Republicans, Democrats and race

Bass v 2.0

Biblical Warrior For God.
Jun 16, 2008
11,405
1,458
98
Pennsylvania
There's been alot of talk lately about race and the two political parties in the US Demos and Repubs. While republicans have gotten alot of heat[most of it well deserved] for being insenstive as far as race relation the Democrats need not be let off the hook. Lest anyone forget, it was the Democrats[Dixiecrats] here in the deep south that practically led the charge with segregation and racism in the south. Through the Bass' personal experience here, the Bass has notice that Democrats like to talk a good game about being liberal and progressive when it comes to race relations, but the reality is that these "good liberals" are only for limited progress, limited as in they'll only let one go but so far and then trick the person into believing that "great progress" has been made when in reality the progress was marginal. In this way alot of blacks have been deceived into believing the Democrats are the best option, only to get frustrated later on when confronted with the true intentions of some of these "good liberals". Once these "good liberals" have been exposed, they resort o playing the same old Democrats vs Republicans games politically to obfuscate the real issues. This isn't a slam on all liberals just the hypocrites.
 
limited progress? how so?


For example, in the 1960s, there were liberal white Democrats here in the south who played the racially progressive card to get votes from blacks in exchange for some token act of kindness, like getting some company to hire 30 blacks when they wouldn't hire any at all before. Those blacks who got hired made virtually *NO* progress within the company, yet the "Liberal politician" who got them those jobs feels a world of progress was made just because some blacks got hired. These same liberals are only for progress inasmuch as they could keep blacks below them but would never any blacks an opportunity to one day have the same or similar position that they themselves have. These so called "good liberals" are doing the same thing they accuse Republicans of doing.
 
Don't worry CB, I created the White man in my laboratory, I can destroy him too. Read and be comforted by the teachings of Rev. Farrakhan.
 
Malcolm X said it best about white liberals:


"The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative.

Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political "football game" that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.

Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball through tricks of tokenism: false promises of integration and civil rights. In this profitable game of deceiving and exploiting the politics of the American Negro, those white liberals have the willing cooperation of the Negro civil rights leaders. These "leaders" sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains. These "leaders" are satisfied with token victories and token progress because they themselves are nothing but token leaders."


Of course this doesn't apply to *ALL* white liberals just those hypocrites that trick minorities into believing they're progressive on race relations when all they do is take advantage.
 
Then the Bass should understand that this world in not the kingdom of God and you should only wear it as a loose garment. God is you judge, not the white man nor the black man.


The Bass is born again and belongs to the church that is called by the name of the Lord, no more, no less.
 
For example, in the 1960s, there were liberal white Democrats here in the south who played the racially progressive card to get votes from blacks in exchange for some token act of kindness, like getting some company to hire 30 blacks when they wouldn't hire any at all before. Those blacks who got hired made virtually *NO* progress within the company, yet the "Liberal politician" who got them those jobs feels a world of progress was made just because some blacks got hired. These same liberals are only for progress inasmuch as they could keep blacks below them but would never any blacks an opportunity to one day have the same or similar position that they themselves have. These so called "good liberals" are doing the same thing they accuse Republicans of doing.

do you have any current examples of liberals keeping blacks down? are blacks less likely to advance in a company today, and if so, do you have evidence of it? how do you propose to correct these problems?
 
do you have any current examples of liberals keeping blacks down? are blacks less likely to advance in a company today, and if so, do you have evidence of it? how do you propose to correct these problems?


One good example is what happened recently during the Democratic Nomination campaign with Obama and Clinton. Clinton built up this trust and friendly appearance with millions of blacks who supported here just because she's a Democrat, but look what she and cronies did[along with her adulterous husband] when things go desperate, she played the race card from the bottom of the deck and then quickly distanced herself from the comments made by he cronies to appear she wasn't a racist. Whats surprising is that alot of Negroes still supported her even after this.


Another example was Bill Clinton's handling of the Haitian refugees. Before he came into office he promised *NOT* to turn back the refugees, just to placate blacks voters and gain their votes, but when he came into office he did an about face on this issue.
 
One good example is what happened recently during the Democratic Nomination campaign with Obama and Clinton. Clinton built up this trust and friendly appearance with millions of blacks who supported here just because she's a Democrat, but look what she and cronies did[along with her adulterous husband] when things go desperate, she played the race card from the bottom of the deck and then quickly distanced herself from the comments made by he cronies to appear she wasn't a racist. Whats surprising is that alot of Negroes still supported her even after this.


Another example was Bill Clinton's handling of the Haitian refugees. Before he came into office he promised *NOT* to turn back the refugees, just to placate blacks voters and gain their votes, but when he came into office he did an about face on this issue.

well, the hillary thing deals with her competing head-to-head in a political race. that isnt exactly working to keep all blacks down, imo.
and bill's thing with the refuges, dont really remember that. do you have links showing the two actions you described?
 
Malcolm X said it best about white liberals:


"The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative.

["]Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political "football game" that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.

["]Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball through tricks of tokenism: false promises of integration and civil rights. In this profitable game of deceiving and exploiting the politics of the American Negro, those white liberals have the willing cooperation of the Negro civil rights leaders. These "leaders" sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains. These "leaders" are satisfied with token victories and token progress because they themselves are nothing but token leaders."

....
Well said, Malcolm. No wonder he was assassinated.

If you look at the history of Civil Rights legislation in the country, it took nearly 100 years, was all implemented by Republicans and resisted by Democrats. When the dam finally broke the Democrats took all the credit for it. They continued their attack on the black man, however, by lowering expectations and exploitation: affirmative action, welfare, a sexed-up society and dead-end jobs, and demonize Republicans who resist this new tactic. The result is a second class citizenry beholden to their Democrat crumb tossers.
 
There's been alot of talk lately about race and the two political parties in the US Demos and Repubs. While republicans have gotten alot of heat[most of it well deserved] for being insenstive as far as race relation the Democrats need not be let off the hook. Lest anyone forget, it was the Democrats[Dixiecrats] here in the deep south that practically led the charge with segregation and racism in the south. Through the Bass' personal experience here, the Bass has notice that Democrats like to talk a good game about being liberal and progressive when it comes to race relations, but the reality is that these "good liberals" are only for limited progress, limited as in they'll only let one go but so far and then trick the person into believing that "great progress" has been made when in reality the progress was marginal. In this way alot of blacks have been deceived into believing the Democrats are the best option, only to get frustrated later on when confronted with the true intentions of some of these "good liberals". Once these "good liberals" have been exposed, they resort o playing the same old Democrats vs Republicans games politically to obfuscate the real issues. This isn't a slam on all liberals just the hypocrites.

Yes, the above is true.

Of course then the Democratic pParety (under Kennedy and then LBJ) kept pressing for equal rights under the law for Blacks in the SOUTH and blew itself up in the process.

Those Dixiecrats are now mostly very loyal Republicans.

Or haven't you been paying attention for the last 40 years?
 
....

Those Dixiecrats are now mostly very loyal Republicans.
....

The realignment of the South took place over several decades and you have no evidence that racists Democrats became Republicans. In fact, logic alone tells us that a Party who fought for Civil Rights over a 100 years history, including a war where Southern families were decimated, would hardly be a attraction for the decedents of those families.
 
The realignment of the South took place over several decades and you have no evidence that racists Democrats became Republicans. In fact, logic alone tells us that a Party who fought for Civil Rights over a 100 years history, including a war where Southern families were decimated, would hardly be a attraction for the decedents of those families.



Your shitty little party doesn't like Italians just like you don't you little jerk off. Where were you born anyways, the back of a trailer park with the rest of the slobs?
 

Forum List

Back
Top