Republican have always used Socialism as a excuse not to help the American People

JimH52

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2007
46,723
24,697
2,645
US
FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire



As Cohen reminds us, the Republicans fought these changes every step of the way. They said famine relief would turn America into a nation of freeloaders, that capitalism would die without the gold standard. They called child-labor laws an intolerable intrusion on states' rights. During the debate over the Tennessee Valley Authority, so many power-company executives denounced the "socialist plan" that Congress had to schedule an extra day of hearings.

Read more: FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire
 
FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire



As Cohen reminds us, the Republicans fought these changes every step of the way. They said famine relief would turn America into a nation of freeloaders, that capitalism would die without the gold standard. They called child-labor laws an intolerable intrusion on states' rights. During the debate over the Tennessee Valley Authority, so many power-company executives denounced the "socialist plan" that Congress had to schedule an extra day of hearings.

Read more: FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire

And they were correct.

Someone should teach you the foolishness of making an argument based solely on your own assumption that everyone holds your worldview.
 
Yup, it it had been left up to the republican party, there would be no social security, no medicare. and the disadvantaged in America would go without medial insurance in their old age and would probably have to work until they drop.

And you are proud of that? Obama is basically mirroring the efforts of FDR after Hoover nearly destroyed this nation. You guys are like parrots. You repeat the same thing over and over until you begin believing. If Nixon had not lost in JFK, it is fairly unlikely schools would have been desegregated and busing would have never been seen. And you are proud of that?
 
Yup, it it had been left up to the republican party, there would be no social security, no medicare. and the disadvantaged in America would go without medial insurance in their old age and would probably have to work until they drop.

And you are proud of that? Obama is basically mirroring the efforts of FDR after Hoover nearly destroyed this nation. You guys are like parrots. You repeat the same thing over and over until you begin believing. If Nixon had not lost in JFK, it is fairly unlikely schools would have been desegregated and busing would have never been seen. And you are proud of that?

Once again, you assume that because YOU think those things are wonderful, that means that they objectively are and/or that everyone else agrees with you.

Am I proud of the fact that I support empowering people to live independent of government "charity"? Sure. Are YOU proud of creating a permanent underclass of helpless dependents who can't do any more for themselves than hold a hand out? Are you proud of having bankrupted our nation and mortgaged our grandchildren's financial futures in order to give yourself a warm fuzzy over how "nice" you are? I can build a much stronger causation line for tracking the ills of society to incessant leftist "do-gooding" than you can to how awful the world MIGHT have been, so from where I sit, YOU have more to be ashamed of than I do.

You guys are like parrots. "The world is so much better for our plans simply because I say it is! You other guys are just MEAN!" You're not even parrots. You're immature, emotionally retarded parrots.
 
Do me a favor Bagger. When you retire, if you aren't already, please mail you SS check back to the government each month. Please don't use the streets or roads. Please don't use public water. Please don't send your children the public school. You need to take one for the Country. Sacrifice everything that government is doing for you. Put that money back into the general fund! Go back and read how Herbert Hoover waited for the "trickle down" for the poor during recession. That sound familar? Yup, your gipper wanted to see trickle down, but the only thing that trickled was his memory when he signed off on illegally helping the contras. You are rediculous...
 
Do me a favor Bagger. When you retire, if you aren't already, please mail you SS check back to the government each month. Please don't use the streets or roads. Please don't use public water. Please don't send your children the public school. You need to take one for the Country. Sacrifice everything that government is doing for you. Put that money back into the general fund! Go back and read how Herbert Hoover waited for the "trickle down" for the poor during recession. That sound familar? Yup, your gipper wanted to see trickle down, but the only thing that trickled was his memory when he signed off on illegally helping the contras. You are rediculous...

Blah blah blah de fucking blah red herring blah blah.

Social Security is a steaming pile of bankrupt shit that likely won't even exist by the time I retire, and whether or not I accept back the money the government forcibly took from MY earnings will not change that fact.

Nothing about this thread has jack shit to do with roads and public utilities, so that little strawman is officially sneered at and ignored.

I already don't send my children to public school because they ALSO are steaming piles of shit not worthy of teaching doggie obedience, let alone teaching my beloved offspring. What, you thought you were hurting me by denying me the "benefits" of your leftist-fucked school system? Puhleeze.

I love the idea that the only other thing that can be done with the massive taxes our bloated, oversocialized government steals from people is to give it to some OTHER branch of government, rather than . . . hold onto your seat . . . letting people use it to take care of themselves.

I am completely confident that what you know about Iran/Contra would fit in a gnat's ear. You have already demonstrated that your knowledge of economics in general, let alone trickle down economics, certainly would.
 
Yup, it it had been left up to the republican party, there would be no social security, no medicare. and the disadvantaged in America would go without medial insurance in their old age and would probably have to work until they drop.

And you are proud of that? Obama is basically mirroring the efforts of FDR after Hoover nearly destroyed this nation. You guys are like parrots. You repeat the same thing over and over until you begin believing. If Nixon had not lost in JFK, it is fairly unlikely schools would have been desegregated and busing would have never been seen. And you are proud of that?

Miss taking your meds this morning, JimH52? You seem a bit tense and unsure of your history.
 
WikiAnswers - What was President Theodore Roosevelt health care policy

President Theodore Roosevelt was a strong advocate for a nationalized healthcare system in the United States. He was the first of five Presidents to push for it. The five Presidents were:

1.) Theodore Roosevelt
2.) Lyndon B. Johnson
3.) Richard M. Nixon
4.) James E. Carter
5.) William J. Clinton

All of them but one is a real inspiration (sic). That one is just a criminal that quit in disgrace.
 
Yup, it it had been left up to the republican party, there would be no social security, no medicare. and the disadvantaged in America would go without medial insurance in their old age and would probably have to work until they drop.

And you are proud of that? Obama is basically mirroring the efforts of FDR after Hoover nearly destroyed this nation. You guys are like parrots. You repeat the same thing over and over until you begin believing. If Nixon had not lost in JFK, it is fairly unlikely schools would have been desegregated and busing would have never been seen. And you are proud of that?

Busing? Again? My god I walked about a mile to Jr high School, and walked home. The only time we had school off for snow was if there was over 2 ft over the weekend or 1 ft overnight.
Today I live in a small village and the school (K-12) is at one end of the village. Takes the Bus an hour to do all the pickups. I can walk from one end to the other in 45 minutes. And I'm slow. We are spoiled. Or at least our kids are.
 
Elks club, kinghts of columbus, kiwanis yeah, where would we be w/o big gubbamint teats?
 
Do me a favor Bagger. When you retire, if you aren't already, please mail you SS check back to the government each month. Please don't use the streets or roads. Please don't use public water. Please don't send your children the public school. You need to take one for the Country. Sacrifice everything that government is doing for you. Put that money back into the general fund! Go back and read how Herbert Hoover waited for the "trickle down" for the poor during recession. That sound familar? Yup, your gipper wanted to see trickle down, but the only thing that trickled was his memory when he signed off on illegally helping the contras. You are rediculous...

Ah but right or wrong we have all paid into Social Security. Therefore we are getting back what we have paid into. And all those years paying taxes, we have more than [paid for the use of the roads. And we pay water bills and sewage bills every month regardless how old we are. How about you start engaging brain before your fingers.
 
Republicans do their very best to defund public schools, then complain because the defunded schools do not have the resources to educate our people.
 
FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire



As Cohen reminds us, the Republicans fought these changes every step of the way. They said famine relief would turn America into a nation of freeloaders, that capitalism would die without the gold standard. They called child-labor laws an intolerable intrusion on states' rights. During the debate over the Tennessee Valley Authority, so many power-company executives denounced the "socialist plan" that Congress had to schedule an extra day of hearings.

Read more: FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire

Another steaming pile of liberal crap. As a group, Conservatives give far more to charity than Liberals. Liberals like it when OTHER people help the poor, just not them. They prefer to have government act like a charity. Sorry Jim, Government spending is not charity. It is not a voluntary sacrifice by individuals. No matter how beneficial or humane it might be, no matter how necessary it is for providing public services, it is still the obligatory redistribution of tax revenues.

Because government spending is not charity, sanctimonious internet postings do not prove you are charitable. Want to help the poor Jim? Give to charity, that is what Conservatives do.
 
Last edited:
WikiAnswers - What was President Theodore Roosevelt health care policy

President Theodore Roosevelt was a strong advocate for a nationalized healthcare system in the United States. He was the first of five Presidents to push for it. The five Presidents were:

1.) Theodore Roosevelt
2.) Lyndon B. Johnson
3.) Richard M. Nixon
4.) James E. Carter
5.) William J. Clinton

All of them but one is a real inspiration (sic). That one is just a criminal that quit in disgrace.

Had Nixon not been a paranoid bastard, he would have been remembered as one of the great ones.
 
FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire



As Cohen reminds us, the Republicans fought these changes every step of the way. They said famine relief would turn America into a nation of freeloaders, that capitalism would die without the gold standard. They called child-labor laws an intolerable intrusion on states' rights. During the debate over the Tennessee Valley Authority, so many power-company executives denounced the "socialist plan" that Congress had to schedule an extra day of hearings.

Read more: FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire

Another steaming pile of liberal crap. As a group Conservatives give far more to charity than Liberals. Liberals like it when OTHER people help the poor, just not them. They prefer to have government act like a charity. Sorry Jim, Government spending is not charity. It is not a voluntary sacrifice by individuals. No matter how beneficial or humane it might be, no matter how necessary it is for providing public services, it is still the obligatory redistribution of tax revenues.

Because government spending is not charity, sanctimonious internet postings do not prove you are charitable. Want to help the poor Jim? Give to charity, that is what Conservatives do.

Back to a time when the poor were poor,
And the rich were rich,
And you felt so damned secure just knowin' which was which
 
FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire



As Cohen reminds us, the Republicans fought these changes every step of the way. They said famine relief would turn America into a nation of freeloaders, that capitalism would die without the gold standard. They called child-labor laws an intolerable intrusion on states' rights. During the debate over the Tennessee Valley Authority, so many power-company executives denounced the "socialist plan" that Congress had to schedule an extra day of hearings.

Read more: FDR Biography Book Review - Nothing to Fear by Adam Cohen - Esquire

America might become a nation of freeloaders? Welcome to the entitlement generation. These guys knew what they were talking about.
 
Sure. The Goddamned Entitlement Generation. CEOs that draw tens, sometimes hundreds of millions a year while their company is going down the tube. People that take taxpayer money to prevent a repeat of 1929, then use some of that money to pay themselves the same thieving salaries as before.

And when we try to limit just the salaries in the companies that the govenment had to bail out, the Repucks scream their head off.

What we should be doing is busting up every company that is too big too fail.
 
Sure. The Goddamned Entitlement Generation. CEOs that draw tens, sometimes hundreds of millions a year while their company is going down the tube. People that take taxpayer money to prevent a repeat of 1929, then use some of that money to pay themselves the same thieving salaries as before.

And when we try to limit just the salaries in the companies that the govenment had to bail out, the Repucks scream their head off.

What we should be doing is busting up every company that is too big too fail.

Or simply let them fail, it's called capitalism. If a company can't make it oh well, 3 others will spring up to take their place. If there are customers. There is no such thing as too big to fail. I was totally against any bailouts from the getgo, to include Bush's.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top