Republicans only like freedom of speech that is their own. Acosta is proof of this

[Billy000]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

 

[Wyatt earp]

He can do podcasts like bill O Reilly after the left destroyed his freedom of speech..



.

 

[Hossfly]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

The White House press conference can be cancelled permanently if the president so desires. It's not a constitutional right for the press critters. They need to start acting like adults.

 

[blackhawk]

He still has freedom of speech revoking his press credentials did not take that away. Aggressive questioning is fine acting like a self important drama queen who is more interested in promoting himself and getting viral moments than providing relevant information to the public is not. If he wants to debate people over Trumps policies or voice his opinion about them and Trump he should give up the journalist title and have CNN give him his own show so he can do that to his hearts content.

 

[Billy000]

He still has freedom of speech revoking his press credentials did not take that away. Aggressive questioning is fine acting like a self important drama queen who is more interested in promoting himself and getting viral moments than providing relevant information to the public is not. If he wants to debate people over Trumps policies or voice his opinion about them and Trump he should give up the journalist title and have CNN give him his own show so he can do that to his hearts content.

Good fucking god. All he did was fucking ask questions. Again, he didn’t violate any established rules. You not liking this guy doesn’t mean shit when it comes to the freedom of the press.

 

[bripat9643]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

How can it be against Whitehouse policy when Trump makes all Whitehouse policy? What a fucking dumbass. How could it possibly be illegal? Are you actually saying that Trump doesn't have the right to control his own press conferences? If he doesn't make the rules, then who does?

 

[Billy000]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

The White House press conference can be cancelled permanently if the president so desires. It's not a constitutional right for the press critters. They need to start acting like adults.

Oh right if Obama had done something that batshit crazy you would have supported him 100% right?

 

[bripat9643]

He still has freedom of speech revoking his press credentials did not take that away. Aggressive questioning is fine acting like a self important drama queen who is more interested in promoting himself and getting viral moments than providing relevant information to the public is not. If he wants to debate people over Trumps policies or voice his opinion about them and Trump he should give up the journalist title and have CNN give him his own show so he can do that to his hearts content.

Good fucking god. All he did was fucking ask questions. Again, he didn’t violate any established rules. You not liking this guy doesn’t mean shit when it comes to the freedom of the press.

He didn't ask a question, and he did violate a rule: the one that says you're done when the president says you're done.

 

[bripat9643]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

The White House press conference can be cancelled permanently if the president so desires. It's not a constitutional right for the press critters. They need to start acting like adults.

Oh right if Obama had done something that batshit crazy you would have supported him 100% right?

It wasn't crazy at all. It's about time someone put that asshole in his place.

 

[Billy000]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

How can it be against Whitehouse policy when Trump makes all Whitehouse policy? What a fucking dumbass. How could it possibly illegal? Are you actually saying that Trump doesn't have the right to control his own press conferences? If he doesn't make the rules, then who does?

It just astounds me how you people can be such drama queens about the second amendment when it comes to ANY attempt at regulation yet Trump booting a reporter from the White House is somehow not an infringement on the 1st amendment. You are such a pawn.

And as for White House policy, hypothetically speaking if democrats were to gain control of all 3 branches of the government some time in the future, you would be okay with them setting their own, made up rules?

 

[Billy000]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

The White House press conference can be cancelled permanently if the president so desires. It's not a constitutional right for the press critters. They need to start acting like adults.

Oh right if Obama had done something that batshit crazy you would have supported him 100% right?

It wasn't crazy at all. It's about time someone put that asshole in his place.

It doesn’t fucking matter if you think he is an asshole. For fuck sake, you people have no principle whatsoever do you?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

The White House press conference can be cancelled permanently if the president so desires. It's not a constitutional right for the press critters. They need to start acting like adults.

Oh right if Obama had done something that batshit crazy you would have supported him 100% right?

It wasn't crazy at all. It's about time someone put that asshole in his place.

It doesn’t fucking matter if you think he is an asshole. For fuck sake, you people have no principle whatsoever do you?

Uhm Billy he was being the drama queen, he can now focus on reporting about some gay stuff..


.

 

[bripat9643]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

How can it be against Whitehouse policy when Trump makes all Whitehouse policy? What a fucking dumbass. How could it possibly illegal? Are you actually saying that Trump doesn't have the right to control his own press conferences? If he doesn't make the rules, then who does?

It just astounds me how you people can be such drama queens about the second amendment when it comes to ANY attempt at regulation yet Trump booting a reporter from the White House is somehow not an infringement on the 1st amendment. You are such a pawn.

And as for White House policy, hypothetically speaking if democrats were to gain control of all 3 branches of the government some time in the future, you would be okay with them setting their own, made up rules?

Booting a reporter is not a violation of the 1st Amendment. Trump is not stopping the asshole Acosta from reporting whatever he wants to report. Trump is not required to give Acosta access to himself.

 

[Billy000]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

How can it be against Whitehouse policy when Trump makes all Whitehouse policy? What a fucking dumbass. How could it possibly illegal? Are you actually saying that Trump doesn't have the right to control his own press conferences? If he doesn't make the rules, then who does?

It just astounds me how you people can be such drama queens about the second amendment when it comes to ANY attempt at regulation yet Trump booting a reporter from the White House is somehow not an infringement on the 1st amendment. You are such a pawn.

And as for White House policy, hypothetically speaking if democrats were to gain control of all 3 branches of the government some time in the future, you would be okay with them setting their own, made up rules?

Booting a reporter is not a violation of the 1st Amendment. Trump is not stopping the asshole Acosta from reporting whatever he wants to report. Trump is not required to give Acosta access to himself.

So, strict mandatory background checks on all gun owners is okay now?

 

[bripat9643]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

The White House press conference can be cancelled permanently if the president so desires. It's not a constitutional right for the press critters. They need to start acting like adults.

Oh right if Obama had done something that batshit crazy you would have supported him 100% right?

It wasn't crazy at all. It's about time someone put that asshole in his place.

It doesn’t fucking matter if you think he is an asshole. For fuck sake, you people have no principle whatsoever do you?

You're right, it doesn't matter whether he is an asshole. That still doesn't make what Trump did illegal. However, what Acosta did is illegal. He assaulted a Whitehouse intern and failed to return Whitehouse property when it was demanded.

 

[KGB]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

How can it be against Whitehouse policy when Trump makes all Whitehouse policy? What a fucking dumbass. How could it possibly illegal? Are you actually saying that Trump doesn't have the right to control his own press conferences? If he doesn't make the rules, then who does?

It just astounds me how you people can be such drama queens about the second amendment when it comes to ANY attempt at regulation yet Trump booting a reporter from the White House is somehow not an infringement on the 1st amendment. You are such a pawn.

And as for White House policy, hypothetically speaking if democrats were to gain control of all 3 branches of the government some time in the future, you would be okay with them setting their own, made up rules?

That’s because an infringement on the second amendment disarms citizens. Little cry baby Acosta lost his press pass....boo hoo. No one cares. CNN isn’t going to stop broadcasting because this jack ass of a reporter acted like a two year old. The first amendment was written with the intent govt types wouldn’t come in & shut down the press.

 

[bripat9643]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

How can it be against Whitehouse policy when Trump makes all Whitehouse policy? What a fucking dumbass. How could it possibly illegal? Are you actually saying that Trump doesn't have the right to control his own press conferences? If he doesn't make the rules, then who does?

It just astounds me how you people can be such drama queens about the second amendment when it comes to ANY attempt at regulation yet Trump booting a reporter from the White House is somehow not an infringement on the 1st amendment. You are such a pawn.

And as for White House policy, hypothetically speaking if democrats were to gain control of all 3 branches of the government some time in the future, you would be okay with them setting their own, made up rules?

Booting a reporter is not a violation of the 1st Amendment. Trump is not stopping the asshole Acosta from reporting whatever he wants to report. Trump is not required to give Acosta access to himself.

So, strict mandatory background checks on all gun owners is okay now?

Did you experience some kind of psychotic break or something?

 

[Billy000]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

How can it be against Whitehouse policy when Trump makes all Whitehouse policy? What a fucking dumbass. How could it possibly illegal? Are you actually saying that Trump doesn't have the right to control his own press conferences? If he doesn't make the rules, then who does?

It just astounds me how you people can be such drama queens about the second amendment when it comes to ANY attempt at regulation yet Trump booting a reporter from the White House is somehow not an infringement on the 1st amendment. You are such a pawn.

And as for White House policy, hypothetically speaking if democrats were to gain control of all 3 branches of the government some time in the future, you would be okay with them setting their own, made up rules?

That’s because an infringement on the second amendment disarms citizens. Little cry baby Acosta lost his press pass....boo hoo. No one cares. CNN isn’t going to stop broadcasting because this jack ass of a reporter acted like a two year old. The first amendment was written with the intent govt types wouldn’t come in & shut down the press.

You are so goddamn emotional. This is your statement in a nutshell: “I don’t like Acosta so I agree with Trump 100%!”

I also want to point out how laughable it is that Trump is not a 2 year old but Acosta is.

 

[Billy000]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

How can it be against Whitehouse policy when Trump makes all Whitehouse policy? What a fucking dumbass. How could it possibly illegal? Are you actually saying that Trump doesn't have the right to control his own press conferences? If he doesn't make the rules, then who does?

It just astounds me how you people can be such drama queens about the second amendment when it comes to ANY attempt at regulation yet Trump booting a reporter from the White House is somehow not an infringement on the 1st amendment. You are such a pawn.

And as for White House policy, hypothetically speaking if democrats were to gain control of all 3 branches of the government some time in the future, you would be okay with them setting their own, made up rules?

Booting a reporter is not a violation of the 1st Amendment. Trump is not stopping the asshole Acosta from reporting whatever he wants to report. Trump is not required to give Acosta access to himself.

So, strict mandatory background checks on all gun owners is okay now?

Did you experience some kind of psychotic break or something?

You know I’m right.

 

[bripat9643]

Regardless of what republicans think of Acosta, agreeing with Trump revoking his pass to the White House is illegal and is against actual White House policy.

I just don’t understand how republicans can just agree with whatever Trump says without question. Look, you can like Trump and still find his move fascist. You’re just a lazy thinker otherwise.

Andrew Napolitono on Fox said that regardless of what you think of Acosta’s behavior, he did not violate the rules and therefore is part of the “rough and tumble of the 1st amendment.”

How can republicans be such snowflakes about this? Can you fucking imagine how they would react if Obama banned a Fox News reporter from the White House because his line of questioning was aggressive?

How can it be against Whitehouse policy when Trump makes all Whitehouse policy? What a fucking dumbass. How could it possibly illegal? Are you actually saying that Trump doesn't have the right to control his own press conferences? If he doesn't make the rules, then who does?

It just astounds me how you people can be such drama queens about the second amendment when it comes to ANY attempt at regulation yet Trump booting a reporter from the White House is somehow not an infringement on the 1st amendment. You are such a pawn.

And as for White House policy, hypothetically speaking if democrats were to gain control of all 3 branches of the government some time in the future, you would be okay with them setting their own, made up rules?

That’s because an infringement on the second amendment disarms citizens. Little cry baby Acosta lost his press pass....boo hoo. No one cares. CNN isn’t going to stop broadcasting because this jack ass of a reporter acted like a two year old. The first amendment was written with the intent govt types wouldn’t come in & shut down the press.

You are so goddamn emotional. This is your statement in a nutshell: “I don’t like Acosta so I agree with Trump 100%!”

I also want to point out how laughable it is that Trump is not a 2 year old but Acosta is.

No, that isn't his position. You've been told the reason 100 times already, but you refuse to accept them. The First Amendment doesn't require the President to give press conferences or answer the question of any given reporter, period.