those states not only support their own poor people, but also Red States, rich and poor.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs. We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers. But Republicans don't want to "waste" the money.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

but Democrats actually "make" money

On Solyndra, for example.

 

[TheOldSchool]

It's no secret that America is funded by the urban areas that republicans so despise.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's no secret that America is funded by the urban areas that republicans so despise.

Yes, the inner city of Chicago is a massive funder.

 

[TheOldSchool]

It's no secret that America is funded by the urban areas that republicans so despise.

Yes, the inner city of Chicago is a massive funder.

Chicago has the 8th highest GDP of all the cities in the world.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's no secret that America is funded by the urban areas that republicans so despise.

Yes, the inner city of Chicago is a massive funder.

Chicago has the 8th highest GDP of all the cities in the world.

Dear Chicago, because of your $20 billion pension debt, your credit worthiness is being downgraded. You have bad credit. That's the message that three major credit rating agencies sent to Chicago this past week. Moody's Investors Service dropped the city down two notches, to junk status. From member station WBEZ in Chicago, Susie An reports.



YVETTE SHIELDS: With the exception of Detroit, Chicago is really alone now among major cities carrying the junk bond rating from at least Moody's.


Chicago's Credit Rating Is Downgraded

Yup, funding America.

 

[TheOldSchool]

It's no secret that America is funded by the urban areas that republicans so despise.

Yes, the inner city of Chicago is a massive funder.

Chicago has the 8th highest GDP of all the cities in the world.

Dear Chicago, because of your $20 billion pension debt, your credit worthiness is being downgraded. You have bad credit. That's the message that three major credit rating agencies sent to Chicago this past week. Moody's Investors Service dropped the city down two notches, to junk status. From member station WBEZ in Chicago, Susie An reports.



YVETTE SHIELDS: With the exception of Detroit, Chicago is really alone now among major cities carrying the junk bond rating from at least Moody's.


Chicago's Credit Rating Is Downgraded

Yup, funding America.

Chicago has a GDP of 600 billion dollars. Yes, they pay for America. Bumfuck, Alabama does not pay for our roads and Aircraft Carriers.

 

[rdean]

but Democrats actually "make" money

On Solyndra, for example.

Oh yea, let's talk about Solyndra, the project pushed by George Bush. The company went bust, but, get this, the program that project was part of made 5 billion. Thank God it was taken over by Obama. Don't you agree?

Clean Energy Program Hated By The GOP Is Projecting A $5 Billion Profit

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

but Democrats actually "make" money

On Solyndra, for example.

Oh yea, let's talk about Solyndra, the project pushed by George Bush. The company went bust, but, get this, the program that project was part of made 5 billion. Thank God it was taken over by Obama. Don't you agree?

Clean Energy Program Hated By The GOP Is Projecting A $5 Billion Profit

Oh yea, let's talk about Solyndra, the project pushed by George Bush.

Bush lent the money, or was it the Obama administration?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

but Democrats actually "make" money

On Solyndra, for example.

Oh yea, let's talk about Solyndra, the project pushed by George Bush. The company went bust, but, get this, the program that project was part of made 5 billion. Thank God it was taken over by Obama. Don't you agree?

Clean Energy Program Hated By The GOP Is Projecting A $5 Billion Profit

It didn't make $5 billion ya stupid git.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Democrats know you need to make money to pay off debt and that requires investment. Investment in R&D, infrastructure, education and so on. .

dear, Republicans are very very big on investment, only private investment so that people are very very careful with where they invest, and risk losing, their own money!!

Do you understand? Its doubtful that private money would invest in bridges to nowhere or fall for the lies Solyndra used to get $500 million out of Barry!!

Do you understand?? Who is going to invest better, a guy investing his own hard earned money or a liberal commie bureaucrat investing other people's money??

 

[Two Thumbs]

I'll be honest, I didn't read past this idiots claim that the government makes money.

The deep ignorance to even think such a thing means the rest of it is just more lies or the spewings of a madman.




If anyone thinks the Fed makes money (not prints, makes) please don't vote, please understand that you are to ignorant to have a say in the lives of your fellow Americans.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Follow GOP and Democratic Policies and the difference between the two parties is startling when it comes to economics.

Democrats know you need to make money to pay off debt and that requires investment. Investment in R&D, infrastructure, education and so on. We know that companies with minimum wage jobs have moved to Texas, but companies that require the highly skilled or modern technology have move to Silicon Valley or other expensive places with high tech workers.

Republicans think you can pay off the debt that came from the Bush Tax Cuts and the unpaid for wars and the tens of thousands of wounded from Iraq simply by not spending. Companies have found out that simply moving someplace where they don't pay taxes isn't enough.

For instance, Republicans say that poor people in their states support Democrats. Well, poor people in Democratic states support Democrats. But those states not only support their own poor people, but also Red States, rich and poor.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs. We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers. But Republicans don't want to "waste" the money.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs.

Bush only cut taxes on the rich? I'm pretty sure he cut taxes for everyone.
Maybe you can find the actual bracket info?

We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers.

That might require uninvesting in stupid liberal grievance classes and concentrating on math and science.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I'll be honest, I didn't read past this idiots claim that the government makes money.

yes, as a typical and stupid liberal he has no understanding of economics at all. We have a huge tax paying economy because of the private inventions that got us from the stone age to here. Govt doesn't invent a thing (USSR: not one single consumer product) so does not contribute one penny to economic growth, tax paying, or "making money".

Seems simple but it is way way over a liberal's head.

 

[rdean]

Democrats know you need to make money to pay off debt and that requires investment. Investment in R&D, infrastructure, education and so on. .

dear, Republicans are very very big on investment, only private investment so that people are very very careful with where they invest, and risk losing, their own money!!

Do you understand? Its doubtful that private money would invest in bridges to nowhere or fall for the lies Solyndra used to get $500 million out of Barry!!

Do you understand?? Who is going to invest better, a guy investing his own hard earned money or a liberal commie bureaucrat investing other people's money??

Bridge to Nowhere? Oh fucking hilarious. Truly fucking hilarious. I love it when Republicans repeat something to often, they think they know what they are talking about. But their ignorance is so easily exposed. Here, let me help.

Sarah Palin, before it became a political football, supported the "bridge to nowhere". It was actually supposed to connect Alaska's second largest airport from the island it's situated on to the mainland. The airport handles hundreds of thousands of people a year. But the way the get to the mainland is by "ferry". Sounds like fun. Waiting around for a fucking ferry. So the people of Alaska were angry Sarah turned something so important to their infrastructure into such a joke, the project was defunded.

Now the truly hilarious part.

She still had the highway built that was supposed to go to the bridge to nowhere. Only now it became a "highway to nowhere" because it ends where the bridge was SUPPOSED to begin.

Isn't that hysterical? Really hysterical?

That's how Republican manage things. Then they blame their disasters and debacles on Democrats.

 

[rdean]

I'll be honest, I didn't read past this idiots claim that the government makes money.

yes, as a typical and stupid liberal he has no understanding of economics at all. We have a huge tax paying economy because of the private inventions that got us from the stone age to here. Govt doesn't invent a thing (USSR: not one single consumer product) so does not contribute one penny to economic growth, tax paying, or "making money".

Seems simple but it is way way over a liberal's head.

NASA

 

[rdean]

Follow GOP and Democratic Policies and the difference between the two parties is startling when it comes to economics.

Democrats know you need to make money to pay off debt and that requires investment. Investment in R&D, infrastructure, education and so on. We know that companies with minimum wage jobs have moved to Texas, but companies that require the highly skilled or modern technology have move to Silicon Valley or other expensive places with high tech workers.

Republicans think you can pay off the debt that came from the Bush Tax Cuts and the unpaid for wars and the tens of thousands of wounded from Iraq simply by not spending. Companies have found out that simply moving someplace where they don't pay taxes isn't enough.

For instance, Republicans say that poor people in their states support Democrats. Well, poor people in Democratic states support Democrats. But those states not only support their own poor people, but also Red States, rich and poor.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs. We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers. But Republicans don't want to "waste" the money.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs.

Bush only cut taxes on the rich? I'm pretty sure he cut taxes for everyone.
Maybe you can find the actual bracket info?

We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers.

That might require uninvesting in stupid liberal grievance classes and concentrating on math and science.

Because a hundred bucks changed my life.

 

[rdean]

Follow GOP and Democratic Policies and the difference between the two parties is startling when it comes to economics.

Democrats know you need to make money to pay off debt and that requires investment. Investment in R&D, infrastructure, education and so on. We know that companies with minimum wage jobs have moved to Texas, but companies that require the highly skilled or modern technology have move to Silicon Valley or other expensive places with high tech workers.

Republicans think you can pay off the debt that came from the Bush Tax Cuts and the unpaid for wars and the tens of thousands of wounded from Iraq simply by not spending. Companies have found out that simply moving someplace where they don't pay taxes isn't enough.

For instance, Republicans say that poor people in their states support Democrats. Well, poor people in Democratic states support Democrats. But those states not only support their own poor people, but also Red States, rich and poor.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs. We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers. But Republicans don't want to "waste" the money.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs.

Bush only cut taxes on the rich? I'm pretty sure he cut taxes for everyone.
Maybe you can find the actual bracket info?

We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers.

That might require uninvesting in stupid liberal grievance classes and concentrating on math and science.

Republicans think science is a faith.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Follow GOP and Democratic Policies and the difference between the two parties is startling when it comes to economics.

Democrats know you need to make money to pay off debt and that requires investment. Investment in R&D, infrastructure, education and so on. We know that companies with minimum wage jobs have moved to Texas, but companies that require the highly skilled or modern technology have move to Silicon Valley or other expensive places with high tech workers.

Republicans think you can pay off the debt that came from the Bush Tax Cuts and the unpaid for wars and the tens of thousands of wounded from Iraq simply by not spending. Companies have found out that simply moving someplace where they don't pay taxes isn't enough.

For instance, Republicans say that poor people in their states support Democrats. Well, poor people in Democratic states support Democrats. But those states not only support their own poor people, but also Red States, rich and poor.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs. We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers. But Republicans don't want to "waste" the money.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs.

Bush only cut taxes on the rich? I'm pretty sure he cut taxes for everyone.
Maybe you can find the actual bracket info?

We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers.

That might require uninvesting in stupid liberal grievance classes and concentrating on math and science.

Republicans think science is a faith.

That's what the white man wants you to think.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Follow GOP and Democratic Policies and the difference between the two parties is startling when it comes to economics.

Democrats know you need to make money to pay off debt and that requires investment. Investment in R&D, infrastructure, education and so on. We know that companies with minimum wage jobs have moved to Texas, but companies that require the highly skilled or modern technology have move to Silicon Valley or other expensive places with high tech workers.

Republicans think you can pay off the debt that came from the Bush Tax Cuts and the unpaid for wars and the tens of thousands of wounded from Iraq simply by not spending. Companies have found out that simply moving someplace where they don't pay taxes isn't enough.

For instance, Republicans say that poor people in their states support Democrats. Well, poor people in Democratic states support Democrats. But those states not only support their own poor people, but also Red States, rich and poor.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs. We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers. But Republicans don't want to "waste" the money.

When the Bush Tax Cuts took effect, it prove that just shoveling money to the rich didn't create jobs.

Bush only cut taxes on the rich? I'm pretty sure he cut taxes for everyone.
Maybe you can find the actual bracket info?

We have over 5 million jobs going unfilled because people don't have the skills to do them. A smart person would invest in education for those people to fill jobs requiring skilled workers.

That might require uninvesting in stupid liberal grievance classes and concentrating on math and science.

Because a hundred bucks changed my life.

Since that was your entire federal tax bill, he gave you a 100% cut!