Republican Compares Obama to the Terrorists that Crashed United Airlines Flight 93

[VaYank5150]

Your Stockholm Syndrome is not my problem.

EIGHT years! The Biblical lean years did not last as long as the economy FDR devastated!

You got sold a line of crap that FDR was great by people who are Socialists. See the light!

the bread provided to the American people during the depresssion by President Roosevelt nourished the young boys who went on to save the world and nation in ww2, the starving masses in the 1930's just might have decided that that new communism stuff or even nazism might have been a great idea after watching their children starve to death as the nation did nothing if we had continued down the road Hoover had us on.

Are the right wingnuts still defending the policies of Hoover??

As long as it is not Obama, they will defend it...

 

[rdean]

Are you lying again?

Doesn't look like it to THIS humble observer - pretty much summarizes the exact events. I can't find anything that post that DIDN'T happen or that is untrue?
Can you?

Yup, every word, including and and but.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RFH7C3vkK4]YouTube - Man Throws Shoes At Bush[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTstzb7qSI4]YouTube - Bush protects Iraqi Christians[/ame]

Yea, every word. Fool.

 

[bodecea]

Actually, when you look at how things turned out, we can all see who is the "friend" of the terroritsts.

Saddam had a secular government and was very anti al Queda and enemies with Bin Laden.

Since that time, al Queda has entered Iraq when they weren't there before.

Iraq has created a new constitution that makes "Islam" the "national religion" and says all legislation is based in Islam and no law can be made that is against Islam.

The Christians have been slaughtered or chased out of the country.

Women have been returned to Sharia law.

Someone even threw a shoe and barely missed our president.

These all look like victories for the terrorists. Not sure how the Republicans can spin it any other way? Whose side have they been on all along? Hmmm.

Are you lying again?

You are welcome to disprove any of the things he has stated in his post. I'd like to see you try.

 

[bodecea]

Are you lying again?

Doesn't look like it to THIS humble observer - pretty much summarizes the exact events. I can't find anything that post that DIDN'T happen or that is untrue?
Can you?

Yup, every word, including and and but.

We await your detailed rebuttal.

 

[The Rabbi]

Actually, when you look at how things turned out, we can all see who is the "friend" of the terroritsts.

Saddam had a secular government and was very anti al Queda and enemies with Bin Laden.

Since that time, al Queda has entered Iraq when they weren't there before.

Iraq has created a new constitution that makes "Islam" the "national religion" and says all legislation is based in Islam and no law can be made that is against Islam.

The Christians have been slaughtered or chased out of the country.

Women have been returned to Sharia law.

Someone even threw a shoe and barely missed our president.

These all look like victories for the terrorists. Not sure how the Republicans can spin it any other way? Whose side have they been on all along? Hmmm.

Are you lying again?

You are welcome to disprove any of the things he has stated in his post. I'd like to see you try.

Since when did Pres Bush become "our president" to the Left?? More hypocrisy.
In fact, the Left cheered the shoe throwing incident. But it represents the liberation of Iraq, a place where political expression is allowed.
It is certainly not a "victory for the terrorists."
No law can be made against Islam? I guess that means that Turkey is now a terrorist regime as well since their ruling party is an Islamic party. Does that equate to a "victory for terrorists"?? No, not in this lifetime.
The rest of the post is filled with equally unsubstantiated and spun facts.
Nice try. Epic FAIL.

 

[bodecea]

Are you lying again?

You are welcome to disprove any of the things he has stated in his post. I'd like to see you try.

Since when did Pres Bush become "our president" to the Left??

Whether we liked it or not, in January 2001.

More hypocrisy.

Where is the hypocrisy?

In fact, the Left cheered the shoe throwing incident.

But it DID really happen, right? And it was an embarassment to the current Iraqi government and to our government, right?

But it represents the liberation of Iraq, a place where political expression is allowed.

LOL....and that kind of "political expression" is allowed in OUR country? Really?

It is certainly not a "victory for the terrorists."

If what the terrorists want is Sharia law and their version of Islam in political control...yes, they have won in Iraq.

No law can be made against Islam? I guess that means that Turkey is now a terrorist regime as well since their ruling party is an Islamic party.

No it is not. Turkey's constitution provides for a SECULAR government...similar to the one that Iraq USED TO HAVE. Turkey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does that equate to a "victory for terrorists"?? No, not in this lifetime.

Not only do you go off talking about another country (Turkey) that we are not at war with, nor have we tried to change their government in anyway...but you also get the FACTS wrong about your O/T country. LOL.

The rest of the post is filled with equally unsubstantiated and spun facts.

I believe that you have just shown us all who has the unsubstantiated and spun facts.

Nice try. Epic FAIL.

Well, when referring to yourself....yes.

 

[uscitizen]

I thought it was a benign statement until he added the "lets roll"

For FoxNews it would be acceptable, for an elected representative, it is inappropriate

Correct..

His other statement sounds rather disjointed and confusing. I have to wonder a bit about that guy.

 

[theHawk]

Oh, spare me. You're still doing it. Trying to defend your hate campaign. Whatever you do, don't admit that Obama would have to had to be a miracle worker to have solved all our problems in 10 months. Or that his plate is ridiculously full or that he is doing the best he can. Just keep jumping on anything you can and try to discredit him at every turn. That's all you teabag conservative crazy people know how to do.

No, what you are doing is trying to blame everything on Bush. You can't admit that for the last two years Bush had a Democratic Congress, and that Congress is just as guilty as Bush if not more for all the economic and budget problems. You can't admit that the Hussein voted for the stimulus bill Bush past. As for the "wars", its apparent the Hussein is doing the exact same thing as Booosh, so isn't it a little hypocritical to blame Bush when it turns out the Hussein is Bush III?

 

[The Rabbi]

Whether we liked it or not, in January 2001.



Where is the hypocrisy?

George W. Bush is Not Our President and I Refuse to Treat Him As Such - Democratic Underground

The rest of your post is merely babble.
The claim was made that all those things represent victories for terrorists. They do not. It is obvious they do not. It is like saying the terrorists achieved victory when we killed or jailed about 30 of the leaders because it allowed them to get new stronger leadership.
The Left is full of shit on this and every other issue. Their hypocrisy is overwhelming. I think dialogue with them is impossible.