Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
if i am summoned to court, do they provide free transportation?
many things are compulsory yet do not provide the transportation.........
Oh yes, yes, of course. I've always had plenty of advance warning when my car has broken down, and if I've got to work 2 hours less per day to start bringing my kids into and back from school - that won't affect my well being or my employers.how many days the kids miss will be up to the parent or child.........
because everyone in the community benefits form an educated workforce.....
not everyone in the community benefits from providing busing..........
They do, if lack of busing interferes with education. How many days will kids miss, if alternate transportation falls through?
if i am summoned to court, do they provide free transportation?
many things are compulsory yet do not provide the transportation.........
how many days the kids miss will be up to the parent or child.........
If I lived there I'd organize a community challenge for a public meeting to go over the Township's budget line by line, item by item. Most people haven't a clue how much fat can be found in such budgets.
good.... why should poperty owners with no kids... or kids who do not use the school bus.. have to pay for the rest of those who do?
and it wasnt "free" bus shuttling"... it was being paid for by alot of people who never could use the service.......
good.... why should poperty owners with no kids... or kids who do not use the school bus.. have to pay for the rest of those who do?
and it wasnt "free" bus shuttling"... it was being paid for by alot of people who never could use the service.......
That's always the case for every form of taxation. You're always paying for something you're not using, and someone else is paying for something that YOU end up using. This complaint is getting very worn out.
This isn't about education, but about buses, isn't it? The parents could drive or the kids could walk. I guess the Reps in Indiana are on board with Michelle's anti-obesity campaign!!!
In the past, property taxes covered the cost of busing students. But last November, Indiana voters overwhelmingly passed a cap on the state's property tax rate. That's kinked the revenue stream that districts across the state use to maintain their buildings, pay down debt and keep buses on the roads. Proponents of the plan argued that it would force districts to budget based on revenues, not expenditures — and learn to do more with less.
Where in the article does it say Republicans did this?? I see no reference to republicans any where. Are you are just ASSuming that fact?? It says voters "overwhemlingly" passed this.
In the past, property taxes covered the cost of busing students. But last November, Indiana voters overwhelmingly passed a cap on the state's property tax rate. That's kinked the revenue stream that districts across the state use to maintain their buildings, pay down debt and keep buses on the roads. Proponents of the plan argued that it would force districts to budget based on revenues, not expenditures — and learn to do more with less.
Where is the republican reference?? Oh and it's not beyond the possibility that politicians that don't get their way come down hardest on the folks it will effect the most. Remember when the Campaigner-in-Chief told the people on SS they might not get their checks?? Yea, go after the most vulnerable to get what you want. Sad, sad, they resort to these antics.
I do remember that. That was when the Republicans were considering allowed the U.S. Treasury to default - which would of course, result in folks getting late SS checks (and later and later each month) - as well as numerous other difficulties. What's your point? That Republicans cry like little bitches when someone points out the obvious flaws in their plans?Remember when the Campaigner-in-Chief told the people on SS they might not get their checks??
good.... why should poperty owners with no kids... or kids who do not use the school bus.. have to pay for the rest of those who do?
and it wasnt "free" bus shuttling"... it was being paid for by alot of people who never could use the service.......
That's always the case for every form of taxation. You're always paying for something you're not using, and someone else is paying for something that YOU end up using. This complaint is getting very worn out.
Where in the article does it say Republicans did this?? I see no reference to republicans any where. Are you are just ASSuming that fact?? It says voters "overwhemlingly" passed this.
In the past, property taxes covered the cost of busing students. But last November, Indiana voters overwhelmingly passed a cap on the state's property tax rate. That's kinked the revenue stream that districts across the state use to maintain their buildings, pay down debt and keep buses on the roads. Proponents of the plan argued that it would force districts to budget based on revenues, not expenditures and learn to do more with less.
Where is the republican reference?? Oh and it's not beyond the possibility that politicians that don't get their way come down hardest on the folks it will effect the most. Remember when the Campaigner-in-Chief told the people on SS they might not get their checks?? Yea, go after the most vulnerable to get what you want. Sad, sad, they resort to these antics.
Its a Republican township.
Franklin Township, Marion County, Indiana - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Because I guess all the Republicans just stayed home on that day and didn't vote.
JFC - RURAL INDIANA for crying out loud - TONS of Democrats there! What are you, a moron?
This isn't about education, but about buses, isn't it? The parents could drive or the kids could walk. I guess the Reps in Indiana are on board with Michelle's anti-obesity campaign!!!
So what's going to start happening is that parents will have to alter their work schedules so that they can deliver and fetch their children to and from school every day, probably spending an average of about 2-3 total hours daily. The business community should just LOVE all that lost productivity.
good.... why should poperty owners with no kids... or kids who do not use the school bus.. have to pay for the rest of those who do?
and it wasnt "free" bus shuttling"... it was being paid for by alot of people who never could use the service.......
That's always the case for every form of taxation. You're always paying for something you're not using, and someone else is paying for something that YOU end up using. This complaint is getting very worn out.
well, there is a difference between "not using" and "not able to use"
my property taxes pay for police and fire..... and even tho i may never have a need to use them, if i do, they are available if i do......
there is no chance of me ever needing to use a school bus.....
or... they arrange car pooling among the parents......
or they pay the cost of the bus fee........
apparently, the parents feel it is more cost effective for them to spend a couple hours each day shuttling their own kids than paying the cost of the bus fee.......
well, there is a difference between "not using" and "not able to use"
my property taxes pay for police and fire..... and even tho i may never have a need to use them, if i do, they are available if i do......
there is no chance of me ever needing to use a school bus.....
well, there is a difference between "not using" and "not able to use"
Tomato, tomato. Either way, it happens. In both senses. I pay taxes for highway maintenance for highways that I'm not able to use. *shrug*
my property taxes pay for police and fire..... and even tho i may never have a need to use them, if i do, they are available if i do......
there is no chance of me ever needing to use a school bus.....
Only because you choose to.
good.... why should poperty owners with no kids... or kids who do not use the school bus.. have to pay for the rest of those who do?
and it wasnt "free" bus shuttling"... it was being paid for by alot of people who never could use the service.......
That's always the case for every form of taxation. You're always paying for something you're not using, and someone else is paying for something that YOU end up using. This complaint is getting very worn out.
well, there is a difference between "not using" and "not able to use"
my property taxes pay for police and fire..... and even tho i may never have a need to use them, if i do, they are available if i do......
there is no chance of me ever needing to use a school bus.....
So we shouldn't pay for busing because you personally chose to not contribute to raising tomorrow's workforce and/or are sterile?
good.... why should poperty owners with no kids... or kids who do not use the school bus.. have to pay for the rest of those who do?
and it wasnt "free" bus shuttling"... it was being paid for by alot of people who never could use the service.......
Well said, a clear, concise an no nonsense comment from a callous conservative. How would Orwell phrase it: Sharing is Selfish.
good.... why should poperty owners with no kids... or kids who do not use the school bus.. have to pay for the rest of those who do?
and it wasnt "free" bus shuttling"... it was being paid for by alot of people who never could use the service.......
Well said, a clear, concise an no nonsense comment from a callous conservative. How would Orwell phrase it: Sharing is Selfish.
clue: i am not a conservative........ not even republican.......
not libertarian either.......
eta: just because someone disagrees with you doesnt make them the opposite of what you consider your political leanings to be......
and if you are so interested in sharing, give me half of all your stuff....... or are you selfish?
