Republicans, is CO2 a Greenhouse gas???

[flacaltenn]

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

Kinda like how virtually every scientist in every scientific society and major university used to say that fat was the devil?

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat

Well yes, just like the energy corporations have paid scientists to testify in front of Congress that there is no AGW. The very same scientists that the tobacco companies paid to testify in front of Congress that tobacco had nothing to do with cancer and other illnesses. Singer and Lindzen to name two.

And kinda like how lots of government money goes into measuring global warming, but quickly dries up if your research doesn't support the government's premise, right?

Really fucking dumb. Now if there were other studies in other nations that said that opposite of what those scientists are saying, you might have a point. But that is not the case. Even the scientists from the oil producing nations are stating that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. In fact, every National Academy of Science of all the nations state that AGW is real. So, to state what you have is to join the little tin hat people.

Guess you forgot the Australian GeoPhys guys/gals who put their "statement" in front of THEIR membership and it caused a 2 year fight so bad ---- they abandoned their "statement" altogether...

Those things are nowhere NEAR consensus. And a lot of members resent these profess. orgs speaking for them. It sure irks ME when mine does it... But all you can do is vote the suckers out and hope the NEXT set stay the hell away from controversy...

 

[jc456]

Kinda like how virtually every scientist in every scientific society and major university used to say that fat was the devil?

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat

Well yes, just like the energy corporations have paid scientists to testify in front of Congress that there is no AGW. The very same scientists that the tobacco companies paid to testify in front of Congress that tobacco had nothing to do with cancer and other illnesses. Singer and Lindzen to name two.

And kinda like how lots of government money goes into measuring global warming, but quickly dries up if your research doesn't support the government's premise, right?

Really fucking dumb. Now if there were other studies in other nations that said that opposite of what those scientists are saying, you might have a point. But that is not the case. Even the scientists from the oil producing nations are stating that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. In fact, every National Academy of Science of all the nations state that AGW is real. So, to state what you have is to join the little tin hat people.

Yes, you are certainly one of the dumbest people on the planet. Every one of those so called scientists you are so proud of owe their monetary, and professional well being to perpetuating the fraud. The whole freaking world KNOWS this to be true. How is it that you are so blindly stupid that you can't figure it out.

Getting desperate now, you lying fuck? So, you are accusing the whole of the scientific community of fraud. The world's whole scientific community. For the thousands of articles that provide evidence of the warming often have citizens from the many nations of this world.

When you see a self proclaimed scientist stating that all the other scientists in the world are frauds, and only he knows the truth, you are dealing with a lying screwball.

I agree they are all frauds!

 

[westwall]

Kinda like how virtually every scientist in every scientific society and major university used to say that fat was the devil?

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat

Well yes, just like the energy corporations have paid scientists to testify in front of Congress that there is no AGW. The very same scientists that the tobacco companies paid to testify in front of Congress that tobacco had nothing to do with cancer and other illnesses. Singer and Lindzen to name two.

And kinda like how lots of government money goes into measuring global warming, but quickly dries up if your research doesn't support the government's premise, right?

Really fucking dumb. Now if there were other studies in other nations that said that opposite of what those scientists are saying, you might have a point. But that is not the case. Even the scientists from the oil producing nations are stating that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. In fact, every National Academy of Science of all the nations state that AGW is real. So, to state what you have is to join the little tin hat people.

Yes, you are certainly one of the dumbest people on the planet. Every one of those so called scientists you are so proud of owe their monetary, and professional well being to perpetuating the fraud. The whole freaking world KNOWS this to be true. How is it that you are so blindly stupid that you can't figure it out.

Getting desperate now, you lying fuck? So, you are accusing the whole of the scientific community of fraud. The world's whole scientific community. For the thousands of articles that provide evidence of the warming often have citizens from the many nations of this world.

When you see a self proclaimed scientist stating that all the other scientists in the world are frauds, and only he knows the truth, you are dealing with a lying screwball.

Where did I say the "whole scientific community"? No, you silly twit, I said the CLIMATOLOGISTS, and not even all of them. There are still some damned good ones out there who care more about science, than they do about easy money.

 

[flacaltenn]

Money sure has bleed OUT of all the other enviro causes. That's what makes me angry. Poor birds and bees can't get a witness anymore unless you promise to write how they are threatened by Global Warning Change.

It's suffocated practically the whole Enviro field.. That's evil right there..

 

[westwall]

Money sure has bleed OUT of all the other enviro causes. That's what makes me angry. Poor birds and bees can't get a witness anymore unless you promise to write how they are threatened by Global Warning Change.

It's suffocated practically the whole Enviro field.. That's evil right there..

Absolutely. There are actual, real environmental issues that have been allowed to fester because these greedy bastards are sucking the lifeblood out of conservation.

Assholes.

 

[flacaltenn]

Money sure has bleed OUT of all the other enviro causes. That's what makes me angry. Poor birds and bees can't get a witness anymore unless you promise to write how they are threatened by Global Warning Change.

It's suffocated practically the whole Enviro field.. That's evil right there..

Absolutely. There are actual, real environmental issues that have been allowed to fester because these greedy bastards are sucking the lifeblood out of conservation.

Assholes.

I wonder if these pesky warmers are LISTENING to others in Conservation and Enviro issues --- how much they are hurting from being buried on the back page by a 0.06deg record temperature? There's a lot of people like us just wondering when we're gonna get the focus back to cleaning up trash heaps in the oceans and and figuring out why I haven't seen a honeybee for years or properly cleaning up Savannah River and Hanford before ALL those barrels of nuclear weapons waste are leaking .......

Where is all THAT on Brambo's to-do list??? ?

 

[flacaltenn]

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

Kinda like how virtually every scientist in every scientific society and major university used to say that fat was the devil?

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat

Well yes, just like the energy corporations have paid scientists to testify in front of Congress that there is no AGW. The very same scientists that the tobacco companies paid to testify in front of Congress that tobacco had nothing to do with cancer and other illnesses. Singer and Lindzen to name two.

You aware that Exxon-Mobil is a major sponsor at the large AGU events --- right????
I thought that would automatically disqualify the AGU from having any valid opinion by leftist rules..

Sure. Same for the GSA. However, they are also supporters of the liars that are denying the warming. They are covering the bases. Just like they contribute to both political parties. Like the tobacco companies, they are playing for time to keep the money rolling in. And that fact that people will die for that, is of no concern to them, just as it was no concern to the tobacco companies.

And we know how the tobacco deal turned out. Made the Government the largest profiteer on every pack. Poor smoker dying of cancer will never SEE any of that loot. Govt now takes $7 a pack, wastes it, and the tobacco companies get $1...

This ain't tobacco. It's a cover for rolling environmentalism into one neat ball. Make it look like EVERY enviro issue is related and has the same solution... Calling CO2 "carbon" is clearly part of that. And it's fed to the warmers on a 8th grade level and exaggerated all the fruck out of proportion. Same propaganda campaign -- different goal..

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Do Republicans even understand that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

Do Republicans understand there are even worse Greenhouse gasses? Such as Sulfur Hexaflouride, a non-toxic gas that is 32,000x more potent than CO2?

Can you imagine what would happen to the Earth if a gas that traps 32,000x more heat in the atmosphere than CO2 were to escape our industries on the scale that we have released CO2?

Just think about what your idiotic lack of scientific understanding implies.

We understand that you'd like to capitalize on hack science while oppressing the USA based upon a natural atmospheric compound. It's fucking pathetic.