Republican Officials Partnering With Christian Extremists

And when did you choose heterosexuality? (making an assumption here...you may not have chosen heterosexuality)

Ah yes, the old leftist standby - anyone who fails to faithfully recite party dogma is a queer - because according to you demagogues, NOTHING is worse than being a queer, so I will fall into line for fear of you leftists calling me queer.


So WHO are are the homophobes in reality?
Get over it. Nobody is saying that you're a homosexual. Nobody gives a fuck. What I have said, and what you ignored ,is that if homosexuality is a choice by virtues of ones acting on the desires, that so is heterosexuality.
 
Conflating alcoholism and homosexuality is just bigoted stupidity.

Why?

Alcoholism is a debilitating disease. Homosexuality is not.

I know alcoholics who are fully functional. Go to work every day, get sloshed every night.

Until the 70's, homosexuality was deemed a debilitating disease. The only difference is that the counter-culture has promoted homosexuality to a heroic status now in furtherance of the goals to dismantle the Constitutional Republic.

Everything that is genetic or in some way biological is not a disease. You ignore the point that I made….that homosexuality, or heterosexuality is more than a sexual practice and that if homosexuality is a choice by virtue of the fact the fact that people act on that attraction SO IS HETEROSEXUALITY.

I never said homosexuality was a disease - I said that acting on homosexual desires is a choice, as is drinking.

Personally I see homosexuality as an evolutionary kill switch, a genetic mechanism to weed out unwanted genes from the species. A self-healing property in our genetic code that is triggered to keep bad genes from replicating.

Homosexuality is natures little way of saying "get the fuck out of the gene pool."

Show some evidence that anyone wants to destroy the traditional nuclear family. That is just asinine, bigoted, paranoid bullshit. All that you’re doing is making absurd assertions that you can’t back up.

{
Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.}

Vladimir Lenin

{
At a very basic level Marxists believe the nuclear family is a tool of the ruling class, an institution used to teach its members to submit to ruling class authority.

Early on Marx saw the family as a mechanism through which private property (a key part of capitalism) could be passed on heirs – as parents living in a monogamous relationship would know who impregnated whom!!! This way it was an ideal mechanism for the proof of paternity. You can see how much women were second-class citizens in the Victorian period, as they married in order in achieve economic security in exchange for sex and providing heirs.

Althusser (1971) a French Marxist, argued that in order for capitalism to survive people must be taught how to think
and behave, and the family (as well as schools and the mass media) was the best mechanism for doing this. Marxists argue ideology is the best tool (Marxism is known as an instrumental approach) for getting people to think and behave in a way you want them to.

Therefore through the process of socialisation family immerses its members into a false consciousness (for example unlike functionalists which see the family as a harmonious institution, Marxists see the family as a place of conflict, with unequal relations of power between its members. This becomes analogous to the inequalities in society).

Contemporary Marxists like Zaretsky (1976) add more weight to the argument the family is simply there as an aid to capitalism because:

  • the capitalist system is built on the domestic labour of housewives who produce future workers
  • at the same time, the family consumes the products of capitalism, which perpetuates the profits for the ruling-class}
Marxist views of the family sociologytwynham.com

So we see that the goal of progressives is to end the family as an institution, because the family is termed a vehicle to perpetuate private ownership of property.

I'll hold my breath while I await your apology.

Gay marriage lacks structure or purpose? Just words that amount to nothing more than more horseshit Your problem is that you don’t see gay people as fully human and capable a committed relationship and of being contributing members of the community. You reduction of homosexuality to nothing more than a sex act is stupid and sickening. And that is coming from a straight guy. I can only imagine how offended gay people would be. My work is done here

Homosexuals do no reproduce. Homosexuals cannot produce a family without artificial means. The purpose of creating a nurturing environment to produce and raise children is absent. This doesn't mean that homosexuals can't be part of a family, my gay uncle growing up was one of my favourites - but homosexuality cannot be the basis of a family - biological reality exists.

Communists are the fakers of reality - you convince yourselves that the fantasy you paint is real, then become angry when rational people reject your nonsense. If only we would pretend along with you....
 
Get over it.

Get over the hypocrisy of leftists who use name calling as a club to beat opponents into line with?

I don't think so.

If I were queer, I would not be ashamed. For Shortbus to use that old, tired bit of demagoguery in an attempt to coerce compliance is laughable. She is quite vacuous.

Nobody is saying that you're a homosexual. Nobody gives a fuck. What I have said, and what you ignored ,is that if homosexuality is a choice by virtues of ones acting on the desires, that so is heterosexuality.

Actually, the Soros minions will always accuse anyone who speaks against the Communist agenda regarding homosexuality a "queer."

It is SOP.

It's also moronic.
 
Conflating alcoholism and homosexuality is just bigoted stupidity.

Why?

Alcoholism is a debilitating disease. Homosexuality is not.

I know alcoholics who are fully functional. Go to work every day, get sloshed every night.

Until the 70's, homosexuality was deemed a debilitating disease. The only difference is that the counter-culture has promoted homosexuality to a heroic status now in furtherance of the goals to dismantle the Constitutional Republic.

Everything that is genetic or in some way biological is not a disease. You ignore the point that I made….that homosexuality, or heterosexuality is more than a sexual practice and that if homosexuality is a choice by virtue of the fact the fact that people act on that attraction SO IS HETEROSEXUALITY.

I never said homosexuality was a disease - I said that acting on homosexual desires is a choice, as is drinking.

Personally I see homosexuality as an evolutionary kill switch, a genetic mechanism to weed out unwanted genes from the species. A self-healing property in our genetic code that is triggered to keep bad genes from replicating.

Homosexuality is natures little way of saying "get the fuck out of the gene pool."

Show some evidence that anyone wants to destroy the traditional nuclear family. That is just asinine, bigoted, paranoid bullshit. All that you’re doing is making absurd assertions that you can’t back up.

{
Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.}

Vladimir Lenin

{
At a very basic level Marxists believe the nuclear family is a tool of the ruling class, an institution used to teach its members to submit to ruling class authority.

Early on Marx saw the family as a mechanism through which private property (a key part of capitalism) could be passed on heirs – as parents living in a monogamous relationship would know who impregnated whom!!! This way it was an ideal mechanism for the proof of paternity. You can see how much women were second-class citizens in the Victorian period, as they married in order in achieve economic security in exchange for sex and providing heirs.

Althusser (1971) a French Marxist, argued that in order for capitalism to survive people must be taught how to think
and behave, and the family (as well as schools and the mass media) was the best mechanism for doing this. Marxists argue ideology is the best tool (Marxism is known as an instrumental approach) for getting people to think and behave in a way you want them to.

Therefore through the process of socialisation family immerses its members into a false consciousness (for example unlike functionalists which see the family as a harmonious institution, Marxists see the family as a place of conflict, with unequal relations of power between its members. This becomes analogous to the inequalities in society).

Contemporary Marxists like Zaretsky (1976) add more weight to the argument the family is simply there as an aid to capitalism because:

  • the capitalist system is built on the domestic labour of housewives who produce future workers
  • at the same time, the family consumes the products of capitalism, which perpetuates the profits for the ruling-class}
Marxist views of the family sociologytwynham.com

So we see that the goal of progressives is to end the family as an institution, because the family is termed a vehicle to perpetuate private ownership of property.

I'll hold my breath while I await your apology.

Gay marriage lacks structure or purpose? Just words that amount to nothing more than more horseshit Your problem is that you don’t see gay people as fully human and capable a committed relationship and of being contributing members of the community. You reduction of homosexuality to nothing more than a sex act is stupid and sickening. And that is coming from a straight guy. I can only imagine how offended gay people would be. My work is done here

Homosexuals do no reproduce. Homosexuals cannot produce a family without artificial means. The purpose of creating a nurturing environment to produce and raise children is absent. This doesn't mean that homosexuals can't be part of a family, my gay uncle growing up was one of my favourites - but homosexuality cannot be the basis of a family - biological reality exists.

Communists are the fakers of reality - you convince yourselves that the fantasy you paint is real, then become angry when rational people reject your nonsense. If only we would pretend along with you....

You make a good case for why and how Marxism wants to destroy the family, and you can blather on about it until you turn blue. However, you make no case for how homosexuality or gay marriage will do so. Everything that you say about gay marriage is debunked hateful horseshit. Gays are having and raising children and those children are thriving. I have reams of data to support that but I'm not going to even bother because it's apparent that your small mind is not interested.
 
Get over it.

Get over the hypocrisy of leftists who use name calling as a club to beat opponents into line with?

I don't think so.

If I were queer, I would not be ashamed. For Shortbus to use that old, tired bit of demagoguery in an attempt to coerce compliance is laughable. She is quite vacuous.

Nobody is saying that you're a homosexual. Nobody gives a fuck. What I have said, and what you ignored ,is that if homosexuality is a choice by virtues of ones acting on the desires, that so is heterosexuality.

Actually, the Soros minions will always accuse anyone who speaks against the Communist agenda regarding homosexuality a "queer."

It is SOP.

It's also moronic.
What is moronic is the fact that you cling to this Communist conspiracy being behind homosexuality. This is not the 50's
 
Do You Know David Lane? Every American Should

This is a name that few people know and that everyone should. He is a far right wing extremist who goal is to establish the U.S. as a Christian Theocracy and he has got the ear of many prominent and influential Republican.

I believe that we as a nation-not just liberals and Democrats- should be very concerned about this. I do not think that most Republican would be comfortable with so many of their politicians being in bed with this person. Most Republican and conservative want this county to be a fair and just country for everyone. David Lane want anything but that. That is why he has been operating under the radar Read more below
______________________________________________________________________________

In pursuit of conservative evangelical voters, GOP candidates embrace far-right political operative who is raising an ‘army’ to fulfill his ‘Christian nation’ vision

On Saturday, June 13, South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley will host a day-long, Christians-only prayer rally organized by political operative David Lane. Lane, who organized similar events for Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, is trying to recruit 1,000 conservative evangelical pastors to run for office, which he believes would mobilize hundreds of thousands of election volunteers and lead to conservative election victories in 2016.

Lane prefers to work outside the glare of the national media. Although his close connections to Republican officials and presidential candidates have drawn some notice, the extremism of the agenda he is promoting deserves far more attention than it has received to date. When one-third of the Republican National Committee took a nine-day junket to Israel in January with the American Family Association picking up the tab, things got a little ugly. Israeli media started asking questions about the extreme positions taken by AFA spokesman Bryan Fischer, including his claims that the First Amendment’s religious liberty protections apply only to Christians and that gays were responsible for the rise of the Nazi Party. In damage control mode, the AFA disavowed some of Fischer’s most inflammatory statements and took away his title – but not the radio show that continues to give him a bigotry-spewing platform. Meanwhile, the actual organizer of the trip, Christian nationalist David Lane, slipped out of the spotlight and got right back to building political alliances between high-level Republican politicians and conservative evangelical pastors, especially those in key primary states. - See more at: Why Do Republican Officials Keep Partnering With Christian-Nation Extremist David Lane Right Wing Watch
Like libtards are comfortable being in bed with commies.

Oh Christ! What Commies are those?? Has Alan West crawled up into your brain like a tape worm ?
Bill Ayets, George Soros, Bernie sanders, need I go on retard?

Thank you for that brilliant, cogent and thorough analysis of my post. I guess I was wrong about these people wanting to create a theocratic America. Right? You seem very threaten by the information that I provided. I have to feel sorry for someone who is so easily disturbed by ideas that don’t match their twisted world view that they must resort to calling me retarded. You can go now
You are a retard, you asked what commiesI answered. The only right way is Christianity, you don't like it, good luck.
 
You make a good case for why and how Marxism wants to destroy the family, and you can blather on about it until you turn blue. However, you make no case for how homosexuality or gay marriage will do so. Everything that you say about gay marriage is debunked hateful horseshit. Gays are having and raising children and those children are thriving. I have reams of data to support that but I'm not going to even bother because it's apparent that your small mind is not interested.

You essentially called me a liar for stating that the goal of the left is the destruction of the nuclear family. I have proven this to be a long standing goal which contemporary progressive continue to pursue.

The farce of homosexual marriage is merely a means, one of many, in assaulting the familial structure. Not the most destructive, either. The frontal assault was AFDC and the requirement that fathers be excluded in order to obtain free money - essentially replacing the father with government.

Let me remind you of the mantra Lenin promoted, "The party is mother, the party is father, all things for the party."

The promotion of homosexuality is the marching orders that progressives obey, but it is really just another tactic in a much broader strategy. While you Communists are told that homosexuality and the promotion of it is the most important issue in the universe, I just view it as yet another prong in the prolonged attack on civil rights and Constitutional government by you.
 
YAWN

this is why nobody takes LWNJs seriously

We better take them seriously. They are winning. Our Constitutional Republic is hanging on by a thread. The Communist Authoritarian state that progressives are fighting to establish gains power with each passing day. The freedom enjoyed by the average American has declined precipitously since the radical left under Obama assumed power.

Just ask bakers. Granted that the SCOTUS slapped Obama and the Communists down with the Hobby Lobby case, but the attacks on civil rights by progressives are a daily occurrence and will not stop.
 
You make a good case for why and how Marxism wants to destroy the family, and you can blather on about it until you turn blue. However, you make no case for how homosexuality or gay marriage will do so. Everything that you say about gay marriage is debunked hateful horseshit. Gays are having and raising children and those children are thriving. I have reams of data to support that but I'm not going to even bother because it's apparent that your small mind is not interested.

You essentially called me a liar for stating that the goal of the left is the destruction of the nuclear family. I have proven this to be a long standing goal which contemporary progressive continue to pursue.

The farce of homosexual marriage is merely a means, one of many, in assaulting the familial structure. Not the most destructive, either. The frontal assault was AFDC and the requirement that fathers be excluded in order to obtain free money - essentially replacing the father with government.

Let me remind you of the mantra Lenin promoted, "The party is mother, the party is father, all things for the party."

The promotion of homosexuality is the marching orders that progressives obey, but it is really just another tactic in a much broader strategy. While you Communists are told that homosexuality and the promotion of it is the most important issue in the universe, I just view it as yet another prong in the prolonged attack on civil rights and Constitutional government by you.
I certainly am calling you a liar. You make shit up about gays and leftists as you go and present it as fact. What the fuck do you call that? If anybody is destroying the family it's the oligarchs on the right who coddle the rich and destroy the middle class, which like the family is a cornerstone of society and family life.

As far as welfare goes, I worked as a welfare case worker when it was still AFDC( Now it is Temporary Assistance for Families) These programs are intended to assist single mothers. In the vast majority of cases the father is long gone for whatever reason. The woman is not forbidden to have a man in the home, although if she does, it is unlikely to be the father. If that's the case, they may be eligible for a companion program- Assistance for the Working Poor. They system is not designed to break up families, so again, you have no idea what you're talking about.

Go ahead, keep telling us how the promotion of gay rights is a communist conspiracy to destroy the family. Keep telling how gay people do not form real families and do the same things as others do. Keep telling us how the wants to destroy the family. Keep making a damned fool of yourself.
 
I certainly am calling you a liar.

Even though I have proven that you are the one lying...

Well, progressives were never known for integrity.

You make shit up about gays and leftists as you go and present it as fact. What the fuck do you call that? If anybody is destroying the family it's the oligarchs on the right who coddle the rich and destroy the middle class, which like the family is a cornerstone of society and family life.

I do?

Or are you simply lying because you cannot offer a reasoned response to the facts I have presented?

As far as welfare goes, I worked as a welfare case worker when it was still AFDC( Now it is Temporary Assistance for Families) These programs are intended to assist single mothers. In the vast majority of cases the father is long gone for whatever reason. The woman is not forbidden to have a man in the home, although if she does, it is unlikely to be the father. If that's the case, they may be eligible for a companion program- Assistance for the Working Poor. They system is not designed to break up families, so again, you have no idea what you're talking about.

Go ahead, keep telling us how the promotion of gay rights is a communist conspiracy to destroy the family. Keep telling how gay people do not form real families and do the same things as others do. Keep telling us how the wants to destroy the family. Keep making a damned fool of yourself.

These programs are intended to enable single motherhood. To expel the financial need for a father, thus shattering the foundation of marriage. this is done to destroy the nuclear family which is an impediment to the supremacy of the state. You of the left seek to establish an authoritarian state with complete allegiance and no dissent by the populace to the central government. What your bosses do is in furtherance of these goals. The war you wage against civil rights is a prime example of the goal of a captive people who are regimented by the party.
 
I certainly am calling you a liar.

Even though I have proven that you are the one lying...

Well, progressives were never known for integrity.

You make shit up about gays and leftists as you go and present it as fact. What the fuck do you call that? If anybody is destroying the family it's the oligarchs on the right who coddle the rich and destroy the middle class, which like the family is a cornerstone of society and family life.

I do?

Or are you simply lying because you cannot offer a reasoned response to the facts I have presented?

As far as welfare goes, I worked as a welfare case worker when it was still AFDC( Now it is Temporary Assistance for Families) These programs are intended to assist single mothers. In the vast majority of cases the father is long gone for whatever reason. The woman is not forbidden to have a man in the home, although if she does, it is unlikely to be the father. If that's the case, they may be eligible for a companion program- Assistance for the Working Poor. They system is not designed to break up families, so again, you have no idea what you're talking about.

Go ahead, keep telling us how the promotion of gay rights is a communist conspiracy to destroy the family. Keep telling how gay people do not form real families and do the same things as others do. Keep telling us how the wants to destroy the family. Keep making a damned fool of yourself.

These programs are intended to enable single motherhood. To expel the financial need for a father, thus shattering the foundation of marriage. this is done to destroy the nuclear family which is an impediment to the supremacy of the state. You of the left seek to establish an authoritarian state with complete allegiance and no dissent by the populace to the central government. What your bosses do is in furtherance of these goals. The war you wage against civil rights is a prime example of the goal of a captive people who are regimented by the party.


:banghead::banghead::banghead:
 
The connecting tissue between Kristian Fundmentalists (kristian with a k because they are not really Christians, they pretend to be) is real. This has been going on for 2-3 decades.

It remains to be seen how desperate these people will become as the demographics are pushing the Republican party further and further from being able to win national elections.
So please tell us what a real christian is?


Someone that lives as Christ lived.

Christ washed the feet of the poor and denounced the moneychangers.

Conservatives in the U.S. spit on the poor and worship at the feet of the wealthy. The are in fact anti-Christ.

The problem is Christ never promoted a governing body to take the place of the role of the "individual" people to sacrificially give to those they see in their own local communities who have a need. Charity comes with no specific income status, and it's not just the responsibility given to the rich, there is no scriptural example that lays such responsibility inclusively and solely on the wealthy but for all.

Always an attempt to parse what the bible says to fit a world view that allows poor treatment of the poor and worshiping the wealthy. Jesus said 'whatever you do to the least of these my brothers you do also to me'. That is pretty clear yeah? So if you ignore the poor when you have ability to help them then you can't claim to be Christian. You know, a follower of Christ. And since there are always poor and those in need, then anyone with wealth cannot be a Christian because you would be ignoring 'the least of these my brothers' while laying up treasure here on Earth. Opposite of what Jesus said.

I know those in America who claim to be Christian are not often challenged on this but you can't get around it, and deep down those who would be Christians know they are lying to themselves when they are driving their BMW or Cadillac and living in a comfy home and eating steak when so many are in desperate need.

When you ignore those in need you are ignoring Jesus. His words.

And you know that.

Jesus said 'whatever YOU [not government] do to the least of these my brothers you do also to me'.

Who are "my brothers" directed towards in that verse? Those who are a follower and a believer in God who have accepted Christ and His Word. There are many in this nation that don't ft into that category, which is why I neither support nor advocate a federal government that forces others to care for the poor in the name of hypocrisy, using the reference towards religion as a tool of "convenience". So many politicians support their cause in the name of supposed "Christianity", when what you really have is a religious buffet ... I will take a little of this, some of that, but I want nothing to do with this over here. Why force the rich into something they don't believe? I mean if you are willing to condone and enforce that, then maybe installing biblical values in public school to teach the people of this nation what they "ought to do" is perfectly acceptable? Should our nation be in the business of using Congress to enforce religion on everyone, particularly the atheists? Are you sure you want this to be about religion? Do we REALLY want to go down that road, or would it be easier to simply be labeled as hypocrites - "Having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof." Yes, I'm very well versed in what the Bible says.

Why are liberals willing to render that responsibility of the poor to our government, do they care so much that they aren't willing to give out of their OWN generosity? Isn't that what happened with the man that was robbed and beaten, they were just willing for someone else to care for him? What happened to that Good Samaritan, that it's far better to pass by on the other side and let someone else look after him ... (that being government) ? Now that doesn't sound like the teachings of Jesus for one who would call himself a "Christian".
 
well you knew this was coming

but the Democrats has been hooked up with every RADICAL and extremist group out there, starting with OWS: where they TOOK over the people parks and trashed them and people places of business.

Images for the ows trashing our parks

then we have the Slimy Rev. Sharpton visiting OUR white house over 60 times, I'm sure it was to hold prayer meeting. like hell, they were planning a hookup with Blacklivesmatters and then we got: FULL blown riots, lootings, cities on fire.

Images for ferguson riots
Images for baltimore riots


Black panthers are threating us again. you sheep along with that PARTY you support (commie/democrat party) have taken the deaths OF NINE people and used THEM to smear a flag, the people in a state, and to piss all over country

should I go on?

freaking tools for the democrat party


The Black Panthers are not threatening you, Dingbat.
 
The connecting tissue between Kristian Fundmentalists (kristian with a k because they are not really Christians, they pretend to be) is real. This has been going on for 2-3 decades.

It remains to be seen how desperate these people will become as the demographics are pushing the Republican party further and further from being able to win national elections.
So please tell us what a real christian is?


Someone that lives as Christ lived.

Christ washed the feet of the poor and denounced the moneychangers.

Conservatives in the U.S. spit on the poor and worship at the feet of the wealthy. The are in fact anti-Christ.
And you call yourself Isaac Newton. You need to change it to fig newton!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Gay Teen Worried He Might Be Christian Gay Teen Worried He Might Be Christian

LOUISVILLE, KY—At first glance, high school senior Lucas Faber, 18, seems like any ordinary gay teen. He's a member of his school's swing choir, enjoys shopping at the mall, and has sex with other males his age. But lately, a growing worry has begun to plague this young gay man. A gnawing feeling that, deep down, he may be a fundamentalist, right-wing Christian.

"I don't know what's happening to me," Faber admitted to reporters Monday. "It's like I get these weird urges sometimes, and suddenly I'm tempted to go behind my friends' backs and attend a megachurch service, or censor books in the school library in some way. Even just the thought of organizing a CD-burning turns me on."

Added Faber, "I feel so confused."
 
And when obama was running around with secular extremists bill ayers and his wife bernadine dohrn, two actual, domestic terrorist bombers, of the violent Weather Underground......you guys actually voted for him...2 times.........
 

Forum List

Back
Top