Republicans Resorting to Death Threats, Lies and Violence at Town Hall Meetings

I know he did, but the evidence doesn't back him up.

Where's your evidence?

A thirty second video clip?

How about eyewitnesses?

How many of those people have you interviewed?
Where is your evidence? This video is what was put forth to claim the man was beaten. It shows nothing of the sort. Prolly in your stupid little brain Obama himself beat the guy up.

I don't need evidence. I'm not the one that's making a claim that the man was or wasn't hurt. I said from the start that I'm going to wait until all the facts are out before I make a judgement call. But idiots like you see thirty seconds of a video and think you know what happened. I'm willing to give the man the benefit of the doubt because he seems to have eyewitnesses that collaborate his story.

The video was used because it's the only video record of the events of that evening. Unfortunately it didn't capture every detail from beginning to end. What you see is only a fraction of what took place. And I never heard anyone say this video proves the man was beaten. The video clearly shows an altercation took place, and all we see is the end of it. Not the beginning nor the middle.

It's clear to me that you are truly a tool who's stupidity has replaced any logic that you may have had.
 
Yes, we know Goebbels.

he sounds a lot like hugo chavez,, hero of the left.. I'm betting he has a Che hat, shirt, and sign hanging in his dank dark basement.. mama paid for his coffee and bagel.. that's what I'm betting.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
I know I shouldn't pick on this rather limited fellow Willow, but I was bored this morning.

He did illustrate quite well what i have been fighting for years.

The blind ideolouge.

All they ever do is label you, if you aern't with them, they try to fit you into whatever box they dislike most, in his case its 'neocon', of course he has no way of knowing the entire board is laughing at him for calling me of all people that.

But then again, these lil goons are all over the net, so there are plenty of chances to have fun at their expense.

BTW, thanks to everyone in the thread for all the rep, I'll try and hit you all back but I was kind of overloaded with this one. :lol:
I agree it is stupid to call you a neo-con without any evidence. At the same time you've repeatedly misstated what he said about protesters. How are you any different? :eusa_eh:
 
I know he did, but the evidence doesn't back him up.

Where's your evidence?

A thirty second video clip?

How about eyewitnesses?

How many of those people have you interviewed?
Where is your evidence? This video is what was put forth to claim the man was beaten. It shows nothing of the sort. Prolly in your stupid little brain Obama himself beat the guy up.

Have you seen the police reports or the medical records or are you simply incapable of believing that a union member is capable of violence

The history of union violence is well documented

because a video clip doesn't show everything that happened does not mean nothing happened
 
I agree it is stupid to call you a neo-con without any evidence.
As well you should.

At the same time you've repeatedly misstated what he said about protesters. How are you any different? :eusa_eh:
He didn't say arrest the protestors?

Sure you want to go with that?
Maybe I missed it what I saw was that he said arrest those that are disrupting the meetings.
 
Where's your evidence?

A thirty second video clip?

How about eyewitnesses?

How many of those people have you interviewed?
Where is your evidence? This video is what was put forth to claim the man was beaten. It shows nothing of the sort. Prolly in your stupid little brain Obama himself beat the guy up.

Have you seen the police reports or the medical records or are you simply incapable of believing that a union member is capable of violence

The history of union violence is well documented

because a video clip doesn't show everything that happened does not mean nothing happened
From the list of those arrested that day no one was arrested for beating this man. IMO, you are letting your stereotypes rule your thinking.
 
Where is your evidence? This video is what was put forth to claim the man was beaten. It shows nothing of the sort. Prolly in your stupid little brain Obama himself beat the guy up.

Have you seen the police reports or the medical records or are you simply incapable of believing that a union member is capable of violence

The history of union violence is well documented

because a video clip doesn't show everything that happened does not mean nothing happened
From the list of those arrested that day no one was arrested for beating this man. IMO, you are letting your stereotypes rule your thinking.

Stereotypes right

the guy filed charges so we'll see

and do you have this list?
 
Maybe I missed it what I saw was that he said arrest those that are disrupting the meetings.
You mean the protestors.
Protesters are one thing. I've got no problem with protesters. I have a problem with people disrupting a town hall meeting to the point where no one is able to interact with their representatives. The people that do that should be escorted from the building.

Maybe the difference is too subtle for you but I think that is what he meant.
 
Have you seen the police reports or the medical records or are you simply incapable of believing that a union member is capable of violence

The history of union violence is well documented

because a video clip doesn't show everything that happened does not mean nothing happened
From the list of those arrested that day no one was arrested for beating this man. IMO, you are letting your stereotypes rule your thinking.

Stereotypes right

the guy filed charges so we'll see

and do you have this list?
— Two men were arrested for misdemeanor assault for allegedly punching and pushing a man who was handing out flags and fliers outside the school.

— One woman was arrested for misdemeanor assault and destruction of property for allegedly pushing another woman who was recording events on her cell phone, then breaking the phone.

— One woman was arrested for interference and resisting arrest. An officer used pepper spray on the woman, police said, when she did not comply with officers and struggled with them.

— One man was arrested for peace disturbance when he allegedly entered a circle of people who had gathered near the pepper-sprayed woman and did not follow orders to leave.

— Post-Dispatch reporter Jake Wagman was arrested for allegedly interfering.
Two sides blame each other in fracas at forum - STLtoday.com
 
From the list of those arrested that day no one was arrested for beating this man. IMO, you are letting your stereotypes rule your thinking.

Stereotypes right

the guy filed charges so we'll see

and do you have this list?
— Two men were arrested for misdemeanor assault for allegedly punching and pushing a man who was handing out flags and fliers outside the school.

— One woman was arrested for misdemeanor assault and destruction of property for allegedly pushing another woman who was recording events on her cell phone, then breaking the phone.

— One woman was arrested for interference and resisting arrest. An officer used pepper spray on the woman, police said, when she did not comply with officers and struggled with them.

— One man was arrested for peace disturbance when he allegedly entered a circle of people who had gathered near the pepper-sprayed woman and did not follow orders to leave.

— Post-Dispatch reporter Jake Wagman was arrested for allegedly interfering.
Two sides blame each other in fracas at forum - STLtoday.com
does your list include assault charges filed after the event?

no

oh so it must not have happened.
 
:popcorn:




I have a question. I haven't seen the videos yet.

Did any citizens actually complain that these individuals were prohibiting them from interacting with their representatives or is it only the politicians and pundits who are complaining?
 

Forum List

Back
Top