Republicans Hate American Workers

There is elite wherever you go, but socialism is about the common man, like this thread about republicans hating American workers. I got it right, you are just to ignorant to comprehend the significance of socialism.

Yes, you care about the working man by lumping them together in a collective mass, ignoring their individual needs, and then killing them when they start to get upset with you.
 
What is wrong Republicans? People who voted for them will start getting a taste of yesteryear..................:confused:

They Got (Way) Richer, And You Didn't. Tell Us Again Why Socialism Is Bad?

A new study by The Center for Responsive Politics finds that over half of Congress is made up of millionaires whose household worth rose 19 percent last year - to $908,255 - as the national median fell 15 percent, to $84,000. This, as House Republicans refused to extend benefits to up to two million long-term unemployed.

They Got (Way) Richer, And You Didn't. Tell Us Again Why Socialism Is Bad? | CommonDreams.org

Are you bipolar or something? You were arguing for ending unemployment benefits less than a year ago, now your complaining that 2 years of unemployment benefits isnt enough and Republicans are somehow bad for not extending them past 2 years.

C'mon Avatar - give him a break, he was only 12 then.
He has grown up now.
 
Christ...I need a score card as to who I hate and don't....anyone keeping score? is their a cliff notes on this?

Ill break it down so it's easy to understand:

Non-democrats - Hate everyone

Democrats - Love everyone.

Any questions?
 
Yep, that is why socialism is a better system, everybody prospers, not just a few.



:doubt:Really?...It has been tried here idiot



In the middle of December 1620 the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock, leaving behind the sinfulness of the “old world” to make a “new Jerusalem” in America. Three years later, in November 1623, they had a great feast thanking God for getting them through an earlier famine, and now for a bountiful crop.

What had created the earlier famine and then the bountiful crops? The story is told in the diary of Governor Bradford, who was one of the elders of that early Puritan colony.

At first, they decided to turn their back on all the institutions of the England that had been their home. This included the institution of private property, which they declared to be the basis of greed, averse, and selfishness. Instead, they were determined to live the “Platonic ideal” of collectivism, in which all work would be done in common, with the rewards of their collective efforts evenly divided among the colonists. Farming was done in common, as well as housekeeping and child raising. This was supposed to lead to prosperity and brotherly love.

But their experiment in collectivism did not lead to prosperity or brotherly love. Rather, it created poverty and envy and slothfulness among most of the members of this little society. Here is Bradford’s description of what communism created among the Pilgrims:
“The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and other ancients applauded by some of later times; that the taking away of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God. For this community was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young men, that were most able and fit for labor and service, did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense. The strong had no more in division of victuals and clothes than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors everything else, thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them.

“And for men's wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it. Upon the point all being to have alike, and all to do alike, they thought themselves in the like condition, and one as good as another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take off the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them” Let none object this is men's corruption, and nothing to the course itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in His wisdom saw another course fitter for them.”

For two years the harvest time failed to bring forth enough to feed the people. Indeed, many starved and many died of famine. Faced with this disaster, the elders of the colony gathered, Governor Bradford tells us, and decided that another year, and they would surely all die and disappear in the wilderness.

Instead, they decided to divide the property and fields of the colony, and gave each family a piece as their own. Whatever they did not use for their own consumption, they had the right to trade away to their neighbors for something they desired instead.

Now, instead of sloth, envy, resentment, and anger among the colonists, there was a great turnaround in their activities. Industry, effort, and joy were now seen in practically all that the men, women and children did. Bradford writes:

“They had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression”. By this time harvest was come, and instead of famine, now God gave them plenty, and the faces of things were changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God.”

Indeed, their bounty was so great, that they had enough to not only trade among themselves but also with the neighboring Indians in the forest. In November 1623, they had a great feast to which they also invited the Indians. They prepared turkey and corn, and much more, and thanked God for bringing them a bountiful crop. They, therefore, set aside a day of “Thanksgiving.”

So this November 23rd, when we all sit down with our families and friends to enjoy the turkey and the trimmings, let us not forget that we are celebrating the establishment and triumph of capitalism and the spirit of enterprise in America!





The Real Thanksgiving Story* --* Gov. Bradford
 
Last edited:
Da rich gets rich and da po gets po-er.

*yawn*

Yep, that is why socialism is a better system, everybody prospers, not just a few.

You mean like every prosperous person in Cuba? How about North Korea? Let's not forget Viet Nam!!!

Yeah buddy...that socialism is the way to go! All those poor Cuban's would probably try to go back to Cuba if the U.S. went the socialism route.
 

Forum List

Back
Top