Republicans Need To Be Careful and Smart

[Votto]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty.

Too funny. Has Hillary ever been convicted of a crime?

The reason Hillary has never been convicted of a crime is the same reason Obama won a Nobel Peace prize.

 

[Synthaholic]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Even the accuser's mother has said the daughter didn't even have a telephone in her own bedroom. Also, for those who wish to be neutral on this unproven allegation:

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.


“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”


“They tried to convince her to do it?” this reporter asked.

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.

“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”

And good thing they did, or Moore would have never faced consequences for his many rapes of young children.

Link to rape of young children.

Moore was a 32 year old man who was molesting a 14 year old 8th grader in his automobile.

He was not.

I'm sorry, but he was.

 

[tinydancer]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Even the accuser's mother has said the daughter didn't even have a telephone in her own bedroom. Also, for those who wish to be neutral on this unproven allegation:

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.


“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”


“They tried to convince her to do it?” this reporter asked.

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.

“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”

And good thing they did, or Moore would have never faced consequences for his many rapes of young children.

Link to rape of young children.

Moore was a 32 year old man who was molesting a 14 year old 8th grader in his automobile.

She said in his house. I don't believe her.

 

[busybee01]

There is evidence in this case. What you want is for the Republican Party to become like the Democrat Party. Tolerate any deviant behavior just as long as we win. Putting a pervert in office is not winning. People who claim to be value voters need to start acting like value voters. Moore and Trump are sexual harassers just as Clinton was and we should stand against it no matter whether it is a Republican or Democrat.

Moore could legitimately sue you for libel.

I'd like to see him try. He is a public figure and he cannot sue anyone for libel. maybe I should sue you.

 

[protectionist]

he's the only one ACCUSED of molesting children, and the evidence is rather ... overwhelming the mufhfakah's guilty as sin. You wanna deny, you fuckers can knock your selves the fuck out. Out.

As for the dems, they need to be careful because Conyers is likely deeply in the doo, although with adult harassment victims. But he will not resign even if he drags folks down with him, and ethics investigations take YEARS

"ACCUSED" means NOTHING. If it meant anything, all we'd have to do is go around acusing whoever we don't like, so as to remove them form the govt or a job. Hey guess what. That's just what the Dems are doing (with Trump & Moore)

Ethics investigations are a farce. Why investigate what you already know ? Franken confessed, and there's photo evidence. Dump him.

As for the evidence, it 's rather "overwhelming" that the accusers waited 39 years and then spoke out just before an election. Overwhelming evidence THAT THEY'RE LYING. Only question is how much are they getting paid, and from whom.

As for Moore, there IS NO evidence, period.

 

[protectionist]

I'd like to see him try. He is a public figure and he cannot sue anyone for libel. maybe I should sue you.

Oh public figures can't sue people. LOL. Want a list of all the public figures who have filed lawsuits and won ?

As for you suing me, HA HA. Sorry, suit defendants have to have vulnerable assets. I don't. Do you ?

 

[protectionist]

Moore was a 32 year old man who was molesting a 14 year old 8th grader in his automobile.

So you have some evidence to substantiate this ? HA HA HA.