Republicans exempt their own insurance from their latest health care proposal

kiwiman127

Comfortably Moderate
Oct 19, 2010
11,802
3,429
350
4th Cleanest City in the World-Minneapolis
Republican legislators want to keep popular Obamacare provisions for themselves and their staff.
House Republicans appear to have included a provision that exempts Members of Congress and their staff from their latest health care plan.
The new Republican amendment, introduced Tuesday night, would allow states to waive out of Obamacare’s ban on pre-existing conditions. This means that insurers could once again, under certain circumstances, charge sick people higher premiums than healthy people.
Republican legislators liked this policy well enough to offer it in a new amendment. They do not, however, seem to like it enough to have it apply to themselves and their staff. A spokesperson for Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.) who authored this amendment confirmed this was the case: members of Congress and their staff would get the guarantee of keeping this Obamacare regulations. Health law expert Tim Jost flagged me to this particular issue.
A bit of background is helpful here. Obamacare requires all members of Congress and their staff to purchase coverage on the individual market, just like Obamacare enrollees. The politics of that plank were simple enough, meant to demonstrate that if the coverage in this law were good enough for Americans than it should be good enough for their representations in Washington.

That’s been happening for the past four years now. Fast-forward to this new amendment, which would allow states to waive out of key Obamacare protections like the ban on pre-existing conditions or the requirement to cover things like maternity care and mental health services.
If Congressional aides lived in a state that decided to waive these protections, the aides who were sick could be vulnerable to higher premiums than the aides that are healthy. Their benefits package could get skimpier as Obamacare’s essential health benefits requirement may no longer apply either.
This apparently does not sound appealing because the Republican amendment includes the members of Congress and their staff as a protected group who cannot be affected by this amendment.
You can see it on the sixth page of the amendment, although it is admittedly hard to spot. The Obamacare section that requires legislators to buy on the individual market is section 1312(d)(3)(D). And if you look at the Republican amendment, and the list of who cannot be included in this waiver? It includes Section 1312(d)(3)(D).
Republicans exempt their own insurance from their latest health care proposal

So, here we have it. The GOP keeps Obamacare for themselves and stick their constituents with their crappy healthcare legislation. Oh and the wealthy get there huge tax cuts.
Of course the Trumpster goose-steppers will love it, even if they get stiffed in the deal. I guarantee it. :up:
 
Ah stupid the house nor the Senate use shit stain care. There were exempt from day one. They already had better care then shit stain care.

Teachers are also exempt from it along with dozens of others like the auto workers Union.
 
Everyone who contributed money to Obama's presidential campaign got an exemption from Obamacare and not one liberal uttered a word of protest. Don't start now, hypocrites.
 
Republican legislators want to keep popular Obamacare provisions for themselves and their staff.
House Republicans appear to have included a provision that exempts Members of Congress and their staff from their latest health care plan.
The new Republican amendment, introduced Tuesday night, would allow states to waive out of Obamacare’s ban on pre-existing conditions. This means that insurers could once again, under certain circumstances, charge sick people higher premiums than healthy people.
Republican legislators liked this policy well enough to offer it in a new amendment. They do not, however, seem to like it enough to have it apply to themselves and their staff. A spokesperson for Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.) who authored this amendment confirmed this was the case: members of Congress and their staff would get the guarantee of keeping this Obamacare regulations. Health law expert Tim Jost flagged me to this particular issue.
A bit of background is helpful here. Obamacare requires all members of Congress and their staff to purchase coverage on the individual market, just like Obamacare enrollees. The politics of that plank were simple enough, meant to demonstrate that if the coverage in this law were good enough for Americans than it should be good enough for their representations in Washington.

That’s been happening for the past four years now. Fast-forward to this new amendment, which would allow states to waive out of key Obamacare protections like the ban on pre-existing conditions or the requirement to cover things like maternity care and mental health services.
If Congressional aides lived in a state that decided to waive these protections, the aides who were sick could be vulnerable to higher premiums than the aides that are healthy. Their benefits package could get skimpier as Obamacare’s essential health benefits requirement may no longer apply either.
This apparently does not sound appealing because the Republican amendment includes the members of Congress and their staff as a protected group who cannot be affected by this amendment.
You can see it on the sixth page of the amendment, although it is admittedly hard to spot. The Obamacare section that requires legislators to buy on the individual market is section 1312(d)(3)(D). And if you look at the Republican amendment, and the list of who cannot be included in this waiver? It includes Section 1312(d)(3)(D).
Republicans exempt their own insurance from their latest health care proposal

So, here we have it. The GOP keeps Obamacare for themselves and stick their constituents with their crappy healthcare legislation. Oh and the wealthy get there huge tax cuts.
Of course the Trumpster goose-steppers will love it, even if they get stiffed in the deal. I guarantee it. :up:

Using far lft religious sites as your "facts" proves once in for all you are far left drone!

Be an adult learn to read and make your mind up and stop letting your rich white masters to tell you want to think!

Then again this far left drone did they make the claim they would give Trump the benefit of the doubt for two years, soo how long that lasted.
 
Using far lft religious sites as your "facts" proves once in for all you are far left drone!
Let us pray, according to the word!

[Discussion Draft]
AMENDMENT TO llll OFFERED BY MR . MACARTHUR OF
NEW JERSEY
[Amendment drafted to H.R. 1628, as amended by self-
executing amendments adopted by Rules Committee]
Strike section 136 and insert the following [...]

SPECIFIED NON APPLICATION PROVISIONS
In no case may a waiver for purposes of paragraph (1) apply with respect to any of the following provisions:

(i) Section 1301 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, to the extent that such section applies to qualified health plans offered through the CO-OP program under section 1322 of such Act or multi-State plans under section 1334 of such Act.

(ii) Sections 1312(d)(3)(D),
source

H.R.3590 - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Sec. 1312, as modified by Sec. 10104) Allows an employer to select a level of coverage to be made available to employees through an Exchange. Allows employees to choose to enroll in any qualified health plan that offers that level of coverage.


Restricts the health plans that the federal government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff after the effective date of this subtitle to only those health plans that are created under this Act or offered through an Exchange.
H.R.3590 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
 
Last edited:
Using far lft religious sites as your "facts" proves once in for all you are far left drone!
Let us pray, according to the word!

SPECIFIED NON APPLICATION PROVISIONS
In no case may a waiver for purposes of paragraph (1) apply with respect to any of the following provisions:

(i) Section 1301 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, to the extent that such section applies to qualified health plans offered through the CO-OP program under section 1322 of such Act or multi-State plans under section 1334 of such Act.

(ii) Sections 1312(d)(3)(D),
source

H.R.3590 - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Sec. 1312, as modified by Sec. 10104) Allows an employer to select a level of coverage to be made available to employees through an Exchange. Allows employees to choose to enroll in any qualified health plan that offers that level of coverage.


Restricts the health plans that the federal government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff after the effective date of this subtitle to only those health plans that are created under this Act or offered through an Exchange.
H.R.3590 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

And a far left drones rushes in and proves my point!

Seriously you can not make this stuff up!

From the far left drone link:

‘‘(B) The application specifies how the ap2

proval of such application will provide for one

3 or more of the following:

4 ‘‘(i) Reducing average premiums for

5 health insurance coverage in the State.

6 ‘‘(ii) Increasing enrollment in health

7 insurance coverage in the State.

8 ‘‘(iii) Stabilizing the market for health

9 insurance coverage in the State.

10 ‘‘(iv) Stabilizing premiums for individ11

uals with pre-existing conditions.

12 ‘‘(v) Increasing the choice of health

13 plans in the State.

14 ‘‘(C) The application specifies the period

15 for which the waiver is to be effective, con16

sistent with paragraph (4).

17 ‘‘(D) In the case of an application for pur18

poses of paragraph (1)(A), the application

19 specifies the higher ratio to be applied pursuant

20 to such paragraph.

21 ‘‘(E) In the case of an application for pur22

poses of paragraph (1)(B), the application

23 specifies the essential health benefits to be ap24

plied pursuant to such paragraph.

VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:29 Apr 24, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:\USERS\JRSHAP~1\APPDATA\ROAMING\SOFTQUAD\XMETAL\7.0\GEN\C\WAIVER~2.XM

April 24,
 
Ah stupid the house nor the Senate use shit stain care. There were exempt from day one. They already had better care then shit stain care.
Except they aren't exempt!
Restricts the health plans that the federal government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff after the effective date of this subtitle to only those health plans that are created under this Act or offered through an Exchange.
H.R.3590 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
 
Ah stupid the house nor the Senate use shit stain care. There were exempt from day one. They already had better care then shit stain care.
Except they aren't exempt!
Restricts the health plans that the federal government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff after the effective date of this subtitle to only those health plans that are created under this Act or offered through an Exchange.
H.R.3590 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Yes they are and so are postal employees. They have better care then shit stain care. Why do you think the American auto workers turned it down? Because it was better?
 
Ah stupid the house nor the Senate use shit stain care. There were exempt from day one. They already had better care then shit stain care.
Except they aren't exempt!
Restricts the health plans that the federal government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff after the effective date of this subtitle to only those health plans that are created under this Act or offered through an Exchange.
H.R.3590 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Yes they are and so are postal employees. They have better care then shit stain care. Why do you think the American auto workers turned it down? Because it was better?
Trumpists always lie in the face of the truth!
Thank you.
 
Ah stupid the house nor the Senate use shit stain care. There were exempt from day one. They already had better care then shit stain care.
Except they aren't exempt!
Restricts the health plans that the federal government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff after the effective date of this subtitle to only those health plans that are created under this Act or offered through an Exchange.
H.R.3590 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Yes they are and so are postal employees. They have better care then shit stain care. Why do you think the American auto workers turned it down? Because it was better?
Trumpists always lie in the face of the truth!
Thank you.
You might want to check what kind of insurance the united auto workers have. It's not shit stain care.
 
Ah stupid the house nor the Senate use shit stain care. There were exempt from day one. They already had better care then shit stain care.
Except they aren't exempt!
Restricts the health plans that the federal government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff after the effective date of this subtitle to only those health plans that are created under this Act or offered through an Exchange.
H.R.3590 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Yes they are and so are postal employees. They have better care then shit stain care. Why do you think the American auto workers turned it down? Because it was better?
Trumpists always lie in the face of the truth!
Thank you.
You might want to check what kind of insurance the united auto workers have. It's not shit stain care.
And how exactly does that rationalize your lie about Congress???
 
Ah stupid the house nor the Senate use shit stain care. There were exempt from day one. They already had better care then shit stain care.
Except they aren't exempt!
Restricts the health plans that the federal government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff after the effective date of this subtitle to only those health plans that are created under this Act or offered through an Exchange.
H.R.3590 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Yes they are and so are postal employees. They have better care then shit stain care. Why do you think the American auto workers turned it down? Because it was better?
Trumpists always lie in the face of the truth!
Thank you.
You might want to check what kind of insurance the united auto workers have. It's not shit stain care.
And how exactly does that rationalize your lie about Congress???
The Senate and house members can use the same insurer as postal employees. Remember when shit stain held up his healthcare card? They already had better then shit stain care.
 
Except they aren't exempt!
Yes they are and so are postal employees. They have better care then shit stain care. Why do you think the American auto workers turned it down? Because it was better?
Trumpists always lie in the face of the truth!
Thank you.
You might want to check what kind of insurance the united auto workers have. It's not shit stain care.
And how exactly does that rationalize your lie about Congress???
The Senate and house members can use the same insurer as postal employees. Remember when shit stain held up his healthcare card? They already had better then shit stain care.
Keep those lies coming.
 
Yes they are and so are postal employees. They have better care then shit stain care. Why do you think the American auto workers turned it down? Because it was better?
Trumpists always lie in the face of the truth!
Thank you.
You might want to check what kind of insurance the united auto workers have. It's not shit stain care.
And how exactly does that rationalize your lie about Congress???
The Senate and house members can use the same insurer as postal employees. Remember when shit stain held up his healthcare card? They already had better then shit stain care.
Keep those lies coming.

YEs Obama did that! Glad you far left drones acknowledge that!
 
Trumpists always lie in the face of the truth!
Thank you.
You might want to check what kind of insurance the united auto workers have. It's not shit stain care.
And how exactly does that rationalize your lie about Congress???
The Senate and house members can use the same insurer as postal employees. Remember when shit stain held up his healthcare card? They already had better then shit stain care.
Keep those lies coming.

YEs Obama did that! Glad you far left drones acknowledge that!
What drugs are you on????
 
You might want to check what kind of insurance the united auto workers have. It's not shit stain care.
And how exactly does that rationalize your lie about Congress???
The Senate and house members can use the same insurer as postal employees. Remember when shit stain held up his healthcare card? They already had better then shit stain care.
Keep those lies coming.

YEs Obama did that! Glad you far left drones acknowledge that!
What drugs are you on????
Obama did in fact do that plus issued about 100 exemptions for labor groups.
 
And how exactly does that rationalize your lie about Congress???
The Senate and house members can use the same insurer as postal employees. Remember when shit stain held up his healthcare card? They already had better then shit stain care.
Keep those lies coming.

YEs Obama did that! Glad you far left drones acknowledge that!
What drugs are you on????
Obama did in fact do that plus issued about 100 exemptions for labor groups.
Does that really make sense to you?
Labor groups have ACA plans?
Labor groups don't bargain for employer based plans?
 
"For thee, but not for me" - The Republicans


Republicans exempt their own insurance from their latest health care proposal

Republican legislators want to keep popular Obamacare provisions for themselves and their staff.

House Republicans appear to have included a provision that exempts members of Congress and their staff from their latest health care plan.

The new Republican amendment, introduced Tuesday night, would allow states to waive out of Obamacare’s ban on preexisting conditions. This means that insurers could once again, under certain circumstances, charge sick people higher premiums than healthy people.

Republican legislators liked this policy well enough to offer it in a new amendment. They do not, however, seem to like it enough to have it apply to themselves and their staff. A spokesperson for Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), who authored this amendment, confirmed this was the case: Members of Congress and their staff would get the guarantee of keeping these Obamacare regulations.

 

Forum List

Back
Top